2019-06-04 11:11:32 +03:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
* mm / userfaultfd . c
*
* Copyright ( C ) 2015 Red Hat , Inc .
*/
# include <linux/mm.h>
2017-02-02 21:15:33 +03:00
# include <linux/sched/signal.h>
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
# include <linux/pagemap.h>
# include <linux/rmap.h>
# include <linux/swap.h>
# include <linux/swapops.h>
# include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
# include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
# include <linux/hugetlb.h>
2017-02-23 02:43:34 +03:00
# include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
# include <asm/tlbflush.h>
mm/mprotect: use mmu_gather
Patch series "mm/mprotect: avoid unnecessary TLB flushes", v6.
This patchset is intended to remove unnecessary TLB flushes during
mprotect() syscalls. Once this patch-set make it through, similar and
further optimizations for MADV_COLD and userfaultfd would be possible.
Basically, there are 3 optimizations in this patch-set:
1. Use TLB batching infrastructure to batch flushes across VMAs and do
better/fewer flushes. This would also be handy for later userfaultfd
enhancements.
2. Avoid unnecessary TLB flushes. This optimization is the one that
provides most of the performance benefits. Unlike previous versions,
we now only avoid flushes that would not result in spurious
page-faults.
3. Avoiding TLB flushes on change_huge_pmd() that are only needed to
prevent the A/D bits from changing.
Andrew asked for some benchmark numbers. I do not have an easy
determinate macrobenchmark in which it is easy to show benefit. I
therefore ran a microbenchmark: a loop that does the following on
anonymous memory, just as a sanity check to see that time is saved by
avoiding TLB flushes. The loop goes:
mprotect(p, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ)
mprotect(p, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE)
*p = 0; // make the page writable
The test was run in KVM guest with 1 or 2 threads (the second thread was
busy-looping). I measured the time (cycles) of each operation:
1 thread 2 threads
mmots +patch mmots +patch
PROT_READ 3494 2725 (-22%) 8630 7788 (-10%)
PROT_READ|WRITE 3952 2724 (-31%) 9075 2865 (-68%)
[ mmots = v5.17-rc6-mmots-2022-03-06-20-38 ]
The exact numbers are really meaningless, but the benefit is clear. There
are 2 interesting results though.
(1) PROT_READ is cheaper, while one can expect it not to be affected.
This is presumably due to TLB miss that is saved
(2) Without memory access (*p = 0), the speedup of the patch is even
greater. In that scenario mprotect(PROT_READ) also avoids the TLB flush.
As a result both operations on the patched kernel take roughly ~1500
cycles (with either 1 or 2 threads), whereas on mmotm their cost is as
high as presented in the table.
This patch (of 3):
change_pXX_range() currently does not use mmu_gather, but instead
implements its own deferred TLB flushes scheme. This both complicates the
code, as developers need to be aware of different invalidation schemes,
and prevents opportunities to avoid TLB flushes or perform them in finer
granularity.
The use of mmu_gather for modified PTEs has benefits in various scenarios
even if pages are not released. For instance, if only a single page needs
to be flushed out of a range of many pages, only that page would be
flushed. If a THP page is flushed, on x86 a single TLB invlpg instruction
can be used instead of 512 instructions (or a full TLB flush, which would
Linux would actually use by default). mprotect() over multiple VMAs
requires a single flush.
Use mmu_gather in change_pXX_range(). As the pages are not released, only
record the flushed range using tlb_flush_pXX_range().
Handle THP similarly and get rid of flush_cache_range() which becomes
redundant since tlb_start_vma() calls it when needed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401180821.1986781-1-namit@vmware.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401180821.1986781-2-namit@vmware.com
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-10 04:20:50 +03:00
# include <asm/tlb.h>
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
# include "internal.h"
2019-12-01 04:57:55 +03:00
static __always_inline
struct vm_area_struct * find_dst_vma ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm ,
unsigned long dst_start ,
unsigned long len )
{
/*
* Make sure that the dst range is both valid and fully within a
* single existing vma .
*/
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ;
dst_vma = find_vma ( dst_mm , dst_start ) ;
if ( ! dst_vma )
return NULL ;
if ( dst_start < dst_vma - > vm_start | |
dst_start + len > dst_vma - > vm_end )
return NULL ;
/*
* Check the vma is registered in uffd , this is required to
* enforce the VM_MAYWRITE check done at uffd registration
* time .
*/
if ( ! dst_vma - > vm_userfaultfd_ctx . ctx )
return NULL ;
return dst_vma ;
}
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
/*
* Install PTEs , to map dst_addr ( within dst_vma ) to page .
*
userfaultfd/shmem: modify shmem_mfill_atomic_pte to use install_pte()
In a previous commit, we added the mfill_atomic_install_pte() helper.
This helper does the job of setting up PTEs for an existing page, to map
it into a given VMA. It deals with both the anon and shmem cases, as well
as the shared and private cases.
In other words, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() duplicates a case it already
handles. So, expose it, and let shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() use it directly,
to reduce code duplication.
This requires that we refactor shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() a bit:
Instead of doing accounting (shmem_recalc_inode() et al) part-way through
the PTE setup, do it afterward. This frees up mfill_atomic_install_pte()
from having to care about this accounting, and means we don't need to e.g.
shmem_uncharge() in the error path.
A side effect is this switches shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() to use
lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable() instead of just lru_cache_add().
This wrapper does some extra accounting in an exceptional case, if
appropriate, so it's actually the more correct thing to use.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-7-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:31 +03:00
* This function handles both MCOPY_ATOMIC_NORMAL and _CONTINUE for both shmem
* and anon , and for both shared and private VMAs .
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
*/
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
int mfill_atomic_install_pte ( pmd_t * dst_pmd ,
userfaultfd/shmem: modify shmem_mfill_atomic_pte to use install_pte()
In a previous commit, we added the mfill_atomic_install_pte() helper.
This helper does the job of setting up PTEs for an existing page, to map
it into a given VMA. It deals with both the anon and shmem cases, as well
as the shared and private cases.
In other words, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() duplicates a case it already
handles. So, expose it, and let shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() use it directly,
to reduce code duplication.
This requires that we refactor shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() a bit:
Instead of doing accounting (shmem_recalc_inode() et al) part-way through
the PTE setup, do it afterward. This frees up mfill_atomic_install_pte()
from having to care about this accounting, and means we don't need to e.g.
shmem_uncharge() in the error path.
A side effect is this switches shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() to use
lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable() instead of just lru_cache_add().
This wrapper does some extra accounting in an exceptional case, if
appropriate, so it's actually the more correct thing to use.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-7-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:31 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_addr , struct page * page ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
bool newly_allocated , uffd_flags_t flags )
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
{
int ret ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
struct mm_struct * dst_mm = dst_vma - > vm_mm ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
pte_t _dst_pte , * dst_pte ;
bool writable = dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_WRITE ;
bool vm_shared = dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ;
2022-11-02 21:41:52 +03:00
bool page_in_cache = page_mapping ( page ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
spinlock_t * ptl ;
2022-11-01 20:53:24 +03:00
struct folio * folio ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
struct inode * inode ;
pgoff_t offset , max_off ;
_dst_pte = mk_pte ( page , dst_vma - > vm_page_prot ) ;
mm/shmem: unconditionally set pte dirty in mfill_atomic_install_pte
Patch series "mm: A few cleanup patches around zap, shmem and uffd", v4.
IMHO all of them are very nice cleanups to existing code already,
they're all small and self-contained. They'll be needed by uffd-wp
coming series.
This patch (of 4):
It was conditionally done previously, as there's one shmem special case
that we use SetPageDirty() instead. However that's not necessary and it
should be easier and cleaner to do it unconditionally in
mfill_atomic_install_pte().
The most recent discussion about this is here, where Hugh explained the
history of SetPageDirty() and why it's possible that it's not required
at all:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.LSU.2.11.2104121657050.1097@eggly.anvils/
Currently mfill_atomic_install_pte() has three callers:
1. shmem_mfill_atomic_pte
2. mcopy_atomic_pte
3. mcontinue_atomic_pte
After the change: case (1) should have its SetPageDirty replaced by the
dirty bit on pte (so we unify them together, finally), case (2) should
have no functional change at all as it has page_in_cache==false, case
(3) may add a dirty bit to the pte. However since case (3) is
UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem, it's merely 100% sure the page is dirty after
all because UFFDIO_CONTINUE normally requires another process to modify
the page cache and kick the faulted thread, so should not make a real
difference either.
This should make it much easier to follow on which case will set dirty
for uffd, as we'll simply set it all now for all uffd related ioctls.
Meanwhile, no special handling of SetPageDirty() if there's no need.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210915181456.10739-1-peterx@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210915181456.10739-2-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-05 23:38:24 +03:00
_dst_pte = pte_mkdirty ( _dst_pte ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
if ( page_in_cache & & ! vm_shared )
writable = false ;
2022-05-13 06:22:52 +03:00
if ( writable )
2022-04-22 02:35:43 +03:00
_dst_pte = pte_mkwrite ( _dst_pte ) ;
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( flags & MFILL_ATOMIC_WP )
2022-12-14 23:15:33 +03:00
_dst_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp ( _dst_pte ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
dst_pte = pte_offset_map_lock ( dst_mm , dst_pmd , dst_addr , & ptl ) ;
if ( vma_is_shmem ( dst_vma ) ) {
/* serialize against truncate with the page table lock */
inode = dst_vma - > vm_file - > f_inode ;
offset = linear_page_index ( dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
max_off = DIV_ROUND_UP ( i_size_read ( inode ) , PAGE_SIZE ) ;
ret = - EFAULT ;
if ( unlikely ( offset > = max_off ) )
goto out_unlock ;
}
ret = - EEXIST ;
2022-05-13 06:22:52 +03:00
/*
* We allow to overwrite a pte marker : consider when both MISSING | WP
* registered , we firstly wr - protect a none pte which has no page cache
* page backing it , then access the page .
