2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
/*
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
* \ file drm_ioc32 . c
*
* 32 - bit ioctl compatibility routines for the DRM .
*
* \ author Paul Mackerras < paulus @ samba . org >
*
* Copyright ( C ) Paul Mackerras 2005.
* All Rights Reserved .
*
* Permission is hereby granted , free of charge , to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files ( the " Software " ) ,
* to deal in the Software without restriction , including without limitation
* the rights to use , copy , modify , merge , publish , distribute , sublicense ,
* and / or sell copies of the Software , and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so , subject to the following conditions :
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice ( including the next
* paragraph ) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software .
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED " AS IS " , WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND , EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED , INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY ,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT . IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM , DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY ,
* WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT , TORT OR OTHERWISE , ARISING FROM ,
* OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE .
*/
# include <linux/compat.h>
2011-06-04 15:36:43 +00:00
# include <linux/ratelimit.h>
2011-08-30 18:16:33 -04:00
# include <linux/export.h>
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2023-11-22 13:09:35 +01:00
# include <drm/drm_device.h>
2019-05-26 19:35:35 +02:00
# include <drm/drm_file.h>
# include <drm/drm_print.h>
2017-05-25 15:45:04 -04:00
# include "drm_crtc_internal.h"
2019-05-26 19:35:35 +02:00
# include "drm_internal.h"
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
# define DRM_IOCTL_VERSION32 DRM_IOWR(0x00, drm_version32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_GET_UNIQUE32 DRM_IOWR(0x01, drm_unique32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_GET_MAP32 DRM_IOWR(0x04, drm_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_GET_CLIENT32 DRM_IOWR(0x05, drm_client32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_GET_STATS32 DRM_IOR( 0x06, drm_stats32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE32 DRM_IOW( 0x10, drm_unique32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_ADD_MAP32 DRM_IOWR(0x15, drm_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_ADD_BUFS32 DRM_IOWR(0x16, drm_buf_desc32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_MARK_BUFS32 DRM_IOW( 0x17, drm_buf_desc32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_INFO_BUFS32 DRM_IOWR(0x18, drm_buf_info32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_MAP_BUFS32 DRM_IOWR(0x19, drm_buf_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_FREE_BUFS32 DRM_IOW( 0x1a, drm_buf_free32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_RM_MAP32 DRM_IOW( 0x1b, drm_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_SET_SAREA_CTX32 DRM_IOW( 0x1c, drm_ctx_priv_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_GET_SAREA_CTX32 DRM_IOWR(0x1d, drm_ctx_priv_map32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_RES_CTX32 DRM_IOWR(0x26, drm_ctx_res32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_DMA32 DRM_IOWR(0x29, drm_dma32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_ENABLE32 DRM_IOW( 0x32, drm_agp_mode32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_INFO32 DRM_IOR( 0x33, drm_agp_info32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_ALLOC32 DRM_IOWR(0x34, drm_agp_buffer32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_FREE32 DRM_IOW( 0x35, drm_agp_buffer32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_BIND32 DRM_IOW( 0x36, drm_agp_binding32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_AGP_UNBIND32 DRM_IOW( 0x37, drm_agp_binding32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_SG_ALLOC32 DRM_IOW( 0x38, drm_scatter_gather32_t)
# define DRM_IOCTL_SG_FREE32 DRM_IOW( 0x39, drm_scatter_gather32_t)
2008-10-21 11:38:50 -07:00
