linux/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c

1710 lines
45 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Stress userfaultfd syscall.
*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Red Hat, Inc.
*
* This test allocates two virtual areas and bounces the physical
* memory across the two virtual areas (from area_src to area_dst)
* using userfaultfd.
*
* There are three threads running per CPU:
*
* 1) one per-CPU thread takes a per-page pthread_mutex in a random
* page of the area_dst (while the physical page may still be in
* area_src), and increments a per-page counter in the same page,
* and checks its value against a verification region.
*
* 2) another per-CPU thread handles the userfaults generated by
* thread 1 above. userfaultfd blocking reads or poll() modes are
* exercised interleaved.
*
* 3) one last per-CPU thread transfers the memory in the background
* at maximum bandwidth (if not already transferred by thread
* 2). Each cpu thread takes cares of transferring a portion of the
* area.
*
* When all threads of type 3 completed the transfer, one bounce is
* complete. area_src and area_dst are then swapped. All threads are
* respawned and so the bounce is immediately restarted in the
* opposite direction.
*
* per-CPU threads 1 by triggering userfaults inside
* pthread_mutex_lock will also verify the atomicity of the memory
* transfer (UFFDIO_COPY).
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <poll.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
#include <assert.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <sys/random.h>
#include "../kselftest.h"
#ifdef __NR_userfaultfd
static unsigned long nr_cpus, nr_pages, nr_pages_per_cpu, page_size;
#define BOUNCE_RANDOM (1<<0)
#define BOUNCE_RACINGFAULTS (1<<1)
#define BOUNCE_VERIFY (1<<2)
#define BOUNCE_POLL (1<<3)
static int bounces;
#define TEST_ANON 1
#define TEST_HUGETLB 2
#define TEST_SHMEM 3
static int test_type;
/* exercise the test_uffdio_*_eexist every ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS */
#define ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS 10
static volatile bool test_uffdio_copy_eexist = true;
static volatile bool test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist = true;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/* Whether to test uffd write-protection */
static bool test_uffdio_wp = false;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
/* Whether to test uffd minor faults */
static bool test_uffdio_minor = false;
static bool map_shared;
userfaultfd/selftests: use memfd_create for shmem test type This is a preparatory commit. In the future, we want to be able to setup alias mappings for area_src and area_dst in the shmem test, like we do in the hugetlb_shared test. With a VMA obtained via mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED), it isn't clear how to do this. So, mmap() with an fd, so we can create alias mappings. Use memfd_create instead of actually passing in a tmpfs path like hugetlb does, since it's more convenient / simpler to run, and works just as well. Future commits will: 1. Setup the alias mappings. 2. Extend our tests to actually take advantage of this, to test new userfaultfd behavior being introduced in this series. Also, a small fix in the area we're changing: when the hugetlb setup fails in main(), pass in the right argv[] so we actually print out the hugetlb file path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-8-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:34 -07:00
static int shm_fd;
static int huge_fd;
static char *huge_fd_off0;
static unsigned long long *count_verify;
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
static int uffd = -1;
static int uffd_flags, finished, *pipefd;
static char *area_src, *area_src_alias, *area_dst, *area_dst_alias;
static char *zeropage;
pthread_attr_t attr;
/* Userfaultfd test statistics */
struct uffd_stats {
int cpu;
unsigned long missing_faults;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
unsigned long wp_faults;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
unsigned long minor_faults;
};
/* pthread_mutex_t starts at page offset 0 */
#define area_mutex(___area, ___nr) \
((pthread_mutex_t *) ((___area) + (___nr)*page_size))
/*
* count is placed in the page after pthread_mutex_t naturally aligned
* to avoid non alignment faults on non-x86 archs.
*/
#define area_count(___area, ___nr) \
((volatile unsigned long long *) ((unsigned long) \
((___area) + (___nr)*page_size + \
sizeof(pthread_mutex_t) + \
sizeof(unsigned long long) - 1) & \
~(unsigned long)(sizeof(unsigned long long) \
- 1)))
const char *examples =
"# Run anonymous memory test on 100MiB region with 99999 bounces:\n"
"./userfaultfd anon 100 99999\n\n"
"# Run share memory test on 1GiB region with 99 bounces:\n"
"./userfaultfd shmem 1000 99\n\n"
"# Run hugetlb memory test on 256MiB region with 50 bounces (using /dev/hugepages/hugefile):\n"
"./userfaultfd hugetlb 256 50 /dev/hugepages/hugefile\n\n"
"# Run the same hugetlb test but using shmem:\n"
"./userfaultfd hugetlb_shared 256 50 /dev/hugepages/hugefile\n\n"
"# 10MiB-~6GiB 999 bounces anonymous test, "
"continue forever unless an error triggers\n"
"while ./userfaultfd anon $[RANDOM % 6000 + 10] 999; do true; done\n\n";
static void usage(void)
{
fprintf(stderr, "\nUsage: ./userfaultfd <test type> <MiB> <bounces> "
"[hugetlbfs_file]\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, "Supported <test type>: anon, hugetlb, "
"hugetlb_shared, shmem\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, "Examples:\n\n");
fprintf(stderr, "%s", examples);
exit(1);
}
#define _err(fmt, ...) \
do { \
int ret = errno; \
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
fprintf(stderr, " (errno=%d, line=%d)\n", \
ret, __LINE__); \
} while (0)
#define err(fmt, ...) \
do { \
_err(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
exit(1); \
} while (0)
static void uffd_stats_reset(struct uffd_stats *uffd_stats,
unsigned long n_cpus)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++) {
uffd_stats[i].cpu = i;
uffd_stats[i].missing_faults = 0;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
uffd_stats[i].wp_faults = 0;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
uffd_stats[i].minor_faults = 0;
}
}
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
static void uffd_stats_report(struct uffd_stats *stats, int n_cpus)
{
int i;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
unsigned long long miss_total = 0, wp_total = 0, minor_total = 0;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++) {
miss_total += stats[i].missing_faults;
wp_total += stats[i].wp_faults;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
minor_total += stats[i].minor_faults;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
}
printf("userfaults: ");
if (miss_total) {
printf("%llu missing (", miss_total);
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
printf("%lu+", stats[i].missing_faults);
printf("\b) ");
}
if (wp_total) {
printf("%llu wp (", wp_total);
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
printf("%lu+", stats[i].wp_faults);
printf("\b) ");
}
if (minor_total) {
printf("%llu minor (", minor_total);
for (i = 0; i < n_cpus; i++)
printf("%lu+", stats[i].minor_faults);
printf("\b)");
}
printf("\n");
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
}
static void anon_release_pages(char *rel_area)
{
if (madvise(rel_area, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_DONTNEED))
err("madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) failed");
}
static void anon_allocate_area(void **alloc_area)
{
2021-07-23 15:50:04 -07:00
*alloc_area = mmap(NULL, nr_pages * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
if (*alloc_area == MAP_FAILED)
err("mmap of anonymous memory failed");
}
static void noop_alias_mapping(__u64 *start, size_t len, unsigned long offset)
{
}
static void hugetlb_release_pages(char *rel_area)
{
if (fallocate(huge_fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE,
rel_area == huge_fd_off0 ? 0 : nr_pages * page_size,
nr_pages * page_size))
err("fallocate() failed");
}
static void hugetlb_allocate_area(void **alloc_area)
{
void *area_alias = NULL;
char **alloc_area_alias;
*alloc_area = mmap(NULL, nr_pages * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
(map_shared ? MAP_SHARED : MAP_PRIVATE) |
MAP_HUGETLB |