*/
if ( ! pte_none_mostly ( * dst_pte ) )
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2022-11-01 20:53:24 +03:00
folio = page_folio ( page ) ;
mm/munlock: rmap call mlock_vma_page() munlock_vma_page()
Add vma argument to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(), make them
inline functions which check (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) before calling
mlock_page() and munlock_page() in mm/mlock.c.
Add bool compound to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(): this is
because we have understandable difficulty in accounting pte maps of THPs,
and if passed a PageHead page, mlock_page() and munlock_page() cannot
tell whether it's a pmd map to be counted or a pte map to be ignored.
Add vma arg to page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap(), like the
others, and use that to call mlock_vma_page() at the end of the page
adds, and munlock_vma_page() at the end of page_remove_rmap() (end or
beginning? unimportant, but end was easier for assertions in testing).
No page lock is required (although almost all adds happen to hold it):
delete the "Serialize with page migration" BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page))s.
Certainly page lock did serialize with page migration, but I'm having
difficulty explaining why that was ever important.
Mlock accounting on THPs has been hard to define, differed between anon
and file, involved PageDoubleMap in some places and not others, required
clear_page_mlock() at some points. Keep it simple now: just count the
pmds and ignore the ptes, there is no reason for ptes to undo pmd mlocks.
page_add_new_anon_rmap() callers unchanged: they have long been calling
lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(), which does its own VM_LOCKED
handling (it also checks for not VM_SPECIAL: I think that's overcautious,
and inconsistent with other checks, that mmap_region() already prevents
VM_LOCKED on VM_SPECIAL; but haven't quite convinced myself to change it).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 05:26:39 +03:00
if ( page_in_cache ) {
/* Usually, cache pages are already added to LRU */
if ( newly_allocated )
2022-11-01 20:53:24 +03:00
folio_add_lru ( folio ) ;
mm/munlock: rmap call mlock_vma_page() munlock_vma_page()
Add vma argument to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(), make them
inline functions which check (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) before calling
mlock_page() and munlock_page() in mm/mlock.c.
Add bool compound to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(): this is
because we have understandable difficulty in accounting pte maps of THPs,
and if passed a PageHead page, mlock_page() and munlock_page() cannot
tell whether it's a pmd map to be counted or a pte map to be ignored.
Add vma arg to page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap(), like the
others, and use that to call mlock_vma_page() at the end of the page
adds, and munlock_vma_page() at the end of page_remove_rmap() (end or
beginning? unimportant, but end was easier for assertions in testing).
No page lock is required (although almost all adds happen to hold it):
delete the "Serialize with page migration" BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page))s.
Certainly page lock did serialize with page migration, but I'm having
difficulty explaining why that was ever important.
Mlock accounting on THPs has been hard to define, differed between anon
and file, involved PageDoubleMap in some places and not others, required
clear_page_mlock() at some points. Keep it simple now: just count the
pmds and ignore the ptes, there is no reason for ptes to undo pmd mlocks.
page_add_new_anon_rmap() callers unchanged: they have long been calling
lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(), which does its own VM_LOCKED
handling (it also checks for not VM_SPECIAL: I think that's overcautious,
and inconsistent with other checks, that mmap_region() already prevents
VM_LOCKED on VM_SPECIAL; but haven't quite convinced myself to change it).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 05:26:39 +03:00
page_add_file_rmap ( page , dst_vma , false ) ;
} else {
2022-05-10 04:20:43 +03:00
page_add_new_anon_rmap ( page , dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
2022-11-01 20:53:24 +03:00
folio_add_lru_vma ( folio , dst_vma ) ;
mm/munlock: rmap call mlock_vma_page() munlock_vma_page()
Add vma argument to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(), make them
inline functions which check (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) before calling
mlock_page() and munlock_page() in mm/mlock.c.
Add bool compound to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(): this is
because we have understandable difficulty in accounting pte maps of THPs,
and if passed a PageHead page, mlock_page() and munlock_page() cannot
tell whether it's a pmd map to be counted or a pte map to be ignored.
Add vma arg to page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap(), like the
others, and use that to call mlock_vma_page() at the end of the page
adds, and munlock_vma_page() at the end of page_remove_rmap() (end or
beginning? unimportant, but end was easier for assertions in testing).
No page lock is required (although almost all adds happen to hold it):
delete the "Serialize with page migration" BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page))s.
Certainly page lock did serialize with page migration, but I'm having
difficulty explaining why that was ever important.
Mlock accounting on THPs has been hard to define, differed between anon
and file, involved PageDoubleMap in some places and not others, required
clear_page_mlock() at some points. Keep it simple now: just count the
pmds and ignore the ptes, there is no reason for ptes to undo pmd mlocks.
page_add_new_anon_rmap() callers unchanged: they have long been calling
lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(), which does its own VM_LOCKED
handling (it also checks for not VM_SPECIAL: I think that's overcautious,
and inconsistent with other checks, that mmap_region() already prevents
VM_LOCKED on VM_SPECIAL; but haven't quite convinced myself to change it).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-02-15 05:26:39 +03:00
}
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
/*
* Must happen after rmap , as mm_counter ( ) checks mapping ( via
* PageAnon ( ) ) , which is set by __page_set_anon_rmap ( ) .
*/
inc_mm_counter ( dst_mm , mm_counter ( page ) ) ;
set_pte_at ( dst_mm , dst_addr , dst_pte , _dst_pte ) ;
/* No need to invalidate - it was non-present before */
update_mmu_cache ( dst_vma , dst_addr , dst_pte ) ;
ret = 0 ;
out_unlock :
pte_unmap_unlock ( dst_pte , ptl ) ;
return ret ;
}
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
static int mfill_atomic_pte_copy ( pmd_t * dst_pmd ,
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_addr ,
unsigned long src_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags ,
struct page * * pagep )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
{
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
void * kaddr ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
int ret ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
struct folio * folio ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
if ( ! * pagep ) {
ret = - ENOMEM ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
folio = vma_alloc_folio ( GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE , 0 , dst_vma ,
dst_addr , false ) ;
if ( ! folio )
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
goto out ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
kaddr = kmap_local_folio ( folio , 0 ) ;
2022-10-24 07:34:52 +03:00
/*
* The read mmap_lock is held here . Despite the
* mmap_lock being read recursive a deadlock is still
* possible if a writer has taken a lock . For example :
*
* process A thread 1 takes read lock on own mmap_lock
* process A thread 2 calls mmap , blocks taking write lock
* process B thread 1 takes page fault , read lock on own mmap lock
* process B thread 2 calls mmap , blocks taking write lock
* process A thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process B
* process B thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process A
*
* Disable page faults to prevent potential deadlock
* and retry the copy outside the mmap_lock .
*/
pagefault_disable ( ) ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
ret = copy_from_user ( kaddr , ( const void __user * ) src_addr ,
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
PAGE_SIZE ) ;
2022-10-24 07:34:52 +03:00
pagefault_enable ( ) ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
kunmap_local ( kaddr ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
2020-06-09 07:33:54 +03:00
/* fallback to copy_from_user outside mmap_lock */
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
if ( unlikely ( ret ) ) {
2018-12-01 01:09:25 +03:00
ret = - ENOENT ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
* pagep = & folio - > page ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
/* don't free the page */
goto out ;
}
2022-03-23 00:42:08 +03:00
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
flush_dcache_folio ( folio ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
} else {
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
folio = page_folio ( * pagep ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
* pagep = NULL ;
}
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
* The memory barrier inside __folio_mark_uptodate makes sure that
2019-12-01 04:58:17 +03:00
* preceding stores to the page contents become visible before
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
* the set_pte_at ( ) write .
