gamzinav/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
forgejo/templates/admin/stacktrace-row.tmpl

67 lines
2.1 KiB
Go HTML Template
Raw Normal View History

Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
<div class="item">
Fix incorrect tailwind migration (#30007) Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945. There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I just ran below command and reverted that one instance. ```sh perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8) Conflicts: templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
2024-03-22 20:51:29 +01:00
<div class="tw-flex tw-items-center">
Migrate margin and padding helpers to tailwind (#30043) This will conclude the refactor of 1:1 class replacements to tailwind, except `gt-hidden`. Commands ran: ```bash perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-0#tw-$1$2-0#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-1#tw-$1$2-0.5#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-2#tw-$1$2-1#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-3#tw-$1$2-2#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-4#tw-$1$2-4#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-5#tw-$1$2-8#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 68ec9b48592fe88765bcc3a73093d43c98b315de) Conflicts: routers/web/repo/view.go templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl templates/repo/diff/box.tmpl templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl templates/repo/view_file.tmpl templates/shared/user/blocked_users.tmpl templates/status/500.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the commands to all files
2024-03-24 17:42:49 +01:00
<div class="icon tw-ml-2 tw-mr-2">
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{if eq .Process.Type "request"}}
Add whitespace removal inside template curly brackes (#20853)
2022-08-25 23:55:52 +02:00
{{svg "octicon-globe" 16}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{else if eq .Process.Type "system"}}
Add whitespace removal inside template curly brackes (#20853)
2022-08-25 23:55:52 +02:00
{{svg "octicon-cpu" 16}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{else if eq .Process.Type "normal"}}
Add whitespace removal inside template curly brackes (#20853)
2022-08-25 23:55:52 +02:00
{{svg "octicon-terminal" 16}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{else}}
Add whitespace removal inside template curly brackes (#20853)
2022-08-25 23:55:52 +02:00
{{svg "octicon-code" 16}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{end}}
</div>
Replace 10 more gt- classes with tw- (#29945) Likely the biggest change of the tailwind refactors. Only thing of note is that `tw-flex-1` resolves to `flex: 1 1 0%` while our `gt-f1` was `flex: 1 1 0`, I don't think it will make any difference. Commands I've ran: ```sh perl -p -i -e 's#gt-vm#tw-align-middle#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fw#tw-flex-wrap#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-f1#tw-flex-1#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fc#tw-flex-col#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-sb#tw-justify-between#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-je#tw-justify-end#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-jc#tw-justify-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-ac#tw-content-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-df#tw-flex#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-dib#tw-inline-block#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit f88ad5424f381bf2a45fd863b551c5a72891bb68) Conflicts: templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_actions.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/release/list.tmpl templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue discard the proposed changes and prefer Forgejo. A followup commit will apply the same commands.
2024-03-22 14:45:10 +01:00
<div class="content tw-flex-1">
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
<div class="header">{{.Process.Description}}</div>
[PORT] Refactor DateUtils and merge TimeSince (gitea#32409) Follow #32383 and #32402 --- Conflict resolution: Magic, painful. (cherry picked from commit b068dbd40ee3b4dc7d18cdcf168f0c24cea234c0)
2024-11-04 19:30:00 +08:00
<div class="description">{{if ne .Process.Type "none"}}{{DateUtils.TimeSince .Process.Start}}{{end}}</div>
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
</div>
<div>
Add whitespace removal inside template curly brackes (#20853)
2022-08-25 23:55:52 +02:00
{{if or (eq .Process.Type "request") (eq .Process.Type "normal")}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
<a class="delete-button icon" href="" data-url="{{.root.Link}}/cancel/{{.Process.PID}}" data-id="{{.Process.PID}}" data-name="{{.Process.Description}}">{{svg "octicon-trash" 16 "text-red"}}</a>
{{end}}
</div>
</div>
{{if .Process.Stacks}}
Migrate margin and padding helpers to tailwind (#30043) This will conclude the refactor of 1:1 class replacements to tailwind, except `gt-hidden`. Commands ran: ```bash perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-0#tw-$1$2-0#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-1#tw-$1$2-0.5#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-2#tw-$1$2-1#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-3#tw-$1$2-2#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-4#tw-$1$2-4#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-5#tw-$1$2-8#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 68ec9b48592fe88765bcc3a73093d43c98b315de) Conflicts: routers/web/repo/view.go templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl templates/repo/diff/box.tmpl templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl templates/repo/view_file.tmpl templates/shared/user/blocked_users.tmpl templates/status/500.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the commands to all files
2024-03-24 17:42:49 +01:00
<div class="divided list tw-ml-2">
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
{{range .Process.Stacks}}
<div class="item">
<details>
<summary>
Simplify helper CSS classes and avoid abuse (#26728) Removed CSS helper classes (some of them are not useful while some of them are abused often) * `gt-db`: in most cases it could be replaced by `gt-df` and the flex layout should be encouraged. Other cases: either it does need the `gt-df` (eg: by using `div` directly) or it is an abuse (eg: the warning message in a form) * `gt-di`: it doesn't seem useful, or it could be replaced by `gt-dib` in most cases. * `gt-dif`: not useful, it could be replaced by `flex-text-inline` or `gt-df` * `gt-js`: never used * All `<i class="icon gt-df gt-ac gt-jc">` could be written as `<i class="icon">` ## Some UI samples ### Admin Notice ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/d02010d4-dc7d-463f-bc99-dcc9b6e2e2ac) ### Admin Stacktrace ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4045695c-a8c4-4e37-b720-e77a61b1e965) ### Org Home ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/069f02d0-76ad-4052-8a80-700d7e501d40) ### Org Team Repo ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/dc8d6106-bb6b-4f60-83ac-06cb28df3ab5) ### Release List ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/0845e8a5-d1a9-487a-9d25-3c200ad54c17) ### User Setting Application Token Scope ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/fffbde27-432b-49c6-827e-17b8cd3457ff) Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-26 07:35:10 +08:00
