linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c

1803 lines
44 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2016 Intel Corporation
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
* paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
* Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
* IN THE SOFTWARE.
*
*/
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <drm/drm_gem.h>
#include "display/intel_frontbuffer.h"
#include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
#include "gt/intel_engine.h"
#include "gt/intel_engine_heartbeat.h"
#include "gt/intel_gt.h"
#include "gt/intel_gt_requests.h"
#include "i915_drv.h"
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
#include "i915_sw_fence_work.h"
#include "i915_trace.h"
#include "i915_vma.h"
static struct kmem_cache *slab_vmas;
static struct i915_vma *i915_vma_alloc(void)
{
return kmem_cache_zalloc(slab_vmas, GFP_KERNEL);
}
static void i915_vma_free(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
return kmem_cache_free(slab_vmas, vma);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_ERRLOG_GEM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_DEBUG_MM)
#include <linux/stackdepot.h>
static void vma_print_allocator(struct i915_vma *vma, const char *reason)
{
char buf[512];
if (!vma->node.stack) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("vma.node [%08llx + %08llx] %s: unknown owner\n",
vma->node.start, vma->node.size, reason);
return;
}
stack_depot_snprint(vma->node.stack, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("vma.node [%08llx + %08llx] %s: inserted at %s\n",
vma->node.start, vma->node.size, reason, buf);
}
#else
static void vma_print_allocator(struct i915_vma *vma, const char *reason)
{
}
#endif
static inline struct i915_vma *active_to_vma(struct i915_active *ref)
{
return container_of(ref, typeof(struct i915_vma), active);
}
static int __i915_vma_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
return i915_vma_tryget(active_to_vma(ref)) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
}
static void __i915_vma_retire(struct i915_active *ref)
{
i915_vma_put(active_to_vma(ref));
}
static struct i915_vma *
vma_create(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct i915_address_space *vm,
const struct i915_ggtt_view *view)
{
struct i915_vma *pos = ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
struct i915_vma *vma;
struct rb_node *rb, **p;
/* The aliasing_ppgtt should never be used directly! */
GEM_BUG_ON(vm == &vm->gt->ggtt->alias->vm);
vma = i915_vma_alloc();
if (vma == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
kref_init(&vma->ref);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
vma->vm = i915_vm_get(vm);
vma->ops = &vm->vma_ops;
vma->obj = obj;
vma->size = obj->base.size;
vma->display_alignment = I915_GTT_MIN_ALIGNMENT;
i915_active_init(&vma->active, __i915_vma_active, __i915_vma_retire, 0);
/* Declare ourselves safe for use inside shrinkers */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP)) {
fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
might_lock(&vma->active.mutex);
fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->closed_link);
if (view && view->type != I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL) {
vma->ggtt_view = *view;
if (view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_PARTIAL) {
GEM_BUG_ON(range_overflows_t(u64,
view->partial.offset,
view->partial.size,
obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT));
vma->size = view->partial.size;
vma->size <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->size > obj->base.size);
} else if (view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_ROTATED) {
vma->size = intel_rotation_info_size(&view->rotated);
vma->size <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
} else if (view->type == I915_GGTT_VIEW_REMAPPED) {
vma->size = intel_remapped_info_size(&view->remapped);
vma->size <<= PAGE_SHIFT;
}
}
if (unlikely(vma->size > vm->total))
goto err_vma;
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(vma->size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE));
drm/i915/gem: Hold obj->vma.lock over for_each_ggtt_vma() While the ggtt vma are protected by their object lifetime, the list continues until it hits a non-ggtt vma, and that vma is not protected and may be freed as we inspect it. Hence, we require the obj->vma.lock to protect the list as we iterate. An example of forgetting to hold the obj->vma.lock is [1642834.464973] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [1642834.464977] CPU: 3 PID: 1954 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 5.6.0-300.fc32.x86_64 #1 [1642834.464979] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS25701/20ARS25701, BIOS GJET94WW (2.44 ) 09/14/2017 [1642834.465021] RIP: 0010:i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x2c0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465024] Code: 8b 84 24 18 01 00 00 f6 c4 80 74 59 49 8b 94 24 a0 00 00 00 49 8b 84 24 e0 00 00 00 49 8b 74 24 10 48 8b 92 30 01 00 00 89 c7 <80> ba 0a 06 00 00 03 0f 87 86 00 00 00 ba 00 00 08 00 b9 00 00 10 [1642834.465025] RSP: 0018:ffffa98780c77d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1642834.465028] RAX: ffff8d232bfb2578 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8d25873a0000 [1642834.465029] RDX: dead000000000122 RSI: fffff0af8ac6e408 RDI: 000000002bfb2578 [1642834.465030] RBP: ffff8d25873a0000 R08: ffff8d252bfb5638 R09: 0000000000000000 [1642834.465031] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8d252bfb5640 R12: ffffa987801cb8f8 [1642834.465032] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8d233e972e50 R15: ffff8d233e972d00 [1642834.465034] FS: 00007f6a3d327f00(0000) GS:ffff8d25926c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1642834.465036] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1642834.465037] CR2: 00007f6a2064d000 CR3: 00000002fb57c001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [1642834.465038] Call Trace: [1642834.465083] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x122/0x230 [i915] [1642834.465121] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465151] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x86/0xd0 [drm] [1642834.465156] ? avc_has_perm+0x3b/0x160 [1642834.465178] drm_ioctl+0x206/0x390 [drm] [1642834.465216] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465221] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x122/0x1c0 [1642834.465226] ? __do_munmap+0x24b/0x4d0 [1642834.465231] ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 [1642834.465235] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1642834.465238] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0 [1642834.465243] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [1642834.465245] RIP: 0033:0x7f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465247] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d aa 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed a9 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [1642834.465249] RSP: 002b:00007ffe71adba28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1642834.465251] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f99048fa40 RCX: 00007f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465253] RDX: 00007ffe71adba30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000e [1642834.465254] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000055f98f3f1798 R09: 0000000000000002 [1642834.465255] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000080 [1642834.465257] R13: 000055f98f3f1690 R14: 00000000c0106461 R15: 00007ffe71adba30 Now to take the spinlock during the list iteration, we need to break it down into two phases. In the first phase under the lock, we cannot sleep and so must defer the actual work to a second list, protected by the ggtt->mutex. We also need to hold the spinlock during creation of a new vma to serialise with updates of the tiling on the object. Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422072805.17340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-22 08:28:05 +01:00
spin_lock(&obj->vma.lock);
if (i915_is_ggtt(vm)) {
if (unlikely(overflows_type(vma->size, u32)))
drm/i915/gem: Hold obj->vma.lock over for_each_ggtt_vma() While the ggtt vma are protected by their object lifetime, the list continues until it hits a non-ggtt vma, and that vma is not protected and may be freed as we inspect it. Hence, we require the obj->vma.lock to protect the list as we iterate. An example of forgetting to hold the obj->vma.lock is [1642834.464973] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [1642834.464977] CPU: 3 PID: 1954 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 5.6.0-300.fc32.x86_64 #1 [1642834.464979] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS25701/20ARS25701, BIOS GJET94WW (2.44 ) 09/14/2017 [1642834.465021] RIP: 0010:i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x2c0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465024] Code: 8b 84 24 18 01 00 00 f6 c4 80 74 59 49 8b 94 24 a0 00 00 00 49 8b 84 24 e0 00 00 00 49 8b 74 24 10 48 8b 92 30 01 00 00 89 c7 <80> ba 0a 06 00 00 03 0f 87 86 00 00 00 ba 00 00 08 00 b9 00 00 10 [1642834.465025] RSP: 0018:ffffa98780c77d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1642834.465028] RAX: ffff8d232bfb2578 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8d25873a0000 [1642834.465029] RDX: dead000000000122 RSI: fffff0af8ac6e408 RDI: 000000002bfb2578 [1642834.465030] RBP: ffff8d25873a0000 R08: ffff8d252bfb5638 R09: 0000000000000000 [1642834.465031] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8d252bfb5640 R12: ffffa987801cb8f8 [1642834.465032] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8d233e972e50 R15: ffff8d233e972d00 [1642834.465034] FS: 00007f6a3d327f00(0000) GS:ffff8d25926c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1642834.465036] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1642834.465037] CR2: 00007f6a2064d000 CR3: 00000002fb57c001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [1642834.465038] Call Trace: [1642834.465083] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x122/0x230 [i915] [1642834.465121] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465151] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x86/0xd0 [drm] [1642834.465156] ? avc_has_perm+0x3b/0x160 [1642834.465178] drm_ioctl+0x206/0x390 [drm] [1642834.465216] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465221] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x122/0x1c0 [1642834.465226] ? __do_munmap+0x24b/0x4d0 [1642834.465231] ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 [1642834.465235] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1642834.465238] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0 [1642834.465243] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [1642834.465245] RIP: 0033:0x7f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465247] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d aa 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed a9 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [1642834.465249] RSP: 002b:00007ffe71adba28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1642834.465251] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f99048fa40 RCX: 00007f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465253] RDX: 00007ffe71adba30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000e [1642834.465254] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000055f98f3f1798 R09: 0000000000000002 [1642834.465255] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000080 [1642834.465257] R13: 000055f98f3f1690 R14: 00000000c0106461 R15: 00007ffe71adba30 Now to take the spinlock during the list iteration, we need to break it down into two phases. In the first phase under the lock, we cannot sleep and so must defer the actual work to a second list, protected by the ggtt->mutex. We also need to hold the spinlock during creation of a new vma to serialise with updates of the tiling on the object. Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422072805.17340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-22 08:28:05 +01:00
