2009-09-16 10:54:45 +04:00
/*
* Only give sleepers 50 % of their service deficit . This allows
* them to run sooner , but does not allow tons of sleepers to
* rip the spread apart .
*/
SCHED_FEAT ( GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS , 1 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
/*
* Place new tasks ahead so that they do not starve already running
* tasks
*/
2008-04-19 21:45:00 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( START_DEBIT , 1 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
/*
* Should wakeups try to preempt running tasks .
*/
SCHED_FEAT ( WAKEUP_PREEMPT , 1 )
/*
* Based on load and program behaviour , see if it makes sense to place
* a newly woken task on the same cpu as the task that woke it - -
* improve cache locality . Typically used with SYNC wakeups as
* generated by pipes and the like , see also SYNC_WAKEUPS .
*/
2008-04-19 21:45:00 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( AFFINE_WAKEUPS , 1 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
/*
* Prefer to schedule the task we woke last ( assuming it failed
* wakeup - preemption ) , since its likely going to consume data we
* touched , increases cache locality .
*/
sched: Improve latencies and throughput
Make the idle balancer more agressive, to improve a
x264 encoding workload provided by Jason Garrett-Glaser:
NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 252.82 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 250.69 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 245.76 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
NO_NEXT_BUDDY LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 344.44 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 346.66 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 352.59 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
NO_NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 425.75 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 425.45 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 422.49 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
Peter pointed out that this is better done via newidle_idx,
not via LB_BIAS, newidle balancing should look for where
there is load _now_, not where there was load 2 ticks ago.
Worst-case latencies are improved as well as no buddies
means less vruntime spread. (as per prior lkml discussions)
This change improves kbuild-peak parallelism as well.
Reported-by: Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1253011667.9128.16.camel@marge.simson.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-09-15 17:07:03 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( NEXT_BUDDY , 0 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
/*
* Prefer to schedule the task that ran last ( when we did
* wake - preempt ) as that likely will touch the same data , increases
* cache locality .
*/
SCHED_FEAT ( LAST_BUDDY , 1 )
/*
* Consider buddies to be cache hot , decreases the likelyness of a
* cache buddy being migrated away , increases cache locality .
*/
2008-04-19 21:45:00 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( CACHE_HOT_BUDDY , 1 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
2009-09-03 15:20:03 +04:00
/*
* Use arch dependent cpu power functions
*/
SCHED_FEAT ( ARCH_POWER , 0 )
2008-10-20 16:27:43 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( HRTICK , 0 )
2008-04-19 21:45:00 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( DOUBLE_TICK , 0 )
2008-08-20 14:44:55 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( LB_BIAS , 1 )
2009-09-16 15:44:33 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( LB_SHARES_UPDATE , 1 )
2008-06-27 15:41:39 +04:00
SCHED_FEAT ( ASYM_EFF_LOAD , 1 )
2009-09-11 14:31:23 +04:00
/*
* Spin - wait on mutex acquisition when the mutex owner is running on
* another cpu - - assumes that when the owner is running , it will soon
* release the lock . Decreases scheduling overhead .
*/
2009-01-12 16:01:47 +03:00
SCHED_FEAT ( OWNER_SPIN , 1 )