*/
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
__folio_mark_uptodate ( folio ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
ret = - ENOMEM ;
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
if ( mem_cgroup_charge ( folio , dst_vma - > vm_mm , GFP_KERNEL ) )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
goto out_release ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
ret = mfill_atomic_install_pte ( dst_pmd , dst_vma , dst_addr ,
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
& folio - > page , true , flags ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
if ( ret )
goto out_release ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
out :
return ret ;
out_release :
2023-04-10 16:39:27 +03:00
folio_put ( folio ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
goto out ;
}
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
static int mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage ( pmd_t * dst_pmd ,
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_addr )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
{
pte_t _dst_pte , * dst_pte ;
spinlock_t * ptl ;
int ret ;
2018-12-01 01:09:37 +03:00
pgoff_t offset , max_off ;
struct inode * inode ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
_dst_pte = pte_mkspecial ( pfn_pte ( my_zero_pfn ( dst_addr ) ,
dst_vma - > vm_page_prot ) ) ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
dst_pte = pte_offset_map_lock ( dst_vma - > vm_mm , dst_pmd , dst_addr , & ptl ) ;
2018-12-01 01:09:37 +03:00
if ( dst_vma - > vm_file ) {
/* the shmem MAP_PRIVATE case requires checking the i_size */
inode = dst_vma - > vm_file - > f_inode ;
offset = linear_page_index ( dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
max_off = DIV_ROUND_UP ( i_size_read ( inode ) , PAGE_SIZE ) ;
ret = - EFAULT ;
if ( unlikely ( offset > = max_off ) )
goto out_unlock ;
}
ret = - EEXIST ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
if ( ! pte_none ( * dst_pte ) )
goto out_unlock ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
set_pte_at ( dst_vma - > vm_mm , dst_addr , dst_pte , _dst_pte ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/* No need to invalidate - it was non-present before */
update_mmu_cache ( dst_vma , dst_addr , dst_pte ) ;
ret = 0 ;
out_unlock :
pte_unmap_unlock ( dst_pte , ptl ) ;
return ret ;
}
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
/* Handles UFFDIO_CONTINUE for all shmem VMAs (shared or private). */
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
static int mfill_atomic_pte_continue ( pmd_t * dst_pmd ,
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags )
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
{
struct inode * inode = file_inode ( dst_vma - > vm_file ) ;
pgoff_t pgoff = linear_page_index ( dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
struct folio * folio ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
struct page * page ;
int ret ;
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
ret = shmem_get_folio ( inode , pgoff , & folio , SGP_NOALLOC ) ;
/* Our caller expects us to return -EFAULT if we failed to find folio */
mm: userfaultfd: fix UFFDIO_CONTINUE on fallocated shmem pages
When fallocate() is used on a shmem file, the pages we allocate can end up
with !PageUptodate.
Since UFFDIO_CONTINUE tries to find the existing page the user wants to
map with SGP_READ, we would fail to find such a page, since
shmem_getpage_gfp returns with a "NULL" pagep for SGP_READ if it discovers
!PageUptodate. As a result, UFFDIO_CONTINUE returns -EFAULT, as it would
do if the page wasn't found in the page cache at all.
This isn't the intended behavior. UFFDIO_CONTINUE is just trying to find
if a page exists, and doesn't care whether it still needs to be cleared or
not. So, instead of SGP_READ, pass in SGP_NOALLOC. This is the same,
except for one critical difference: in the !PageUptodate case, SGP_NOALLOC
will clear the page and then return it. With this change, UFFDIO_CONTINUE
works properly (succeeds) on a shmem file which has been fallocated, but
otherwise not modified.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220610173812.1768919-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Fixes: 153132571f02 ("userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem")
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-10 20:38:12 +03:00
if ( ret = = - ENOENT )
ret = - EFAULT ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
if ( ret )
goto out ;
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
if ( ! folio ) {
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
ret = - EFAULT ;
goto out ;
}
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
page = folio_file_page ( folio , pgoff ) ;
2022-01-15 01:05:19 +03:00
if ( PageHWPoison ( page ) ) {
ret = - EIO ;
goto out_release ;
}
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
ret = mfill_atomic_install_pte ( dst_pmd , dst_vma , dst_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
page , false , flags ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
if ( ret )
goto out_release ;
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
folio_unlock ( folio ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
ret = 0 ;
out :
return ret ;
out_release :
2022-09-02 22:46:28 +03:00
folio_unlock ( folio ) ;
folio_put ( folio ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
goto out ;
}
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
static pmd_t * mm_alloc_pmd ( struct mm_struct * mm , unsigned long address )
{
pgd_t * pgd ;
2017-03-09 17:24:07 +03:00
p4d_t * p4d ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
pud_t * pud ;
pgd = pgd_offset ( mm , address ) ;
2017-03-09 17:24:07 +03:00
p4d = p4d_alloc ( mm , pgd , address ) ;
if ( ! p4d )
return NULL ;
pud = pud_alloc ( mm , p4d , address ) ;
if ( ! pud )
return NULL ;
/*
* Note that we didn ' t run this because the pmd was
* missing , the * pmd may be already established and in
* turn it may also be a trans_huge_pmd .
*/
return pmd_alloc ( mm , pud , address ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
}
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
# ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
/*
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
* mfill_atomic processing for HUGETLB vmas . Note that this routine is
2020-06-09 07:33:54 +03:00
* called with mmap_lock held , it will release mmap_lock before returning .
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
*/
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_hugetlb (
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_start ,
unsigned long src_start ,
unsigned long len ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags )
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
{
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
struct mm_struct * dst_mm = dst_vma - > vm_mm ;
2017-02-23 02:43:43 +03:00
int vm_shared = dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
ssize_t err ;
pte_t * dst_pte ;
unsigned long src_addr , dst_addr ;
long copied ;
struct page * page ;
unsigned long vma_hpagesize ;
pgoff_t idx ;
u32 hash ;
struct address_space * mapping ;
/*
* There is no default zero huge page for all huge page sizes as
* supported by hugetlb . A PMD_SIZE huge pages may exist as used
* by THP . Since we can not reliably insert a zero page , this
* feature is not supported .
*/
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( uffd_flags_mode_is ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE ) ) {
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
return - EINVAL ;
}
src_addr = src_start ;
dst_addr = dst_start ;
copied = 0 ;
page = NULL ;
vma_hpagesize = vma_kernel_pagesize ( dst_vma ) ;
/*
* Validate alignment based on huge page size
*/
err = - EINVAL ;
if ( dst_start & ( vma_hpagesize - 1 ) | | len & ( vma_hpagesize - 1 ) )
goto out_unlock ;
retry :
/*
2020-06-09 07:33:54 +03:00
* On routine entry dst_vma is set . If we had to drop mmap_lock and
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
* retry , dst_vma will be set to NULL and we must lookup again .
*/
if ( ! dst_vma ) {
2017-02-25 01:58:28 +03:00
err = - ENOENT ;
2019-12-01 04:57:55 +03:00
dst_vma = find_dst_vma ( dst_mm , dst_start , len ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
if ( ! dst_vma | | ! is_vm_hugetlb_page ( dst_vma ) )
goto out_unlock ;
2017-02-23 02:43:43 +03:00
2017-02-25 01:58:28 +03:00
err = - EINVAL ;
if ( vma_hpagesize ! = vma_kernel_pagesize ( dst_vma ) )
goto out_unlock ;
2017-02-23 02:43:43 +03:00
vm_shared = dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
}
/*
2017-02-23 02:43:43 +03:00
* If not shared , ensure the dst_vma has a anon_vma .
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
*/
err = - ENOMEM ;
2017-02-23 02:43:43 +03:00
if ( ! vm_shared ) {
if ( unlikely ( anon_vma_prepare ( dst_vma ) ) )
goto out_unlock ;
}
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
while ( src_addr < src_start + len ) {
BUG_ON ( dst_addr > = dst_start + len ) ;
/*
2022-09-15 01:18:09 +03:00
* Serialize via vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex .
* vma_lock ensures the dst_pte remains valid even
* in the case of shared pmds . fault mutex prevents
* races with other faulting threads .
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
*/
hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing synchronization
Patch series "hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more synchronization", v2.
While discussing the issue with huge_pte_offset [1], I remembered that
there were more outstanding hugetlb races. These issues are:
1) For shared pmds, huge PTE pointers returned by huge_pte_alloc can become
invalid via a call to huge_pmd_unshare by another thread.
2) hugetlbfs page faults can race with truncation causing invalid global
reserve counts and state.
A previous attempt was made to use i_mmap_rwsem in this manner as
described at [2]. However, those patches were reverted starting with [3]
due to locking issues.
To effectively use i_mmap_rwsem to address the above issues it needs to be
held (in read mode) during page fault processing. However, during fault
processing we need to lock the page we will be adding. Lock ordering
requires we take page lock before i_mmap_rwsem. Waiting until after
taking the page lock is too late in the fault process for the
synchronization we want to do.
To address this lock ordering issue, the following patches change the lock
ordering for hugetlb pages. This is not too invasive as hugetlbfs
processing is done separate from core mm in many places. However, I don't
really like this idea. Much ugliness is contained in the new routine
hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write() of patch 1.
The only other way I can think of to address these issues is by catching
all the races. After catching a race, cleanup, backout, retry ... etc,
as needed. This can get really ugly, especially for huge page
reservations. At one time, I started writing some of the reservation
backout code for page faults and it got so ugly and complicated I went
down the path of adding synchronization to avoid the races. Any other
suggestions would be welcome.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1582342427-230392-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20181222223013.22193-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190103235452.29335-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1584028670.7365.182.camel@lca.pw/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200312183142.108df9ac@canb.auug.org.au/
This patch (of 2):
While looking at BUGs associated with invalid huge page map counts, it was
discovered and observed that a huge pte pointer could become 'invalid' and
point to another task's page table. Consider the following:
A task takes a page fault on a shared hugetlbfs file and calls
huge_pte_alloc to get a ptep. Suppose the returned ptep points to a
shared pmd.
Now, another task truncates the hugetlbfs file. As part of truncation, it
unmaps everyone who has the file mapped. If the range being truncated is
covered by a shared pmd, huge_pmd_unshare will be called. For all but the
last user of the shared pmd, huge_pmd_unshare will clear the pud pointing
to the pmd. If the task in the middle of the page fault is not the last
user, the ptep returned by huge_pte_alloc now points to another task's
page table or worse. This leads to bad things such as incorrect page
map/reference counts or invalid memory references.
To fix, expand the use of i_mmap_rwsem as follows:
- i_mmap_rwsem is held in read mode whenever huge_pmd_share is called.
huge_pmd_share is only called via huge_pte_alloc, so callers of
huge_pte_alloc take i_mmap_rwsem before calling. In addition, callers
of huge_pte_alloc continue to hold the semaphore until finished with
the ptep.
- i_mmap_rwsem is held in write mode whenever huge_pmd_unshare is called.
One problem with this scheme is that it requires taking i_mmap_rwsem
before taking the page lock during page faults. This is not the order
specified in the rest of mm code. Handling of hugetlbfs pages is mostly
isolated today. Therefore, we use this alternative locking order for
PageHuge() pages.
mapping->i_mmap_rwsem
hugetlb_fault_mutex (hugetlbfs specific page fault mutex)
page->flags PG_locked (lock_page)
To help with lock ordering issues, hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write() is
introduced to write lock the i_mmap_rwsem associated with a page.
In most cases it is easy to get address_space via vma->vm_file->f_mapping.
However, in the case of migration or memory errors for anon pages we do
not have an associated vma. A new routine _get_hugetlb_page_mapping()
will use anon_vma to get address_space in these cases.
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@oracle.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200316205756.146666-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 07:11:05 +03:00
idx = linear_page_index ( dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
2022-09-15 01:18:03 +03:00
mapping = dst_vma - > vm_file - > f_mapping ;
2019-12-01 04:57:02 +03:00
hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash ( mapping , idx ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
mutex_lock ( & hugetlb_fault_mutex_table [ hash ] ) ;
2022-09-15 01:18:09 +03:00
hugetlb_vma_lock_read ( dst_vma ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
err = - ENOMEM ;
2021-05-05 04:33:00 +03:00
dst_pte = huge_pte_alloc ( dst_mm , dst_vma , dst_addr , vma_hpagesize ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
if ( ! dst_pte ) {
2022-09-15 01:18:09 +03:00
hugetlb_vma_unlock_read ( dst_vma ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
mutex_unlock ( & hugetlb_fault_mutex_table [ hash ] ) ;
goto out_unlock ;
}
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( ! uffd_flags_mode_is ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_CONTINUE ) & &
2022-05-13 06:22:54 +03:00
! huge_pte_none_mostly ( huge_ptep_get ( dst_pte ) ) ) {
userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl
This ioctl is how userspace ought to resolve "minor" userfaults. The
idea is, userspace is notified that a minor fault has occurred. It
might change the contents of the page using its second non-UFFD mapping,
or not. Then, it calls UFFDIO_CONTINUE to tell the kernel "I have
ensured the page contents are correct, carry on setting up the mapping".
Note that it doesn't make much sense to use UFFDIO_{COPY,ZEROPAGE} for
MINOR registered VMAs. ZEROPAGE maps the VMA to the zero page; but in
the minor fault case, we already have some pre-existing underlying page.
Likewise, UFFDIO_COPY isn't useful if we have a second non-UFFD mapping.
We'd just use memcpy() or similar instead.
It turns out hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() already does very close to what
we want, if an existing page is provided via `struct page **pagep`. We
already special-case the behavior a bit for the UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE case, so
just extend that design: add an enum for the three modes of operation,
and make the small adjustments needed for the MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE
case. (Basically, look up the existing page, and avoid adding the
existing page to the page cache or calling set_page_huge_active() on
it.)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 04:35:49 +03:00
err = - EEXIST ;
2022-09-15 01:18:09 +03:00
hugetlb_vma_unlock_read ( dst_vma ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
mutex_unlock ( & hugetlb_fault_mutex_table [ hash ] ) ;
goto out_unlock ;
}
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
err = hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte ( dst_pte , dst_vma , dst_addr ,
src_addr , flags , & page ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
2022-09-15 01:18:09 +03:00
hugetlb_vma_unlock_read ( dst_vma ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
mutex_unlock ( & hugetlb_fault_mutex_table [ hash ] ) ;
cond_resched ( ) ;
2018-12-01 01:09:25 +03:00
if ( unlikely ( err = = - ENOENT ) ) {
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
BUG_ON ( ! page ) ;
err = copy_huge_page_from_user ( page ,
( const void __user * ) src_addr ,
2019-12-01 04:57:49 +03:00
vma_hpagesize / PAGE_SIZE ,
true ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
if ( unlikely ( err ) ) {
err = - EFAULT ;
goto out ;
}
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_lock ( dst_mm ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
dst_vma = NULL ;
goto retry ;
} else
BUG_ON ( page ) ;
if ( ! err ) {
dst_addr + = vma_hpagesize ;
src_addr + = vma_hpagesize ;
copied + = vma_hpagesize ;
if ( fatal_signal_pending ( current ) )
err = - EINTR ;
}
if ( err )
break ;
}
out_unlock :
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
out :
mm, hugetlb: fix racy resv_huge_pages underflow on UFFDIO_COPY
On UFFDIO_COPY, if we fail to copy the page contents while holding the
hugetlb_fault_mutex, we will drop the mutex and return to the caller after
allocating a page that consumed a reservation. In this case there may be
a fault that double consumes the reservation. To handle this, we free the
allocated page, fix the reservations, and allocate a temporary hugetlb
page and return that to the caller. When the caller does the copy outside
of the lock, we again check the cache, and allocate a page consuming the
reservation, and copy over the contents.
Test:
Hacked the code locally such that resv_huge_pages underflows produce
a warning and the copy_huge_page_from_user() always fails, then:
./tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd hugetlb_shared 10
2 /tmp/kokonut_test/huge/userfaultfd_test && echo test success
./tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd hugetlb 10
2 /tmp/kokonut_test/huge/userfaultfd_test && echo test success
Both tests succeed and produce no warnings. After the
test runs number of free/resv hugepages is correct.
[yuehaibing@huawei.com: remove set but not used variable 'vm_alloc_shared']
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210601141610.28332-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
[almasrymina@google.com: fix allocation error check and copy func name]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210605010626.1459873-1-almasrymina@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210528005029.88088-1-almasrymina@google.com
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:48:19 +03:00
if ( page )
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
put_page ( page ) ;
BUG_ON ( copied < 0 ) ;
BUG_ON ( err > 0 ) ;
BUG_ON ( ! copied & & ! err ) ;
return copied ? copied : err ;
}
# else /* !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
/* fail at build time if gcc attempts to use this */
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
extern ssize_t mfill_atomic_hugetlb ( struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_start ,
unsigned long src_start ,
unsigned long len ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
# endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic_pte ( pmd_t * dst_pmd ,
2017-09-07 02:23:06 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
unsigned long dst_addr ,
unsigned long src_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags ,
struct page * * pagep )
2017-09-07 02:23:06 +03:00
{
ssize_t err ;
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( uffd_flags_mode_is ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_CONTINUE ) ) {
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
return mfill_atomic_pte_continue ( dst_pmd , dst_vma ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
dst_addr , flags ) ;
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
}
2018-12-01 01:09:28 +03:00
/*
* The normal page fault path for a shmem will invoke the
* fault , fill the hole in the file and COW it right away . The
* result generates plain anonymous memory . So when we are
* asked to fill an hole in a MAP_PRIVATE shmem mapping , we ' ll
* generate anonymous memory directly without actually filling
* the hole . For the MAP_PRIVATE case the robustness check
* only happens in the pagetable ( to verify it ' s still none )
* and not in the radix tree .
*/
if ( ! ( dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ) ) {
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( uffd_flags_mode_is ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_COPY ) )
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
err = mfill_atomic_pte_copy ( dst_pmd , dst_vma ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
dst_addr , src_addr ,
flags , pagep ) ;
2017-09-07 02:23:06 +03:00
else
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
err = mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage ( dst_pmd ,
2017-09-07 02:23:06 +03:00
dst_vma , dst_addr ) ;
} else {
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
err = shmem_mfill_atomic_pte ( dst_pmd , dst_vma ,
userfaultfd/shmem: support UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem
With this change, userspace can resolve a minor fault within a
shmem-backed area with a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl. The semantics for this
match those for hugetlbfs - we look up the existing page in the page
cache, and install a PTE for it.
This commit introduces a new helper: mfill_atomic_install_pte.
Why handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE for shmem in mm/userfaultfd.c, instead of in
shmem.c? The existing userfault implementation only relies on shmem.c for
VM_SHARED VMAs. However, minor fault handling / CONTINUE work just fine
for !VM_SHARED VMAs as well. We'd prefer to handle CONTINUE for shmem in
one place, regardless of shared/private (to reduce code duplication).
Why add a new mfill_atomic_install_pte helper? A problem we have with
continue is that shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and mcopy_atomic_pte() are
*close* to what we want, but not exactly. We do want to setup the PTEs in
a CONTINUE operation, but we don't want to e.g. allocate a new page,
charge it (e.g. to the shmem inode), manipulate various flags, etc. Also
we have the problem stated above: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() and
mcopy_atomic_pte() both handle one-half of the problem (shared / private)
continue cares about. So, introduce mcontinue_atomic_pte(), to handle all
of the shmem continue cases. Introduce the helper so it doesn't duplicate
code with mcopy_atomic_pte().
In a future commit, shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() will also be modified to use
this new helper. However, since this is a bigger refactor, it seems most
clear to do it as a separate change.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 04:49:24 +03:00
dst_addr , src_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
flags , pagep ) ;
2017-09-07 02:23:06 +03:00
}
return err ;
}
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
static __always_inline ssize_t mfill_atomic ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm ,
unsigned long dst_start ,
unsigned long src_start ,
unsigned long len ,
atomic_t * mmap_changing ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
uffd_flags_t flags )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
{
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ;
ssize_t err ;
pmd_t * dst_pmd ;
unsigned long src_addr , dst_addr ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
long copied ;
struct page * page ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
* Sanitize the command parameters :
*/
BUG_ON ( dst_start & ~ PAGE_MASK ) ;
BUG_ON ( len & ~ PAGE_MASK ) ;
/* Does the address range wrap, or is the span zero-sized? */
BUG_ON ( src_start + len < = src_start ) ;
BUG_ON ( dst_start + len < = dst_start ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
src_addr = src_start ;
dst_addr = dst_start ;
copied = 0 ;
page = NULL ;
retry :
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_lock ( dst_mm ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
userfaultfd: prevent non-cooperative events vs mcopy_atomic races
If a process monitored with userfaultfd changes it's memory mappings or
forks() at the same time as uffd monitor fills the process memory with
UFFDIO_COPY, the actual creation of page table entries and copying of
the data in mcopy_atomic may happen either before of after the memory
mapping modifications and there is no way for the uffd monitor to
maintain consistent view of the process memory layout.
For instance, let's consider fork() running in parallel with
userfaultfd_copy():
process | uffd monitor
---------------------------------+------------------------------
fork() | userfaultfd_copy()
... | ...
dup_mmap() | down_read(mmap_sem)
down_write(mmap_sem) | /* create PTEs, copy data */
dup_uffd() | up_read(mmap_sem)
copy_page_range() |
up_write(mmap_sem) |
dup_uffd_complete() |
/* notify monitor */ |
If the userfaultfd_copy() takes the mmap_sem first, the new page(s) will
be present by the time copy_page_range() is called and they will appear
in the child's memory mappings. However, if the fork() is the first to
take the mmap_sem, the new pages won't be mapped in the child's address
space.
If the pages are not present and child tries to access them, the monitor
will get page fault notification and everything is fine. However, if
the pages *are present*, the child can access them without uffd
noticing. And if we copy them into child it'll see the wrong data.
Since we are talking about background copy, we'd need to decide whether
the pages should be copied or not regardless #PF notifications.
Since userfaultfd monitor has no way to determine what was the order,
let's disallow userfaultfd_copy in parallel with the non-cooperative
events. In such case we return -EAGAIN and the uffd monitor can
understand that userfaultfd_copy() clashed with a non-cooperative event
and take an appropriate action.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527061324-19949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-06-08 03:09:25 +03:00
/*
* If memory mappings are changing because of non - cooperative
* operation ( e . g . mremap ) running in parallel , bail out and
* request the user to retry later
*/
err = - EAGAIN ;
2021-09-03 00:58:56 +03:00
if ( mmap_changing & & atomic_read ( mmap_changing ) )
userfaultfd: prevent non-cooperative events vs mcopy_atomic races
If a process monitored with userfaultfd changes it's memory mappings or
forks() at the same time as uffd monitor fills the process memory with
UFFDIO_COPY, the actual creation of page table entries and copying of
the data in mcopy_atomic may happen either before of after the memory
mapping modifications and there is no way for the uffd monitor to
maintain consistent view of the process memory layout.
For instance, let's consider fork() running in parallel with
userfaultfd_copy():
process | uffd monitor
---------------------------------+------------------------------
fork() | userfaultfd_copy()
... | ...
dup_mmap() | down_read(mmap_sem)
down_write(mmap_sem) | /* create PTEs, copy data */
dup_uffd() | up_read(mmap_sem)
copy_page_range() |
up_write(mmap_sem) |
dup_uffd_complete() |
/* notify monitor */ |
If the userfaultfd_copy() takes the mmap_sem first, the new page(s) will
be present by the time copy_page_range() is called and they will appear
in the child's memory mappings. However, if the fork() is the first to
take the mmap_sem, the new pages won't be mapped in the child's address
space.
If the pages are not present and child tries to access them, the monitor
will get page fault notification and everything is fine. However, if
the pages *are present*, the child can access them without uffd
noticing. And if we copy them into child it'll see the wrong data.
Since we are talking about background copy, we'd need to decide whether
the pages should be copied or not regardless #PF notifications.
Since userfaultfd monitor has no way to determine what was the order,
let's disallow userfaultfd_copy in parallel with the non-cooperative
events. In such case we return -EAGAIN and the uffd monitor can
understand that userfaultfd_copy() clashed with a non-cooperative event
and take an appropriate action.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1527061324-19949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-06-08 03:09:25 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
* Make sure the vma is not shared , that the dst range is
* both valid and fully within a single existing vma .
*/
2017-02-25 01:58:28 +03:00
err = - ENOENT ;
2019-12-01 04:57:55 +03:00
dst_vma = find_dst_vma ( dst_mm , dst_start , len ) ;
2017-02-23 02:43:34 +03:00
if ( ! dst_vma )
goto out_unlock ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
2017-02-25 01:58:28 +03:00
err = - EINVAL ;
/*
* shmem_zero_setup is invoked in mmap for MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED but
* it will overwrite vm_ops , so vma_is_anonymous must return false .
*/
if ( WARN_ON_ONCE ( vma_is_anonymous ( dst_vma ) & &
dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ) )
goto out_unlock ;
2020-04-07 06:05:41 +03:00
/*
* validate ' mode ' now that we know the dst_vma : don ' t allow
* a wrprotect copy if the userfaultfd didn ' t register as WP .
*/
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( ( flags & MFILL_ATOMIC_WP ) & & ! ( dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP ) )
2020-04-07 06:05:41 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
/*
* If this is a HUGETLB vma , pass off to appropriate routine
*/
if ( is_vm_hugetlb_page ( dst_vma ) )
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
return mfill_atomic_hugetlb ( dst_vma , dst_start ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
src_start , len , flags ) ;
2017-02-23 02:42:55 +03:00
2017-02-23 02:43:34 +03:00
if ( ! vma_is_anonymous ( dst_vma ) & & ! vma_is_shmem ( dst_vma ) )
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
if ( ! vma_is_shmem ( dst_vma ) & &
uffd_flags_mode_is ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_CONTINUE ) )
userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl
This ioctl is how userspace ought to resolve "minor" userfaults. The
idea is, userspace is notified that a minor fault has occurred. It
might change the contents of the page using its second non-UFFD mapping,
or not. Then, it calls UFFDIO_CONTINUE to tell the kernel "I have
ensured the page contents are correct, carry on setting up the mapping".
Note that it doesn't make much sense to use UFFDIO_{COPY,ZEROPAGE} for
MINOR registered VMAs. ZEROPAGE maps the VMA to the zero page; but in
the minor fault case, we already have some pre-existing underlying page.
Likewise, UFFDIO_COPY isn't useful if we have a second non-UFFD mapping.
We'd just use memcpy() or similar instead.
It turns out hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() already does very close to what
we want, if an existing page is provided via `struct page **pagep`. We
already special-case the behavior a bit for the UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE case, so
just extend that design: add an enum for the three modes of operation,
and make the small adjustments needed for the MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE
case. (Basically, look up the existing page, and avoid adding the
existing page to the page cache or calling set_page_huge_active() on
it.)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 04:35:49 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
* Ensure the dst_vma has a anon_vma or this page
* would get a NULL anon_vma when moved in the
* dst_vma .
*/
err = - ENOMEM ;
2018-12-01 01:09:28 +03:00
if ( ! ( dst_vma - > vm_flags & VM_SHARED ) & &
unlikely ( anon_vma_prepare ( dst_vma ) ) )
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
while ( src_addr < src_start + len ) {
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
pmd_t dst_pmdval ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
BUG_ON ( dst_addr > = dst_start + len ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
dst_pmd = mm_alloc_pmd ( dst_mm , dst_addr ) ;
if ( unlikely ( ! dst_pmd ) ) {
err = - ENOMEM ;
break ;
}
2020-11-26 19:20:28 +03:00
dst_pmdval = pmdp_get_lockless ( dst_pmd ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
/*
* If the dst_pmd is mapped as THP don ' t
* override it and just be strict .
*/
if ( unlikely ( pmd_trans_huge ( dst_pmdval ) ) ) {
err = - EEXIST ;
break ;
}
if ( unlikely ( pmd_none ( dst_pmdval ) ) & &
mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions
Patch series "Add support for fast mremap".
This series speeds up the mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at
the PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra
'address' argument that mremap passes to pte_alloc may do something
subtle architecture related in the future that may make the scheme not
work. Also we find that there is no point in passing the 'address' to
pte_alloc since its unused. This patch therefore removes this argument
tree-wide resulting in a nice negative diff as well. Also ensuring
along the way that the enabled architectures do not do anything funky
with the 'address' argument that goes unnoticed by the optimization.
Build and boot tested on x86-64. Build tested on arm64. The config
enablement patch for arm64 will be posted in the future after more
testing.
The changes were obtained by applying the following Coccinelle script.
(thanks Julia for answering all Coccinelle questions!).
Following fix ups were done manually:
* Removal of address argument from pte_fragment_alloc
* Removal of pte_alloc_one_fast definitions from m68k and microblaze.
// Options: --include-headers --no-includes
// Note: I split the 'identifier fn' line, so if you are manually
// running it, please unsplit it so it runs for you.
virtual patch
@pte_alloc_func_def depends on patch exists@
identifier E2;
identifier fn =~
"^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
type T2;
@@
fn(...
- , T2 E2
)
{ ... }
@pte_alloc_func_proto_noarg depends on patch exists@
type T1, T2, T3, T4;
identifier fn =~ "^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
@@
(
- T3 fn(T1, T2);
+ T3 fn(T1);
|
- T3 fn(T1, T2, T4);
+ T3 fn(T1, T2);
)
@pte_alloc_func_proto depends on patch exists@
identifier E1, E2, E4;
type T1, T2, T3, T4;
identifier fn =~
"^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
@@
(
- T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2);
+ T3 fn(T1 E1);
|
- T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2, T4 E4);
+ T3 fn(T1 E1, T2 E2);
)
@pte_alloc_func_call depends on patch exists@
expression E2;
identifier fn =~
"^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
@@
fn(...
-, E2
)
@pte_alloc_macro depends on patch exists@
identifier fn =~
"^(__pte_alloc|pte_alloc_one|pte_alloc|__pte_alloc_kernel|pte_alloc_one_kernel)$";
identifier a, b, c;
expression e;
position p;
@@
(
- #define fn(a, b, c) e
+ #define fn(a, b) e
|
- #define fn(a, b) e
+ #define fn(a) e
)
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108181201.88826-2-joelaf@google.com
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 02:28:34 +03:00
unlikely ( __pte_alloc ( dst_mm , dst_pmd ) ) ) {
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
err = - ENOMEM ;
break ;
}
/* If an huge pmd materialized from under us fail */
if ( unlikely ( pmd_trans_huge ( * dst_pmd ) ) ) {
err = - EFAULT ;
break ;
}
BUG_ON ( pmd_none ( * dst_pmd ) ) ;
BUG_ON ( pmd_trans_huge ( * dst_pmd ) ) ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
err = mfill_atomic_pte ( dst_pmd , dst_vma , dst_addr ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
src_addr , flags , & page ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
cond_resched ( ) ;
2018-12-01 01:09:25 +03:00
if ( unlikely ( err = = - ENOENT ) ) {
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
void * page_kaddr ;
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
BUG_ON ( ! page ) ;
2022-10-24 07:34:52 +03:00
page_kaddr = kmap_local_page ( page ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
err = copy_from_user ( page_kaddr ,
( const void __user * ) src_addr ,
PAGE_SIZE ) ;
2022-10-24 07:34:52 +03:00
kunmap_local ( page_kaddr ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
if ( unlikely ( err ) ) {
err = - EFAULT ;
goto out ;
}
2022-03-23 00:42:08 +03:00
flush_dcache_page ( page ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
goto retry ;
} else
BUG_ON ( page ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
if ( ! err ) {
dst_addr + = PAGE_SIZE ;
src_addr + = PAGE_SIZE ;
copied + = PAGE_SIZE ;
if ( fatal_signal_pending ( current ) )
err = - EINTR ;
}
if ( err )
break ;
}
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
out_unlock :
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:08 +03:00
out :
if ( page )
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 15:29:47 +03:00
put_page ( page ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
BUG_ON ( copied < 0 ) ;
BUG_ON ( err > 0 ) ;
BUG_ON ( ! copied & & ! err ) ;
return copied ? copied : err ;
}
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
ssize_t mfill_atomic_copy ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm , unsigned long dst_start ,
unsigned long src_start , unsigned long len ,
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
atomic_t * mmap_changing , uffd_flags_t flags )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
{
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
return mfill_atomic ( dst_mm , dst_start , src_start , len , mmap_changing ,
uffd_flags_set_mode ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_COPY ) ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
}
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
ssize_t mfill_atomic_zeropage ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm , unsigned long start ,
unsigned long len , atomic_t * mmap_changing )
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
{
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
return mfill_atomic ( dst_mm , start , 0 , len , mmap_changing ,
uffd_flags_set_mode ( 0 , MFILL_ATOMIC_ZEROPAGE ) ) ;
userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl
This ioctl is how userspace ought to resolve "minor" userfaults. The
idea is, userspace is notified that a minor fault has occurred. It
might change the contents of the page using its second non-UFFD mapping,
or not. Then, it calls UFFDIO_CONTINUE to tell the kernel "I have
ensured the page contents are correct, carry on setting up the mapping".
Note that it doesn't make much sense to use UFFDIO_{COPY,ZEROPAGE} for
MINOR registered VMAs. ZEROPAGE maps the VMA to the zero page; but in
the minor fault case, we already have some pre-existing underlying page.
Likewise, UFFDIO_COPY isn't useful if we have a second non-UFFD mapping.
We'd just use memcpy() or similar instead.
It turns out hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() already does very close to what
we want, if an existing page is provided via `struct page **pagep`. We
already special-case the behavior a bit for the UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE case, so
just extend that design: add an enum for the three modes of operation,
and make the small adjustments needed for the MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE
case. (Basically, look up the existing page, and avoid adding the
existing page to the page cache or calling set_page_huge_active() on
it.)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 04:35:49 +03:00
}
mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency
Patch series "mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP",
v5.
- Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the
main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args.
- Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP.
This patch (of 4):
The basic problem is, over time we've added new userfaultfd ioctls, and
we've refactored the code so functions which used to handle only one case
are now re-used to deal with several cases. While this happened, we
didn't bother to rename the functions.
Similarly, as we added new functions, we cargo-culted pieces of the
now-inconsistent naming scheme, so those functions too ended up with names
that don't make a lot of sense.
A key point here is, "copy" in most userfaultfd code refers specifically
to UFFDIO_COPY, where we allocate a new page and copy its contents from
userspace. There are many functions with "copy" in the name that don't
actually do this (at least in some cases).
So, rename things into a consistent scheme. The high level idea is that
the call stack for userfaultfd ioctls becomes:
userfaultfd_ioctl
-> userfaultfd_(particular ioctl)
-> mfill_atomic_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic /* loops over pages in range */
-> mfill_atomic_pte /* deals with single pages */
-> mfill_atomic_pte_(particular kind of fill operation)
-> mfill_atomic_install_pte
There are of course some special cases (shmem, hugetlb), but this is the
general structure which all function names now adhere to.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-1-axelrasmussen@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230314221250.682452-2-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-03-15 01:12:47 +03:00
ssize_t mfill_atomic_continue ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm , unsigned long start ,
2023-03-15 01:12:50 +03:00
unsigned long len , atomic_t * mmap_changing ,
uffd_flags_t flags )
userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl
This ioctl is how userspace ought to resolve "minor" userfaults. The
idea is, userspace is notified that a minor fault has occurred. It
might change the contents of the page using its second non-UFFD mapping,
or not. Then, it calls UFFDIO_CONTINUE to tell the kernel "I have
ensured the page contents are correct, carry on setting up the mapping".
Note that it doesn't make much sense to use UFFDIO_{COPY,ZEROPAGE} for
MINOR registered VMAs. ZEROPAGE maps the VMA to the zero page; but in
the minor fault case, we already have some pre-existing underlying page.
Likewise, UFFDIO_COPY isn't useful if we have a second non-UFFD mapping.
We'd just use memcpy() or similar instead.
It turns out hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() already does very close to what
we want, if an existing page is provided via `struct page **pagep`. We
already special-case the behavior a bit for the UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE case, so
just extend that design: add an enum for the three modes of operation,
and make the small adjustments needed for the MCOPY_ATOMIC_CONTINUE
case. (Basically, look up the existing page, and avoid adding the
existing page to the page cache or calling set_page_huge_active() on
it.)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-5-axelrasmussen@google.com
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-05 04:35:49 +03:00
{
2023-03-15 01:12:49 +03:00
return mfill_atomic ( dst_mm , start , 0 , len , mmap_changing ,
2023-03-15 01:12:50 +03:00
uffd_flags_set_mode ( flags , MFILL_ATOMIC_CONTINUE ) ) ;
2015-09-05 01:47:04 +03:00
}
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
long uffd_wp_range ( struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ,
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
unsigned long start , unsigned long len , bool enable_wp )
{
mm/userfaultfd: rely on vma->vm_page_prot in uffd_wp_range()
Patch series "mm: uffd-wp + change_protection() cleanups".
Cleanup page protection handling in uffd-wp when calling
change_protection() and improve unprotecting uffd=wp in private mappings,
trying to set PTEs writable again if possible just like we do during
mprotect() when upgrading write permissions. Make the change_protection()
interface harder to get wrong :)
I consider both pages primarily cleanups, although patch #1 fixes a corner
case with uffd-wp and softdirty tracking for shmem. @Peter, please let me
know if we should flag patch #1 as pure cleanup -- I have no idea how
important softdirty tracking on shmem is.
This patch (of 2):
uffd_wp_range() currently calculates page protection manually using
vm_get_page_prot(). This will ignore any other reason for active
writenotify: one mechanism applicable to shmem is softdirty tracking.
For example, the following sequence
1) Write to mapped shmem page
2) Clear softdirty
3) Register uffd-wp covering the mapped page
4) Unregister uffd-wp covering the mapped page
5) Write to page again
will not set the modified page softdirty, because uffd_wp_range() will
ignore that writenotify is required for softdirty tracking and simply map
the page writable again using change_protection(). Similarly, instead of
unregistering, protecting followed by un-protecting the page using uffd-wp
would result in the same situation.
Now that we enable writenotify whenever enabling uffd-wp on a VMA,
vma->vm_page_prot will already properly reflect our requirements: the
default is to write-protect all PTEs. However, for shared mappings we
would now not remap the PTEs writable if possible when unprotecting, just
like for private mappings (COW). To compensate, set
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE just like mprotect() does to try mapping
individual PTEs writable.
For private mappings, this change implies that we will now always try
setting PTEs writable when un-protecting, just like when upgrading write
permissions using mprotect(), which is an improvement.
For shared mappings, we will only set PTEs writable if
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() indicates that it's
ok. For ordinary shmem, this will be the case when PTEs are dirty, which
should usually be the case -- otherwise we could special-case shmem in
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() easily, because shmem
itself doesn't require writenotify.
Note that hugetlb does not yet implement MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE, so we
won't try setting PTEs writable when unprotecting or when unregistering
uffd-wp. This can be added later on top by implementing
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE.
While commit ffd05793963a ("userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for
userfault vma range") introduced that code, it should only be applicable
to uffd-wp on shared mappings -- shmem (hugetlb does not support softdirty
tracking). I don't think this corner cases justifies to cc stable. Let's
just handle it correctly and prepare for change_protection() cleanups.
[david@redhat.com: o need for additional harmless checks if we're wr-protecting either way]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/71412742-a71f-9c74-865f-773ad83db7a5@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-23 18:56:15 +03:00
unsigned int mm_cp_flags ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
struct mmu_gather tlb ;
mm/uffd: detect pgtable allocation failures
Before this patch, when there's any pgtable allocation issues happened
during change_protection(), the error will be ignored from the syscall.
For shmem, there will be an error dumped into the host dmesg. Two issues
with that:
(1) Doing a trace dump when allocation fails is not anything close to
grace.
(2) The user should be notified with any kind of such error, so the user
can trap it and decide what to do next, either by retrying, or stop
the process properly, or anything else.
For userfault users, this will change the API of UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT when
pgtable allocation failure happened. It should not normally break anyone,
though. If it breaks, then in good ways.
One man-page update will be on the way to introduce the new -ENOMEM for
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT. Not marking stable so we keep the old behavior on
the 5.19-till-now kernels.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104225207.1066932-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-01-05 01:52:07 +03:00
long ret ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
VM_WARN_ONCE ( start < dst_vma - > vm_start | | start + len > dst_vma - > vm_end ,
" The address range exceeds VMA boundary. \n " ) ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
if ( enable_wp )
mm/userfaultfd: rely on vma->vm_page_prot in uffd_wp_range()
Patch series "mm: uffd-wp + change_protection() cleanups".
Cleanup page protection handling in uffd-wp when calling
change_protection() and improve unprotecting uffd=wp in private mappings,
trying to set PTEs writable again if possible just like we do during
mprotect() when upgrading write permissions. Make the change_protection()
interface harder to get wrong :)
I consider both pages primarily cleanups, although patch #1 fixes a corner
case with uffd-wp and softdirty tracking for shmem. @Peter, please let me
know if we should flag patch #1 as pure cleanup -- I have no idea how
important softdirty tracking on shmem is.
This patch (of 2):
uffd_wp_range() currently calculates page protection manually using
vm_get_page_prot(). This will ignore any other reason for active
writenotify: one mechanism applicable to shmem is softdirty tracking.
For example, the following sequence
1) Write to mapped shmem page
2) Clear softdirty
3) Register uffd-wp covering the mapped page
4) Unregister uffd-wp covering the mapped page
5) Write to page again
will not set the modified page softdirty, because uffd_wp_range() will
ignore that writenotify is required for softdirty tracking and simply map
the page writable again using change_protection(). Similarly, instead of
unregistering, protecting followed by un-protecting the page using uffd-wp
would result in the same situation.
Now that we enable writenotify whenever enabling uffd-wp on a VMA,
vma->vm_page_prot will already properly reflect our requirements: the
default is to write-protect all PTEs. However, for shared mappings we
would now not remap the PTEs writable if possible when unprotecting, just
like for private mappings (COW). To compensate, set
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE just like mprotect() does to try mapping
individual PTEs writable.
For private mappings, this change implies that we will now always try
setting PTEs writable when un-protecting, just like when upgrading write
permissions using mprotect(), which is an improvement.
For shared mappings, we will only set PTEs writable if
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() indicates that it's
ok. For ordinary shmem, this will be the case when PTEs are dirty, which
should usually be the case -- otherwise we could special-case shmem in
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() easily, because shmem
itself doesn't require writenotify.
Note that hugetlb does not yet implement MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE, so we
won't try setting PTEs writable when unprotecting or when unregistering
uffd-wp. This can be added later on top by implementing
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE.
While commit ffd05793963a ("userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for
userfault vma range") introduced that code, it should only be applicable
to uffd-wp on shared mappings -- shmem (hugetlb does not support softdirty
tracking). I don't think this corner cases justifies to cc stable. Let's
just handle it correctly and prepare for change_protection() cleanups.
[david@redhat.com: o need for additional harmless checks if we're wr-protecting either way]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/71412742-a71f-9c74-865f-773ad83db7a5@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-23 18:56:15 +03:00
mm_cp_flags = MM_CP_UFFD_WP ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
else
mm/userfaultfd: rely on vma->vm_page_prot in uffd_wp_range()
Patch series "mm: uffd-wp + change_protection() cleanups".
Cleanup page protection handling in uffd-wp when calling
change_protection() and improve unprotecting uffd=wp in private mappings,
trying to set PTEs writable again if possible just like we do during
mprotect() when upgrading write permissions. Make the change_protection()
interface harder to get wrong :)
I consider both pages primarily cleanups, although patch #1 fixes a corner
case with uffd-wp and softdirty tracking for shmem. @Peter, please let me
know if we should flag patch #1 as pure cleanup -- I have no idea how
important softdirty tracking on shmem is.
This patch (of 2):
uffd_wp_range() currently calculates page protection manually using
vm_get_page_prot(). This will ignore any other reason for active
writenotify: one mechanism applicable to shmem is softdirty tracking.
For example, the following sequence
1) Write to mapped shmem page
2) Clear softdirty
3) Register uffd-wp covering the mapped page
4) Unregister uffd-wp covering the mapped page
5) Write to page again
will not set the modified page softdirty, because uffd_wp_range() will
ignore that writenotify is required for softdirty tracking and simply map
the page writable again using change_protection(). Similarly, instead of
unregistering, protecting followed by un-protecting the page using uffd-wp
would result in the same situation.
Now that we enable writenotify whenever enabling uffd-wp on a VMA,
vma->vm_page_prot will already properly reflect our requirements: the
default is to write-protect all PTEs. However, for shared mappings we
would now not remap the PTEs writable if possible when unprotecting, just
like for private mappings (COW). To compensate, set
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE just like mprotect() does to try mapping
individual PTEs writable.
For private mappings, this change implies that we will now always try
setting PTEs writable when un-protecting, just like when upgrading write
permissions using mprotect(), which is an improvement.
For shared mappings, we will only set PTEs writable if
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() indicates that it's
ok. For ordinary shmem, this will be the case when PTEs are dirty, which
should usually be the case -- otherwise we could special-case shmem in
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() easily, because shmem
itself doesn't require writenotify.
Note that hugetlb does not yet implement MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE, so we
won't try setting PTEs writable when unprotecting or when unregistering
uffd-wp. This can be added later on top by implementing
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE.
While commit ffd05793963a ("userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for
userfault vma range") introduced that code, it should only be applicable
to uffd-wp on shared mappings -- shmem (hugetlb does not support softdirty
tracking). I don't think this corner cases justifies to cc stable. Let's
just handle it correctly and prepare for change_protection() cleanups.
[david@redhat.com: o need for additional harmless checks if we're wr-protecting either way]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/71412742-a71f-9c74-865f-773ad83db7a5@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-23 18:56:15 +03:00
mm_cp_flags = MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
mm/userfaultfd: rely on vma->vm_page_prot in uffd_wp_range()
Patch series "mm: uffd-wp + change_protection() cleanups".
Cleanup page protection handling in uffd-wp when calling
change_protection() and improve unprotecting uffd=wp in private mappings,
trying to set PTEs writable again if possible just like we do during
mprotect() when upgrading write permissions. Make the change_protection()
interface harder to get wrong :)
I consider both pages primarily cleanups, although patch #1 fixes a corner
case with uffd-wp and softdirty tracking for shmem. @Peter, please let me
know if we should flag patch #1 as pure cleanup -- I have no idea how
important softdirty tracking on shmem is.
This patch (of 2):
uffd_wp_range() currently calculates page protection manually using
vm_get_page_prot(). This will ignore any other reason for active
writenotify: one mechanism applicable to shmem is softdirty tracking.
For example, the following sequence
1) Write to mapped shmem page
2) Clear softdirty
3) Register uffd-wp covering the mapped page
4) Unregister uffd-wp covering the mapped page
5) Write to page again
will not set the modified page softdirty, because uffd_wp_range() will
ignore that writenotify is required for softdirty tracking and simply map
the page writable again using change_protection(). Similarly, instead of
unregistering, protecting followed by un-protecting the page using uffd-wp
would result in the same situation.
Now that we enable writenotify whenever enabling uffd-wp on a VMA,
vma->vm_page_prot will already properly reflect our requirements: the
default is to write-protect all PTEs. However, for shared mappings we
would now not remap the PTEs writable if possible when unprotecting, just
like for private mappings (COW). To compensate, set
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE just like mprotect() does to try mapping
individual PTEs writable.
For private mappings, this change implies that we will now always try
setting PTEs writable when un-protecting, just like when upgrading write
permissions using mprotect(), which is an improvement.
For shared mappings, we will only set PTEs writable if
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() indicates that it's
ok. For ordinary shmem, this will be the case when PTEs are dirty, which
should usually be the case -- otherwise we could special-case shmem in
can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() easily, because shmem
itself doesn't require writenotify.
Note that hugetlb does not yet implement MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE, so we
won't try setting PTEs writable when unprotecting or when unregistering
uffd-wp. This can be added later on top by implementing
MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE.
While commit ffd05793963a ("userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for
userfault vma range") introduced that code, it should only be applicable
to uffd-wp on shared mappings -- shmem (hugetlb does not support softdirty
tracking). I don't think this corner cases justifies to cc stable. Let's
just handle it correctly and prepare for change_protection() cleanups.
[david@redhat.com: o need for additional harmless checks if we're wr-protecting either way]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/71412742-a71f-9c74-865f-773ad83db7a5@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-2-david@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-12-23 18:56:15 +03:00
/*
* vma - > vm_page_prot already reflects that uffd - wp is enabled for this
* VMA ( see userfaultfd_set_vm_flags ( ) ) and that all PTEs are supposed
* to be write - protected as default whenever protection changes .
* Try upgrading write permissions manually .
*/
if ( ! enable_wp & & vma_wants_manual_pte_write_upgrade ( dst_vma ) )
mm_cp_flags | = MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE ;
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
tlb_gather_mmu ( & tlb , dst_vma - > vm_mm ) ;
mm/uffd: detect pgtable allocation failures
Before this patch, when there's any pgtable allocation issues happened
during change_protection(), the error will be ignored from the syscall.
For shmem, there will be an error dumped into the host dmesg. Two issues
with that:
(1) Doing a trace dump when allocation fails is not anything close to
grace.
(2) The user should be notified with any kind of such error, so the user
can trap it and decide what to do next, either by retrying, or stop
the process properly, or anything else.
For userfault users, this will change the API of UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT when
pgtable allocation failure happened. It should not normally break anyone,
though. If it breaks, then in good ways.
One man-page update will be on the way to introduce the new -ENOMEM for
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT. Not marking stable so we keep the old behavior on
the 5.19-till-now kernels.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104225207.1066932-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-01-05 01:52:07 +03:00
ret = change_protection ( & tlb , dst_vma , start , start + len , mm_cp_flags ) ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
tlb_finish_mmu ( & tlb ) ;
mm/uffd: detect pgtable allocation failures
Before this patch, when there's any pgtable allocation issues happened
during change_protection(), the error will be ignored from the syscall.
For shmem, there will be an error dumped into the host dmesg. Two issues
with that:
(1) Doing a trace dump when allocation fails is not anything close to
grace.
(2) The user should be notified with any kind of such error, so the user
can trap it and decide what to do next, either by retrying, or stop
the process properly, or anything else.
For userfault users, this will change the API of UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT when
pgtable allocation failure happened. It should not normally break anyone,
though. If it breaks, then in good ways.
One man-page update will be on the way to introduce the new -ENOMEM for
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT. Not marking stable so we keep the old behavior on
the 5.19-till-now kernels.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104225207.1066932-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-01-05 01:52:07 +03:00
return ret ;
mm/uffd: reset write protection when unregister with wp-mode
The motivation of this patch comes from a recent report and patchfix from
David Hildenbrand on hugetlb shared handling of wr-protected page [1].
With the reproducer provided in commit message of [1], one can leverage
the uffd-wp lazy-reset of ptes to trigger a hugetlb issue which can affect
not only the attacker process, but also the whole system.
The lazy-reset mechanism of uffd-wp was used to make unregister faster,
meanwhile it has an assumption that any leftover pgtable entries should
only affect the process on its own, so not only the user should be aware
of anything it does, but also it should not affect outside of the process.
But it seems that this is not true, and it can also be utilized to make
some exploit easier.
So far there's no clue showing that the lazy-reset is important to any
userfaultfd users because normally the unregister will only happen once
for a specific range of memory of the lifecycle of the process.
Considering all above, what this patch proposes is to do explicit pte
resets when unregister an uffd region with wr-protect mode enabled.
It should be the same as calling ioctl(UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, wp=false)
right before ioctl(UFFDIO_UNREGISTER) for the user. So potentially it'll
make the unregister slower. From that pov it's a very slight abi change,
but hopefully nothing should break with this change either.
Regarding to the change itself - core of uffd write [un]protect operation
is moved into a separate function (uffd_wp_range()) and it is reused in
the unregister code path.
Note that the new function will not check for anything, e.g. ranges or
memory types, because they should have been checked during the previous
UFFDIO_REGISTER or it should have failed already. It also doesn't check
mmap_changing because we're with mmap write lock held anyway.
I added a Fixes upon introducing of uffd-wp shmem+hugetlbfs because that's
the only issue reported so far and that's the commit David's reproducer
will start working (v5.19+). But the whole idea actually applies to not
only file memories but also anonymous. It's just that we don't need to
fix anonymous prior to v5.19- because there's no known way to exploit.
IOW, this patch can also fix the issue reported in [1] as the patch 2 does.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220811103435.188481-3-david@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220811201340.39342-1-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b1f9e876862d ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-08-11 23:13:40 +03:00
}
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
int mwriteprotect_range ( struct mm_struct * dst_mm , unsigned long start ,
2021-09-03 00:58:56 +03:00
unsigned long len , bool enable_wp ,
atomic_t * mmap_changing )
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
{
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
unsigned long end = start + len ;
unsigned long _start , _end ;
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
struct vm_area_struct * dst_vma ;
2022-05-13 06:22:54 +03:00
unsigned long page_mask ;
mm/uffd: detect pgtable allocation failures
Before this patch, when there's any pgtable allocation issues happened
during change_protection(), the error will be ignored from the syscall.
For shmem, there will be an error dumped into the host dmesg. Two issues
with that:
(1) Doing a trace dump when allocation fails is not anything close to
grace.
(2) The user should be notified with any kind of such error, so the user
can trap it and decide what to do next, either by retrying, or stop
the process properly, or anything else.
For userfault users, this will change the API of UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT when
pgtable allocation failure happened. It should not normally break anyone,
though. If it breaks, then in good ways.
One man-page update will be on the way to introduce the new -ENOMEM for
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT. Not marking stable so we keep the old behavior on
the 5.19-till-now kernels.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104225207.1066932-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-01-05 01:52:07 +03:00
long err ;
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
VMA_ITERATOR ( vmi , dst_mm , start ) ;
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
/*
* Sanitize the command parameters :
*/
BUG_ON ( start & ~ PAGE_MASK ) ;
BUG_ON ( len & ~ PAGE_MASK ) ;
/* Does the address range wrap, or is the span zero-sized? */
BUG_ON ( start + len < = start ) ;
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_lock ( dst_mm ) ;
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
/*
* If memory mappings are changing because of non - cooperative
* operation ( e . g . mremap ) running in parallel , bail out and
* request the user to retry later
*/
err = - EAGAIN ;
2021-09-03 00:58:56 +03:00
if ( mmap_changing & & atomic_read ( mmap_changing ) )
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
goto out_unlock ;
err = - ENOENT ;
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
for_each_vma_range ( vmi , dst_vma , end ) {
2022-05-13 06:22:56 +03:00
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
if ( ! userfaultfd_wp ( dst_vma ) ) {
err = - ENOENT ;
break ;
}
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
if ( is_vm_hugetlb_page ( dst_vma ) ) {
err = - EINVAL ;
page_mask = vma_kernel_pagesize ( dst_vma ) - 1 ;
if ( ( start & page_mask ) | | ( len & page_mask ) )
break ;
}
2022-05-13 06:22:54 +03:00
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
_start = max ( dst_vma - > vm_start , start ) ;
_end = min ( dst_vma - > vm_end , end ) ;
mm/uffd: detect pgtable allocation failures
Before this patch, when there's any pgtable allocation issues happened
during change_protection(), the error will be ignored from the syscall.
For shmem, there will be an error dumped into the host dmesg. Two issues
with that:
(1) Doing a trace dump when allocation fails is not anything close to
grace.
(2) The user should be notified with any kind of such error, so the user
can trap it and decide what to do next, either by retrying, or stop
the process properly, or anything else.
For userfault users, this will change the API of UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT when
pgtable allocation failure happened. It should not normally break anyone,
though. If it breaks, then in good ways.
One man-page update will be on the way to introduce the new -ENOMEM for
UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT. Not marking stable so we keep the old behavior on
the 5.19-till-now kernels.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230104225207.1066932-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Acked-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-01-05 01:52:07 +03:00
2023-03-15 01:12:48 +03:00
err = uffd_wp_range ( dst_vma , _start , _end - _start , enable_wp ) ;
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
2023-02-17 13:55:58 +03:00
/* Return 0 on success, <0 on failures */
if ( err < 0 )
break ;
err = 0 ;
}
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
out_unlock :
2020-06-09 07:33:25 +03:00
mmap_read_unlock ( dst_mm ) ;
2020-04-07 06:06:09 +03:00
return err ;
}