iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
641b9103d8
linux/include/drm/drm_managed.h

39 lines
1.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device We have lots of these. And the cleanup code tends to be of dubious quality. The biggest wrong pattern is that developers use devm_, which ties the release action to the underlying struct device, whereas all the userspace visible stuff attached to a drm_device can long outlive that one (e.g. after a hotunplug while userspace has open files and mmap'ed buffers). Give people what they want, but with more correctness. Mostly copied from devres.c, with types adjusted to fit drm_device and a few simplifications - I didn't (yet) copy over everything. Since the types don't match code sharing looked like a hopeless endeavour. For now it's only super simplified, no groups, you can't remove actions (but kfree exists, we'll need that soon). Plus all specific to drm_device ofc, including the logging. Which I didn't bother to make compile-time optional, since none of the other drm logging is compile time optional either. One tricky bit here is the chicken&egg between allocating your drm_device structure and initiliazing it with drm_dev_init. For perfect onion unwinding we'd need to have the action to kfree the allocation registered before drm_dev_init registers any of its own release handlers. But drm_dev_init doesn't know where exactly the drm_device is emebedded into the overall structure, and by the time it returns it'll all be too late. And forcing drivers to be able clean up everything except the one kzalloc is silly. Work around this by having a very special final_kfree pointer. This also avoids troubles with the list head possibly disappearing from underneath us when we release all resources attached to the drm_device. v2: Do all the kerneldoc at the end, to avoid lots of fairly pointless shuffling while getting everything into shape. v3: Add static to add/del_dr (Neil) Move typo fix to the right patch (Neil) v4: Enforce contract for drmm_add_final_kfree: Use ksize() to check that the drm_device is indeed contained somewhere in the final kfree(). Because we need that or the entire managed release logic blows up in a pile of use-after-frees. Motivated by a discussion with Laurent. v5: Review from Laurent: - %zu instead of casting size_t - header guards - sorting of includes - guarding of data assignment if we didn't allocate it for a NULL pointer - delete spurious newline - cast void* data parameter correctly in ->release call, no idea how this even worked before v6: Review from Sam - Add the kerneldoc for the managed sub-struct back in, even if it doesn't show up in the generated html somehow. - Explain why __always_inline. - Fix bisectability around the final kfree() in drm_dev_relase(). This is just interim code which will disappear again. - Some whitespace polish. - Add debug output when drmm_add_action or drmm_kmalloc fail. v7: My bisectability fix wasn't up to par as noticed by smatch. v8: Remove unecessary {} around if else v9: Use kstrdup_const, which requires kfree_const and introducing a free_dr() helper (Thomas). v10: kfree_const goes boom on the plain "kmalloc" assignment, somehow we need to wrap that in kstrdup_const() too!! Also renumber revision log, I somehow reset it midway thruh. Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324124540.3227396-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2020-03-24 15:45:40 +03:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#ifndef _DRM_MANAGED_H_
#define _DRM_MANAGED_H_
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
struct drm_device;
typedef void (*drmres_release_t)(struct drm_device *dev, void *res);
#define drmm_add_action(dev, action, data) \
__drmm_add_action(dev, action, data, #action)
int __must_check __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev,
drmres_release_t action,
void *data, const char *name);
drm: manage drm_minor cleanup with drmm_ The cleanup here is somewhat tricky, since we can't tell apart the allocated minor index from 0. So register a cleanup action first, and if the index allocation fails, unregister that cleanup action again to avoid bad mistakes. The kdev for the minor already handles NULL, so no problem there. Hence add drmm_remove_action() to the drm_managed library. v2: Make pointer math around void ** consistent with what Laurent suggested. v3: Use drmm_add_action_or_reset and remove drmm_remove_action. Noticed because of some questions from Thomas. This also means we need to move the drmm_add_action_or_reset helper earlier in the series. v4: Uh ... fix slightly embarrassing bug CI spotted. Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324203936.3330994-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2020-03-24 23:39:36 +03:00
#define drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, action, data) \
__drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, action, data, #action)
int __must_check __drmm_add_action_or_reset(struct drm_device *dev,
drmres_release_t action,
void *data, const char *name);
void drmm_add_final_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *container);
drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device We have lots of these. And the cleanup code tends to be of dubious quality. The biggest wrong pattern is that developers use devm_, which ties the release action to the underlying struct device, whereas all the userspace visible stuff attached to a drm_device can long outlive that one (e.g. after a hotunplug while userspace has open files and mmap'ed buffers). Give people what they want, but with more correctness. Mostly copied from devres.c, with types adjusted to fit drm_device and a few simplifications - I didn't (yet) copy over everything. Since the types don't match code sharing looked like a hopeless endeavour. For now it's only super simplified, no groups, you can't remove actions (but kfree exists, we'll need that soon). Plus all specific to drm_device ofc, including the logging. Which I didn't bother to make compile-time optional, since none of the other drm logging is compile time optional either. One tricky bit here is the chicken&egg between allocating your drm_device structure and initiliazing it with drm_dev_init. For perfect onion unwinding we'd need to have the action to kfree the allocation registered before drm_dev_init registers any of its own release handlers. But drm_dev_init doesn't know where exactly the drm_device is emebedded into the overall structure, and by the time it returns it'll all be too late. And forcing drivers to be able clean up everything except the one kzalloc is silly. Work around this by having a very special final_kfree pointer. This also avoids troubles with the list head possibly disappearing from underneath us when we release all resources attached to the drm_device. v2: Do all the kerneldoc at the end, to avoid lots of fairly pointless shuffling while getting everything into shape. v3: Add static to add/del_dr (Neil) Move typo fix to the right patch (Neil) v4: Enforce contract for drmm_add_final_kfree: Use ksize() to check that the drm_device is indeed contained somewhere in the final kfree(). Because we need that or the entire managed release logic blows up in a pile of use-after-frees. Motivated by a discussion with Laurent. v5: Review from Laurent: - %zu instead of casting size_t - header guards - sorting of includes - guarding of data assignment if we didn't allocate it for a NULL pointer - delete spurious newline - cast void* data parameter correctly in ->release call, no idea how this even worked before v6: Review from Sam - Add the kerneldoc for the managed sub-struct back in, even if it doesn't show up in the generated html somehow. - Explain why __always_inline. - Fix bisectability around the final kfree() in drm_dev_relase(). This is just interim code which will disappear again. - Some whitespace polish. - Add debug output when drmm_add_action or drmm_kmalloc fail. v7: My bisectability fix wasn't up to par as noticed by smatch. v8: Remove unecessary {} around if else v9: Use kstrdup_const, which requires kfree_const and introducing a free_dr() helper (Thomas). v10: kfree_const goes boom on the plain "kmalloc" assignment, somehow we need to wrap that in kstrdup_const() too!! Also renumber revision log, I somehow reset it midway thruh. Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324124540.3227396-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2020-03-24 15:45:40 +03:00
void *drmm_kmalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) __malloc;
static inline void *drmm_kzalloc(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t gfp)
{
return drmm_kmalloc(dev, size, gfp | __GFP_ZERO);
}
drm: Handle dev->unique with drmm_ We need to add a drmm_kstrdup for this, but let's start somewhere. This is not exactly perfect onion unwinding, but it's jsut a kfree so doesn't really matter at all. Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323144950.3018436-21-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2020-03-23 17:49:19 +03:00
char *drmm_kstrdup(struct drm_device *dev, const char *s, gfp_t gfp);
drm: add managed resources tied to drm_device We have lots of these. And the cleanup code tends to be of dubious quality. The biggest wrong pattern is that developers use devm_, which ties the release action to the underlying struct device, whereas all the userspace visible stuff attached to a drm_device can long outlive that one (e.g. after a hotunplug while userspace has open files and mmap'ed buffers). Give people what they want, but with more correctness. Mostly copied from devres.c, with types adjusted to fit drm_device and a few simplifications - I didn't (yet) copy over everything. Since the types don't match code sharing looked like a hopeless endeavour. For now it's only super simplified, no groups, you can't remove actions (but kfree exists, we'll need that soon). Plus all specific to drm_device ofc, including the logging. Which I didn't bother to make compile-time optional, since none of the other drm logging is compile time optional either. One tricky bit here is the chicken&egg between allocating your drm_device structure and initiliazing it with drm_dev_init. For perfect onion unwinding we'd need to have the action to kfree the allocation registered before drm_dev_init registers any of its own release handlers. But drm_dev_init doesn't know where exactly the drm_device is emebedded into the overall structure, and by the time it returns it'll all be too late. And forcing drivers to be able clean up everything except the one kzalloc is silly. Work around this by having a very special final_kfree pointer. This also avoids troubles with the list head possibly disappearing from underneath us when we release all resources attached to the drm_device. v2: Do all the kerneldoc at the end, to avoid lots of fairly pointless shuffling while getting everything into shape. v3: Add static to add/del_dr (Neil) Move typo fix to the right patch (Neil) v4: Enforce contract for drmm_add_final_kfree: Use ksize() to check that the drm_device is indeed contained somewhere in the final kfree(). Because we need that or the entire managed release logic blows up in a pile of use-after-frees. Motivated by a discussion with Laurent. v5: Review from Laurent: - %zu instead of casting size_t - header guards - sorting of includes - guarding of data assignment if we didn't allocate it for a NULL pointer - delete spurious newline - cast void* data parameter correctly in ->release call, no idea how this even worked before v6: Review from Sam - Add the kerneldoc for the managed sub-struct back in, even if it doesn't show up in the generated html somehow. - Explain why __always_inline. - Fix bisectability around the final kfree() in drm_dev_relase(). This is just interim code which will disappear again. - Some whitespace polish. - Add debug output when drmm_add_action or drmm_kmalloc fail. v7: My bisectability fix wasn't up to par as noticed by smatch. v8: Remove unecessary {} around if else v9: Use kstrdup_const, which requires kfree_const and introducing a free_dr() helper (Thomas). v10: kfree_const goes boom on the plain "kmalloc" assignment, somehow we need to wrap that in kstrdup_const() too!! Also renumber revision log, I somehow reset it midway thruh. Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324124540.3227396-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
2020-03-24 15:45:40 +03:00
void drmm_kfree(struct drm_device *dev, void *data);
#endif
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink