IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
to reduce the creep of optional dependencies being exposed as features.
this requires cargo 0.63 (and debcargo built against at least that
version), but greatly reduces the number of binary packages and provides
generated, while still allowing sensible selection of optional
dependencies via the explicit feature meant for pulling them in.
diff stat for running `make deb` after this change:
proxmox-http/debian/control | 226 ++++--------------------------------
proxmox-router/debian/control | 74 +-----------
proxmox-schema/debian/control | 53 ++-------
proxmox-subscription/debian/control | 17 +--
proxmox-sys/debian/control | 51 +++-----
proxmox-tfa/debian/control | 110 ++----------------
6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 459 deletions(-)
the 'dep:' prefix marks something on the RHS inside the features section
as dependency, it's only allowed if the string after it is an optional
dependency an no explicit feature of the same name exists. if all
pointers to the optional dependency in the features section are marked
as such, the optional dependency itself will not be exposed as a feature
(either on the cargo or debian/control level).
the '?' suffix marks dependencies as "weak", which only enables the
optional dependency + its feature(s) if the optional dependency itself
is also enabled. it has no effect on d/control since such a relationship
is not encodable in Debian package relations, but it does affect cargo
dependency resolution and allows skipping the build of unneeded optional
dependencies in some cases.
with no packages/crates depending on the no longer exposed automatically
generated features/packages, so these are safe to remove even though
it's technically a breaking change.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
with two variants:
(expr, expr) => assumes that the second is an 'Error'
(expr, (tt)+) => passes the tt through anyhow::format_err
also added tests
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
'unwrap_' because they will panic and as `const fn` since
panic in const fn is now possible
Note that const evaluation will only be triggered when
actually used in const context, so to ensure *compile time*
checks, use something like this:
const FOO_SCHEMA: &AllOfSchema =
SomeType::API_SCHEMA.unwrap_all_of_schema();
then_use(FOO_SCHEMA);
or to use the list of enum values of an enum string type
with compile time checks:
const LIST: &'static [EnumEntry] =
AnEnumStringType::API_SCHEMA
.unwrap_string_schema()
.unwrap_format()
.unwrap_enum_format();
for values in LIST {
...
}
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
This allows free form text to exist within property strings,
quoted, like:
key="A value with \"quotes, also commas",key2=value2
or also:
"the value for a default_key",key2=value2
And drop ';' as a key=value separator since those are meant
for arrays inside property strings...
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
for ease of use implement these traits for ParameterError:
* From<(&str, Error)>
* From<(String, Error)>
* Extend<(String, Error)>
* Extend<(&str, Error)>
* IntoIterator<Item = (String, Error)>
and add the following methods:
* fn into_inner(self) -> Vec<(String, Error)>;
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
by replacing the whole Vec.
if we ever want to support adding/removing/modifying elements of a Vec
via the Updater, we'd need to extend it anyway (or use a custom
updater).
Suggested-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