userfaultfd/selftests: fix hugetlb area allocations Currently, userfaultfd selftest for hugetlb as run from run_vmtests.sh or any environment where there are 'just enough' hugetlb pages will always fail with: testing events (fork, remap, remove): ERROR: UFFDIO_COPY error: -12 (errno=12, line=616) The ENOMEM error code implies there are not enough hugetlb pages. However, there are free hugetlb pages but they are all reserved. There is a basic problem with the way the test allocates hugetlb pages which has existed since the test was originally written. Due to the way 'cleanup' was done between different phases of the test, this issue was masked until recently. The issue was uncovered by commit 8ba6e8640844 ("userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test"). For the hugetlb test, src and dst areas are allocated as PRIVATE mappings of a hugetlb file. This means that at mmap time, pages are reserved for the src and dst areas. At the start of event testing (and other tests) the src area is populated which results in allocation of huge pages to fill the area and consumption of reserves associated with the area. Then, a child is forked to fault in the dst area. Note that the dst area was allocated in the parent and hence the parent owns the reserves associated with the mapping. The child has normal access to the dst area, but can not use the reserves created/owned by the parent. Thus, if there are no other huge pages available allocation of a page for the dst by the child will fail. Fix by not creating reserves for the dst area. In this way the child can use free (non-reserved) pages. Also, MAP_PRIVATE of a file only makes sense if you are interested in the contents of the file before making a COW copy. The test does not do this. So, just use MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB to create an anonymous hugetlb mapping. There is no need to create a hugetlb file in the non-shared case. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211217172919.7861-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-12-30 20:12:31 -08:00
(*alloc_area == area_src ? 0 : MAP_NORESERVE),
huge_fd, *alloc_area == area_src ? 0 :
nr_pages * page_size);
if (*alloc_area == MAP_FAILED)
err("mmap of hugetlbfs file failed");
if (map_shared) {
area_alias = mmap(NULL, nr_pages * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED | MAP_HUGETLB,
huge_fd, *alloc_area == area_src ? 0 :
nr_pages * page_size);
if (area_alias == MAP_FAILED)
err("mmap of hugetlb file alias failed");
}
if (*alloc_area == area_src) {
huge_fd_off0 = *alloc_area;
alloc_area_alias = &area_src_alias;
} else {
alloc_area_alias = &area_dst_alias;
}
if (area_alias)
*alloc_area_alias = area_alias;
}
static void hugetlb_alias_mapping(__u64 *start, size_t len, unsigned long offset)
{
if (!map_shared)
return;
/*
* We can't zap just the pagetable with hugetlbfs because
* MADV_DONTEED won't work. So exercise -EEXIST on a alias
* mapping where the pagetables are not established initially,
* this way we'll exercise the -EEXEC at the fs level.
*/
*start = (unsigned long) area_dst_alias + offset;
}
static void shmem_release_pages(char *rel_area)
{
if (madvise(rel_area, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_REMOVE))
err("madvise(MADV_REMOVE) failed");
}
static void shmem_allocate_area(void **alloc_area)
{
void *area_alias = NULL;
bool is_src = alloc_area == (void **)&area_src;
unsigned long offset = is_src ? 0 : nr_pages * page_size;
userfaultfd/selftests: use memfd_create for shmem test type This is a preparatory commit. In the future, we want to be able to setup alias mappings for area_src and area_dst in the shmem test, like we do in the hugetlb_shared test. With a VMA obtained via mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED), it isn't clear how to do this. So, mmap() with an fd, so we can create alias mappings. Use memfd_create instead of actually passing in a tmpfs path like hugetlb does, since it's more convenient / simpler to run, and works just as well. Future commits will: 1. Setup the alias mappings. 2. Extend our tests to actually take advantage of this, to test new userfaultfd behavior being introduced in this series. Also, a small fix in the area we're changing: when the hugetlb setup fails in main(), pass in the right argv[] so we actually print out the hugetlb file path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-8-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:34 -07:00
*alloc_area = mmap(NULL, nr_pages * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
userfaultfd/selftests: use memfd_create for shmem test type This is a preparatory commit. In the future, we want to be able to setup alias mappings for area_src and area_dst in the shmem test, like we do in the hugetlb_shared test. With a VMA obtained via mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED), it isn't clear how to do this. So, mmap() with an fd, so we can create alias mappings. Use memfd_create instead of actually passing in a tmpfs path like hugetlb does, since it's more convenient / simpler to run, and works just as well. Future commits will: 1. Setup the alias mappings. 2. Extend our tests to actually take advantage of this, to test new userfaultfd behavior being introduced in this series. Also, a small fix in the area we're changing: when the hugetlb setup fails in main(), pass in the right argv[] so we actually print out the hugetlb file path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-8-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:34 -07:00
MAP_SHARED, shm_fd, offset);
if (*alloc_area == MAP_FAILED)
err("mmap of memfd failed");
area_alias = mmap(NULL, nr_pages * page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, shm_fd, offset);
if (area_alias == MAP_FAILED)
err("mmap of memfd alias failed");
if (is_src)
area_src_alias = area_alias;
else
area_dst_alias = area_alias;
}
static void shmem_alias_mapping(__u64 *start, size_t len, unsigned long offset)
{
*start = (unsigned long)area_dst_alias + offset;
}
struct uffd_test_ops {
void (*allocate_area)(void **alloc_area);
void (*release_pages)(char *rel_area);
void (*alias_mapping)(__u64 *start, size_t len, unsigned long offset);
};
static struct uffd_test_ops anon_uffd_test_ops = {
.allocate_area = anon_allocate_area,
.release_pages = anon_release_pages,
.alias_mapping = noop_alias_mapping,
};
static struct uffd_test_ops shmem_uffd_test_ops = {
.allocate_area = shmem_allocate_area,
.release_pages = shmem_release_pages,
.alias_mapping = shmem_alias_mapping,
};
static struct uffd_test_ops hugetlb_uffd_test_ops = {
.allocate_area = hugetlb_allocate_area,
.release_pages = hugetlb_release_pages,
.alias_mapping = hugetlb_alias_mapping,
};
static struct uffd_test_ops *uffd_test_ops;
static inline uint64_t uffd_minor_feature(void)
{
if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB && map_shared)
return UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_HUGETLBFS;
else if (test_type == TEST_SHMEM)
return UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_SHMEM;
else
return 0;
}
static uint64_t get_expected_ioctls(uint64_t mode)
{
uint64_t ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS;
if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB)
ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE);
if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP) && test_uffdio_wp))
ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT);
if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR) && test_uffdio_minor))
ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE);
return ioctls;
}
static void assert_expected_ioctls_present(uint64_t mode, uint64_t ioctls)
{
uint64_t expected = get_expected_ioctls(mode);
uint64_t actual = ioctls & expected;
if (actual != expected) {
err("missing ioctl(s): expected %"PRIx64" actual: %"PRIx64,
expected, actual);
}
}
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
static void userfaultfd_open(uint64_t *features)
{
struct uffdio_api uffdio_api;
uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
if (uffd < 0)
err("userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel");
uffd_flags = fcntl(uffd, F_GETFD, NULL);
uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
uffdio_api.features = *features;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api))
err("UFFDIO_API failed.\nPlease make sure to "
"run with either root or ptrace capability.");
if (uffdio_api.api != UFFD_API)
err("UFFDIO_API error: %" PRIu64, (uint64_t)uffdio_api.api);
*features = uffdio_api.features;
}
static inline void munmap_area(void **area)
{
if (*area)
if (munmap(*area, nr_pages * page_size))
err("munmap");
*area = NULL;
}
static void uffd_test_ctx_clear(void)
{
size_t i;
if (pipefd) {
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus * 2; ++i) {
if (close(pipefd[i]))
err("close pipefd");
}
free(pipefd);
pipefd = NULL;
}
if (count_verify) {
free(count_verify);
count_verify = NULL;
}
if (uffd != -1) {
if (close(uffd))
err("close uffd");
uffd = -1;
}
huge_fd_off0 = NULL;
munmap_area((void **)&area_src);
munmap_area((void **)&area_src_alias);
munmap_area((void **)&area_dst);
munmap_area((void **)&area_dst_alias);
}
static void uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features)
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
{
unsigned long nr, cpu;
uffd_test_ctx_clear();
uffd_test_ops->allocate_area((void **)&area_src);
uffd_test_ops->allocate_area((void **)&area_dst);
userfaultfd_open(&features);
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
count_verify = malloc(nr_pages * sizeof(unsigned long long));
if (!count_verify)
err("count_verify");
for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr++) {
*area_mutex(area_src, nr) =
(pthread_mutex_t)PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
count_verify[nr] = *area_count(area_src, nr) = 1;
/*
* In the transition between 255 to 256, powerpc will
* read out of order in my_bcmp and see both bytes as
* zero, so leave a placeholder below always non-zero
* after the count, to avoid my_bcmp to trigger false
* positives.
