2019-05-19 15:07:45 +03:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
2005-06-26 01:57:36 +04:00
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
choice
prompt "Preemption Model"
default PREEMPT_NONE
config PREEMPT_NONE
bool "No Forced Preemption (Server)"
help
This is the traditional Linux preemption model, geared towards
throughput. It will still provide good latencies most of the
time, but there are no guarantees and occasional longer delays
are possible.
Select this option if you are building a kernel for a server or
scientific/computation system, or if you want to maximize the
raw processing power of the kernel, irrespective of scheduling
latencies.
config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
bool "Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop)"
2018-07-31 14:39:32 +03:00
depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
2005-06-26 01:57:36 +04:00
help
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by adding more
"explicit preemption points" to the kernel code. These new
preemption points have been selected to reduce the maximum
latency of rescheduling, providing faster application reactions,
2007-05-09 09:12:20 +04:00
at the cost of slightly lower throughput.
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
This allows reaction to interactive events by allowing a
low priority process to voluntarily preempt itself even if it
is in kernel mode executing a system call. This allows
applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the system is
2005-06-26 01:57:36 +04:00
under load.
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop system.
2019-07-22 18:59:19 +03:00
config PREEMPT
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
2018-07-31 14:39:32 +03:00
depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
2019-07-22 18:59:19 +03:00
select PREEMPTION
2012-03-22 13:55:08 +04:00
select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
2021-01-18 17:12:19 +03:00
select PREEMPT_DYNAMIC if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
help
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
preemptible. This allows reaction to interactive events by
permitting a low priority process to be preempted involuntarily
even if it is in kernel mode executing a system call and would
otherwise not be about to reach a natural preemption point.
This allows applications to run more 'smoothly' even when the
2007-05-09 09:12:20 +04:00
system is under load, at the cost of slightly lower throughput
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
and a slight runtime overhead to kernel code.
Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or
embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds
range.
2019-07-17 23:01:49 +03:00
config PREEMPT_RT
bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
depends on EXPERT && ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
2019-07-22 18:59:19 +03:00
select PREEMPTION
2019-07-17 23:01:49 +03:00
help
This option turns the kernel into a real-time kernel by replacing
various locking primitives (spinlocks, rwlocks, etc.) with
preemptible priority-inheritance aware variants, enforcing
interrupt threading and introducing mechanisms to break up long
non-preemptible sections. This makes the kernel, except for very
2019-10-26 02:02:07 +03:00
low level and critical code paths (entry code, scheduler, low
2019-07-17 23:01:49 +03:00
level interrupt handling) fully preemptible and brings most
execution contexts under scheduler control.
Select this if you are building a kernel for systems which
require real-time guarantees.
2005-06-26 01:57:39 +04:00
endchoice
2005-06-26 01:57:36 +04:00
2011-06-08 03:13:27 +04:00
config PREEMPT_COUNT
2018-12-11 14:00:51 +03:00
bool
2019-07-17 23:01:49 +03:00
2019-07-22 18:59:19 +03:00
config PREEMPTION
2019-07-17 23:01:49 +03:00
bool
select PREEMPT_COUNT
2021-01-18 17:12:19 +03:00
config PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
bool
help
This option allows to define the preemption model on the kernel
command line parameter and thus override the default preemption
model defined during compile time.
The feature is primarily interesting for Linux distributions which
provide a pre-built kernel binary to reduce the number of kernel
flavors they offer while still offering different usecases.
The runtime overhead is negligible with HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE enabled
but if runtime patching is not available for the specific architecture
then the potential overhead should be considered.
Interesting if you want the same pre-built kernel should be used for
both Server and Desktop workloads.