Dmitry V. Levin
71fe62e6b7
AF_* constants appear to be more standardized, and in practice there's always a one to one relationship between AF_* and PF_*, so let's use AF_* instead of PF_*. * xlat/domains.in: Remove. * net.c: Do not define PF_UNSPEC. Stop including "xlat/domains.h". Replace PF_* with AF_*. Replace domains with addrfams. * tests/inet-cmsg.c: Replace PF_INET with AF_INET. * tests/net-yy-inet.c: Likewise. * tests/netlink_inet_diag.c: Likewise. * tests/net-accept-connect.c: Replace PF_LOCAL with AF_LOCAL. * tests/net-y-unix.c: Likewise. * tests/net-yy-unix.c: Likewise. * tests/netlink_unix_diag.c: Likewise. * tests/net.expected: Replace PF_ with AF_.
8 lines
757 B
Plaintext
8 lines
757 B
Plaintext
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +socket\(AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), SOCK_STREAM, 0\) += 0
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +socket\(AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), SOCK_STREAM, 0\) += 1
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +bind\(0, \{sa_family=AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), sun_path="net-local-stream"\}, 19\) += 0
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +listen\(0, 5\) += 0
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +getsockname\(0, \{sa_family=AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), sun_path="net-local-stream"\}, \[19\]\) += 0
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +accept\(0, \{sa_family=AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), NULL\}, \[2\]\) += 1
|
|
[1-9][0-9]* +[0-9]+:[0-9]+:[0-9]+\.[0-9]+ +connect\(1, \{sa_family=AF_(LOCAL|UNIX|FILE), sun_path="net-local-stream"\}, 19\) += 0
|