linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c

643 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2001 Russell King
* (C) 2003 Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>.
* Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include "cpufreq_governor.h"
/* On-demand governor macros */
#define DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (80)
#define DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (1)
#define MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR (100000)
#define MICRO_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (95)
#define MICRO_FREQUENCY_MIN_SAMPLE_RATE (10000)
#define MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (11)
#define MAX_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD (100)
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s, od_cpu_dbs_info);
static struct od_ops od_ops;
static unsigned int default_powersave_bias;
static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
dbs_info->freq_table = cpufreq_frequency_get_table(cpu);
dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
}
/*
* Not all CPUs want IO time to be accounted as busy; this depends on how
* efficient idling at a higher frequency/voltage is.
* Pavel Machek says this is not so for various generations of AMD and old
* Intel systems.
* Mike Chan (android.com) claims this is also not true for ARM.
* Because of this, whitelist specific known (series) of CPUs by default, and
* leave all others up to the user.
*/
static int should_io_be_busy(void)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
/*
* For Intel, Core 2 (model 15) and later have an efficient idle.
*/
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL &&
boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 15)
return 1;
#endif
return 0;
}
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
/*
* Find right freq to be set now with powersave_bias on.
* Returns the freq_hi to be used right now and will set freq_hi_jiffies,
* freq_lo, and freq_lo_jiffies in percpu area for averaging freqs.
*/
static unsigned int generic_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int freq_next, unsigned int relation)
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
{
unsigned int freq_req, freq_reduc, freq_avg;
unsigned int freq_hi, freq_lo;
unsigned int index = 0;
unsigned int jiffies_total, jiffies_hi, jiffies_lo;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
policy->cpu);
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
if (!dbs_info->freq_table) {
dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies = 0;
return freq_next;
}
cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_table, freq_next,
relation, &index);
freq_req = dbs_info->freq_table[index].frequency;
freq_reduc = freq_req * od_tuners->powersave_bias / 1000;
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
freq_avg = freq_req - freq_reduc;
/* Find freq bounds for freq_avg in freq_table */
index = 0;
cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_table, freq_avg,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H, &index);
freq_lo = dbs_info->freq_table[index].frequency;
index = 0;
cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_table, freq_avg,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L, &index);
freq_hi = dbs_info->freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Find out how long we have to be in hi and lo freqs */
if (freq_hi == freq_lo) {
dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies = 0;
return freq_lo;
}
jiffies_total = usecs_to_jiffies(od_tuners->sampling_rate);
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
jiffies_hi = (freq_avg - freq_lo) * jiffies_total;
jiffies_hi += ((freq_hi - freq_lo) / 2);
jiffies_hi /= (freq_hi - freq_lo);
jiffies_lo = jiffies_total - jiffies_hi;
dbs_info->freq_lo = freq_lo;
dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies = jiffies_lo;
dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies = jiffies_hi;
return freq_hi;
}
static void ondemand_powersave_bias_init(void)
{
int i;
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu(i);
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
}
}
static void dbs_freq_increase(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
{
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
if (od_tuners->powersave_bias)
freq = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy, freq,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
else if (policy->cur == policy->max)
return;
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, od_tuners->powersave_bias ?
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L : CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
}
/*
* Every sampling_rate, we check, if current idle time is less than 20%
cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency The ondemand governor calculates load in terms of frequency and increases it only if load_freq is greater than up_threshold multiplied by the current or average frequency. This appears to produce oscillations of frequency between min and max because, for example, a relatively small load can easily saturate minimum frequency and lead the CPU to the max. Then, it will decrease back to the min due to small load_freq. Change the calculation method of load and target frequency on the basis of the following two observations: - Load computation should not depend on the current or average measured frequency. For example, absolute load of 80% at 100MHz is not necessarily equivalent to 8% at 1000MHz in the next sampling interval. - It should be possible to increase the target frequency to any value present in the frequency table proportional to the absolute load, rather than to the max only, so that: Target frequency = C * load where we take C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100. Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on Quad core 1500MHz Krait. Phoronix benchmark of Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 test shows an increase ~1.5% in performance. cpufreq_stats (time_in_state) shows that middle frequencies are used more, with this patch. Highest and lowest frequencies were used less by ~9%. [rjw: We have run multiple other tests on kernels with this change applied and in the vast majority of cases it turns out that the resulting performance improvement also leads to reduced consumption of energy. The change is additionally justified by the overall simplification of the code in question.] Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-05 20:01:25 +04:00
* (default), then we try to increase frequency. Else, we adjust the frequency
* proportional to load.
*/
cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency The ondemand governor calculates load in terms of frequency and increases it only if load_freq is greater than up_threshold multiplied by the current or average frequency. This appears to produce oscillations of frequency between min and max because, for example, a relatively small load can easily saturate minimum frequency and lead the CPU to the max. Then, it will decrease back to the min due to small load_freq. Change the calculation method of load and target frequency on the basis of the following two observations: - Load computation should not depend on the current or average measured frequency. For example, absolute load of 80% at 100MHz is not necessarily equivalent to 8% at 1000MHz in the next sampling interval. - It should be possible to increase the target frequency to any value present in the frequency table proportional to the absolute load, rather than to the max only, so that: Target frequency = C * load where we take C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100. Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on Quad core 1500MHz Krait. Phoronix benchmark of Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 test shows an increase ~1.5% in performance. cpufreq_stats (time_in_state) shows that middle frequencies are used more, with this patch. Highest and lowest frequencies were used less by ~9%. [rjw: We have run multiple other tests on kernels with this change applied and in the vast majority of cases it turns out that the resulting performance improvement also leads to reduced consumption of energy. The change is additionally justified by the overall simplification of the code in question.] Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-05 20:01:25 +04:00
static void od_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load)
{
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = policy_dbs->policy;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
dbs_info->freq_lo = 0;
/* Check for frequency increase */
cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency The ondemand governor calculates load in terms of frequency and increases it only if load_freq is greater than up_threshold multiplied by the current or average frequency. This appears to produce oscillations of frequency between min and max because, for example, a relatively small load can easily saturate minimum frequency and lead the CPU to the max. Then, it will decrease back to the min due to small load_freq. Change the calculation method of load and target frequency on the basis of the following two observations: - Load computation should not depend on the current or average measured frequency. For example, absolute load of 80% at 100MHz is not necessarily equivalent to 8% at 1000MHz in the next sampling interval. - It should be possible to increase the target frequency to any value present in the frequency table proportional to the absolute load, rather than to the max only, so that: Target frequency = C * load where we take C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100. Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on Quad core 1500MHz Krait. Phoronix benchmark of Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 test shows an increase ~1.5% in performance. cpufreq_stats (time_in_state) shows that middle frequencies are used more, with this patch. Highest and lowest frequencies were used less by ~9%. [rjw: We have run multiple other tests on kernels with this change applied and in the vast majority of cases it turns out that the resulting performance improvement also leads to reduced consumption of energy. The change is additionally justified by the overall simplification of the code in question.] Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-05 20:01:25 +04:00
if (load > od_tuners->up_threshold) {
/* If switching to max speed, apply sampling_down_factor */
if (policy->cur < policy->max)
dbs_info->rate_mult =
od_tuners->sampling_down_factor;
dbs_freq_increase(policy, policy->max);
cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency The ondemand governor calculates load in terms of frequency and increases it only if load_freq is greater than up_threshold multiplied by the current or average frequency. This appears to produce oscillations of frequency between min and max because, for example, a relatively small load can easily saturate minimum frequency and lead the CPU to the max. Then, it will decrease back to the min due to small load_freq. Change the calculation method of load and target frequency on the basis of the following two observations: - Load computation should not depend on the current or average measured frequency. For example, absolute load of 80% at 100MHz is not necessarily equivalent to 8% at 1000MHz in the next sampling interval. - It should be possible to increase the target frequency to any value present in the frequency table proportional to the absolute load, rather than to the max only, so that: Target frequency = C * load where we take C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100. Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on Quad core 1500MHz Krait. Phoronix benchmark of Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 test shows an increase ~1.5% in performance. cpufreq_stats (time_in_state) shows that middle frequencies are used more, with this patch. Highest and lowest frequencies were used less by ~9%. [rjw: We have run multiple other tests on kernels with this change applied and in the vast majority of cases it turns out that the resulting performance improvement also leads to reduced consumption of energy. The change is additionally justified by the overall simplification of the code in question.] Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-05 20:01:25 +04:00
} else {
/* Calculate the next frequency proportional to load */
cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect Currently, ondemand calculates the target frequency proportional to load using the formula: Target frequency = C * load where C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100 Though, in many cases, the minimum available frequency is pretty high and the above calculation introduces a dead band from load 0 to 100 * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq where the target frequency is always calculated to less than policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and the minimum frequency is selected. For example: on Intel i7-3770 @ 3.4GHz the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 1600000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 3400000 (without turbo). Thus, the CPU starts to scale up at a load above 47. On quad core 1500MHz Krait the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 384000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 1512000. Thus, the CPU starts to scale at load above 25. Change the calculation of target frequency to eliminate the above effect using the formula: Target frequency = A + B * load where A = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and B = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq - policy->cpuinfo->min_freq) / 100 This will map load values 0 to 100 linearly to cpuinfo.min_freq to cpuinfo.max_freq. Also, use the CPUFREQ_RELATION_C in __cpufreq_driver_target to select the closest frequency in frequency_table. This is necessary to avoid selection of minimum frequency only when load equals to 0. It will also help for selection of frequencies using a more 'fair' criterion. Tables below show the difference in selected frequency for specific values of load without and with this patch. On Intel i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 1600000 1600000 1600000 5 170050 1600000 1690050 1700000 10 340100 1600000 1780100 1700000 15 510150 1600000 1870150 1900000 20 680200 1600000 1960200 2000000 25 850250 1600000 2050250 2100000 30 1020300 1600000 2140300 2100000 35 1190350 1600000 2230350 2200000 40 1360400 1600000 2320400 2400000 45 1530450 1600000 2410450 2400000 50 1700500 1900000 2500500 2500000 55 1870550 1900000 2590550 2600000 60 2040600 2100000 2680600 2600000 65 2210650 2400000 2770650 2800000 70 2380700 2400000 2860700 2800000 75 2550750 2600000 2950750 3000000 80 2720800 2800000 3040800 3000000 85 2890850 2900000 3130850 3100000 90 3060900 3100000 3220900 3300000 95 3230950 3300000 3310950 3300000 100 3401000 3401000 3401000 3401000 On ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 384000 384000 384000 5 75600 384000 440400 486000 10 151200 384000 496800 486000 15 226800 384000 553200 594000 20 302400 384000 609600 594000 25 378000 384000 666000 702000 30 453600 486000 722400 702000 35 529200 594000 778800 810000 40 604800 702000 835200 810000 45 680400 702000 891600 918000 50 756000 810000 948000 918000 55 831600 918000 1004400 1026000 60 907200 918000 1060800 1026000 65 982800 1026000 1117200 1134000 70 1058400 1134000 1173600 1134000 75 1134000 1134000 1230000 1242000 80 1209600 1242000 1286400 1242000 85 1285200 1350000 1342800 1350000 90 1360800 1458000 1399200 1350000 95 1436400 1458000 1455600 1458000 100 1512000 1512000 1512000 1512000 Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait (Android smartphone). Benchmarks on Intel i7 shows a performance improvement on low and medium work loads with lower power consumption. Specifics: Phoronix Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1: Time: -0.40%, energy: -0.07% Phoronix Apache: Time: -4.98%, energy: -2.35% Phoronix FFMPEG: Time: -6.29%, energy: -4.02% Also, running mp3 decoding (very low load) shows no differences with and without this patch. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-30 20:59:34 +04:00
unsigned int freq_next, min_f, max_f;
min_f = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
max_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
freq_next = min_f + load * (max_f - min_f) / 100;
/* No longer fully busy, reset rate_mult */
dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
if (!od_tuners->powersave_bias) {
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next,
cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect Currently, ondemand calculates the target frequency proportional to load using the formula: Target frequency = C * load where C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100 Though, in many cases, the minimum available frequency is pretty high and the above calculation introduces a dead band from load 0 to 100 * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq where the target frequency is always calculated to less than policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and the minimum frequency is selected. For example: on Intel i7-3770 @ 3.4GHz the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 1600000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 3400000 (without turbo). Thus, the CPU starts to scale up at a load above 47. On quad core 1500MHz Krait the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 384000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 1512000. Thus, the CPU starts to scale at load above 25. Change the calculation of target frequency to eliminate the above effect using the formula: Target frequency = A + B * load where A = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and B = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq - policy->cpuinfo->min_freq) / 100 This will map load values 0 to 100 linearly to cpuinfo.min_freq to cpuinfo.max_freq. Also, use the CPUFREQ_RELATION_C in __cpufreq_driver_target to select the closest frequency in frequency_table. This is necessary to avoid selection of minimum frequency only when load equals to 0. It will also help for selection of frequencies using a more 'fair' criterion. Tables below show the difference in selected frequency for specific values of load without and with this patch. On Intel i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 1600000 1600000 1600000 5 170050 1600000 1690050 1700000 10 340100 1600000 1780100 1700000 15 510150 1600000 1870150 1900000 20 680200 1600000 1960200 2000000 25 850250 1600000 2050250 2100000 30 1020300 1600000 2140300 2100000 35 1190350 1600000 2230350 2200000 40 1360400 1600000 2320400 2400000 45 1530450 1600000 2410450 2400000 50 1700500 1900000 2500500 2500000 55 1870550 1900000 2590550 2600000 60 2040600 2100000 2680600 2600000 65 2210650 2400000 2770650 2800000 70 2380700 2400000 2860700 2800000 75 2550750 2600000 2950750 3000000 80 2720800 2800000 3040800 3000000 85 2890850 2900000 3130850 3100000 90 3060900 3100000 3220900 3300000 95 3230950 3300000 3310950 3300000 100 3401000 3401000 3401000 3401000 On ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 384000 384000 384000 5 75600 384000 440400 486000 10 151200 384000 496800 486000 15 226800 384000 553200 594000 20 302400 384000 609600 594000 25 378000 384000 666000 702000 30 453600 486000 722400 702000 35 529200 594000 778800 810000 40 604800 702000 835200 810000 45 680400 702000 891600 918000 50 756000 810000 948000 918000 55 831600 918000 1004400 1026000 60 907200 918000 1060800 1026000 65 982800 1026000 1117200 1134000 70 1058400 1134000 1173600 1134000 75 1134000 1134000 1230000 1242000 80 1209600 1242000 1286400 1242000 85 1285200 1350000 1342800 1350000 90 1360800 1458000 1399200 1350000 95 1436400 1458000 1455600 1458000 100 1512000 1512000 1512000 1512000 Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait (Android smartphone). Benchmarks on Intel i7 shows a performance improvement on low and medium work loads with lower power consumption. Specifics: Phoronix Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1: Time: -0.40%, energy: -0.07% Phoronix Apache: Time: -4.98%, energy: -2.35% Phoronix FFMPEG: Time: -6.29%, energy: -4.02% Also, running mp3 decoding (very low load) shows no differences with and without this patch. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-30 20:59:34 +04:00
CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
return;
}
freq_next = od_ops.powersave_bias_target(policy, freq_next,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect Currently, ondemand calculates the target frequency proportional to load using the formula: Target frequency = C * load where C = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq / 100 Though, in many cases, the minimum available frequency is pretty high and the above calculation introduces a dead band from load 0 to 100 * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq / policy->cpuinfo.max_freq where the target frequency is always calculated to less than policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and the minimum frequency is selected. For example: on Intel i7-3770 @ 3.4GHz the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 1600000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 3400000 (without turbo). Thus, the CPU starts to scale up at a load above 47. On quad core 1500MHz Krait the policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 384000 and the policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 1512000. Thus, the CPU starts to scale at load above 25. Change the calculation of target frequency to eliminate the above effect using the formula: Target frequency = A + B * load where A = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq and B = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq - policy->cpuinfo->min_freq) / 100 This will map load values 0 to 100 linearly to cpuinfo.min_freq to cpuinfo.max_freq. Also, use the CPUFREQ_RELATION_C in __cpufreq_driver_target to select the closest frequency in frequency_table. This is necessary to avoid selection of minimum frequency only when load equals to 0. It will also help for selection of frequencies using a more 'fair' criterion. Tables below show the difference in selected frequency for specific values of load without and with this patch. On Intel i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 1600000 1600000 1600000 5 170050 1600000 1690050 1700000 10 340100 1600000 1780100 1700000 15 510150 1600000 1870150 1900000 20 680200 1600000 1960200 2000000 25 850250 1600000 2050250 2100000 30 1020300 1600000 2140300 2100000 35 1190350 1600000 2230350 2200000 40 1360400 1600000 2320400 2400000 45 1530450 1600000 2410450 2400000 50 1700500 1900000 2500500 2500000 55 1870550 1900000 2590550 2600000 60 2040600 2100000 2680600 2600000 65 2210650 2400000 2770650 2800000 70 2380700 2400000 2860700 2800000 75 2550750 2600000 2950750 3000000 80 2720800 2800000 3040800 3000000 85 2890850 2900000 3130850 3100000 90 3060900 3100000 3220900 3300000 95 3230950 3300000 3310950 3300000 100 3401000 3401000 3401000 3401000 On ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait: Without With Load Target Selected Target Selected 0 0 384000 384000 384000 5 75600 384000 440400 486000 10 151200 384000 496800 486000 15 226800 384000 553200 594000 20 302400 384000 609600 594000 25 378000 384000 666000 702000 30 453600 486000 722400 702000 35 529200 594000 778800 810000 40 604800 702000 835200 810000 45 680400 702000 891600 918000 50 756000 810000 948000 918000 55 831600 918000 1004400 1026000 60 907200 918000 1060800 1026000 65 982800 1026000 1117200 1134000 70 1058400 1134000 1173600 1134000 75 1134000 1134000 1230000 1242000 80 1209600 1242000 1286400 1242000 85 1285200 1350000 1342800 1350000 90 1360800 1458000 1399200 1350000 95 1436400 1458000 1455600 1458000 100 1512000 1512000 1512000 1512000 Tested on Intel i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz and on ARM quad core 1500MHz Krait (Android smartphone). Benchmarks on Intel i7 shows a performance improvement on low and medium work loads with lower power consumption. Specifics: Phoronix Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1: Time: -0.40%, energy: -0.07% Phoronix Apache: Time: -4.98%, energy: -2.35% Phoronix FFMPEG: Time: -6.29%, energy: -4.02% Also, running mp3 decoding (very low load) shows no differences with and without this patch. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-06-30 20:59:34 +04:00
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
}
}
static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu);
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
int delay = 0, sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
/* Common NORMAL_SAMPLE setup */
dbs_info->sample_type = OD_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
if (sample_type == OD_SUB_SAMPLE) {
delay = dbs_info->freq_lo_jiffies;
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_lo,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
} else {
dbs_check_cpu(policy);
if (dbs_info->freq_lo) {
/* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */
dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
delay = dbs_info->freq_hi_jiffies;
}
}
if (!delay)
delay = delay_for_sampling_rate(od_tuners->sampling_rate
* dbs_info->rate_mult);
return delay;
}
/************************** sysfs interface ************************/
static struct dbs_governor od_dbs_gov;
/**
* update_sampling_rate - update sampling rate effective immediately if needed.
* @new_rate: new sampling rate
*
* If new rate is smaller than the old, simply updating
* dbs_tuners_int.sampling_rate might not be appropriate. For example, if the
* original sampling_rate was 1 second and the requested new sampling rate is 10
* ms because the user needs immediate reaction from ondemand governor, but not
* sure if higher frequency will be required or not, then, the governor may
* change the sampling rate too late; up to 1 second later. Thus, if we are
* reducing the sampling rate, we need to make the new value effective
* immediately.
*/
static void update_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
unsigned int new_rate)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
struct cpumask cpumask;
int cpu;
od_tuners->sampling_rate = new_rate = max(new_rate,
dbs_data->min_sampling_rate);
/*
* Lock governor so that governor start/stop can't execute in parallel.
*/
mutex_lock(&dbs_data_mutex);
cpumask_copy(&cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpumask) {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs;
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu);
cdbs = &dbs_info->cdbs;
policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
/*
* A valid policy_dbs and policy_dbs->policy means governor
* hasn't stopped or exited yet.
*/
if (!policy_dbs || !policy_dbs->policy)
continue;
policy = policy_dbs->policy;
/* clear all CPUs of this policy */
cpumask_andnot(&cpumask, &cpumask, policy->cpus);
/*
* Update sampling rate for CPUs whose policy is governed by
* dbs_data. In case of governor_per_policy, only a single
* policy will be governed by dbs_data, otherwise there can be
* multiple policies that are governed by the same dbs_data.
*/
if (dbs_data == policy_dbs->dbs_data) {
mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
/*
* On 32-bit architectures this may race with the
* sample_delay_ns read in dbs_update_util_handler(),
* but that really doesn't matter. If the read returns
* a value that's too big, the sample will be skipped,
* but the next invocation of dbs_update_util_handler()
* (when the update has been completed) will take a
* sample. If the returned value is too small, the
* sample will be taken immediately, but that isn't a
* problem, as we want the new rate to take effect
* immediately anyway.
*
* If this runs in parallel with dbs_work_handler(), we
* may end up overwriting the sample_delay_ns value that
* it has just written, but the difference should not be
* too big and it will be corrected next time a sample
* is taken, so it shouldn't be significant.
*/
gov_update_sample_delay(policy_dbs, new_rate);
mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
}
}
mutex_unlock(&dbs_data_mutex);
}
static ssize_t store_sampling_rate(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
size_t count)
{
unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
update_sampling_rate(dbs_data, input);
return count;
}
static ssize_t store_io_is_busy(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
size_t count)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
unsigned int input;
int ret;
unsigned int j;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
od_tuners->io_is_busy = !!input;
/* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */
for_each_online_cpu(j) {
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
j);
dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j,
&dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_wall, od_tuners->io_is_busy);
}
return count;
}
static ssize_t store_up_threshold(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
size_t count)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD ||
input < MIN_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD) {
return -EINVAL;
}
od_tuners->up_threshold = input;
return count;
}
static ssize_t store_sampling_down_factor(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
unsigned int input, j;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1 || input > MAX_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR || input < 1)
return -EINVAL;
od_tuners->sampling_down_factor = input;
/* Reset down sampling multiplier in case it was active */
for_each_online_cpu(j) {
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
j);
dbs_info->rate_mult = 1;
}
return count;
}
static ssize_t store_ignore_nice_load(struct dbs_data *dbs_data,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
unsigned int input;
int ret;
unsigned int j;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
if (input > 1)
input = 1;
if (input == od_tuners->ignore_nice_load) { /* nothing to do */
return count;
}
od_tuners->ignore_nice_load = input;
/* we need to re-evaluate prev_cpu_idle */
for_each_online_cpu(j) {
struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info;
dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, j);
dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j,
&dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_wall, od_tuners->io_is_busy);
if (od_tuners->ignore_nice_load)
dbs_info->cdbs.prev_cpu_nice =
kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
}
return count;
}
static ssize_t store_powersave_bias(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, const char *buf,
size_t count)
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
unsigned int input;
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
if (ret != 1)
return -EINVAL;
if (input > 1000)
input = 1000;
od_tuners->powersave_bias = input;
[CPUFREQ][2/2] ondemand: updated add powersave_bias tunable ondemand selects the minimum frequency that can retire a workload with negligible idle time -- ideally resulting in the highest performance/power efficiency with negligible performance impact. But on some systems and some workloads, this algorithm is more performance biased than necessary, and de-tuning it a bit to allow some performance impact can save measurable power. This patch adds a "powersave_bias" tunable to ondemand to allow it to reduce its target frequency by a specified percent. By default, the powersave_bias is 0 and has no effect. powersave_bias is in units of 0.1%, so it has an effective range of 1 through 1000, resulting in 0.1% to 100% impact. In practice, users will not be able to detect a difference between 0.1% increments, but 1.0% increments turned out to be too large. Also, the max value of 1000 (100%) would simply peg the system in its deepest power saving P-state, unless the processor really has a hardware P-state at 0Hz:-) For example, If ondemand requests 2.0GHz based on utilization, and powersave_bias=100, this code will knock 10% off the target and seek a target of 1.8GHz instead of 2.0GHz until the next sampling. If 1.8 is an exact match with an hardware frequency we use it, otherwise we average our time between the frequency next higher than 1.8 and next lower than 1.8. Note that a user or administrative program can change powersave_bias at run-time depending on how they expect the system to be used. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy at intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
2006-07-31 22:28:12 +04:00
ondemand_powersave_bias_init();
return count;
}
show_store_one(od, sampling_rate);
show_store_one(od, io_is_busy);
show_store_one(od, up_threshold);
show_store_one(od, sampling_down_factor);
show_store_one(od, ignore_nice_load);
show_store_one(od, powersave_bias);
show_one_common(od, min_sampling_rate);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_rate);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(io_is_busy);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(up_threshold);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(sampling_down_factor);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(ignore_nice_load);
gov_sys_pol_attr_rw(powersave_bias);
gov_sys_pol_attr_ro(min_sampling_rate);
static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_gov_sys[] = {
&min_sampling_rate_gov_sys.attr,
&sampling_rate_gov_sys.attr,
&up_threshold_gov_sys.attr,
&sampling_down_factor_gov_sys.attr,
&ignore_nice_load_gov_sys.attr,
&powersave_bias_gov_sys.attr,
&io_is_busy_gov_sys.attr,
NULL
};
static struct attribute_group od_attr_group_gov_sys = {
.attrs = dbs_attributes_gov_sys,
.name = "ondemand",
};
static struct attribute *dbs_attributes_gov_pol[] = {
&min_sampling_rate_gov_pol.attr,
&sampling_rate_gov_pol.attr,
&up_threshold_gov_pol.attr,
&sampling_down_factor_gov_pol.attr,
&ignore_nice_load_gov_pol.attr,
&powersave_bias_gov_pol.attr,
&io_is_busy_gov_pol.attr,
NULL
};
static struct attribute_group od_attr_group_gov_pol = {
.attrs = dbs_attributes_gov_pol,
.name = "ondemand",
};
/************************** sysfs end ************************/
static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify)
{
struct od_dbs_tuners *tuners;
u64 idle_time;
int cpu;
tuners = kzalloc(sizeof(*tuners), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tuners) {
pr_err("%s: kzalloc failed\n", __func__);
return -ENOMEM;
}
cpu = get_cpu();
idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
put_cpu();
if (idle_time != -1ULL) {
/* Idle micro accounting is supported. Use finer thresholds */
tuners->up_threshold = MICRO_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD;
/*
* In nohz/micro accounting case we set the minimum frequency
* not depending on HZ, but fixed (very low). The deferred
* timer might skip some samples if idle/sleeping as needed.
