linux/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303_mdio.c

178 lines
4.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Copyright (C) 2017 Pengutronix, Juergen Borleis <kernel@pengutronix.de>
*
* Partially based on a patch from
* Copyright (c) 2014 Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mdio.h>
#include <linux/phy.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include "lan9303.h"
/* Generate phy-addr and -reg from the input address */
#define PHY_ADDR(x) ((((x) >> 6) + 0x10) & 0x1f)
#define PHY_REG(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x1f)
struct lan9303_mdio {
struct mdio_device *device;
struct lan9303 chip;
};
static void lan9303_mdio_real_write(struct mdio_device *mdio, int reg, u16 val)
{
mdio->bus->write(mdio->bus, PHY_ADDR(reg), PHY_REG(reg), val);
}
static int lan9303_mdio_write(void *ctx, uint32_t reg, uint32_t val)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = (struct lan9303_mdio *)ctx;
reg <<= 2; /* reg num to offset */
net: dsa: lan9303: consequently nested-lock physical MDIO When LAN9303 is MDIO-connected two callchains exist into mdio->bus->write(): 1. switch ports 1&2 ("physical" PHYs): virtual (switch-internal) MDIO bus (lan9303_switch_ops->phy_{read|write})-> lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write} -> mdiobus_{read|write}_nested 2. LAN9303 virtual PHY: virtual MDIO bus (lan9303_phy_{read|write}) -> lan9303_virt_phy_reg_{read|write} -> regmap -> lan9303_mdio_{read|write} If the latter functions just take mutex_lock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock) it triggers a LOCKDEP false-positive splat. It's false-positive because the first mdio_lock in the second callchain above belongs to virtual MDIO bus, the second mdio_lock belongs to physical MDIO bus. Consequent annotation in lan9303_mdio_{read|write} as nested lock (similar to lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write}, it's the same physical MDIO bus) prevents the following splat: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u4:3/609 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000011531c68 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_lock_mutex but task is already holding lock: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested lan9303_mdio_read _regmap_read regmap_read lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork -> #0 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by kworker/u4:3/609: #0: ffff000002842938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #1: ffff80000bacbd60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #2: ffff000007645178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach #3: ffff8000096e6e78 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dsa_register_switch #4: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 609 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.15.71 #1 Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: dump_backtrace show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe ... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: dc7005831523 ("net: dsa: LAN9303: add MDIO managed mode support") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231027065741.534971-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 08:57:38 +02:00
mutex_lock_nested(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
lan9303_mdio_real_write(sw_dev->device, reg, val & 0xffff);
lan9303_mdio_real_write(sw_dev->device, reg + 2, (val >> 16) & 0xffff);
mutex_unlock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock);
return 0;
}
static u16 lan9303_mdio_real_read(struct mdio_device *mdio, int reg)
{
return mdio->bus->read(mdio->bus, PHY_ADDR(reg), PHY_REG(reg));
}
static int lan9303_mdio_read(void *ctx, uint32_t reg, uint32_t *val)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = (struct lan9303_mdio *)ctx;
reg <<= 2; /* reg num to offset */
net: dsa: lan9303: consequently nested-lock physical MDIO When LAN9303 is MDIO-connected two callchains exist into mdio->bus->write(): 1. switch ports 1&2 ("physical" PHYs): virtual (switch-internal) MDIO bus (lan9303_switch_ops->phy_{read|write})-> lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write} -> mdiobus_{read|write}_nested 2. LAN9303 virtual PHY: virtual MDIO bus (lan9303_phy_{read|write}) -> lan9303_virt_phy_reg_{read|write} -> regmap -> lan9303_mdio_{read|write} If the latter functions just take mutex_lock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock) it triggers a LOCKDEP false-positive splat. It's false-positive because the first mdio_lock in the second callchain above belongs to virtual MDIO bus, the second mdio_lock belongs to physical MDIO bus. Consequent annotation in lan9303_mdio_{read|write} as nested lock (similar to lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write}, it's the same physical MDIO bus) prevents the following splat: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.71 #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u4:3/609 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000011531c68 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_lock_mutex but task is already holding lock: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested lan9303_mdio_read _regmap_read regmap_read lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork -> #0 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe mdio_probe really_probe __driver_probe_device driver_probe_device __device_attach_driver bus_for_each_drv __device_attach device_initial_probe bus_probe_device deferred_probe_work_func process_one_work worker_thread kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); lock(&bus->mdio_lock); lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by kworker/u4:3/609: #0: ffff000002842938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #1: ffff80000bacbd60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work #2: ffff000007645178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach #3: ffff8000096e6e78 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dsa_register_switch #4: ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 609 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.15.71 #1 Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func Call trace: dump_backtrace show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire.part.0 lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested regmap_lock_mutex regmap_read lan9303_phy_read dsa_slave_phy_read __mdiobus_read mdiobus_read get_phy_device mdiobus_scan __mdiobus_register dsa_register_switch lan9303_probe lan9303_mdio_probe ... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: dc7005831523 ("net: dsa: LAN9303: add MDIO managed mode support") Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231027065741.534971-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2023-10-27 08:57:38 +02:00
mutex_lock_nested(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
*val = lan9303_mdio_real_read(sw_dev->device, reg);
*val |= (lan9303_mdio_real_read(sw_dev->device, reg + 2) << 16);
mutex_unlock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock);
return 0;
}
static int lan9303_mdio_phy_write(struct lan9303 *chip, int phy, int reg,
u16 val)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = dev_get_drvdata(chip->dev);
return mdiobus_write_nested(sw_dev->device->bus, phy, reg, val);
}
static int lan9303_mdio_phy_read(struct lan9303 *chip, int phy, int reg)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = dev_get_drvdata(chip->dev);
return mdiobus_read_nested(sw_dev->device->bus, phy, reg);
}
static const struct lan9303_phy_ops lan9303_mdio_phy_ops = {
.phy_read = lan9303_mdio_phy_read,
.phy_write = lan9303_mdio_phy_write,
};
static const struct regmap_config lan9303_mdio_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 32,
.reg_stride = 1,
.can_multi_write = true,
.max_register = 0x0ff, /* address bits 0..1 are not used */
.reg_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_LITTLE,
.volatile_table = &lan9303_register_set,
.wr_table = &lan9303_register_set,
.rd_table = &lan9303_register_set,
.reg_read = lan9303_mdio_read,
.reg_write = lan9303_mdio_write,
.cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
};
static int lan9303_mdio_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev;
int ret;
sw_dev = devm_kzalloc(&mdiodev->dev, sizeof(struct lan9303_mdio),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sw_dev)
return -ENOMEM;
sw_dev->chip.regmap = devm_regmap_init(&mdiodev->dev, NULL, sw_dev,
&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(sw_dev->chip.regmap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(sw_dev->chip.regmap);
dev_err(&mdiodev->dev, "regmap init failed: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
/* link forward and backward */
sw_dev->device = mdiodev;
dev_set_drvdata(&mdiodev->dev, sw_dev);
sw_dev->chip.dev = &mdiodev->dev;
sw_dev->chip.ops = &lan9303_mdio_phy_ops;
ret = lan9303_probe(&sw_dev->chip, mdiodev->dev.of_node);
if (ret != 0)
return ret;
dev_info(&mdiodev->dev, "LAN9303 MDIO driver loaded successfully\n");
return 0;
}
static void lan9303_mdio_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&mdiodev->dev);
if (!sw_dev)
return;
lan9303_remove(&sw_dev->chip);
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 16:34:33 +03:00
}
static void lan9303_mdio_shutdown(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
{
struct lan9303_mdio *sw_dev = dev_get_drvdata(&mdiodev->dev);
if (!sw_dev)
return;
lan9303_shutdown(&sw_dev->chip);
dev_set_drvdata(&mdiodev->dev, NULL);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
static const struct of_device_id lan9303_mdio_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "smsc,lan9303-mdio" },
{ .compatible = "microchip,lan9354-mdio" },
{ /* sentinel */ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lan9303_mdio_of_match);
static struct mdio_driver lan9303_mdio_driver = {
.mdiodrv.driver = {
.name = "LAN9303_MDIO",
.of_match_table = lan9303_mdio_of_match,
},
.probe = lan9303_mdio_probe,
.remove = lan9303_mdio_remove,
net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea726e9 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/ Reported-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-09-17 16:34:33 +03:00
.shutdown = lan9303_mdio_shutdown,
};
mdio_module_driver(lan9303_mdio_driver);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, Juergen Borleis <kernel@pengutronix.de>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for SMSC/Microchip LAN9303 three port ethernet switch in MDIO managed mode");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");