iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
0f363b250b
linux/arch/x86/lib/rwsem.S

137 lines
3.6 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
/*
* x86 semaphore implementation.
*
* (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds
*
* Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
*/
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
#include <asm/dwarf2.h>
#define __ASM_HALF_REG(reg) __ASM_SEL(reg, e##reg)
#define __ASM_HALF_SIZE(inst) __ASM_SEL(inst##w, inst##l)
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/*
* The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that
* allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines
* need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when
* there is contention on the semaphore.
*
* %eax contains the semaphore pointer on entry. Save the C-clobbered
* registers (%eax, %edx and %ecx) except %eax whish is either a return
* value or just clobbered..
*/
#define save_common_regs \
pushl_cfi %ecx; CFI_REL_OFFSET ecx, 0
#define restore_common_regs \
popl_cfi %ecx; CFI_RESTORE ecx
/* Avoid uglifying the argument copying x86-64 needs to do. */
.macro movq src, dst
.endm
#else
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
/*
* x86-64 rwsem wrappers
*
* This interfaces the inline asm code to the slow-path
* C routines. We need to save the call-clobbered regs
* that the asm does not mark as clobbered, and move the
* argument from %rax to %rdi.
*
* NOTE! We don't need to save %rax, because the functions
* will always return the semaphore pointer in %rax (which
* is also the input argument to these helpers)
*
* The following can clobber %rdx because the asm clobbers it:
* call_rwsem_down_write_failed
* call_rwsem_wake
* but %rdi, %rsi, %rcx, %r8-r11 always need saving.
*/
#define save_common_regs \
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
pushq_cfi %rdi; CFI_REL_OFFSET rdi, 0; \
pushq_cfi %rsi; CFI_REL_OFFSET rsi, 0; \
pushq_cfi %rcx; CFI_REL_OFFSET rcx, 0; \
pushq_cfi %r8; CFI_REL_OFFSET r8, 0; \
pushq_cfi %r9; CFI_REL_OFFSET r9, 0; \
pushq_cfi %r10; CFI_REL_OFFSET r10, 0; \
pushq_cfi %r11; CFI_REL_OFFSET r11, 0
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
#define restore_common_regs \
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
popq_cfi %r11; CFI_RESTORE r11; \
popq_cfi %r10; CFI_RESTORE r10; \
popq_cfi %r9; CFI_RESTORE r9; \
popq_cfi %r8; CFI_RESTORE r8; \
popq_cfi %rcx; CFI_RESTORE rcx; \
popq_cfi %rsi; CFI_RESTORE rsi; \
popq_cfi %rdi; CFI_RESTORE rdi
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
#endif
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
/* Fix up special calling conventions */
ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_STARTPROC
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
save_common_regs
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
__ASM_SIZE(push,_cfi) %__ASM_REG(dx)
CFI_REL_OFFSET __ASM_REG(dx), 0
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
movq %rax,%rdi
call rwsem_down_read_failed
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
__ASM_SIZE(pop,_cfi) %__ASM_REG(dx)
CFI_RESTORE __ASM_REG(dx)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
restore_common_regs
ret
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_read_failed)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
ENTRY(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_STARTPROC
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
save_common_regs
movq %rax,%rdi
call rwsem_down_write_failed
restore_common_regs
ret
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(call_rwsem_down_write_failed)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
ENTRY(call_rwsem_wake)
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_STARTPROC
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
/* do nothing if still outstanding active readers */
__ASM_HALF_SIZE(dec) %__ASM_HALF_REG(dx)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
jnz 1f
save_common_regs
movq %rax,%rdi
call rwsem_wake
restore_common_regs
1: ret
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(call_rwsem_wake)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
ENTRY(call_rwsem_downgrade_wake)
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_STARTPROC
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
save_common_regs
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
__ASM_SIZE(push,_cfi) %__ASM_REG(dx)
CFI_REL_OFFSET __ASM_REG(dx), 0
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
movq %rax,%rdi
call rwsem_downgrade_wake
x86: Unify rwsem assembly implementation Rather than having two functionally identical implementations for 32- and 64-bit configurations, use the previously extended assembly abstractions to fold the rwsem two implementations into a shared one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E258DF3020000780004E3ED@nat28.tlf.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-19 16:00:19 +04:00
__ASM_SIZE(pop,_cfi) %__ASM_REG(dx)
CFI_RESTORE __ASM_REG(dx)
x86-64: support native xadd rwsem implementation This one is much faster than the spinlock based fallback rwsem code, with certain artifical benchmarks having shown 300%+ improvement on threaded page faults etc. Again, note the 32767-thread limit here. So this really does need that whole "make rwsem_count_t be 64-bit and fix the BIAS values to match" extension on top of it, but that is conceptually a totally independent issue. NOT TESTED! The original patch that this all was based on were tested by KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, but maybe I screwed up something when I created the cleaned-up series, so caveat emptor.. Also note that it _may_ be a good idea to mark some more registers clobbered on x86-64 in the inline asms instead of saving/restoring them. They are inline functions, but they are only used in places where there are not a lot of live registers _anyway_, so doing for example the clobbers of %r8-%r11 in the asm wouldn't make the fast-path code any worse, and would make the slow-path code smaller. (Not that the slow-path really matters to that degree. Saving a few unnecessary registers is the _least_ of our problems when we hit the slow path. The instruction/cycle counting really only matters in the fast path). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001121810410.17145@localhost.localdomain> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2010-01-13 05:16:42 +03:00
restore_common_regs
ret
x86-64: Add CFI annotations to lib/rwsem_64.S These weren't part of the initial commit of this code. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm> LKML-Reference: <4D6BCDFF02000078000341B0@vpn.id2.novell.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-02-28 18:31:59 +03:00
CFI_ENDPROC
ENDPROC(call_rwsem_downgrade_wake)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink