iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux/arch/arm64/lib/crc32.S

161 lines
2.8 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500 Based on 2 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation # extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-04 10:11:33 +02:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
/*
* Accelerated CRC32(C) using AArch64 CRC instructions
*
* Copyright (C) 2016 - 2018 Linaro Ltd <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
*/
#include <linux/linkage.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/assembler.h>
arm64: lib: Consistently enable crc32 extension Currently most of the assembly files that use architecture extensions enable them using the .arch directive but crc32.S uses .cpu instead. Move that over to .arch for consistency. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414182843.31664-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-04-14 19:28:43 +01:00
.arch armv8-a+crc
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
.macro byteorder, reg, be
.if \be
CPU_LE( rev \reg, \reg )
.else
CPU_BE( rev \reg, \reg )
.endif
.endm
.macro byteorder16, reg, be
.if \be
CPU_LE( rev16 \reg, \reg )
.else
CPU_BE( rev16 \reg, \reg )
.endif
.endm
.macro bitorder, reg, be
.if \be
rbit \reg, \reg
.endif
.endm
.macro bitorder16, reg, be
.if \be
rbit \reg, \reg
lsr \reg, \reg, #16
.endif
.endm
.macro bitorder8, reg, be
.if \be
rbit \reg, \reg
lsr \reg, \reg, #24
.endif
.endm
.macro __crc32, c, be=0
bitorder w0, \be
arm64/lib: improve CRC32 performance for deep pipelines Improve the performance of the crc32() asm routines by getting rid of most of the branches and small sized loads on the common path. Instead, use a branchless code path involving overlapping 16 byte loads to process the first (length % 32) bytes, and process the remainder using a loop that processes 32 bytes at a time. Tested using the following test program: #include <stdlib.h> extern void crc32_le(unsigned short, char const*, int); int main(void) { static const char buf[4096]; srand(20181126); for (int i = 0; i < 100 * 1000 * 1000; i++) crc32_le(0, buf, rand() % 1024); return 0; } On Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57, the performance regresses but only very slightly. On Cortex-A72 however, the performance improves from $ time ./crc32 real 0m10.149s user 0m10.149s sys 0m0.000s to $ time ./crc32 real 0m7.915s user 0m7.915s sys 0m0.000s Cc: Rui Sun <sunrui26@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-11-27 18:42:55 +01:00
cmp x2, #16
b.lt 8f // less than 16 bytes
and x7, x2, #0x1f
and x2, x2, #~0x1f
cbz x7, 32f // multiple of 32 bytes
and x8, x7, #0xf
ldp x3, x4, [x1]
add x8, x8, x1
add x1, x1, x7
ldp x5, x6, [x8]
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
byteorder x3, \be
byteorder x4, \be
byteorder x5, \be
byteorder x6, \be
bitorder x3, \be
bitorder x4, \be
bitorder x5, \be
bitorder x6, \be
arm64/lib: improve CRC32 performance for deep pipelines Improve the performance of the crc32() asm routines by getting rid of most of the branches and small sized loads on the common path. Instead, use a branchless code path involving overlapping 16 byte loads to process the first (length % 32) bytes, and process the remainder using a loop that processes 32 bytes at a time. Tested using the following test program: #include <stdlib.h> extern void crc32_le(unsigned short, char const*, int); int main(void) { static const char buf[4096]; srand(20181126); for (int i = 0; i < 100 * 1000 * 1000; i++) crc32_le(0, buf, rand() % 1024); return 0; } On Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57, the performance regresses but only very slightly. On Cortex-A72 however, the performance improves from $ time ./crc32 real 0m10.149s user 0m10.149s sys 0m0.000s to $ time ./crc32 real 0m7.915s user 0m7.915s sys 0m0.000s Cc: Rui Sun <sunrui26@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-11-27 18:42:55 +01:00
tst x7, #8
crc32\c\()x w8, w0, x3
csel x3, x3, x4, eq
csel w0, w0, w8, eq
tst x7, #4
lsr x4, x3, #32
crc32\c\()w w8, w0, w3
csel x3, x3, x4, eq
csel w0, w0, w8, eq
tst x7, #2
lsr w4, w3, #16
crc32\c\()h w8, w0, w3
csel w3, w3, w4, eq
csel w0, w0, w8, eq
tst x7, #1
crc32\c\()b w8, w0, w3
csel w0, w0, w8, eq
tst x7, #16
crc32\c\()x w8, w0, x5
crc32\c\()x w8, w8, x6
csel w0, w0, w8, eq
cbz x2, 0f
32: ldp x3, x4, [x1], #32
sub x2, x2, #32
ldp x5, x6, [x1, #-16]
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
byteorder x3, \be
byteorder x4, \be
byteorder x5, \be
byteorder x6, \be
bitorder x3, \be
bitorder x4, \be
bitorder x5, \be
bitorder x6, \be
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
crc32\c\()x w0, w0, x3
crc32\c\()x w0, w0, x4
arm64/lib: improve CRC32 performance for deep pipelines Improve the performance of the crc32() asm routines by getting rid of most of the branches and small sized loads on the common path. Instead, use a branchless code path involving overlapping 16 byte loads to process the first (length % 32) bytes, and process the remainder using a loop that processes 32 bytes at a time. Tested using the following test program: #include <stdlib.h> extern void crc32_le(unsigned short, char const*, int); int main(void) { static const char buf[4096]; srand(20181126); for (int i = 0; i < 100 * 1000 * 1000; i++) crc32_le(0, buf, rand() % 1024); return 0; } On Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57, the performance regresses but only very slightly. On Cortex-A72 however, the performance improves from $ time ./crc32 real 0m10.149s user 0m10.149s sys 0m0.000s to $ time ./crc32 real 0m7.915s user 0m7.915s sys 0m0.000s Cc: Rui Sun <sunrui26@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-11-27 18:42:55 +01:00
crc32\c\()x w0, w0, x5
crc32\c\()x w0, w0, x6
cbnz x2, 32b
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
0: bitorder w0, \be
ret
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
8: tbz x2, #3, 4f
ldr x3, [x1], #8
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
byteorder x3, \be
bitorder x3, \be
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
crc32\c\()x w0, w0, x3
4: tbz x2, #2, 2f
ldr w3, [x1], #4
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
byteorder w3, \be
bitorder w3, \be
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
crc32\c\()w w0, w0, w3
2: tbz x2, #1, 1f
ldrh w3, [x1], #2
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
byteorder16 w3, \be
bitorder16 w3, \be
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
crc32\c\()h w0, w0, w3
1: tbz x2, #0, 0f
ldrb w3, [x1]
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
bitorder8 w3, \be
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
crc32\c\()b w0, w0, w3
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
0: bitorder w0, \be
ret
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
.endm
.align 5
arm64: lib: Use modern annotations for assembly functions In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously had no ENTRY equivalent. Update the annotations in the library code to the new macros. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [will: Use SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-01-06 19:58:17 +00:00
SYM_FUNC_START(crc32_le)
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_CRC32
b crc32_le_base
alternative_else_nop_endif
__crc32
arm64: lib: Use modern annotations for assembly functions In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously had no ENTRY equivalent. Update the annotations in the library code to the new macros. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [will: Use SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-01-06 19:58:17 +00:00
SYM_FUNC_END(crc32_le)
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
.align 5
arm64: lib: Use modern annotations for assembly functions In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously had no ENTRY equivalent. Update the annotations in the library code to the new macros. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [will: Use SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-01-06 19:58:17 +00:00
SYM_FUNC_START(__crc32c_le)
arm64/lib: add accelerated crc32 routines Unlike crc32c(), which is wired up to the crypto API internally so the optimal driver is selected based on the platform's capabilities, crc32_le() is implemented as a library function using a slice-by-8 table based C implementation. Even though few of the call sites may be bottlenecks, calling a time variant implementation with a non-negligible D-cache footprint is a bit of a waste, given that ARMv8.1 and up mandates support for the CRC32 instructions that were optional in ARMv8.0, but are already widely available, even on the Cortex-A53 based Raspberry Pi. So implement routines that use these instructions if available, and fall back to the existing generic routines otherwise. The selection is based on alternatives patching. Note that this unconditionally selects CONFIG_CRC32 as a builtin. Since CRC32 is relied upon by core functionality such as CONFIG_OF_FLATTREE, this just codifies the status quo. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2018-08-27 13:02:44 +02:00
alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_CRC32
b __crc32c_le_base
alternative_else_nop_endif
__crc32 c
arm64: lib: Use modern annotations for assembly functions In an effort to clarify and simplify the annotation of assembly functions in the kernel new macros have been introduced. These replace ENTRY and ENDPROC and also add a new annotation for static functions which previously had no ENTRY equivalent. Update the annotations in the library code to the new macros. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [will: Use SYM_FUNC_START_WEAK_PI] Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-01-06 19:58:17 +00:00
SYM_FUNC_END(__crc32c_le)
arm64: lib: accelerate crc32_be It makes no sense to leave crc32_be using the generic code while we only accelerate the little-endian ops. Even though the big-endian form doesn't fit as smoothly into the arm64, we can speed it up and avoid hitting the D cache. Tested on Cortex-A53. Without acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 192240 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21360 nsec With acceleration: crc32: CRC_LE_BITS = 64, CRC_BE BITS = 64 crc32: self tests passed, processed 225944 bytes in 53480 nsec crc32c: CRC_LE_BITS = 64 crc32c: self tests passed, processed 112972 bytes in 21480 nsec Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2022-01-18 12:23:51 +02:00
.align 5
SYM_FUNC_START(crc32_be)
alternative_if_not ARM64_HAS_CRC32
b crc32_be_base
alternative_else_nop_endif
__crc32 be=1
SYM_FUNC_END(crc32_be)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink