58615482ed
current port allocation to various processes (clumsy):
1023 - 1 -> client ports range if bind secure is turned on
49151 - 1024 -> fall back to this, if in above case ports exhaust
65535 - 1024 -> client port range if bind insecure is on
49152 - 65535 -> brick port range
now, we have segregated port ranges 0 - 65535 to below 3 ranges
1023 - 1 -> client ports range if bind secure is turned on
49151 - 1024 -> client port range if bind insecure is on
(fall back to this, if in above case ports exhaust)
49152 - 65535 -> brick port range
so now we have a clean segregation of port mapping
Change-Id: Ie3b4e7703e0bbeabbe0adbdd6c60d9ef78ef7c65
BUG: 1335776
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <prasanna.kalever@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14326
Tested-by: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <pkalever@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
For information about contributing to GlusterFS, please follow the below link : Contributing to GlusterFS community
GlusterFS does not follow the GitHub: Fork & pull workflow but use Gerrit for code review.
The development guidelines are detailed in Development Workflow.
The GlusterFS documentation can be found at Documentation
For more info, please visit http://www.gluster.org/.