goto err_unlock;
vma->fence_size = i915_gem_fence_size(vm->i915, vma->size,
i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj),
i915_gem_object_get_stride(obj));
if (unlikely(vma->fence_size < vma->size || /* overflow */
vma->fence_size > vm->total))
drm/i915/gem: Hold obj->vma.lock over for_each_ggtt_vma() While the ggtt vma are protected by their object lifetime, the list continues until it hits a non-ggtt vma, and that vma is not protected and may be freed as we inspect it. Hence, we require the obj->vma.lock to protect the list as we iterate. An example of forgetting to hold the obj->vma.lock is [1642834.464973] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [1642834.464977] CPU: 3 PID: 1954 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 5.6.0-300.fc32.x86_64 #1 [1642834.464979] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS25701/20ARS25701, BIOS GJET94WW (2.44 ) 09/14/2017 [1642834.465021] RIP: 0010:i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x2c0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465024] Code: 8b 84 24 18 01 00 00 f6 c4 80 74 59 49 8b 94 24 a0 00 00 00 49 8b 84 24 e0 00 00 00 49 8b 74 24 10 48 8b 92 30 01 00 00 89 c7 <80> ba 0a 06 00 00 03 0f 87 86 00 00 00 ba 00 00 08 00 b9 00 00 10 [1642834.465025] RSP: 0018:ffffa98780c77d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1642834.465028] RAX: ffff8d232bfb2578 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8d25873a0000 [1642834.465029] RDX: dead000000000122 RSI: fffff0af8ac6e408 RDI: 000000002bfb2578 [1642834.465030] RBP: ffff8d25873a0000 R08: ffff8d252bfb5638 R09: 0000000000000000 [1642834.465031] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8d252bfb5640 R12: ffffa987801cb8f8 [1642834.465032] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8d233e972e50 R15: ffff8d233e972d00 [1642834.465034] FS: 00007f6a3d327f00(0000) GS:ffff8d25926c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1642834.465036] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1642834.465037] CR2: 00007f6a2064d000 CR3: 00000002fb57c001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [1642834.465038] Call Trace: [1642834.465083] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x122/0x230 [i915] [1642834.465121] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465151] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x86/0xd0 [drm] [1642834.465156] ? avc_has_perm+0x3b/0x160 [1642834.465178] drm_ioctl+0x206/0x390 [drm] [1642834.465216] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465221] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x122/0x1c0 [1642834.465226] ? __do_munmap+0x24b/0x4d0 [1642834.465231] ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 [1642834.465235] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1642834.465238] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0 [1642834.465243] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [1642834.465245] RIP: 0033:0x7f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465247] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d aa 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed a9 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [1642834.465249] RSP: 002b:00007ffe71adba28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1642834.465251] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f99048fa40 RCX: 00007f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465253] RDX: 00007ffe71adba30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000e [1642834.465254] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000055f98f3f1798 R09: 0000000000000002 [1642834.465255] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000080 [1642834.465257] R13: 000055f98f3f1690 R14: 00000000c0106461 R15: 00007ffe71adba30 Now to take the spinlock during the list iteration, we need to break it down into two phases. In the first phase under the lock, we cannot sleep and so must defer the actual work to a second list, protected by the ggtt->mutex. We also need to hold the spinlock during creation of a new vma to serialise with updates of the tiling on the object. Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422072805.17340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-22 08:28:05 +01:00
goto err_unlock;
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(vma->fence_size, I915_GTT_MIN_ALIGNMENT));
vma->fence_alignment = i915_gem_fence_alignment(vm->i915, vma->size,
i915_gem_object_get_tiling(obj),
i915_gem_object_get_stride(obj));
GEM_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(vma->fence_alignment));
__set_bit(I915_VMA_GGTT_BIT, __i915_vma_flags(vma));
}
rb = NULL;
p = &obj->vma.tree.rb_node;
while (*p) {
long cmp;
rb = *p;
pos = rb_entry(rb, struct i915_vma, obj_node);
/*
* If the view already exists in the tree, another thread
* already created a matching vma, so return the older instance
* and dispose of ours.
*/
cmp = i915_vma_compare(pos, vm, view);
if (cmp < 0)
p = &rb->rb_right;
else if (cmp > 0)
p = &rb->rb_left;
else
goto err_unlock;
}
rb_link_node(&vma->obj_node, rb, p);
rb_insert_color(&vma->obj_node, &obj->vma.tree);
if (i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma))
/*
* We put the GGTT vma at the start of the vma-list, followed
* by the ppGGTT vma. This allows us to break early when
* iterating over only the GGTT vma for an object, see
* for_each_ggtt_vma()
*/
list_add(&vma->obj_link, &obj->vma.list);
else
list_add_tail(&vma->obj_link, &obj->vma.list);
spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock);
return vma;
drm/i915/gem: Hold obj->vma.lock over for_each_ggtt_vma() While the ggtt vma are protected by their object lifetime, the list continues until it hits a non-ggtt vma, and that vma is not protected and may be freed as we inspect it. Hence, we require the obj->vma.lock to protect the list as we iterate. An example of forgetting to hold the obj->vma.lock is [1642834.464973] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [1642834.464977] CPU: 3 PID: 1954 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 5.6.0-300.fc32.x86_64 #1 [1642834.464979] Hardware name: LENOVO 20ARS25701/20ARS25701, BIOS GJET94WW (2.44 ) 09/14/2017 [1642834.465021] RIP: 0010:i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x2c0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465024] Code: 8b 84 24 18 01 00 00 f6 c4 80 74 59 49 8b 94 24 a0 00 00 00 49 8b 84 24 e0 00 00 00 49 8b 74 24 10 48 8b 92 30 01 00 00 89 c7 <80> ba 0a 06 00 00 03 0f 87 86 00 00 00 ba 00 00 08 00 b9 00 00 10 [1642834.465025] RSP: 0018:ffffa98780c77d60 EFLAGS: 00010282 [1642834.465028] RAX: ffff8d232bfb2578 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: ffff8d25873a0000 [1642834.465029] RDX: dead000000000122 RSI: fffff0af8ac6e408 RDI: 000000002bfb2578 [1642834.465030] RBP: ffff8d25873a0000 R08: ffff8d252bfb5638 R09: 0000000000000000 [1642834.465031] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8d252bfb5640 R12: ffffa987801cb8f8 [1642834.465032] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8d233e972e50 R15: ffff8d233e972d00 [1642834.465034] FS: 00007f6a3d327f00(0000) GS:ffff8d25926c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1642834.465036] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1642834.465037] CR2: 00007f6a2064d000 CR3: 00000002fb57c001 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [1642834.465038] Call Trace: [1642834.465083] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x122/0x230 [i915] [1642834.465121] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465151] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x86/0xd0 [drm] [1642834.465156] ? avc_has_perm+0x3b/0x160 [1642834.465178] drm_ioctl+0x206/0x390 [drm] [1642834.465216] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x3e0/0x3e0 [i915] [1642834.465221] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x122/0x1c0 [1642834.465226] ? __do_munmap+0x24b/0x4d0 [1642834.465231] ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 [1642834.465235] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1642834.465238] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0xf0 [1642834.465243] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [1642834.465245] RIP: 0033:0x7f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465247] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 1d aa 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ed a9 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [1642834.465249] RSP: 002b:00007ffe71adba28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1642834.465251] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f99048fa40 RCX: 00007f6a3d7b047b [1642834.465253] RDX: 00007ffe71adba30 RSI: 00000000c0106461 RDI: 000000000000000e [1642834.465254] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 000055f98f3f1798 R09: 0000000000000002 [1642834.465255] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000080 [1642834.465257] R13: 000055f98f3f1690 R14: 00000000c0106461 R15: 00007ffe71adba30 Now to take the spinlock during the list iteration, we need to break it down into two phases. In the first phase under the lock, we cannot sleep and so must defer the actual work to a second list, protected by the ggtt->mutex. We also need to hold the spinlock during creation of a new vma to serialise with updates of the tiling on the object. Reported-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422072805.17340-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-22 08:28:05 +01:00
err_unlock:
spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock);
err_vma:
i915_vm_put(vm);
i915_vma_free(vma);
return pos;
}
static struct i915_vma *
i915_vma_lookup(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct i915_address_space *vm,
const struct i915_ggtt_view *view)
{
struct rb_node *rb;
rb = obj->vma.tree.rb_node;
while (rb) {
struct i915_vma *vma = rb_entry(rb, struct i915_vma, obj_node);
long cmp;
cmp = i915_vma_compare(vma, vm, view);
if (cmp == 0)
return vma;
if (cmp < 0)
rb = rb->rb_right;
else
rb = rb->rb_left;
}
return NULL;
}
/**
* i915_vma_instance - return the singleton instance of the VMA
* @obj: parent &struct drm_i915_gem_object to be mapped
* @vm: address space in which the mapping is located
* @view: additional mapping requirements
*
* i915_vma_instance() looks up an existing VMA of the @obj in the @vm with
* the same @view characteristics. If a match is not found, one is created.
* Once created, the VMA is kept until either the object is freed, or the
* address space is closed.
*
* Returns the vma, or an error pointer.
*/
struct i915_vma *
i915_vma_instance(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct i915_address_space *vm,
const struct i915_ggtt_view *view)
{
struct i915_vma *vma;
GEM_BUG_ON(view && !i915_is_ggtt_or_dpt(vm));
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&vm->open));
spin_lock(&obj->vma.lock);
vma = i915_vma_lookup(obj, vm, view);
spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock);
/* vma_create() will resolve the race if another creates the vma */
if (unlikely(!vma))
vma = vma_create(obj, vm, view);
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ERR(vma) && i915_vma_compare(vma, vm, view));
return vma;
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
struct i915_vma_work {
struct dma_fence_work base;
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
struct i915_address_space *vm;
struct i915_vm_pt_stash stash;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
struct i915_vma *vma;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *pinned;
struct i915_sw_dma_fence_cb cb;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
enum i915_cache_level cache_level;
unsigned int flags;
};
static void __vma_bind(struct dma_fence_work *work)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
{
struct i915_vma_work *vw = container_of(work, typeof(*vw), base);
struct i915_vma *vma = vw->vma;
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
vma->ops->bind_vma(vw->vm, &vw->stash,
vma, vw->cache_level, vw->flags);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
}
static void __vma_release(struct dma_fence_work *work)
{
struct i915_vma_work *vw = container_of(work, typeof(*vw), base);
if (vw->pinned) {
__i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(vw->pinned);
i915_gem_object_put(vw->pinned);
}
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
i915_vm_free_pt_stash(vw->vm, &vw->stash);
i915_vm_put(vw->vm);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
static const struct dma_fence_work_ops bind_ops = {
.name = "bind",
.work = __vma_bind,
.release = __vma_release,
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
};
struct i915_vma_work *i915_vma_work(void)
{
struct i915_vma_work *vw;
vw = kzalloc(sizeof(*vw), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vw)
return NULL;
dma_fence_work_init(&vw->base, &bind_ops);
vw->base.dma.error = -EAGAIN; /* disable the worker by default */
return vw;
}
int i915_vma_wait_for_bind(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
int err = 0;
if (rcu_access_pointer(vma->active.excl.fence)) {
struct dma_fence *fence;
rcu_read_lock();
fence = dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(&vma->active.excl.fence);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (fence) {
err = dma_fence_wait(fence, true);
dma_fence_put(fence);
}
}
return err;
}
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM)
static int i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
struct dma_fence *fence = i915_active_fence_get(&vma->active.excl);
int err;
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
if (!fence)
return 0;
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
err = fence->error;
else
err = -EBUSY;
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
dma_fence_put(fence);
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
return err;
}
#else
#define i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(_vma) 0
#endif
/**
* i915_vma_bind - Sets up PTEs for an VMA in it's corresponding address space.
* @vma: VMA to map
* @cache_level: mapping cache level
* @flags: flags like global or local mapping
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
* @work: preallocated worker for allocating and binding the PTE
*
* DMA addresses are taken from the scatter-gather table of this object (or of
* this VMA in case of non-default GGTT views) and PTE entries set up.
* Note that DMA addresses are also the only part of the SG table we care about.
*/
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
int i915_vma_bind(struct i915_vma *vma,
enum i915_cache_level cache_level,
u32 flags,
struct i915_vma_work *work)
{
u32 bind_flags;
u32 vma_flags;
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->size > vma->node.size);
drm/i915: GEM_WARN_ON considered harmful GEM_WARN_ON currently has dangerous semantics where it is completely compiled out on !GEM_DEBUG builds. This can leave users who expect it to be more like a WARN_ON, just without a warning in non-debug builds, in complete ignorance. Another gotcha with it is that it cannot be used as a statement. Which is again different from a standard kernel WARN_ON. This patch fixes both problems by making it behave as one would expect. It can now be used both as an expression and as statement, and also the condition evaluates properly in all builds - code under the conditional will therefore not unexpectedly disappear. To satisfy call sites which really want the code under the conditional to completely disappear, we add GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON and convert some of the callers to it. This one can also be used as both expression and statement. >From the above it follows GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON should be used in situations where we are certain the condition will be hit during development, but at a place in code where error can be handled to the benefit of not crashing the machine. GEM_WARN_ON on the other hand should be used where condition may happen in production and we just want to distinguish the level of debugging output emitted between the production and debug build. v2: * Dropped BUG_ON hunk. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181012063142.16080-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2018-10-12 07:31:42 +01:00
if (GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(range_overflows(vma->node.start,
vma->node.size,
vma->vm->total)))
return -ENODEV;
drm/i915: GEM_WARN_ON considered harmful GEM_WARN_ON currently has dangerous semantics where it is completely compiled out on !GEM_DEBUG builds. This can leave users who expect it to be more like a WARN_ON, just without a warning in non-debug builds, in complete ignorance. Another gotcha with it is that it cannot be used as a statement. Which is again different from a standard kernel WARN_ON. This patch fixes both problems by making it behave as one would expect. It can now be used both as an expression and as statement, and also the condition evaluates properly in all builds - code under the conditional will therefore not unexpectedly disappear. To satisfy call sites which really want the code under the conditional to completely disappear, we add GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON and convert some of the callers to it. This one can also be used as both expression and statement. >From the above it follows GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON should be used in situations where we are certain the condition will be hit during development, but at a place in code where error can be handled to the benefit of not crashing the machine. GEM_WARN_ON on the other hand should be used where condition may happen in production and we just want to distinguish the level of debugging output emitted between the production and debug build. v2: * Dropped BUG_ON hunk. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181012063142.16080-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2018-10-12 07:31:42 +01:00
if (GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON(!flags))
return -EINVAL;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
bind_flags = flags;
bind_flags &= I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND | I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND;
vma_flags = atomic_read(&vma->flags);
vma_flags &= I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND | I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND;
bind_flags &= ~vma_flags;
if (bind_flags == 0)
return 0;
GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&vma->pages_count));
trace_i915_vma_bind(vma, bind_flags);
if (work && bind_flags & vma->vm->bind_async_flags) {
struct dma_fence *prev;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
work->vma = vma;
work->cache_level = cache_level;
work->flags = bind_flags;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
/*
* Note we only want to chain up to the migration fence on
* the pages (not the object itself). As we don't track that,
* yet, we have to use the exclusive fence instead.
*
* Also note that we do not want to track the async vma as
* part of the obj->resv->excl_fence as it only affects
* execution and not content or object's backing store lifetime.
