IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
APT doesn't mind a repository with either "/" or "./" as suite/distribution,
such as
deb https://example.com/debian ./
in that case, the 'dists' part of the URL and the trailing slash (which would
be encoded as '_') is dropped in the file name in '/var/lib/apt/lists/'.
Other suite values with a trailing or leading '/' are rejected with an error by APT:
E: Malformed entry 1 in sources file /etc/apt/sources.list.d/test.list (absolute Suite Component)
E: The list of sources could not be read.
so this should be the only special case requiring handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
APT will not store the InRelease file in some cases, and some repositories
might not even have one in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
The old 'main' component stays valid, pointing to no-subscription,
which means the is_referenced_repository() check needs a special case
for it. It will eventually go away, together with the handles for
Quincy.
Alternatively, the standard repository's info() could've been changed
to return multiple possible components, similar to URLs, but as
opposed to URLs, there could be a standard repository that wants to
have multiple components and it feels a bit unnatural, because
multiple components are usually not aliases of the same. And adapting
is_referenced_repository() would be needed here too. So overall, the
above alternative just felt better.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