*/
*(area_count(area_src, nr) + 1) = 1;
}
mm/userfaultfd: selftests: fix memory corruption with thp enabled In RHEL's gating selftests we've encountered memory corruption in the uffd event test even with upstream kernel: # ./userfaultfd anon 128 4 nr_pages: 32768, nr_pages_per_cpu: 32768 bounces: 3, mode: rnd racing read, userfaults: 6240 missing (6240) 14729 wp (14729) bounces: 2, mode: racing read, userfaults: 1444 missing (1444) 28877 wp (28877) bounces: 1, mode: rnd read, userfaults: 6055 missing (6055) 14699 wp (14699) bounces: 0, mode: read, userfaults: 82 missing (82) 25196 wp (25196) testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=4096): done testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=2097152): done testing events (fork, remap, remove): ERROR: nr 32427 memory corruption 0 1 (errno=0, line=963) ERROR: faulting process failed (errno=0, line=1117) It can be easily reproduced when global thp enabled, which is the default for RHEL. It's also known as a side effect of commit 0db282ba2c12 ("selftest: use mmap instead of posix_memalign to allocate memory", 2021-07-23), which is imho right itself on using mmap() to make sure the addresses will be untagged even on arm. The problem is, for each test we allocate buffers using two allocate_area() calls. We assumed these two buffers won't affect each other, however they could, because mmap() could have found that the two buffers are near each other and having the same VMA flags, so they got merged into one VMA. It won't be a big problem if thp is not enabled, but when thp is agressively enabled it means when initializing the src buffer it could accidentally setup part of the dest buffer too when there's a shared THP that overlaps the two regions. Then some of the dest buffer won't be able to be trapped by userfaultfd missing mode, then it'll cause memory corruption as described. To fix it, do release_pages() after initializing the src buffer. Since the previous two release_pages() calls are after uffd_test_ctx_clear() which will unmap all the buffers anyway (which is stronger than release pages; as unmap() also tear town pgtables), drop them as they shouldn't really be anything useful. We can mark the Fixes tag upon 0db282ba2c12 as it's reported to only happen there, however the real "Fixes" IMHO should be 8ba6e8640844, as before that commit we'll always do explicit release_pages() before registration of uffd, and 8ba6e8640844 changed that logic by adding extra unmap/map and we didn't release the pages at the right place. Meanwhile I don't have a solid glue anyway on whether posix_memalign() could always avoid triggering this bug, hence it's safer to attach this fix to commit 8ba6e8640844. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210923232512.210092-1-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: 8ba6e8640844 ("userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test") Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994931 Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reported-by: Li Wang <liwan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-10-18 15:15:22 -07:00
/*
* After initialization of area_src, we must explicitly release pages
* for area_dst to make sure it's fully empty. Otherwise we could have
* some area_dst pages be errornously initialized with zero pages,
* hence we could hit memory corruption later in the test.
*
* One example is when THP is globally enabled, above allocate_area()
* calls could have the two areas merged into a single VMA (as they
* will have the same VMA flags so they're mergeable). When we
* initialize the area_src above, it's possible that some part of
* area_dst could have been faulted in via one huge THP that will be
* shared between area_src and area_dst. It could cause some of the
* area_dst won't be trapped by missing userfaults.
*
* This release_pages() will guarantee even if that happened, we'll
* proactively split the thp and drop any accidentally initialized
* pages within area_dst.
*/
uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst);
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
pipefd = malloc(sizeof(int) * nr_cpus * 2);
if (!pipefd)
err("pipefd");
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++)
if (pipe2(&pipefd[cpu * 2], O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK))
err("pipe");
}
static int my_bcmp(char *str1, char *str2, size_t n)
{
unsigned long i;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (str1[i] != str2[i])
return 1;
return 0;
}
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
static void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp)
{
struct uffdio_writeprotect prms;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/* Write protection page faults */
prms.range.start = start;
prms.range.len = len;
/* Undo write-protect, do wakeup after that */
prms.mode = wp ? UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP : 0;
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT, &prms))
err("clear WP failed: address=0x%"PRIx64, (uint64_t)start);
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
}
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
static void continue_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len)
{
struct uffdio_continue req;
int ret;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
req.range.start = start;
req.range.len = len;
req.mode = 0;
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_CONTINUE, &req))
err("UFFDIO_CONTINUE failed for address 0x%" PRIx64,
(uint64_t)start);
/*
* Error handling within the kernel for continue is subtly different
* from copy or zeropage, so it may be a source of bugs. Trigger an
* error (-EEXIST) on purpose, to verify doing so doesn't cause a BUG.
*/
req.mapped = 0;
ret = ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_CONTINUE, &req);
if (ret >= 0 || req.mapped != -EEXIST)
err("failed to exercise UFFDIO_CONTINUE error handling, ret=%d, mapped=%" PRId64,
ret, (int64_t) req.mapped);
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
}
static void *locking_thread(void *arg)
{
unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) arg;
unsigned long page_nr = *(&(page_nr)); /* uninitialized warning */
unsigned long long count;
if (!(bounces & BOUNCE_RANDOM)) {
page_nr = -bounces;
if (!(bounces & BOUNCE_RACINGFAULTS))
page_nr += cpu * nr_pages_per_cpu;
}
while (!finished) {
if (bounces & BOUNCE_RANDOM) {
if (getrandom(&page_nr, sizeof(page_nr), 0) != sizeof(page_nr))
err("getrandom failed");
} else
page_nr += 1;
page_nr %= nr_pages;
pthread_mutex_lock(area_mutex(area_dst, page_nr));
count = *area_count(area_dst, page_nr);
if (count != count_verify[page_nr])
err("page_nr %lu memory corruption %llu %llu",
page_nr, count, count_verify[page_nr]);
count++;
*area_count(area_dst, page_nr) = count_verify[page_nr] = count;
pthread_mutex_unlock(area_mutex(area_dst, page_nr));
}
return NULL;
}
static void retry_copy_page(int ufd, struct uffdio_copy *uffdio_copy,
unsigned long offset)
{
uffd_test_ops->alias_mapping(&uffdio_copy->dst,
uffdio_copy->len,
offset);
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_COPY, uffdio_copy)) {
/* real retval in ufdio_copy.copy */
if (uffdio_copy->copy != -EEXIST)
err("UFFDIO_COPY retry error: %"PRId64,
(int64_t)uffdio_copy->copy);
} else {
err("UFFDIO_COPY retry unexpected: %"PRId64,
(int64_t)uffdio_copy->copy);
}
}
selftests/vm/userfaultfd: wake after copy failure When userfaultfd copy-ioctl fails since the PTE already exists, an -EEXIST error is returned and the faulting thread is not woken. The current userfaultfd test does not wake the faulting thread in such case. The assumption is presumably that another thread set the PTE through copy/wp ioctl and would wake the faulting thread or that alternatively the fault handler would realize there is no need to "must_wait" and continue. This is not necessarily true. There is an assumption that the "must_wait" tests in handle_userfault() are sufficient to provide definitive answer whether the offending PTE is populated or not. However, userfaultfd_must_wait() test is lockless. Consequently, concurrent calls to ptep_modify_prot_start(), for instance, can clear the PTE and can cause userfaultfd_must_wait() to wrongly assume it is not populated and a wait is needed. There are therefore 3 options: (1) Change the tests to wake on copy failure. (2) Wake faulting thread unconditionally on zero/copy ioctls before returning -EEXIST. (3) Change the userfaultfd_must_wait() to hold locks. This patch took the first approach, but the others are valid solutions with different tradeoffs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210808020724.1022515-4-namit@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-02 14:59:02 -07:00
static void wake_range(int ufd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
{
struct uffdio_range uffdio_wake;
uffdio_wake.start = addr;
uffdio_wake.len = len;
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_WAKE, &uffdio_wake))
fprintf(stderr, "error waking %lu\n",
addr), exit(1);
}
static int __copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool retry)
{
struct uffdio_copy uffdio_copy;
if (offset >= nr_pages * page_size)
err("unexpected offset %lu\n", offset);
uffdio_copy.dst = (unsigned long) area_dst + offset;
uffdio_copy.src = (unsigned long) area_src + offset;
uffdio_copy.len = page_size;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (test_uffdio_wp)
uffdio_copy.mode = UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP;
else
uffdio_copy.mode = 0;
uffdio_copy.copy = 0;
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_COPY, &uffdio_copy)) {
/* real retval in ufdio_copy.copy */
if (uffdio_copy.copy != -EEXIST)
err("UFFDIO_COPY error: %"PRId64,
(int64_t)uffdio_copy.copy);
selftests/vm/userfaultfd: wake after copy failure When userfaultfd copy-ioctl fails since the PTE already exists, an -EEXIST error is returned and the faulting thread is not woken. The current userfaultfd test does not wake the faulting thread in such case. The assumption is presumably that another thread set the PTE through copy/wp ioctl and would wake the faulting thread or that alternatively the fault handler would realize there is no need to "must_wait" and continue. This is not necessarily true. There is an assumption that the "must_wait" tests in handle_userfault() are sufficient to provide definitive answer whether the offending PTE is populated or not. However, userfaultfd_must_wait() test is lockless. Consequently, concurrent calls to ptep_modify_prot_start(), for instance, can clear the PTE and can cause userfaultfd_must_wait() to wrongly assume it is not populated and a wait is needed. There are therefore 3 options: (1) Change the tests to wake on copy failure. (2) Wake faulting thread unconditionally on zero/copy ioctls before returning -EEXIST. (3) Change the userfaultfd_must_wait() to hold locks. This patch took the first approach, but the others are valid solutions with different tradeoffs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210808020724.1022515-4-namit@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-02 14:59:02 -07:00
wake_range(ufd, uffdio_copy.dst, page_size);
} else if (uffdio_copy.copy != page_size) {
err("UFFDIO_COPY error: %"PRId64, (int64_t)uffdio_copy.copy);
} else {
if (test_uffdio_copy_eexist && retry) {
test_uffdio_copy_eexist = false;
retry_copy_page(ufd, &uffdio_copy, offset);
}
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static int copy_page_retry(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
{
return __copy_page(ufd, offset, true);
}
static int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
{
return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false);
}
static int uffd_read_msg(int ufd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
{
int ret = read(uffd, msg, sizeof(*msg));
if (ret != sizeof(*msg)) {
if (ret < 0) {
if (errno == EAGAIN || errno == EINTR)
return 1;
err("blocking read error");
} else {
err("short read");
}
}
return 0;
}
static void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg,
struct uffd_stats *stats)
{
unsigned long offset;
if (msg->event != UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT)
err("unexpected msg event %u", msg->event);
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP) {
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
/* Write protect page faults */
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
wp_range(uffd, msg->arg.pagefault.address, page_size, false);
stats->wp_faults++;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
} else if (msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_MINOR) {
uint8_t *area;
int b;
/*
* Minor page faults
*
* To prove we can modify the original range for testing
* purposes, we're going to bit flip this range before
* continuing.
*
* Note that this requires all minor page fault tests operate on
* area_dst (non-UFFD-registered) and area_dst_alias
* (UFFD-registered).
*/
area = (uint8_t *)(area_dst +
((char *)msg->arg.pagefault.address -
area_dst_alias));
for (b = 0; b < page_size; ++b)
area[b] = ~area[b];
continue_range(uffd, msg->arg.pagefault.address, page_size);
stats->minor_faults++;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
} else {
/* Missing page faults */
if (msg->arg.pagefault.flags & UFFD_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WRITE)
err("unexpected write fault");
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
offset = (char *)(unsigned long)msg->arg.pagefault.address - area_dst;
offset &= ~(page_size-1);
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (copy_page(uffd, offset))
stats->missing_faults++;
}
}
static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg)
{
struct uffd_stats *stats = (struct uffd_stats *)arg;
unsigned long cpu = stats->cpu;
struct pollfd pollfd[2];
struct uffd_msg msg;
struct uffdio_register uffd_reg;
int ret;
char tmp_chr;
pollfd[0].fd = uffd;
pollfd[0].events = POLLIN;
pollfd[1].fd = pipefd[cpu*2];
pollfd[1].events = POLLIN;
for (;;) {
ret = poll(pollfd, 2, -1);
if (ret <= 0) {
if (errno == EINTR || errno == EAGAIN)
continue;
err("poll error: %d", ret);
}
if (pollfd[1].revents & POLLIN) {
if (read(pollfd[1].fd, &tmp_chr, 1) != 1)
err("read pipefd error");
break;
}
if (!(pollfd[0].revents & POLLIN))
err("pollfd[0].revents %d", pollfd[0].revents);
if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg))
continue;
switch (msg.event) {
default:
err("unexpected msg event %u\n", msg.event);
break;
case UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT:
uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg, stats);
break;
case UFFD_EVENT_FORK:
close(uffd);
uffd = msg.arg.fork.ufd;
pollfd[0].fd = uffd;
break;
case UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE:
uffd_reg.range.start = msg.arg.remove.start;
uffd_reg.range.len = msg.arg.remove.end -
msg.arg.remove.start;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &uffd_reg.range))
err("remove failure");
break;
case UFFD_EVENT_REMAP:
area_dst = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.remap.to;
break;
}
}
return NULL;
}
pthread_mutex_t uffd_read_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
static void *uffd_read_thread(void *arg)
{
struct uffd_stats *stats = (struct uffd_stats *)arg;
struct uffd_msg msg;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&uffd_read_mutex);
/* from here cancellation is ok */
for (;;) {
if (uffd_read_msg(uffd, &msg))
continue;
uffd_handle_page_fault(&msg, stats);
}
return NULL;
}
static void *background_thread(void *arg)
{
unsigned long cpu = (unsigned long) arg;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
unsigned long page_nr, start_nr, mid_nr, end_nr;
start_nr = cpu * nr_pages_per_cpu;
end_nr = (cpu+1) * nr_pages_per_cpu;
mid_nr = (start_nr + end_nr) / 2;
/* Copy the first half of the pages */
for (page_nr = start_nr; page_nr < mid_nr; page_nr++)
copy_page_retry(uffd, page_nr * page_size);
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/*
* If we need to test uffd-wp, set it up now. Then we'll have
* at least the first half of the pages mapped already which
* can be write-protected for testing
*/
if (test_uffdio_wp)
wp_range(uffd, (unsigned long)area_dst + start_nr * page_size,
nr_pages_per_cpu * page_size, true);
/*
* Continue the 2nd half of the page copying, handling write
* protection faults if any
*/
for (page_nr = mid_nr; page_nr < end_nr; page_nr++)
copy_page_retry(uffd, page_nr * page_size);
return NULL;
}
static int stress(struct uffd_stats *uffd_stats)
{
unsigned long cpu;
pthread_t locking_threads[nr_cpus];
pthread_t uffd_threads[nr_cpus];
pthread_t background_threads[nr_cpus];
finished = 0;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
if (pthread_create(&locking_threads[cpu], &attr,
locking_thread, (void *)cpu))
return 1;
if (bounces & BOUNCE_POLL) {
if (pthread_create(&uffd_threads[cpu], &attr,
uffd_poll_thread,
(void *)&uffd_stats[cpu]))
return 1;
} else {
if (pthread_create(&uffd_threads[cpu], &attr,
uffd_read_thread,
(void *)&uffd_stats[cpu]))
return 1;
pthread_mutex_lock(&uffd_read_mutex);
}
if (pthread_create(&background_threads[cpu], &attr,
background_thread, (void *)cpu))
return 1;
}
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++)
if (pthread_join(background_threads[cpu], NULL))
return 1;
/*
* Be strict and immediately zap area_src, the whole area has
* been transferred already by the background treads. The
* area_src could then be faulted in in a racy way by still
* running uffdio_threads reading zeropages after we zapped
* area_src (but they're guaranteed to get -EEXIST from
* UFFDIO_COPY without writing zero pages into area_dst
* because the background threads already completed).
*/
uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_src);
finished = 1;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++)
if (pthread_join(locking_threads[cpu], NULL))
return 1;
for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
char c;
if (bounces & BOUNCE_POLL) {
if (write(pipefd[cpu*2+1], &c, 1) != 1)
err("pipefd write error");
if (pthread_join(uffd_threads[cpu],
(void *)&uffd_stats[cpu]))
return 1;
} else {
if (pthread_cancel(uffd_threads[cpu]))
return 1;
if (pthread_join(uffd_threads[cpu], NULL))
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
sigjmp_buf jbuf, *sigbuf;
static void sighndl(int sig, siginfo_t *siginfo, void *ptr)
{
if (sig == SIGBUS) {
if (sigbuf)
siglongjmp(*sigbuf, 1);
abort();
}
}
/*
* For non-cooperative userfaultfd test we fork() a process that will
* generate pagefaults, will mremap the area monitored by the
* userfaultfd and at last this process will release the monitored
* area.
* For the anonymous and shared memory the area is divided into two
* parts, the first part is accessed before mremap, and the second
* part is accessed after mremap. Since hugetlbfs does not support
* mremap, the entire monitored area is accessed in a single pass for
* HUGETLB_TEST.
* The release of the pages currently generates event for shmem and
* anonymous memory (UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE), hence it is not checked
* for hugetlb.
* For signal test(UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS), signal_test = 1, we register
* monitored area, generate pagefaults and test that signal is delivered.
* Use UFFDIO_COPY to allocate missing page and retry. For signal_test = 2
* test robustness use case - we release monitored area, fork a process
* that will generate pagefaults and verify signal is generated.
* This also tests UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK event along with the signal
* feature. Using monitor thread, verify no userfault events are generated.
*/
static int faulting_process(int signal_test)
{
unsigned long nr;
unsigned long long count;
unsigned long split_nr_pages;
unsigned long lastnr;
struct sigaction act;
unsigned long signalled = 0;
if (test_type != TEST_HUGETLB)
split_nr_pages = (nr_pages + 1) / 2;
else
split_nr_pages = nr_pages;
if (signal_test) {
sigbuf = &jbuf;
memset(&act, 0, sizeof(act));
act.sa_sigaction = sighndl;
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
if (sigaction(SIGBUS, &act, 0))
err("sigaction");
lastnr = (unsigned long)-1;
}
for (nr = 0; nr < split_nr_pages; nr++) {
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
int steps = 1;
unsigned long offset = nr * page_size;
if (signal_test) {
if (sigsetjmp(*sigbuf, 1) != 0) {
if (steps == 1 && nr == lastnr)
err("Signal repeated");
lastnr = nr;
if (signal_test == 1) {
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (steps == 1) {
/* This is a MISSING request */
steps++;
if (copy_page(uffd, offset))
signalled++;
} else {
/* This is a WP request */
assert(steps == 2);
wp_range(uffd,
(__u64)area_dst +
offset,
page_size, false);
}
} else {
signalled++;
continue;
}
}
}
count = *area_count(area_dst, nr);
if (count != count_verify[nr])
err("nr %lu memory corruption %llu %llu\n",
nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/*
* Trigger write protection if there is by writing
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
* the same value back.
*/
*area_count(area_dst, nr) = count;
}
if (signal_test)
return signalled != split_nr_pages;
if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB)
return 0;
area_dst = mremap(area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, nr_pages * page_size,
MREMAP_MAYMOVE | MREMAP_FIXED, area_src);
if (area_dst == MAP_FAILED)
err("mremap");
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
/* Reset area_src since we just clobbered it */
area_src = NULL;
for (; nr < nr_pages; nr++) {
count = *area_count(area_dst, nr);
if (count != count_verify[nr]) {
err("nr %lu memory corruption %llu %llu\n",
nr, count, count_verify[nr]);
}
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/*
* Trigger write protection if there is by writing
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
* the same value back.
*/
*area_count(area_dst, nr) = count;
}
uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst);
for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr++)
if (my_bcmp(area_dst + nr * page_size, zeropage, page_size))
err("nr %lu is not zero", nr);
return 0;
}
static void retry_uffdio_zeropage(int ufd,
struct uffdio_zeropage *uffdio_zeropage,
unsigned long offset)
{
uffd_test_ops->alias_mapping(&uffdio_zeropage->range.start,
uffdio_zeropage->range.len,
offset);
if (ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE, uffdio_zeropage)) {
if (uffdio_zeropage->zeropage != -EEXIST)
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE error: %"PRId64,
(int64_t)uffdio_zeropage->zeropage);
} else {
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE error: %"PRId64,
(int64_t)uffdio_zeropage->zeropage);
}
}
static int __uffdio_zeropage(int ufd, unsigned long offset, bool retry)
{
struct uffdio_zeropage uffdio_zeropage;
int ret;
bool has_zeropage = get_expected_ioctls(0) & (1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE);
__s64 res;
if (offset >= nr_pages * page_size)
err("unexpected offset %lu", offset);
uffdio_zeropage.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst + offset;
uffdio_zeropage.range.len = page_size;
uffdio_zeropage.mode = 0;
ret = ioctl(ufd, UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE, &uffdio_zeropage);
res = uffdio_zeropage.zeropage;
if (ret) {
/* real retval in ufdio_zeropage.zeropage */
if (has_zeropage)
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE error: %"PRId64, (int64_t)res);
else if (res != -EINVAL)
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE not -EINVAL");
} else if (has_zeropage) {
if (res != page_size) {
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE unexpected size");
} else {
if (test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist && retry) {
test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist = false;
retry_uffdio_zeropage(ufd, &uffdio_zeropage,
offset);
}
return 1;
}
} else
err("UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE succeeded");
return 0;
}
static int uffdio_zeropage(int ufd, unsigned long offset)
{
return __uffdio_zeropage(ufd, offset, false);
}
/* exercise UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE */
static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
printf("testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: ");
fflush(stdout);
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
uffd_test_ctx_init(0);
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (test_uffdio_wp)
uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure");
assert_expected_ioctls_present(
uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls);
if (uffdio_zeropage(uffd, 0))
if (my_bcmp(area_dst, zeropage, page_size))
err("zeropage is not zero");
printf("done.\n");
return 0;
}
static int userfaultfd_events_test(void)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
pthread_t uffd_mon;
int err, features;
pid_t pid;
char c;
struct uffd_stats stats = { 0 };
printf("testing events (fork, remap, remove): ");
fflush(stdout);
features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP |
UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE;
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
uffd_test_ctx_init(features);
fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (test_uffdio_wp)
uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure");
assert_expected_ioctls_present(
uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls);
if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, &attr, uffd_poll_thread, &stats))
err("uffd_poll_thread create");
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
err("fork");
if (!pid)
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
exit(faulting_process(0));
waitpid(pid, &err, 0);
if (err)
err("faulting process failed");
if (write(pipefd[1], &c, sizeof(c)) != sizeof(c))
err("pipe write");
if (pthread_join(uffd_mon, NULL))
return 1;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
uffd_stats_report(&stats, 1);
return stats.missing_faults != nr_pages;
}
static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
unsigned long userfaults;
pthread_t uffd_mon;
int err, features;
pid_t pid;
char c;
struct uffd_stats stats = { 0 };
printf("testing signal delivery: ");
fflush(stdout);
features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK|UFFD_FEATURE_SIGBUS;
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
uffd_test_ctx_init(features);
fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (test_uffdio_wp)
uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure");
assert_expected_ioctls_present(
uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls);
if (faulting_process(1))
err("faulting process failed");
uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst);
if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, &attr, uffd_poll_thread, &stats))
err("uffd_poll_thread create");
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
err("fork");
if (!pid)
exit(faulting_process(2));
waitpid(pid, &err, 0);
if (err)
err("faulting process failed");
if (write(pipefd[1], &c, sizeof(c)) != sizeof(c))
err("pipe write");
if (pthread_join(uffd_mon, (void **)&userfaults))
return 1;
printf("done.\n");
if (userfaults)
err("Signal test failed, userfaults: %ld", userfaults);
return userfaults != 0;
}
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
static int userfaultfd_minor_test(void)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
unsigned long p;
pthread_t uffd_mon;
uint8_t expected_byte;
void *expected_page;
char c;
struct uffd_stats stats = { 0 };
if (!test_uffdio_minor)
return 0;
printf("testing minor faults: ");
fflush(stdout);
uffd_test_ctx_init(uffd_minor_feature());
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)area_dst_alias;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure");
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
assert_expected_ioctls_present(
uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls);
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
/*
* After registering with UFFD, populate the non-UFFD-registered side of
* the shared mapping. This should *not* trigger any UFFD minor faults.
*/
for (p = 0; p < nr_pages; ++p) {
memset(area_dst + (p * page_size), p % ((uint8_t)-1),
page_size);
}
if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, &attr, uffd_poll_thread, &stats))
err("uffd_poll_thread create");
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
/*
* Read each of the pages back using the UFFD-registered mapping. We
* expect that the first time we touch a page, it will result in a minor
* fault. uffd_poll_thread will resolve the fault by bit-flipping the
* page's contents, and then issuing a CONTINUE ioctl.