<div class="flex-text-inline">
Migrate margin and padding helpers to tailwind (#30043) This will conclude the refactor of 1:1 class replacements to tailwind, except `gt-hidden`. Commands ran: ```bash perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-0#tw-$1$2-0#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-1#tw-$1$2-0.5#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-2#tw-$1$2-1#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-3#tw-$1$2-2#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-4#tw-$1$2-4#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-5#tw-$1$2-8#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 68ec9b48592fe88765bcc3a73093d43c98b315de) Conflicts: routers/web/repo/view.go templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl templates/repo/diff/box.tmpl templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl templates/repo/view_file.tmpl templates/shared/user/blocked_users.tmpl templates/status/500.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the commands to all files
2024-03-24 17:42:49 +01:00
<div class="header tw-ml-2">
<span class="icon tw-mr-2">{{svg "octicon-code" 16}}</span>{{.Description}}{{if gt .Count 1}} * {{.Count}}{{end}}
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
</div>
<div class="description">
{{range .Labels}}
<div class="ui label">{{.Name}}<div class="detail">{{.Value}}</div></div>
{{end}}
</div>
</div>
</summary>
<div class="list">
{{range .Entry}}
Fix incorrect tailwind migration (#30007) Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30005. Regression from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29945. There was only once instance of `tw-content-center` before that PR, so I just ran below command and reverted that one instance. ```sh perl -p -i -e 's#tw-content-center#tw-items-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 04f9ad056882fc3f21b247b16f84437adf0f36d8) Conflicts: templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue re-ran the command after discarding the Gitea changes to ensure all Forgejo files are also covered
2024-03-22 20:51:29 +01:00
<div class="item tw-flex tw-items-center">
Migrate margin and padding helpers to tailwind (#30043) This will conclude the refactor of 1:1 class replacements to tailwind, except `gt-hidden`. Commands ran: ```bash perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-0#tw-$1$2-0#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-1#tw-$1$2-0.5#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-2#tw-$1$2-1#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-3#tw-$1$2-2#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-4#tw-$1$2-4#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-(p|m)([lrtbxy])?-5#tw-$1$2-8#g' {web_src/js,templates,routers,services}/**/* ``` (cherry picked from commit 68ec9b48592fe88765bcc3a73093d43c98b315de) Conflicts: routers/web/repo/view.go templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl templates/repo/code/recently_pushed_new_branches.tmpl templates/repo/diff/box.tmpl templates/repo/diff/compare.tmpl templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/sidebar.tmpl templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl templates/repo/view_file.tmpl templates/shared/user/blocked_users.tmpl templates/status/500.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue resolved by prefering Forgejo version and applying the commands to all files
2024-03-24 17:42:49 +01:00
<span class="icon tw-mr-4">{{svg "octicon-dot-fill" 16}}</span>
Replace 10 more gt- classes with tw- (#29945) Likely the biggest change of the tailwind refactors. Only thing of note is that `tw-flex-1` resolves to `flex: 1 1 0%` while our `gt-f1` was `flex: 1 1 0`, I don't think it will make any difference. Commands I've ran: ```sh perl -p -i -e 's#gt-vm#tw-align-middle#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fw#tw-flex-wrap#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-f1#tw-flex-1#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-fc#tw-flex-col#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-sb#tw-justify-between#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-je#tw-justify-end#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-jc#tw-justify-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-ac#tw-content-center#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-df#tw-flex#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* perl -p -i -e 's#gt-dib#tw-inline-block#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* tests/**/* Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit f88ad5424f381bf2a45fd863b551c5a72891bb68) Conflicts: templates/repo/diff/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/header.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_actions.tmpl templates/repo/issue/filter_list.tmpl templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl templates/repo/release/list.tmpl templates/repo/wiki/view.tmpl web_src/js/components/DashboardRepoList.vue discard the proposed changes and prefer Forgejo. A followup commit will apply the same commands.
2024-03-22 14:45:10 +01:00
<div class="content tw-flex-1">
Add Goroutine stack inspector to admin/monitor (#19207) Continues on from #19202. Following the addition of pprof labels we can now more easily understand the relationship between a goroutine and the requests that spawn them. This PR takes advantage of the labels and adds a few others, then provides a mechanism for the monitoring page to query the pprof goroutine profile. The binary profile that results from this profile is immediately piped in to the google library for parsing this and then stack traces are formed for the goroutines. If the goroutine is within a context or has been created from a goroutine within a process context it will acquire the process description labels for that process. The goroutines are mapped with there associate pids and any that do not have an associated pid are placed in a group at the bottom as unbound. In this way we should be able to more easily examine goroutines that have been stuck. A manager command `gitea manager processes` is also provided that can export the processes (with or without stacktraces) to the command line. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-03-31 18:01:43 +01:00
<div class="header"><code>{{.Function}}</code></div>
<div class="description"><code>{{.File}}:{{.Line}}</code></div>
</div>
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
</details>
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
{{end}}
{{if .Process.Children}}
<div class="divided list">
{{range .Process.Children}}
{{template "admin/stacktrace-row" dict "Process" . "root" $.root}}
{{end}}
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink