lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
/*
* Test for find_ * _bit functions .
*
* Copyright ( c ) 2017 Cavium .
*
* This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or
* modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation .
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful , but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the GNU
* General Public License for more details .
*/
/*
* find_bit functions are widely used in kernel , so the successful boot
* is good enough test for correctness .
*
* This test is focused on performance of traversing bitmaps . Two typical
* scenarios are reproduced :
* - randomly filled bitmap with approximately equal number of set and
* cleared bits ;
* - sparse bitmap with few set bits at random positions .
*/
# include <linux/bitops.h>
# include <linux/kernel.h>
# include <linux/list.h>
# include <linux/module.h>
# include <linux/printk.h>
# include <linux/random.h>
# define BITMAP_LEN (4096UL * 8 * 10)
# define SPARSE 500
static DECLARE_BITMAP ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) __initdata ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
static DECLARE_BITMAP ( bitmap2 , BITMAP_LEN ) __initdata ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
/*
* This is Schlemiel the Painter ' s algorithm . It should be called after
* all other tests for the same bitmap because it sets all bits of bitmap to 1.
*/
static int __init test_find_first_bit ( void * bitmap , unsigned long len )
{
unsigned long i , cnt ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
ktime_t time ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
for ( cnt = i = 0 ; i < len ; cnt + + ) {
i = find_first_bit ( bitmap , len ) ;
__clear_bit ( i , bitmap ) ;
}
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) - time ;
pr_err ( " find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations \n " , time , cnt ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
static int __init test_find_next_bit ( const void * bitmap , unsigned long len )
{
unsigned long i , cnt ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
ktime_t time ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
for ( cnt = i = 0 ; i < BITMAP_LEN ; cnt + + )
i = find_next_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN , i ) + 1 ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) - time ;
pr_err ( " find_next_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations \n " , time , cnt ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
static int __init test_find_next_zero_bit ( const void * bitmap , unsigned long len )
{
unsigned long i , cnt ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
ktime_t time ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
for ( cnt = i = 0 ; i < BITMAP_LEN ; cnt + + )
i = find_next_zero_bit ( bitmap , len , i ) + 1 ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) - time ;
pr_err ( " find_next_zero_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations \n " , time , cnt ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
static int __init test_find_last_bit ( const void * bitmap , unsigned long len )
{
unsigned long l , cnt = 0 ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
ktime_t time ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
do {
cnt + + ;
l = find_last_bit ( bitmap , len ) ;
if ( l > = len )
break ;
len = l ;
} while ( len ) ;
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) - time ;
pr_err ( " find_last_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations \n " , time , cnt ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
static int __init test_find_next_and_bit ( const void * bitmap ,
const void * bitmap2 , unsigned long len )
{
unsigned long i , cnt ;
lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: align test_find_next_and_bit with others
Contrary to other tests, test_find_next_and_bit() test uses tab
formatting in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get().
get_cycles() is not supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better
in generic code.
Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 8545712 ns, 164399 iterations
find_last_bit: 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations
find_first_bit: 20509424 ns, 16606 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 4060016 ns, 73424 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 55984 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 19197536 ns, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 65088 ns, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 5923712 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 29088 ns, 1 iterations
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123174803.10916-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Norov, Yuri" <Yuri.Norov@cavium.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 02:26:48 +03:00
ktime_t time ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: align test_find_next_and_bit with others
Contrary to other tests, test_find_next_and_bit() test uses tab
formatting in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get().
get_cycles() is not supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better
in generic code.
Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 8545712 ns, 164399 iterations
find_last_bit: 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations
find_first_bit: 20509424 ns, 16606 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 4060016 ns, 73424 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 55984 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 19197536 ns, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 65088 ns, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 5923712 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 29088 ns, 1 iterations
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123174803.10916-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Norov, Yuri" <Yuri.Norov@cavium.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 02:26:48 +03:00
time = ktime_get ( ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
for ( cnt = i = 0 ; i < BITMAP_LEN ; cnt + + )
lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: align test_find_next_and_bit with others
Contrary to other tests, test_find_next_and_bit() test uses tab
formatting in output and get_cycles() instead of ktime_get().
get_cycles() is not supported by some arches, so ktime_get() fits better
in generic code.
Fix it and minor style issues, so the output looks like this:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 7142816 ns, 163282 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 8545712 ns, 164399 iterations
find_last_bit: 6332032 ns, 163282 iterations
find_first_bit: 20509424 ns, 16606 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 4060016 ns, 73424 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 55984 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 19197536 ns, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 65088 ns, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 5923712 ns, 656 iterations
find_next_and_bit: 29088 ns, 1 iterations
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123174803.10916-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Norov, Yuri" <Yuri.Norov@cavium.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 02:26:48 +03:00
i = find_next_and_bit ( bitmap , bitmap2 , BITMAP_LEN , i + 1 ) ;
time = ktime_get ( ) - time ;
pr_err ( " find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations \n " , time , cnt ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
static int __init find_bit_test ( void )
{
unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE ;
pr_err ( " \n Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap \n " ) ;
get_random_bytes ( bitmap , sizeof ( bitmap ) ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
get_random_bytes ( bitmap2 , sizeof ( bitmap2 ) ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
test_find_next_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
test_find_next_zero_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
test_find_last_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
2018-05-12 02:01:39 +03:00
/*
* test_find_first_bit ( ) may take some time , so
* traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup .
*/
test_find_first_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN / 10 ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
test_find_next_and_bit ( bitmap , bitmap2 , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
pr_err ( " \n Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap \n " ) ;
bitmap_zero ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
bitmap_zero ( bitmap2 , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
while ( nbits - - ) {
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
__set_bit ( prandom_u32 ( ) % BITMAP_LEN , bitmap ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
__set_bit ( prandom_u32 ( ) % BITMAP_LEN , bitmap2 ) ;
}
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
test_find_next_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
test_find_next_zero_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
test_find_last_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
test_find_first_bit ( bitmap , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).
Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).
For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory
usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].
[1] Approximate benchmark code:
```
unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
}
}
```
Results:
pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65
0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24
0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94
0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0
0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67
0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71
0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90
0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58
0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46
0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49
0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45
0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10
0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18
0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18
0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17
0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25
-----------------------------
geo.mean 2.06
[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)
[ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
[ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
[ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
[ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
[ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations
[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).
[ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations
[courbet@google.com: v6]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-07 02:38:34 +03:00
test_find_next_and_bit ( bitmap , bitmap2 , BITMAP_LEN ) ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
2018-02-07 02:38:31 +03:00
/*
* Everything is OK . Return error just to let user run benchmark
* again without annoying rmmod .
*/
return - EINVAL ;
lib: test module for find_*_bit() functions
find_bit functions are widely used in the kernel, including hot paths.
This module tests performance of those functions in 2 typical scenarios:
randomly filled bitmap with relatively equal distribution of set and
cleared bits, and sparse bitmap which has 1 set bit for 500 cleared
bits.
On ThunderX machine:
Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
find_next_bit: 240043 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 312848 cycles, 163619 iterations
find_last_bit: 193748 cycles, 164062 iterations
find_first_bit: 177720874 cycles, 164062 iterations
Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
find_next_bit: 3633 cycles, 656 iterations
find_next_zero_bit: 620399 cycles, 327025 iterations
find_last_bit: 3038 cycles, 656 iterations
find_first_bit: 691407 cycles, 656 iterations
[arnd@arndb.de: use correct format string for find-bit tests]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171113135605.3166307-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171109140714.13168-1-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-18 02:28:31 +03:00
}
module_init ( find_bit_test ) ;
MODULE_LICENSE ( " GPL " ) ;