*/
prev = i915_active_set_exclusive(&vma->active, &work->base.dma);
if (prev) {
__i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&work->base.chain,
prev,
&work->cb);
dma_fence_put(prev);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
work->base.dma.error = 0; /* enable the queue_work() */
__i915_gem_object_pin_pages(vma->obj);
work->pinned = i915_gem_object_get(vma->obj);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
} else {
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
if (vma->obj) {
int ret;
ret = i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(vma->obj, true);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
vma->ops->bind_vma(vma->vm, NULL, vma, cache_level, bind_flags);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
}
atomic_or(bind_flags, &vma->flags);
return 0;
}
void __iomem *i915_vma_pin_iomap(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
void __iomem *ptr;
int err;
if (!i915_gem_object_is_lmem(vma->obj)) {
if (GEM_WARN_ON(!i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))) {
err = -ENODEV;
goto err;
}
}
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND));
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(vma));
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
ptr = READ_ONCE(vma->iomap);
if (ptr == NULL) {
/*
* TODO: consider just using i915_gem_object_pin_map() for lmem
* instead, which already supports mapping non-contiguous chunks
* of pages, that way we can also drop the
* I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS when allocating the object.
*/
if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(vma->obj))
ptr = i915_gem_object_lmem_io_map(vma->obj, 0,
vma->obj->base.size);
else
ptr = io_mapping_map_wc(&i915_vm_to_ggtt(vma->vm)->iomap,
vma->node.start,
vma->node.size);
if (ptr == NULL) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (unlikely(cmpxchg(&vma->iomap, NULL, ptr))) {
io_mapping_unmap(ptr);
ptr = vma->iomap;
}
}
__i915_vma_pin(vma);
err = i915_vma_pin_fence(vma);
if (err)
goto err_unpin;
i915_vma_set_ggtt_write(vma);
/* NB Access through the GTT requires the device to be awake. */
return ptr;
err_unpin:
__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
err:
return IO_ERR_PTR(err);
}
void i915_vma_flush_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (i915_vma_unset_ggtt_write(vma))
intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(vma->vm->gt);
}
void i915_vma_unpin_iomap(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->iomap == NULL);
i915_vma_flush_writes(vma);
i915_vma_unpin_fence(vma);
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
}
void i915_vma_unpin_and_release(struct i915_vma **p_vma, unsigned int flags)
{
struct i915_vma *vma;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
vma = fetch_and_zero(p_vma);
if (!vma)
return;
obj = vma->obj;
GEM_BUG_ON(!obj);
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
if (flags & I915_VMA_RELEASE_MAP)
i915_gem_object_unpin_map(obj);
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
}
bool i915_vma_misplaced(const struct i915_vma *vma,
u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
{
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
return false;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (test_bit(I915_VMA_ERROR_BIT, __i915_vma_flags(vma)))
return true;
if (vma->node.size < size)
return true;
GEM_BUG_ON(alignment && !is_power_of_2(alignment));
if (alignment && !IS_ALIGNED(vma->node.start, alignment))
return true;
if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE && !i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
return true;
if (flags & PIN_OFFSET_BIAS &&
vma->node.start < (flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK))
return true;
if (flags & PIN_OFFSET_FIXED &&
vma->node.start != (flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK))
return true;
return false;
}
void __i915_vma_set_map_and_fenceable(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
bool mappable, fenceable;
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(!vma->fence_size);
fenceable = (vma->node.size >= vma->fence_size &&
IS_ALIGNED(vma->node.start, vma->fence_alignment));
mappable = vma->node.start + vma->fence_size <= i915_vm_to_ggtt(vma->vm)->mappable_end;
if (mappable && fenceable)
set_bit(I915_VMA_CAN_FENCE_BIT, __i915_vma_flags(vma));
else
clear_bit(I915_VMA_CAN_FENCE_BIT, __i915_vma_flags(vma));
}
bool i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned long color)
{
struct drm_mm_node *node = &vma->node;
struct drm_mm_node *other;
/*
* On some machines we have to be careful when putting differing types
* of snoopable memory together to avoid the prefetcher crossing memory
* domains and dying. During vm initialisation, we decide whether or not
* these constraints apply and set the drm_mm.color_adjust
* appropriately.
*/
if (!i915_vm_has_cache_coloring(vma->vm))
return true;
/* Only valid to be called on an already inserted vma */
GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(node));
GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&node->node_list));
other = list_prev_entry(node, node_list);
if (i915_node_color_differs(other, color) &&
!drm_mm_hole_follows(other))
return false;
other = list_next_entry(node, node_list);
if (i915_node_color_differs(other, color) &&
!drm_mm_hole_follows(node))
return false;
return true;
}
/**
* i915_vma_insert - finds a slot for the vma in its address space
* @vma: the vma
* @size: requested size in bytes (can be larger than the VMA)
* @alignment: required alignment
* @flags: mask of PIN_* flags to use
*
* First we try to allocate some free space that meets the requirements for
* the VMA. Failiing that, if the flags permit, it will evict an old VMA,
* preferrably the oldest idle entry to make room for the new VMA.
*
* Returns:
* 0 on success, negative error code otherwise.
*/
static int
i915_vma_insert(struct i915_vma *vma, u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
{
unsigned long color;
u64 start, end;
int ret;
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND | I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND));
GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
size = max(size, vma->size);
alignment = max(alignment, vma->display_alignment);
if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE) {
size = max_t(typeof(size), size, vma->fence_size);
alignment = max_t(typeof(alignment),
alignment, vma->fence_alignment);
}
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE));
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(alignment, I915_GTT_MIN_ALIGNMENT));
GEM_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(alignment));
start = flags & PIN_OFFSET_BIAS ? flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK : 0;
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE));
end = vma->vm->total;
if (flags & PIN_MAPPABLE)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
end = min_t(u64, end, i915_vm_to_ggtt(vma->vm)->mappable_end);
if (flags & PIN_ZONE_4G)
end = min_t(u64, end, (1ULL << 32) - I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE);
GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(end, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE));
/* If binding the object/GGTT view requires more space than the entire
* aperture has, reject it early before evicting everything in a vain
* attempt to find space.
*/
if (size > end) {
DRM_DEBUG("Attempting to bind an object larger than the aperture: request=%llu > %s aperture=%llu\n",
size, flags & PIN_MAPPABLE ? "mappable" : "total",
end);
drm/i915: Eliminate lots of iterations over the execobjects array The major scaling bottleneck in execbuffer is the processing of the execobjects. Creating an auxiliary list is inefficient when compared to using the execobject array we already have allocated. Reservation is then split into phases. As we lookup up the VMA, we try and bind it back into active location. Only if that fails, do we add it to the unbound list for phase 2. In phase 2, we try and add all those objects that could not fit into their previous location, with fallback to retrying all objects and evicting the VM in case of severe fragmentation. (This is the same as before, except that phase 1 is now done inline with looking up the VMA to avoid an iteration over the execobject array. In the ideal case, we eliminate the separate reservation phase). During the reservation phase, we only evict from the VM between passes (rather than currently as we try to fit every new VMA). In testing with Unreal Engine's Atlantis demo which stresses the eviction logic on gen7 class hardware, this speed up the framerate by a factor of 2. The second loop amalgamation is between move_to_gpu and move_to_active. As we always submit the request, even if incomplete, we can use the current request to track active VMA as we perform the flushes and synchronisation required. The next big advancement is to avoid copying back to the user any execobjects and relocations that are not changed. v2: Add a Theory of Operation spiel. v3: Fall back to slow relocations in preparation for flushing userptrs. v4: Document struct members, factor out eb_validate_vma(), add a few more comments to explain some magic and hide other magic behind macros. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2017-06-16 15:05:19 +01:00
return -ENOSPC;
}
color = 0;
if (i915_vm_has_cache_coloring(vma->vm))
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
color = vma->obj->cache_level;
if (flags & PIN_OFFSET_FIXED) {
u64 offset = flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK;
if (!IS_ALIGNED(offset, alignment) ||
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
range_overflows(offset, size, end))
return -EINVAL;
ret = i915_gem_gtt_reserve(vma->vm, &vma->node,
size, offset, color,
flags);
if (ret)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
return ret;
} else {
/*
* We only support huge gtt pages through the 48b PPGTT,
* however we also don't want to force any alignment for
* objects which need to be tightly packed into the low 32bits.
*
* Note that we assume that GGTT are limited to 4GiB for the
* forseeable future. See also i915_ggtt_offset().
*/
if (upper_32_bits(end - 1) &&
vma->page_sizes.sg > I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE) {
/*
* We can't mix 64K and 4K PTEs in the same page-table
* (2M block), and so to avoid the ugliness and
* complexity of coloring we opt for just aligning 64K
* objects to 2M.
*/
u64 page_alignment =
rounddown_pow_of_two(vma->page_sizes.sg |
I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M);
/*
* Check we don't expand for the limited Global GTT
* (mappable aperture is even more precious!). This
* also checks that we exclude the aliasing-ppgtt.
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma));
alignment = max(alignment, page_alignment);
if (vma->page_sizes.sg & I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K)
size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M);
}
ret = i915_gem_gtt_insert(vma->vm, &vma->node,
size, alignment, color,
start, end, flags);
if (ret)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
return ret;
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->node.start < start);
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->node.start + vma->node.size > end);
}
GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(vma, color));
list_add_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
return 0;
}
static void
i915_vma_detach(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND | I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND));
/*
* And finally now the object is completely decoupled from this
* vma, we can drop its hold on the backing storage and allow
* it to be reaped by the shrinker.
*/
list_del(&vma->vm_link);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
static bool try_qad_pin(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned int flags)
{
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
unsigned int bound;
bool pinned = true;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
bound = atomic_read(&vma->flags);
do {
if (unlikely(flags & ~bound))
return false;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (unlikely(bound & (I915_VMA_OVERFLOW | I915_VMA_ERROR)))
return false;
if (!(bound & I915_VMA_PIN_MASK))
goto unpinned;
GEM_BUG_ON(((bound + 1) & I915_VMA_PIN_MASK) == 0);
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&vma->flags, &bound, bound + 1));
return true;
unpinned:
/*
* If pin_count==0, but we are bound, check under the lock to avoid
* racing with a concurrent i915_vma_unbind().
*/
mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
do {
if (unlikely(bound & (I915_VMA_OVERFLOW | I915_VMA_ERROR))) {
pinned = false;
break;
}
if (unlikely(flags & ~bound)) {
pinned = false;
break;
}
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&vma->flags, &bound, bound + 1));
mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
return pinned;
}
static struct scatterlist *
rotate_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int offset,
unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
unsigned int src_stride, unsigned int dst_stride,
struct sg_table *st, struct scatterlist *sg)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
{
unsigned int column, row;
unsigned int src_idx;
for (column = 0; column < width; column++) {
unsigned int left;
src_idx = src_stride * (height - 1) + column + offset;
for (row = 0; row < height; row++) {
st->nents++;
/*
* We don't need the pages, but need to initialize
* the entries so the sg list can be happily traversed.
* The only thing we need are DMA addresses.
*/
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) =
i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(obj, src_idx);
sg_dma_len(sg) = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
sg = sg_next(sg);
src_idx -= src_stride;
}
left = (dst_stride - height) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
if (!left)
continue;
st->nents++;
/*
* The DE ignores the PTEs for the padding tiles, the sg entry
* here is just a conenience to indicate how many padding PTEs
* to insert at this spot.
*/
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, left, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) = 0;
sg_dma_len(sg) = left;
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
return sg;
}
static noinline struct sg_table *
intel_rotate_pages(struct intel_rotation_info *rot_info,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
unsigned int size = intel_rotation_info_size(rot_info);
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
struct sg_table *st;
struct scatterlist *sg;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
int i;
/* Allocate target SG list. */
st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!st)
goto err_st_alloc;
ret = sg_alloc_table(st, size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto err_sg_alloc;
st->nents = 0;
sg = st->sgl;
for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rot_info->plane); i++)
sg = rotate_pages(obj, rot_info->plane[i].offset,
rot_info->plane[i].width, rot_info->plane[i].height,
rot_info->plane[i].src_stride,
rot_info->plane[i].dst_stride,
st, sg);
return st;
err_sg_alloc:
kfree(st);
err_st_alloc:
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Failed to create rotated mapping for object size %zu! (%ux%u tiles, %u pages)\n",
obj->base.size, rot_info->plane[0].width,
rot_info->plane[0].height, size);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static struct scatterlist *
remap_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
unsigned int offset, unsigned int alignment_pad,
unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
unsigned int src_stride, unsigned int dst_stride,
struct sg_table *st, struct scatterlist *sg)
{
unsigned int row;
if (!width || !height)
return sg;
if (alignment_pad) {
st->nents++;
/*
* The DE ignores the PTEs for the padding tiles, the sg entry
* here is just a convenience to indicate how many padding PTEs
* to insert at this spot.
*/
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, alignment_pad * 4096, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) = 0;
sg_dma_len(sg) = alignment_pad * 4096;
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
for (row = 0; row < height; row++) {
unsigned int left = width * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
while (left) {
dma_addr_t addr;
unsigned int length;
/*
* We don't need the pages, but need to initialize
* the entries so the sg list can be happily traversed.
* The only thing we need are DMA addresses.
*/
addr = i915_gem_object_get_dma_address_len(obj, offset, &length);
length = min(left, length);
st->nents++;
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, length, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) = addr;
sg_dma_len(sg) = length;
sg = sg_next(sg);
offset += length / I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
left -= length;
}
offset += src_stride - width;
left = (dst_stride - width) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
if (!left)
continue;
st->nents++;
/*
* The DE ignores the PTEs for the padding tiles, the sg entry
* here is just a conenience to indicate how many padding PTEs
* to insert at this spot.
*/
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, left, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) = 0;
sg_dma_len(sg) = left;
sg = sg_next(sg);
}
return sg;
}
static noinline struct sg_table *
intel_remap_pages(struct intel_remapped_info *rem_info,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
unsigned int size = intel_remapped_info_size(rem_info);
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
struct sg_table *st;
struct scatterlist *sg;
unsigned int gtt_offset = 0;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
int i;
/* Allocate target SG list. */
st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!st)
goto err_st_alloc;
ret = sg_alloc_table(st, size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto err_sg_alloc;
st->nents = 0;
sg = st->sgl;
for (i = 0 ; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rem_info->plane); i++) {
unsigned int alignment_pad = 0;
if (rem_info->plane_alignment)
alignment_pad = ALIGN(gtt_offset, rem_info->plane_alignment) - gtt_offset;
sg = remap_pages(obj,
rem_info->plane[i].offset, alignment_pad,
rem_info->plane[i].width, rem_info->plane[i].height,
rem_info->plane[i].src_stride, rem_info->plane[i].dst_stride,
st, sg);
gtt_offset += alignment_pad +
rem_info->plane[i].dst_stride * rem_info->plane[i].height;
}
i915_sg_trim(st);
return st;
err_sg_alloc:
kfree(st);
err_st_alloc:
drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Failed to create remapped mapping for object size %zu! (%ux%u tiles, %u pages)\n",
obj->base.size, rem_info->plane[0].width,
rem_info->plane[0].height, size);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static noinline struct sg_table *
intel_partial_pages(const struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
struct sg_table *st;
struct scatterlist *sg, *iter;
unsigned int count = view->partial.size;
unsigned int offset;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
st = kmalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!st)
goto err_st_alloc;
ret = sg_alloc_table(st, count, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto err_sg_alloc;
iter = i915_gem_object_get_sg_dma(obj, view->partial.offset, &offset);
GEM_BUG_ON(!iter);
sg = st->sgl;
st->nents = 0;
do {
unsigned int len;
len = min(sg_dma_len(iter) - (offset << PAGE_SHIFT),
count << PAGE_SHIFT);
sg_set_page(sg, NULL, len, 0);
sg_dma_address(sg) =
sg_dma_address(iter) + (offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
sg_dma_len(sg) = len;
st->nents++;
count -= len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (count == 0) {
sg_mark_end(sg);
i915_sg_trim(st); /* Drop any unused tail entries. */
return st;
}
sg = __sg_next(sg);
iter = __sg_next(iter);
offset = 0;
} while (1);
err_sg_alloc:
kfree(st);
err_st_alloc:
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static int
__i915_vma_get_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
struct sg_table *pages;
int ret;
/*
* The vma->pages are only valid within the lifespan of the borrowed
* obj->mm.pages. When the obj->mm.pages sg_table is regenerated, so
* must be the vma->pages. A simple rule is that vma->pages must only
* be accessed when the obj->mm.pages are pinned.
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(vma->obj));
switch (vma->ggtt_view.type) {
default:
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->ggtt_view.type);
fallthrough;
case I915_GGTT_VIEW_NORMAL:
pages = vma->obj->mm.pages;
break;
case I915_GGTT_VIEW_ROTATED:
pages =
intel_rotate_pages(&vma->ggtt_view.rotated, vma->obj);
break;
case I915_GGTT_VIEW_REMAPPED:
pages =
intel_remap_pages(&vma->ggtt_view.remapped, vma->obj);
break;
case I915_GGTT_VIEW_PARTIAL:
pages = intel_partial_pages(&vma->ggtt_view, vma->obj);
break;
}
ret = 0;
if (IS_ERR(pages)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(pages);
pages = NULL;
drm_err(&vma->vm->i915->drm,
"Failed to get pages for VMA view type %u (%d)!\n",
vma->ggtt_view.type, ret);
}
vma->pages = pages;
return ret;
}
I915_SELFTEST_EXPORT int i915_vma_get_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
int err;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (atomic_add_unless(&vma->pages_count, 1, 0))
return 0;
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(vma->obj);
if (err)
return err;
err = __i915_vma_get_pages(vma);
if (err)
goto err_unpin;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
vma->page_sizes = vma->obj->mm.page_sizes;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
atomic_inc(&vma->pages_count);
return 0;
err_unpin:
__i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(vma->obj);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
return err;
}
static void __vma_put_pages(struct i915_vma *vma, unsigned int count)
{
/* We allocate under vma_get_pages, so beware the shrinker */
struct sg_table *pages = READ_ONCE(vma->pages);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
GEM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&vma->pages_count) < count);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (atomic_sub_return(count, &vma->pages_count) == 0) {
/*
* The atomic_sub_return is a read barrier for the READ_ONCE of
* vma->pages above.
*
* READ_ONCE is safe because this is either called from the same
* function (i915_vma_pin_ww), or guarded by vma->vm->mutex.
*
* TODO: We're leaving vma->pages dangling, until vma->obj->resv
* lock is required.
*/
if (pages != vma->obj->mm.pages) {
sg_free_table(pages);
kfree(pages);
}
i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(vma->obj);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
}
I915_SELFTEST_EXPORT void i915_vma_put_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
{
if (atomic_add_unless(&vma->pages_count, -1, 1))
return;
__vma_put_pages(vma, 1);
}
static void vma_unbind_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
unsigned int count;
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
/* The upper portion of pages_count is the number of bindings */
count = atomic_read(&vma->pages_count);
count >>= I915_VMA_PAGES_BIAS;
GEM_BUG_ON(!count);
__vma_put_pages(vma, count | count << I915_VMA_PAGES_BIAS);
}
int i915_vma_pin_ww(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
{
struct i915_vma_work *work = NULL;
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
struct dma_fence *moving = NULL;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
unsigned int bound;
int err;
assert_vma_held(vma);
GEM_BUG_ON(!ww);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
BUILD_BUG_ON(PIN_GLOBAL != I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND);
BUILD_BUG_ON(PIN_USER != I915_VMA_LOCAL_BIND);
GEM_BUG_ON(!(flags & (PIN_USER | PIN_GLOBAL)));
/* First try and grab the pin without rebinding the vma */
if (try_qad_pin(vma, flags & I915_VMA_BIND_MASK))
return 0;
err = i915_vma_get_pages(vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (err)
return err;
if (flags & PIN_GLOBAL)
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm);
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
moving = vma->obj ? i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(vma->obj) : NULL;
if (flags & vma->vm->bind_async_flags || moving) {
/* lock VM */
err = i915_vm_lock_objects(vma->vm, ww);
if (err)
goto err_rpm;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
work = i915_vma_work();
if (!work) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_rpm;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
}
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
work->vm = i915_vm_get(vma->vm);
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
dma_fence_work_chain(&work->base, moving);
drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories We need to make the DMA allocations used for page directories to be performed up front so that we can include those allocations in our memory reservation pass. The downside is that we have to assume the worst case, even before we know the final layout, and always allocate enough page directories for this object, even when there will be overlap. This unfortunately can be quite expensive, especially as we have to clear/reset the page directories and DMA pages, but it should only be required during early phases of a workload when new objects are being discovered, or after memory/eviction pressure when we need to rebind. Once we reach steady state, the objects should not be moved and we no longer need to preallocating the pages tables. It should be noted that the lifetime for the page directories DMA is more or less decoupled from individual fences as they will be shared across objects across timelines. v2: Only allocate enough PD space for the PTE we may use, we do not need to allocate PD that will be left as scratch. v3: Store the shift unto the first PD level to encapsulate the different PTE counts for gen6/gen8. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-29 17:42:17 +01:00
/* Allocate enough page directories to used PTE */
if (vma->vm->allocate_va_range) {
drm/i915: check i915_vm_alloc_pt_stash for errors If we are really unlucky and encounter an error during i915_vm_alloc_pt_stash, we end up passing an empty pt/pd stash all the way down into the low-level ppgtt alloc code, leading to explosions, since it expects at least the required number of pt/pd for the va range. [ 211.981418] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 211.981421] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 211.981422] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 211.981424] PGD 80000008439cb067 P4D 80000008439cb067 PUD 84a37f067 PMD 0 [ 211.981427] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 211.981428] CPU: 1 PID: 1301 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G U I 5.9.0-rc5+ #3 [ 211.981430] Hardware name: /NUC6i7KYB, BIOS KYSKLi70.86A.0050.2017.0831.1924 08/31/2017 [ 211.981521] RIP: 0010:__gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0x1ed/0x3c0 [i915] [ 211.981523] Code: c1 48 c7 c7 5d 5d fe c0 65 ff 0d ee 1d 03 3f e8 d9 91 1f e2 8b 55 c4 31 c0 48 8b 75 b8 85 d2 0f 95 c0 48 8b 1c c6 48 89 45 98 <48> 8b 03 48 8b 90 58 02 00 00 48 85 d2 0f 84 07 ea 15 00 48 81 fa [ 211.981526] RSP: 0018:ffffba2cc0eb3970 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 211.981527] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 [ 211.981529] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffff9be998bdb8c0 RDI: ffff9be99c844300 [ 211.981530] RBP: ffffba2cc0eb39d8 R08: 0000000000000640 R09: ffff9be97cdfd000 [ 211.981531] R10: ffff9be97cdfd614 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 211.981532] R13: ffff9be98607ba20 R14: ffff9be995a0b400 R15: ffffba2cc0eb39e8 [ 211.981534] FS: 00007f0f10b31000(0000) GS:ffff9be99fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 211.981536] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 211.981538] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000084d74e006 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 211.981539] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 211.981541] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 211.981542] Call Trace: [ 211.981609] gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0x79/0x90 [i915] [ 211.981678] ppgtt_bind_vma+0x36/0x80 [i915] [ 211.981756] __vma_bind+0x39/0x40 [i915] [ 211.981818] fence_work+0x21/0x98 [i915] [ 211.981879] fence_notify+0x8d/0x128 [i915] [ 211.981939] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x62/0x240 [i915] [ 211.982018] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x1ee/0x9c0 [i915] Fixes: cd0452aa2a0d ("drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200921160844.73186-1-matthew.auld@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 1604cb2aa7fafd83e11f9257f765a5f5dd7c19d3) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2020-09-21 17:08:44 +01:00
err = i915_vm_alloc_pt_stash(vma->vm,
&work->stash,
vma->size);
if (err)
goto err_fence;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
err = i915_vm_map_pt_stash(vma->vm, &work->stash);
if (err)
goto err_fence;
}
}
/*
* Differentiate between user/kernel vma inside the aliasing-ppgtt.
*
* We conflate the Global GTT with the user's vma when using the
* aliasing-ppgtt, but it is still vitally important to try and
* keep the use cases distinct. For example, userptr objects are
* not allowed inside the Global GTT as that will cause lock
* inversions when we have to evict them the mmu_notifier callbacks -
* but they are allowed to be part of the user ppGTT which can never
* be mapped. As such we try to give the distinct users of the same
* mutex, distinct lockclasses [equivalent to how we keep i915_ggtt
* and i915_ppgtt separate].
*
* NB this may cause us to mask real lock inversions -- while the
* code is safe today, lockdep may not be able to spot future
* transgressions.
*/
err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&vma->vm->mutex,
!(flags & PIN_GLOBAL));
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (err)
goto err_fence;
/* No more allocations allowed now we hold vm->mutex */
if (unlikely(i915_vma_is_closed(vma))) {
err = -ENOENT;
goto err_unlock;
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
bound = atomic_read(&vma->flags);
if (unlikely(bound & I915_VMA_ERROR)) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_unlock;
}
if (unlikely(!((bound + 1) & I915_VMA_PIN_MASK))) {
err = -EAGAIN; /* pins are meant to be fairly temporary */
goto err_unlock;
}
if (unlikely(!(flags & ~bound & I915_VMA_BIND_MASK))) {
__i915_vma_pin(vma);
goto err_unlock;
}
err = i915_active_acquire(&vma->active);
if (err)
goto err_unlock;
if (!(bound & I915_VMA_BIND_MASK)) {
err = i915_vma_insert(vma, size, alignment, flags);
if (err)
goto err_active;
if (i915_is_ggtt(vma->vm))
__i915_vma_set_map_and_fenceable(vma);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
GEM_BUG_ON(!vma->pages);
err = i915_vma_bind(vma,
vma->obj->cache_level,
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
flags, work);
if (err)
goto err_remove;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
/* There should only be at most 2 active bindings (user, global) */
GEM_BUG_ON(bound + I915_VMA_PAGES_ACTIVE < bound);
atomic_add(I915_VMA_PAGES_ACTIVE, &vma->pages_count);
list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
__i915_vma_pin(vma);
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_pinned(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_bound(vma, flags));
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_misplaced(vma, size, alignment, flags));
err_remove:
if (!i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_BIND_MASK)) {
i915_vma_detach(vma);
drm_mm_remove_node(&vma->node);
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
err_active:
i915_active_release(&vma->active);
err_unlock:
mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
err_fence:
if (work)
dma_fence_work_commit_imm(&work->base);
err_rpm:
if (wakeref)
intel_runtime_pm_put(&vma->vm->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
2021-11-22 22:45:49 +01:00
if (moving)
dma_fence_put(moving);
i915_vma_put_pages(vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
return err;
}
static void flush_idle_contexts(struct intel_gt *gt)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
enum intel_engine_id id;
for_each_engine(engine, gt, id)
intel_engine_flush_barriers(engine);
intel_gt_wait_for_idle(gt, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
}
static int __i915_ggtt_pin(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
u32 align, unsigned int flags)
{
struct i915_address_space *vm = vma->vm;
int err;
do {
err = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, ww, 0, align, flags | PIN_GLOBAL);
if (err != -ENOSPC) {
if (!err) {
err = i915_vma_wait_for_bind(vma);
if (err)
i915_vma_unpin(vma);
}
return err;
}
/* Unlike i915_vma_pin, we don't take no for an answer! */
flush_idle_contexts(vm->gt);
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&vm->mutex) == 0) {
i915_gem_evict_vm(vm);
mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
}
} while (1);
}
int i915_ggtt_pin(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
u32 align, unsigned int flags)
{
struct i915_gem_ww_ctx _ww;
int err;
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma));
if (ww)
return __i915_ggtt_pin(vma, ww, align, flags);
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
WARN_ON(dma_resv_held(vma->obj->base.resv));
#endif
for_i915_gem_ww(&_ww, err, true) {
err = i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, &_ww);
if (!err)
err = __i915_ggtt_pin(vma, &_ww, align, flags);
}
return err;
}
static void __vma_close(struct i915_vma *vma, struct intel_gt *gt)
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
{
/*
* We defer actually closing, unbinding and destroying the VMA until
* the next idle point, or if the object is freed in the meantime. By
* postponing the unbind, we allow for it to be resurrected by the
* client, avoiding the work required to rebind the VMA. This is
* advantageous for DRI, where the client/server pass objects
* between themselves, temporarily opening a local VMA to the
* object, and then closing it again. The same object is then reused
* on the next frame (or two, depending on the depth of the swap queue)
* causing us to rebind the VMA once more. This ends up being a lot
* of wasted work for the steady state.
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_closed(vma));
list_add(&vma->closed_link, &gt->closed_vma);
}
void i915_vma_close(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
struct intel_gt *gt = vma->vm->gt;
unsigned long flags;
if (i915_vma_is_ggtt(vma))
return;
GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&vma->open_count));
if (atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave(&vma->open_count,
&gt->closed_lock,
flags)) {
__vma_close(vma, gt);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gt->closed_lock, flags);
}
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
}
static void __i915_vma_remove_closed(struct i915_vma *vma)
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
{
struct intel_gt *gt = vma->vm->gt;
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
spin_lock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
list_del_init(&vma->closed_link);
spin_unlock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
}
void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (i915_vma_is_closed(vma))
__i915_vma_remove_closed(vma);
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
}
void i915_vma_release(struct kref *ref)
{
struct i915_vma *vma = container_of(ref, typeof(*vma), ref);
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
atomic_and(~I915_VMA_PIN_MASK, &vma->flags);
WARN_ON(__i915_vma_unbind(vma));
mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
GEM_BUG_ON(drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
}
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_active(vma));
spin_lock(&obj->vma.lock);
list_del(&vma->obj_link);
if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&vma->obj_node))
rb_erase(&vma->obj_node, &obj->vma.tree);
spin_unlock(&obj->vma.lock);
__i915_vma_remove_closed(vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
i915_vm_put(vma->vm);
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
i915_active_fini(&vma->active);
i915_vma_free(vma);
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
}
void i915_vma_parked(struct intel_gt *gt)
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
{
struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
LIST_HEAD(closed);
spin_lock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &gt->closed_vma, closed_link) {
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
struct i915_address_space *vm = vma->vm;
/* XXX All to avoid keeping a reference on i915_vma itself */
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&obj->base.refcount))
continue;
if (!i915_vm_tryopen(vm)) {
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
continue;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
}
list_move(&vma->closed_link, &closed);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
/* As the GT is held idle, no vma can be reopened as we destroy them */
list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &closed, closed_link) {
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
struct i915_address_space *vm = vma->vm;
drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space. This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps (with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager every time. However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is able to access the same object from the same context again. If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual. In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in the bud. v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc. v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-03 20:51:14 +01:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->closed_link);
__i915_vma_put(vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
i915_gem_object_put(obj);
i915_vm_close(vm);
}
}
static void __i915_vma_iounmap(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_pinned(vma));
if (vma->iomap == NULL)
return;
io_mapping_unmap(vma->iomap);
vma->iomap = NULL;
}
void i915_vma_revoke_mmap(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
struct drm_vma_offset_node *node;
u64 vma_offset;
if (!i915_vma_has_userfault(vma))
return;
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma));
GEM_BUG_ON(!vma->obj->userfault_count);
node = &vma->mmo->vma_node;
vma_offset = vma->ggtt_view.partial.offset << PAGE_SHIFT;
unmap_mapping_range(vma->vm->i915->drm.anon_inode->i_mapping,
drm_vma_node_offset_addr(node) + vma_offset,
vma->size,
1);
i915_vma_unset_userfault(vma);
if (!--vma->obj->userfault_count)
list_del(&vma->obj->userfault_link);
}
static int
__i915_request_await_bind(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_vma *vma)
{
return __i915_request_await_exclusive(rq, &vma->active);
}
static int __i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma, struct i915_request *rq)
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
{
int err;
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_pinned(vma));
/* Wait for the vma to be bound before we start! */
err = __i915_request_await_bind(rq, vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (err)
return err;
return i915_active_add_request(&vma->active, rq);
}
drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-10-14 10:20:00 -07:00
int _i915_vma_move_to_active(struct i915_vma *vma,
struct i915_request *rq,
struct dma_fence *fence,
unsigned int flags)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
int err;
assert_object_held(obj);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
err = __i915_vma_move_to_active(vma, rq);
if (unlikely(err))
return err;
if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE) {
struct intel_frontbuffer *front;
front = __intel_frontbuffer_get(obj);
if (unlikely(front)) {
if (intel_frontbuffer_invalidate(front, ORIGIN_CS))
i915_active_add_request(&front->write, rq);
intel_frontbuffer_put(front);
}
drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-10-14 10:20:00 -07:00
if (fence) {
dma_resv_add_excl_fence(vma->obj->base.resv, fence);
drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-10-14 10:20:00 -07:00
obj->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
obj->read_domains = 0;
}
} else {
if (!(flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NO_RESERVE)) {
err = dma_resv_reserve_shared(vma->obj->base.resv, 1);
if (unlikely(err))
return err;
}
drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-10-14 10:20:00 -07:00
if (fence) {
dma_resv_add_shared_fence(vma->obj->base.resv, fence);
drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Allow multiple batch buffers to be submitted in a single execbuf IOCTL after a context has been configured with the 'set_parallel' extension. The number batches is implicit based on the contexts configuration. This is implemented with a series of loops. First a loop is used to find all the batches, a loop to pin all the HW contexts, a loop to create all the requests, a loop to submit (emit BB start, etc...) all the requests, a loop to tie the requests to the VMAs they touch, and finally a loop to commit the requests to the backend. A composite fence is also created for the generated requests to return to the user and to stick in dma resv slots. No behavior from the existing IOCTL should be changed aside from when throttling because the ring for a context is full. In this situation, i915 will now wait while holding the object locks. This change was done because the code is much simpler to wait while holding the locks and we believe there isn't a huge benefit of dropping these locks. If this proves false we can restructure the code to drop the locks during the wait. IGT: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/447008/?series=93071&rev=1 media UMD: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/1252 v2: (Matthew Brost) - Return proper error value if i915_request_create fails v3: (John Harrison) - Add comment explaining create / add order loops + locking - Update commit message explaining different in IOCTL behavior - Line wrap some comments - eb_add_request returns void - Return -EINVAL rather triggering BUG_ON if cmd parser used (Checkpatch) - Check eb->batch_len[*current_batch] v4: (CI) - Set batch len if passed if via execbuf args - Call __i915_request_skip after __i915_request_commit (Kernel test robot) - Initialize rq to NULL in eb_pin_timeline v5: (John Harrison) - Fix typo in comments near bb order loops Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-21-matthew.brost@intel.com
2021-10-14 10:20:00 -07:00
obj->write_domain = 0;
}
}
if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE && vma->fence)
i915_active_add_request(&vma->fence->active, rq);
obj->read_domains |= I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
obj->mm.dirty = true;
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_vma_is_active(vma));
return 0;
}
void __i915_vma_evict(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_pinned(vma));
if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma)) {
/* Force a pagefault for domain tracking on next user access */
i915_vma_revoke_mmap(vma);
/*
* Check that we have flushed all writes through the GGTT
* before the unbind, other due to non-strict nature of those
* indirect writes they may end up referencing the GGTT PTE
* after the unbind.