*/
if (posix_memalign(&expected_page, page_size, page_size))
err("out of memory");
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
for (p = 0; p < nr_pages; ++p) {
expected_byte = ~((uint8_t)(p % ((uint8_t)-1)));
memset(expected_page, expected_byte, page_size);
if (my_bcmp(expected_page, area_dst_alias + (p * page_size),
page_size))
err("unexpected page contents after minor fault");
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
}
if (write(pipefd[1], &c, sizeof(c)) != sizeof(c))
err("pipe write");
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
if (pthread_join(uffd_mon, NULL))
return 1;
uffd_stats_report(&stats, 1);
return stats.missing_faults != 0 || stats.minor_faults != nr_pages;
}
#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr))
#define PM_SOFT_DIRTY BIT_ULL(55)
#define PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE BIT_ULL(56)
#define PM_UFFD_WP BIT_ULL(57)
#define PM_FILE BIT_ULL(61)
#define PM_SWAP BIT_ULL(62)
#define PM_PRESENT BIT_ULL(63)
static int pagemap_open(void)
{
int fd = open("/proc/self/pagemap", O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0)
err("open pagemap");
return fd;
}
static uint64_t pagemap_read_vaddr(int fd, void *vaddr)
{
uint64_t value;
int ret;
ret = pread(fd, &value, sizeof(uint64_t),
((uint64_t)vaddr >> 12) * sizeof(uint64_t));
if (ret != sizeof(uint64_t))
err("pread() on pagemap failed");
return value;
}
/* This macro let __LINE__ works in err() */
#define pagemap_check_wp(value, wp) do { \
if (!!(value & PM_UFFD_WP) != wp) \
err("pagemap uffd-wp bit error: 0x%"PRIx64, value); \
} while (0)
static int pagemap_test_fork(bool present)
{
pid_t child = fork();
uint64_t value;
int fd, result;
if (!child) {
/* Open the pagemap fd of the child itself */
fd = pagemap_open();
value = pagemap_read_vaddr(fd, area_dst);
/*
* After fork() uffd-wp bit should be gone as long as we're
* without UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK
*/
pagemap_check_wp(value, false);
/* Succeed */
exit(0);
}
waitpid(child, &result, 0);
return result;
}
static void userfaultfd_pagemap_test(unsigned int test_pgsize)
{
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
int pagemap_fd;
uint64_t value;
/* Pagemap tests uffd-wp only */
if (!test_uffdio_wp)
return;
/* Not enough memory to test this page size */
if (test_pgsize > nr_pages * page_size)
return;
printf("testing uffd-wp with pagemap (pgsize=%u): ", test_pgsize);
/* Flush so it doesn't flush twice in parent/child later */
fflush(stdout);
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
uffd_test_ctx_init(0);
if (test_pgsize > page_size) {
/* This is a thp test */
if (madvise(area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_HUGEPAGE))
err("madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) failed");
} else if (test_pgsize == page_size) {
/* This is normal page test; force no thp */
if (madvise(area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE))
err("madvise(MADV_NOHUGEPAGE) failed");
}
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failed");
pagemap_fd = pagemap_open();
/* Touch the page */
*area_dst = 1;
wp_range(uffd, (uint64_t)area_dst, test_pgsize, true);
value = pagemap_read_vaddr(pagemap_fd, area_dst);
pagemap_check_wp(value, true);
/* Make sure uffd-wp bit dropped when fork */
if (pagemap_test_fork(true))
err("Detected stall uffd-wp bit in child");
/* Exclusive required or PAGEOUT won't work */
if (!(value & PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE))
err("multiple mapping detected: 0x%"PRIx64, value);
if (madvise(area_dst, test_pgsize, MADV_PAGEOUT))
err("madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT) failed");
/* Uffd-wp should persist even swapped out */
value = pagemap_read_vaddr(pagemap_fd, area_dst);
pagemap_check_wp(value, true);
/* Make sure uffd-wp bit dropped when fork */
if (pagemap_test_fork(false))
err("Detected stall uffd-wp bit in child");
/* Unprotect; this tests swap pte modifications */
wp_range(uffd, (uint64_t)area_dst, page_size, false);
value = pagemap_read_vaddr(pagemap_fd, area_dst);
pagemap_check_wp(value, false);
/* Fault in the page from disk */
*area_dst = 2;
value = pagemap_read_vaddr(pagemap_fd, area_dst);
pagemap_check_wp(value, false);
close(pagemap_fd);
printf("done\n");
}
static int userfaultfd_stress(void)
{
void *area;
char *tmp_area;
unsigned long nr;
struct uffdio_register uffdio_register;
struct uffd_stats uffd_stats[nr_cpus];
userfaultfd/selftests: reinitialize test context in each test Currently, the context (fds, mmap-ed areas, etc.) are global. Each test mutates this state in some way, in some cases really "clobbering it" (e.g., the events test mremap-ing area_dst over the top of area_src, or the minor faults tests overwriting the count_verify values in the test areas). We run the tests in a particular order, each test is careful to make the right assumptions about its starting state, etc. But, this is fragile. It's better for a test's success or failure to not depend on what some other prior test case did to the global state. To that end, clear and reinitialize the test context at the start of each test case, so whatever prior test cases did doesn't affect future tests. This is particularly relevant to this series because the events test's mremap of area_dst screws up assumptions the minor fault test was relying on. This wasn't a problem for hugetlb, as we don't mremap in that case. [peterx@redhat.com: fix conflict between this patch and the uffd pagemap series] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKQqKrl+/cQ1utrb@t490s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-10-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:41 -07:00
uffd_test_ctx_init(0);
if (posix_memalign(&area, page_size, page_size))
err("out of memory");
zeropage = area;
bzero(zeropage, page_size);
pthread_mutex_lock(&uffd_read_mutex);
pthread_attr_init(&attr);
pthread_attr_setstacksize(&attr, 16*1024*1024);
while (bounces--) {
printf("bounces: %d, mode:", bounces);
if (bounces & BOUNCE_RANDOM)
printf(" rnd");
if (bounces & BOUNCE_RACINGFAULTS)
printf(" racing");
if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY)
printf(" ver");
if (bounces & BOUNCE_POLL)
printf(" poll");
else
printf(" read");
printf(", ");
fflush(stdout);
if (bounces & BOUNCE_POLL)
fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK);
else
fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags & ~O_NONBLOCK);
/* register */
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size;
uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
if (test_uffdio_wp)
uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure");
assert_expected_ioctls_present(
uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls);
if (area_dst_alias) {
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)
area_dst_alias;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register))
err("register failure alias");
}
/*
* The madvise done previously isn't enough: some
* uffd_thread could have read userfaults (one of
* those already resolved by the background thread)
* and it may be in the process of calling
* UFFDIO_COPY. UFFDIO_COPY will read the zapped
* area_src and it would map a zero page in it (of
* course such a UFFDIO_COPY is perfectly safe as it'd
* return -EEXIST). The problem comes at the next
* bounce though: that racing UFFDIO_COPY would
* generate zeropages in the area_src, so invalidating
* the previous MADV_DONTNEED. Without this additional
* MADV_DONTNEED those zeropages leftovers in the
* area_src would lead to -EEXIST failure during the
* next bounce, effectively leaving a zeropage in the
* area_dst.
*
* Try to comment this out madvise to see the memory
* corruption being caught pretty quick.
*
* khugepaged is also inhibited to collapse THP after
* MADV_DONTNEED only after the UFFDIO_REGISTER, so it's
* required to MADV_DONTNEED here.
*/
uffd_test_ops->release_pages(area_dst);
uffd_stats_reset(uffd_stats, nr_cpus);
/* bounce pass */
if (stress(uffd_stats))
return 1;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/* Clear all the write protections if there is any */
if (test_uffdio_wp)
wp_range(uffd, (unsigned long)area_dst,
nr_pages * page_size, false);
/* unregister */
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &uffdio_register.range))
err("unregister failure");
if (area_dst_alias) {
uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst;
if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER,
&uffdio_register.range))
err("unregister failure alias");
}
/* verification */
if (bounces & BOUNCE_VERIFY)
for (nr = 0; nr < nr_pages; nr++)
if (*area_count(area_dst, nr) != count_verify[nr])
err("error area_count %llu %llu %lu\n",
*area_count(area_src, nr),
count_verify[nr], nr);
/* prepare next bounce */
tmp_area = area_src;
area_src = area_dst;
area_dst = tmp_area;
tmp_area = area_src_alias;
area_src_alias = area_dst_alias;
area_dst_alias = tmp_area;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
uffd_stats_report(uffd_stats, nr_cpus);
}
if (test_type == TEST_ANON) {
/*
* shmem/hugetlb won't be able to run since they have different
* behavior on fork() (file-backed memory normally drops ptes
* directly when fork), meanwhile the pagemap test will verify
* pgtable entry of fork()ed child.
*/
userfaultfd_pagemap_test(page_size);
/*
* Hard-code for x86_64 for now for 2M THP, as x86_64 is
* currently the only one that supports uffd-wp
*/
userfaultfd_pagemap_test(page_size * 512);
}
return userfaultfd_zeropage_test() || userfaultfd_sig_test()
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
|| userfaultfd_events_test() || userfaultfd_minor_test();
}
/*
* Copied from mlock2-tests.c
*/
unsigned long default_huge_page_size(void)
{
unsigned long hps = 0;
char *line = NULL;
size_t linelen = 0;
FILE *f = fopen("/proc/meminfo", "r");
if (!f)
return 0;
while (getline(&line, &linelen, f) > 0) {
if (sscanf(line, "Hugepagesize: %lu kB", &hps) == 1) {
hps <<= 10;
break;
}
}
free(line);
fclose(f);
return hps;
}
static void set_test_type(const char *type)
{
uint64_t features = UFFD_API_FEATURES;
if (!strcmp(type, "anon")) {
test_type = TEST_ANON;
uffd_test_ops = &anon_uffd_test_ops;
userfaultfd: selftests: add write-protect test Add uffd tests for write protection. Instead of introducing new tests for it, let's simply squashing uffd-wp tests into existing uffd-missing test cases. Changes are: (1) Bouncing tests We do the write-protection in two ways during the bouncing test: - By using UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP when resolving MISSING pages: then we'll make sure for each bounce process every single page will be at least fault twice: once for MISSING, once for WP. - By direct call UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT on existing faulted memories: To further torture the explicit page protection procedures of uffd-wp, we split each bounce procedure into two halves (in the background thread): the first half will be MISSING+WP for each page as explained above. After the first half, we write protect the faulted region in the background thread to make sure at least half of the pages will be write protected again which is the first half to test the new UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT call. Then we continue with the 2nd half, which will contain both MISSING and WP faulting tests for the 2nd half and WP-only faults from the 1st half. (2) Event/Signal test Mostly previous tests but will do MISSING+WP for each page. For sigbus-mode test we'll need to provide standalone path to handle the write protection faults. For all tests, do statistics as well for uffd-wp pages. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov> Cc: Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220163112.11409-20-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-06 20:06:36 -07:00
/* Only enable write-protect test for anonymous test */
test_uffdio_wp = true;
} else if (!strcmp(type, "hugetlb")) {
test_type = TEST_HUGETLB;
uffd_test_ops = &hugetlb_uffd_test_ops;
} else if (!strcmp(type, "hugetlb_shared")) {
map_shared = true;
test_type = TEST_HUGETLB;
uffd_test_ops = &hugetlb_uffd_test_ops;
userfaultfd/selftests: add test exercising minor fault handling Fix a dormant bug in userfaultfd_events_test(), where we did `return faulting_process(0)` instead of `exit(faulting_process(0))`. This caused the forked process to keep running, trying to execute any further test cases after the events test in parallel with the "real" process. Add a simple test case which exercises minor faults. In short, it does the following: 1. "Sets up" an area (area_dst) and a second shared mapping to the same underlying pages (area_dst_alias). 2. Register one of these areas with userfaultfd, in minor fault mode. 3. Start a second thread to handle any minor faults. 4. Populate the underlying pages with the non-UFFD-registered side of the mapping. Basically, memset() each page with some arbitrary contents. 5. Then, using the UFFD-registered mapping, read all of the page contents, asserting that the contents match expectations (we expect the minor fault handling thread can modify the page contents before resolving the fault). The minor fault handling thread, upon receiving an event, flips all the bits (~) in that page, just to prove that it can modify it in some arbitrary way. Then it issues a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl, to setup the mapping and resolve the fault. The reading thread should wake up and see this modification. Currently the minor fault test is only enabled in hugetlb_shared mode, as this is the only configuration the kernel feature supports. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301222728.176417-7-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@google.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@mediatek.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shawn Anastasio <shawn@anastas.io> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-05-04 18:35:57 -07:00
/* Minor faults require shared hugetlb; only enable here. */
test_uffdio_minor = true;
} else if (!strcmp(type, "shmem")) {
map_shared = true;
test_type = TEST_SHMEM;
uffd_test_ops = &shmem_uffd_test_ops;
test_uffdio_minor = true;
} else {
err("Unknown test type: %s", type);
}
if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB)
page_size = default_huge_page_size();
else
page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE);
if (!page_size)
err("Unable to determine page size");
if ((unsigned long) area_count(NULL, 0) + sizeof(unsigned long long) * 2
> page_size)
err("Impossible to run this test");
/*
* Whether we can test certain features depends not just on test type,
* but also on whether or not this particular kernel supports the
* feature.
*/
userfaultfd_open(&features);
test_uffdio_wp = test_uffdio_wp &&
(features & UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP);
test_uffdio_minor = test_uffdio_minor &&
(features & uffd_minor_feature());
close(uffd);
uffd = -1;
}
static void sigalrm(int sig)
{
if (sig != SIGALRM)
abort();
test_uffdio_copy_eexist = true;
test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist = true;
alarm(ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (argc < 4)
usage();
if (signal(SIGALRM, sigalrm) == SIG_ERR)
err("failed to arm SIGALRM");
alarm(ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS);
set_test_type(argv[1]);
nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
nr_pages_per_cpu = atol(argv[2]) * 1024*1024 / page_size /
nr_cpus;
if (!nr_pages_per_cpu) {
_err("invalid MiB");
usage();
}
bounces = atoi(argv[3]);
if (bounces <= 0) {
_err("invalid bounces");
usage();
}
nr_pages = nr_pages_per_cpu * nr_cpus;
if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB) {
if (argc < 5)
usage();
huge_fd = open(argv[4], O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0755);
if (huge_fd < 0)
err("Open of %s failed", argv[4]);
if (ftruncate(huge_fd, 0))
err("ftruncate %s to size 0 failed", argv[4]);
userfaultfd/selftests: use memfd_create for shmem test type This is a preparatory commit. In the future, we want to be able to setup alias mappings for area_src and area_dst in the shmem test, like we do in the hugetlb_shared test. With a VMA obtained via mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_SHARED), it isn't clear how to do this. So, mmap() with an fd, so we can create alias mappings. Use memfd_create instead of actually passing in a tmpfs path like hugetlb does, since it's more convenient / simpler to run, and works just as well. Future commits will: 1. Setup the alias mappings. 2. Extend our tests to actually take advantage of this, to test new userfaultfd behavior being introduced in this series. Also, a small fix in the area we're changing: when the hugetlb setup fails in main(), pass in the right argv[] so we actually print out the hugetlb file path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503180737.2487560-8-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-06-30 18:49:34 -07:00
} else if (test_type == TEST_SHMEM) {
shm_fd = memfd_create(argv[0], 0);
if (shm_fd < 0)
err("memfd_create");
if (ftruncate(shm_fd, nr_pages * page_size * 2))
err("ftruncate");
if (fallocate(shm_fd,
FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0,
nr_pages * page_size * 2))
err("fallocate");
}
printf("nr_pages: %lu, nr_pages_per_cpu: %lu\n",
nr_pages, nr_pages_per_cpu);
return userfaultfd_stress();
}
#else /* __NR_userfaultfd */
#warning "missing __NR_userfaultfd definition"
int main(void)
{
printf("skip: Skipping userfaultfd test (missing __NR_userfaultfd)\n");
return KSFT_SKIP;
}
#endif /* __NR_userfaultfd */