# define DRM_IOCTL_UPDATE_DRAW32 DRM_IOW( 0x3f, drm_update_draw32_t)
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
# define DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK32 DRM_IOWR(0x3a, drm_wait_vblank32_t)
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
# define DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB232 DRM_IOWR(0xb8, drm_mode_fb_cmd232_t)
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
typedef struct drm_version_32 {
2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
int version_major ; /* Major version */
int version_minor ; /* Minor version */
int version_patchlevel ; /* Patch level */
u32 name_len ; /* Length of name buffer */
u32 name ; /* Name of driver */
u32 date_len ; /* Length of date buffer */
u32 date ; /* User-space buffer to hold date */
u32 desc_len ; /* Length of desc buffer */
u32 desc ; /* User-space buffer to hold desc */
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
} drm_version32_t ;
static int compat_drm_version ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
drm_version32_t v32 ;
2017-05-24 14:11:03 -04:00
struct drm_version v ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
int err ;
2005-09-25 14:28:13 +10:00
if ( copy_from_user ( & v32 , ( void __user * ) arg , sizeof ( v32 ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
2021-02-22 11:06:43 +01:00
memset ( & v , 0 , sizeof ( v ) ) ;
2017-05-24 14:11:03 -04:00
v = ( struct drm_version ) {
. name_len = v32 . name_len ,
. name = compat_ptr ( v32 . name ) ,
. date_len = v32 . date_len ,
. date = compat_ptr ( v32 . date ) ,
. desc_len = v32 . desc_len ,
. desc = compat_ptr ( v32 . desc ) ,
} ;
err = drm_ioctl_kernel ( file , drm_version , & v ,
2019-06-05 14:08:35 +02:00
DRM_RENDER_ALLOW ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
if ( err )
return err ;
2017-05-24 14:11:03 -04:00
v32 . version_major = v . version_major ;
v32 . version_minor = v . version_minor ;
v32 . version_patchlevel = v . version_patchlevel ;
2017-07-12 14:18:32 +08:00
v32 . name_len = v . name_len ;
v32 . date_len = v . date_len ;
v32 . desc_len = v . desc_len ;
2005-09-25 14:28:13 +10:00
if ( copy_to_user ( ( void __user * ) arg , & v32 , sizeof ( v32 ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
return 0 ;
}
typedef struct drm_unique32 {
2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
u32 unique_len ; /* Length of unique */
u32 unique ; /* Unique name for driver instantiation */
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
} drm_unique32_t ;
static int compat_drm_getunique ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
drm_unique32_t uq32 ;
2017-05-24 14:15:20 -04:00
struct drm_unique uq ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
int err ;
2005-09-25 14:28:13 +10:00
if ( copy_from_user ( & uq32 , ( void __user * ) arg , sizeof ( uq32 ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
2021-02-22 11:06:43 +01:00
memset ( & uq , 0 , sizeof ( uq ) ) ;
2017-05-24 14:15:20 -04:00
uq = ( struct drm_unique ) {
. unique_len = uq32 . unique_len ,
. unique = compat_ptr ( uq32 . unique ) ,
} ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2019-06-05 14:08:35 +02:00
err = drm_ioctl_kernel ( file , drm_getunique , & uq , 0 ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
if ( err )
return err ;
2017-05-24 14:15:20 -04:00
uq32 . unique_len = uq . unique_len ;
2005-09-25 14:28:13 +10:00
if ( copy_to_user ( ( void __user * ) arg , & uq32 , sizeof ( uq32 ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
return 0 ;
}
static int compat_drm_setunique ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
2017-05-24 14:20:21 -04:00
/* it's dead */
return - EINVAL ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
}
typedef struct drm_client32 {
2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
int idx ; /* Which client desired? */
int auth ; /* Is client authenticated? */
u32 pid ; /* Process ID */
u32 uid ; /* User ID */
u32 magic ; /* Magic */
u32 iocs ; /* Ioctl count */
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
} drm_client32_t ;
static int compat_drm_getclient ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
drm_client32_t c32 ;
drm_client32_t __user * argp = ( void __user * ) arg ;
2017-05-24 19:10:32 -04:00
struct drm_client client ;
int err ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2017-05-24 19:10:32 -04:00
if ( copy_from_user ( & c32 , argp , sizeof ( c32 ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
2021-02-22 11:06:43 +01:00
memset ( & client , 0 , sizeof ( client ) ) ;
2017-05-24 19:10:32 -04:00
client . idx = c32 . idx ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2019-06-05 14:08:35 +02:00
err = drm_ioctl_kernel ( file , drm_getclient , & client , 0 ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
if ( err )
return err ;
2017-05-24 19:10:32 -04:00
c32 . idx = client . idx ;
c32 . auth = client . auth ;
c32 . pid = client . pid ;
c32 . uid = client . uid ;
c32 . magic = client . magic ;
c32 . iocs = client . iocs ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
if ( copy_to_user ( argp , & c32 , sizeof ( c32 ) ) )
return - EFAULT ;
return 0 ;
}
typedef struct drm_stats32 {
u32 count ;
struct {
u32 value ;
2007-07-16 13:53:57 +10:00
enum drm_stat_type type ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
} data [ 15 ] ;
} drm_stats32_t ;
static int compat_drm_getstats ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
drm_stats32_t __user * argp = ( void __user * ) arg ;
2021-02-22 11:06:08 +01:00
/* getstats is defunct, just clear */
2017-05-24 19:18:06 -04:00
if ( clear_user ( argp , sizeof ( drm_stats32_t ) ) )
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return - EFAULT ;
return 0 ;
}
2017-05-25 23:25:07 -04:00
# if defined(CONFIG_X86)
2008-10-21 11:38:50 -07:00
typedef struct drm_update_draw32 {
drm_drawable_t handle ;
unsigned int type ;
unsigned int num ;
/* 64-bit version has a 32-bit pad here */
u64 data ; /**< Pointer */
} __attribute__ ( ( packed ) ) drm_update_draw32_t ;
static int compat_drm_update_draw ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
2021-02-22 11:06:08 +01:00
/* update_draw is defunct */
return 0 ;
2008-10-21 11:38:50 -07:00
}
2009-02-18 01:35:21 -08:00
# endif
2008-10-21 11:38:50 -07:00
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
struct drm_wait_vblank_request32 {
2007-07-16 13:53:57 +10:00
enum drm_vblank_seq_type type ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
unsigned int sequence ;
u32 signal ;
} ;
struct drm_wait_vblank_reply32 {
2007-07-16 13:53:57 +10:00
enum drm_vblank_seq_type type ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
unsigned int sequence ;
s32 tval_sec ;
s32 tval_usec ;
} ;
typedef union drm_wait_vblank32 {
struct drm_wait_vblank_request32 request ;
struct drm_wait_vblank_reply32 reply ;
} drm_wait_vblank32_t ;
static int compat_drm_wait_vblank ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
drm_wait_vblank32_t __user * argp = ( void __user * ) arg ;
drm_wait_vblank32_t req32 ;
2017-05-25 13:33:11 -04:00
union drm_wait_vblank req ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
int err ;
if ( copy_from_user ( & req32 , argp , sizeof ( req32 ) ) )
return - EFAULT ;
2021-02-22 11:06:43 +01:00
memset ( & req , 0 , sizeof ( req ) ) ;
2017-05-25 13:33:11 -04:00
req . request . type = req32 . request . type ;
req . request . sequence = req32 . request . sequence ;
req . request . signal = req32 . request . signal ;
2023-11-22 13:09:40 +01:00
err = drm_ioctl_kernel ( file , drm_wait_vblank_ioctl , & req , 0 ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2017-05-25 13:33:11 -04:00
req32 . reply . type = req . reply . type ;
req32 . reply . sequence = req . reply . sequence ;
req32 . reply . tval_sec = req . reply . tval_sec ;
req32 . reply . tval_usec = req . reply . tval_usec ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
if ( copy_to_user ( argp , & req32 , sizeof ( req32 ) ) )
return - EFAULT ;
2021-08-12 15:49:17 -04:00
return err ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
}
2017-05-25 23:25:07 -04:00
# if defined(CONFIG_X86)
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
typedef struct drm_mode_fb_cmd232 {
u32 fb_id ;
u32 width ;
u32 height ;
u32 pixel_format ;
u32 flags ;
u32 handles [ 4 ] ;
u32 pitches [ 4 ] ;
u32 offsets [ 4 ] ;
u64 modifier [ 4 ] ;
} __attribute__ ( ( packed ) ) drm_mode_fb_cmd232_t ;
static int compat_drm_mode_addfb2 ( struct file * file , unsigned int cmd ,
unsigned long arg )
{
struct drm_mode_fb_cmd232 __user * argp = ( void __user * ) arg ;
2017-07-06 02:00:00 -04:00
struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 req64 ;
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
int err ;
2021-02-22 11:06:43 +01:00
memset ( & req64 , 0 , sizeof ( req64 ) ) ;
2017-05-25 15:45:04 -04:00
if ( copy_from_user ( & req64 , argp ,
offsetof ( drm_mode_fb_cmd232_t , modifier ) ) )
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
return - EFAULT ;
2017-05-25 15:45:04 -04:00
if ( copy_from_user ( & req64 . modifier , & argp - > modifier ,
sizeof ( req64 . modifier ) ) )
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
return - EFAULT ;
2019-06-05 14:08:35 +02:00
err = drm_ioctl_kernel ( file , drm_mode_addfb2 , & req64 , 0 ) ;
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
if ( err )
return err ;
2017-05-25 15:45:04 -04:00
if ( put_user ( req64 . fb_id , & argp - > fb_id ) )
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
return - EFAULT ;
return 0 ;
}
2016-09-13 14:20:45 -07:00
# endif
2015-07-14 11:13:08 +01:00
2017-05-24 13:59:22 -04:00
static struct {
drm_ioctl_compat_t * fn ;
char * name ;
} drm_compat_ioctls [ ] = {
2017-05-24 13:42:27 -04:00
# define DRM_IOCTL32_DEF(n, f) [DRM_IOCTL_NR(n##32)] = {.fn = f, .name = #n}
2017-05-24 14:11:03 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_VERSION , compat_drm_version ) ,
2017-05-24 14:15:20 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_GET_UNIQUE , compat_drm_getunique ) ,
2017-05-24 19:10:32 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_GET_CLIENT , compat_drm_getclient ) ,
2017-05-24 19:18:06 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_GET_STATS , compat_drm_getstats ) ,
2017-05-24 14:20:21 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_SET_UNIQUE , compat_drm_setunique ) ,
arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture
The Itanium architecture is obsolete, and an informal survey [0] reveals
that any residual use of Itanium hardware in production is mostly HP-UX
or OpenVMS based. The use of Linux on Itanium appears to be limited to
enthusiasts that occasionally boot a fresh Linux kernel to see whether
things are still working as intended, and perhaps to churn out some
distro packages that are rarely used in practice.
None of the original companies behind Itanium still produce or support
any hardware or software for the architecture, and it is listed as
'Orphaned' in the MAINTAINERS file, as apparently, none of the engineers
that contributed on behalf of those companies (nor anyone else, for that
matter) have been willing to support or maintain the architecture
upstream or even be responsible for applying the odd fix. The Intel
firmware team removed all IA-64 support from the Tianocore/EDK2
reference implementation of EFI in 2018. (Itanium is the original
architecture for which EFI was developed, and the way Linux supports it
deviates significantly from other architectures.) Some distros, such as
Debian and Gentoo, still maintain [unofficial] ia64 ports, but many have
dropped support years ago.
While the argument is being made [1] that there is a 'for the common
good' angle to being able to build and run existing projects such as the
Grid Community Toolkit [2] on Itanium for interoperability testing, the
fact remains that none of those projects are known to be deployed on
Linux/ia64, and very few people actually have access to such a system in
the first place. Even if there were ways imaginable in which Linux/ia64
could be put to good use today, what matters is whether anyone is
actually doing that, and this does not appear to be the case.
There are no emulators widely available, and so boot testing Itanium is
generally infeasible for ordinary contributors. GCC still supports IA-64
but its compile farm [3] no longer has any IA-64 machines. GLIBC would
like to get rid of IA-64 [4] too because it would permit some overdue
code cleanups. In summary, the benefits to the ecosystem of having IA-64
be part of it are mostly theoretical, whereas the maintenance overhead
of keeping it supported is real.
So let's rip off the band aid, and remove the IA-64 arch code entirely.
This follows the timeline proposed by the Debian/ia64 maintainer [5],
which removes support in a controlled manner, leaving IA-64 in a known
good state in the most recent LTS release. Other projects will follow
once the kernel support is removed.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMj1kXFCMh_578jniKpUtx_j8ByHnt=s7S+yQ+vGbKt9ud7+kQ@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0075883c-7c51-00f5-2c2d-5119c1820410@web.de/
[2] https://gridcf.org/gct-docs/latest/index.html
[3] https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87bkiilpc4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff58a3e76e5102c94bb5946d99187b358def688a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de/
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2022-10-20 15:54:33 +02:00
# if defined(CONFIG_X86)
2017-05-25 13:28:51 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_UPDATE_DRAW , compat_drm_update_draw ) ,
2009-02-18 01:35:21 -08:00
# endif
2017-05-25 13:33:11 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK , compat_drm_wait_vblank ) ,
arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture
The Itanium architecture is obsolete, and an informal survey [0] reveals
that any residual use of Itanium hardware in production is mostly HP-UX
or OpenVMS based. The use of Linux on Itanium appears to be limited to
enthusiasts that occasionally boot a fresh Linux kernel to see whether
things are still working as intended, and perhaps to churn out some
distro packages that are rarely used in practice.
None of the original companies behind Itanium still produce or support
any hardware or software for the architecture, and it is listed as
'Orphaned' in the MAINTAINERS file, as apparently, none of the engineers
that contributed on behalf of those companies (nor anyone else, for that
matter) have been willing to support or maintain the architecture
upstream or even be responsible for applying the odd fix. The Intel
firmware team removed all IA-64 support from the Tianocore/EDK2
reference implementation of EFI in 2018. (Itanium is the original
architecture for which EFI was developed, and the way Linux supports it
deviates significantly from other architectures.) Some distros, such as
Debian and Gentoo, still maintain [unofficial] ia64 ports, but many have
dropped support years ago.
While the argument is being made [1] that there is a 'for the common
good' angle to being able to build and run existing projects such as the
Grid Community Toolkit [2] on Itanium for interoperability testing, the
fact remains that none of those projects are known to be deployed on
Linux/ia64, and very few people actually have access to such a system in
the first place. Even if there were ways imaginable in which Linux/ia64
could be put to good use today, what matters is whether anyone is
actually doing that, and this does not appear to be the case.
There are no emulators widely available, and so boot testing Itanium is
generally infeasible for ordinary contributors. GCC still supports IA-64
but its compile farm [3] no longer has any IA-64 machines. GLIBC would
like to get rid of IA-64 [4] too because it would permit some overdue
code cleanups. In summary, the benefits to the ecosystem of having IA-64
be part of it are mostly theoretical, whereas the maintenance overhead
of keeping it supported is real.
So let's rip off the band aid, and remove the IA-64 arch code entirely.
This follows the timeline proposed by the Debian/ia64 maintainer [5],
which removes support in a controlled manner, leaving IA-64 in a known
good state in the most recent LTS release. Other projects will follow
once the kernel support is removed.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMj1kXFCMh_578jniKpUtx_j8ByHnt=s7S+yQ+vGbKt9ud7+kQ@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0075883c-7c51-00f5-2c2d-5119c1820410@web.de/
[2] https://gridcf.org/gct-docs/latest/index.html
[3] https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87bkiilpc4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff58a3e76e5102c94bb5946d99187b358def688a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de/
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2022-10-20 15:54:33 +02:00
# if defined(CONFIG_X86)
2017-05-25 15:45:04 -04:00
DRM_IOCTL32_DEF ( DRM_IOCTL_MODE_ADDFB2 , compat_drm_mode_addfb2 ) ,
2016-09-13 14:20:45 -07:00
# endif
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
} ;
/**
2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
* drm_compat_ioctl - 32 bit IOCTL compatibility handler for DRM drivers
* @ filp : file this ioctl is called on
* @ cmd : ioctl cmd number
* @ arg : user argument
*
* Compatibility handler for 32 bit userspace running on 64 kernels . All actual
* IOCTL handling is forwarded to drm_ioctl ( ) , while marshalling structures as
* appropriate . Note that this only handles DRM core IOCTLs , if the driver has
* botched IOCTL itself , it must handle those by wrapping this function .
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
*
2017-04-04 11:52:57 +02:00
* Returns :
* Zero on success , negative error code on failure .
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
*/
long drm_compat_ioctl ( struct file * filp , unsigned int cmd , unsigned long arg )
{
unsigned int nr = DRM_IOCTL_NR ( cmd ) ;
2017-05-25 16:27:27 -04:00
struct drm_file * file_priv = filp - > private_data ;
2022-12-23 11:23:02 +00:00
struct drm_device * dev = file_priv - > minor - > dev ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
drm_ioctl_compat_t * fn ;
int ret ;
2007-11-22 17:02:08 +10:00
/* Assume that ioctls without an explicit compat routine will just
* work . This may not always be a good assumption , but it ' s better
* than always failing .
*/
2006-08-07 20:07:43 +10:00
if ( nr > = ARRAY_SIZE ( drm_compat_ioctls ) )
2009-12-16 22:17:09 +00:00
return drm_ioctl ( filp , cmd , arg ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2017-05-24 13:59:22 -04:00
fn = drm_compat_ioctls [ nr ] . fn ;
if ( ! fn )
return drm_ioctl ( filp , cmd , arg ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
2022-12-23 11:23:02 +00:00
drm_dbg_core ( dev , " comm= \" %s \" , pid=%d, dev=0x%lx, auth=%d, %s \n " ,
current - > comm , task_pid_nr ( current ) ,
( long ) old_encode_dev ( file_priv - > minor - > kdev - > devt ) ,
file_priv - > authenticated ,
drm_compat_ioctls [ nr ] . name ) ;
2017-05-25 16:27:27 -04:00
ret = ( * fn ) ( filp , cmd , arg ) ;
if ( ret )
2022-12-23 11:23:02 +00:00
drm_dbg_core ( dev , " ret = %d \n " , ret ) ;
drm: 32/64-bit DRM ioctl compatibility patch
The patch is against a 2.6.11 kernel tree. I am running this with a
32-bit X server (compiled up from X.org CVS as of a couple of weeks
ago) and 32-bit DRI libraries and clients. All the userland stuff is
identical to what I am using under a 32-bit kernel on my G4 powerbook
(which is a 32-bit machine of course). I haven't tried compiling up a
64-bit X server or clients yet.
In the compatibility routines I have assumed that the kernel can
safely access user addresses after set_fs(KERNEL_DS). That is, where
an ioctl argument structure contains pointers to other structures, and
those other structures are already compatible between the 32-bit and
64-bit ABIs (i.e. they only contain things like chars, shorts or
ints), I just check the address with access_ok() and then pass it
through to the 64-bit ioctl code. I believe this approach may not
work on sparc64, but it does work on ppc64 and x86_64 at least.
One tricky area which may need to be revisited is the question of how
to handle the handles which we pass back to userspace to identify
mappings. These handles are generated in the ADDMAP ioctl and then
passed in as the offset value to mmap. However, offset values for
mmap seem to be generated in other ways as well, particularly for AGP
mappings.
The approach I have ended up with is to generate a fake 32-bit handle
only for _DRM_SHM mappings. The handles for other mappings (AGP, REG,
FB) are physical addresses which are already limited to 32 bits, and
generating fake handles for them created all sorts of problems in the
mmap/nopage code.
This patch has been updated to use the new compatibility ioctls.
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
2005-06-23 21:29:18 +10:00
return ret ;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL ( drm_compat_ioctl ) ;