*
* Note that we may be concurrently poking at the GGTT_WRITE
* bit from set-domain, as we mark all GGTT vma associated
* with an object. We know this is for another vma, as we
* are currently unbinding this one -- so if this vma will be
* reused, it will be refaulted and have its dirty bit set
* before the next write.
*/
i915_vma_flush_writes(vma);
/* release the fence reg _after_ flushing */
i915_vma_revoke_fence(vma);
__i915_vma_iounmap(vma);
clear_bit(I915_VMA_CAN_FENCE_BIT, __i915_vma_flags(vma));
}
GEM_BUG_ON(vma->fence);
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_has_userfault(vma));
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (likely(atomic_read(&vma->vm->open))) {
trace_i915_vma_unbind(vma);
vma->ops->unbind_vma(vma->vm, vma);
}
atomic_and(~(I915_VMA_BIND_MASK | I915_VMA_ERROR | I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE),
&vma->flags);
i915_vma_detach(vma);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
vma_unbind_pages(vma);
}
int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
return 0;
if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma)) {
vma_print_allocator(vma, "is pinned");
return -EAGAIN;
}
/*
* After confirming that no one else is pinning this vma, wait for
* any laggards who may have crept in during the wait (through
* a residual pin skipping the vm->mutex) to complete.
*/
ret = i915_vma_sync(vma);
if (ret)
return ret;
GEM_BUG_ON(i915_vma_is_active(vma));
__i915_vma_evict(vma);
drm_mm_remove_node(&vma->node); /* pairs with i915_vma_release() */
return 0;
}
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
struct i915_address_space *vm = vma->vm;
intel_wakeref_t wakeref = 0;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
int err;
/* Optimistic wait before taking the mutex */
err = i915_vma_sync(vma);
if (err)
return err;
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
return 0;
drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind Do an early rejection of a i915_vma_unbind() attempt if the i915_vma is currently pinned, without waiting to see if the inflight operations may unpin it. We see this problem with the shrinker trying to unbind the active vma from inside its bind worker: <6> [472.618968] Workqueue: events_unbound fence_work [i915] <4> [472.618970] Call Trace: <4> [472.618974] ? __schedule+0x2e5/0x810 <4> [472.618978] schedule+0x37/0xe0 <4> [472.618982] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 <4> [472.618984] __mutex_lock+0x281/0x9c0 <4> [472.618987] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 <4> [472.618989] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x60 <4> [472.619038] ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915] <4> [472.619084] ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915] <4> [472.619122] i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915] <4> [472.619165] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x1dc/0x400 [i915] <4> [472.619208] i915_gem_shrink+0x328/0x660 [i915] <4> [472.619250] ? i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915] <4> [472.619282] i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915] <4> [472.619325] vm_alloc_page.constprop.25+0x1aa/0x240 [i915] <4> [472.619330] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4d/0x80 <4> [472.619363] ? __alloc_pd+0xb/0x30 [i915] <4> [472.619366] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0xf/0x30 <4> [472.619368] ? __module_address+0x23/0xe0 <4> [472.619371] ? is_module_address+0x26/0x40 <4> [472.619374] ? static_obj+0x34/0x50 <4> [472.619376] ? lockdep_init_map+0x4d/0x1e0 <4> [472.619407] setup_page_dma+0xd/0x90 [i915] <4> [472.619437] alloc_pd+0x29/0x50 [i915] <4> [472.619470] __gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0x443/0x6b0 [i915] <4> [472.619503] gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0xd7/0x300 [i915] <4> [472.619535] ppgtt_bind_vma+0x2a/0xe0 [i915] <4> [472.619577] __vma_bind+0x26/0x40 [i915] <4> [472.619611] fence_work+0x1c/0x90 [i915] <4> [472.619617] process_one_work+0x26a/0x620 Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200403120150.17091-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-04-03 13:01:50 +01:00
if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma)) {
vma_print_allocator(vma, "is pinned");
return -EAGAIN;
}
if (i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND))
/* XXX not always required: nop_clear_range */
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&vm->i915->runtime_pm);
err = mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(&vma->vm->mutex, !wakeref);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
if (err)
goto out_rpm;
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
err = __i915_vma_unbind(vma);
mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
out_rpm:
if (wakeref)
intel_runtime_pm_put(&vm->i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate workers to do allocate and apply the PTE updates after we have we reserved their slot in the drm_mm (using fences to order the PTE writes with the GPU work and with later unbind). In adding the asynchronous vma binding, one subtle requirement is to avoid coupling the binding fence into the backing object->resv. That is the asynchronous binding only applies to the vma timeline itself and not to the pages as that is a more global timeline (the binding of one vma does not need to be ordered with another vma, nor does the implicit GEM fencing depend on a vma, only on writes to the backing store). Keeping the vma binding distinct from the backing store timelines is verified by a number of async gem_exec_fence and gem_exec_schedule tests. The way we do this is quite simple, we keep the fence for the vma binding separate and only wait on it as required, and never add it to the obj->resv itself. Another consequence in reducing the locking around the vma is the destruction of the vma is no longer globally serialised by struct_mutex. A natural solution would be to add a kref to i915_vma, but that requires decoupling the reference cycles, possibly by introducing a new i915_mm_pages object that is own by both obj->mm and vma->pages. However, we have not taken that route due to the overshadowing lmem/ttm discussions, and instead play a series of complicated games with trylocks to (hopefully) ensure that only one destruction path is called! v2: Add some commentary, and some helpers to reduce patch churn. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04 14:39:58 +01:00
return err;
}
struct i915_vma *i915_vma_make_unshrinkable(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(vma->obj);
return vma;
}
void i915_vma_make_shrinkable(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
i915_gem_object_make_shrinkable(vma->obj);
}
void i915_vma_make_purgeable(struct i915_vma *vma)
{
i915_gem_object_make_purgeable(vma->obj);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
#include "selftests/i915_vma.c"
#endif
void i915_vma_module_exit(void)
{
kmem_cache_destroy(slab_vmas);
}
int __init i915_vma_module_init(void)
{
slab_vmas = KMEM_CACHE(i915_vma, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN);
if (!slab_vmas)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}