*/
dbs_data->min_sampling_rate = MICRO_FREQUENCY_MIN_SAMPLE_RATE;
} else {
tuners->up_threshold = DEF_FREQUENCY_UP_THRESHOLD;
/* For correct statistics, we need 10 ticks for each measure */
dbs_data->min_sampling_rate = MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO *
jiffies_to_usecs(10);
}
tuners->sampling_down_factor = DEF_SAMPLING_DOWN_FACTOR;
tuners->ignore_nice_load = 0;
tuners->powersave_bias = default_powersave_bias;
tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
return 0;
}
static void od_exit(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, bool notify)
{
kfree(dbs_data->tuners);
}
define_get_cpu_dbs_routines(od_cpu_dbs_info);
static struct od_ops od_ops = {
.powersave_bias_init_cpu = ondemand_powersave_bias_init_cpu,
.powersave_bias_target = generic_powersave_bias_target,
.freq_increase = dbs_freq_increase,
};
static struct dbs_governor od_dbs_gov = {
.gov = {
.name = "ondemand",
.governor = cpufreq_governor_dbs,
.max_transition_latency = TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
},
.governor = GOV_ONDEMAND,
.attr_group_gov_sys = &od_attr_group_gov_sys,
.attr_group_gov_pol = &od_attr_group_gov_pol,
.get_cpu_cdbs = get_cpu_cdbs,
.get_cpu_dbs_info_s = get_cpu_dbs_info_s,
.gov_dbs_timer = od_dbs_timer,
.gov_check_cpu = od_check_cpu,
.gov_ops = &od_ops,
.init = od_init,
.exit = od_exit,
};
#define CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND (&od_dbs_gov.gov)
static void od_set_powersave_bias(unsigned int powersave_bias)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners;
unsigned int cpu;
cpumask_t done;
default_powersave_bias = powersave_bias;
cpumask_clear(&done);
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs;
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &done))
continue;
policy_dbs = per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, cpu).cdbs.policy_dbs;
if (!policy_dbs)
continue;
policy = policy_dbs->policy;
cpumask_or(&done, &done, policy->cpus);
if (policy->governor != CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND)
continue;
dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
od_tuners->powersave_bias = default_powersave_bias;
}
put_online_cpus();
}
void od_register_powersave_bias_handler(unsigned int (*f)
(struct cpufreq_policy *, unsigned int, unsigned int),
unsigned int powersave_bias)
{
od_ops.powersave_bias_target = f;
od_set_powersave_bias(powersave_bias);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(od_register_powersave_bias_handler);
void od_unregister_powersave_bias_handler(void)
{
od_ops.powersave_bias_target = generic_powersave_bias_target;
od_set_powersave_bias(0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(od_unregister_powersave_bias_handler);
static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
{
return cpufreq_register_governor(CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND);
}
static void __exit cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit(void)
{
cpufreq_unregister_governor(CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND);
}
MODULE_AUTHOR("Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("'cpufreq_ondemand' - A dynamic cpufreq governor for "
"Low Latency Frequency Transition capable processors");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND
struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void)
{
return CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND;
}
fs_initcall(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
#else
module_init(cpufreq_gov_dbs_init);
#endif
module_exit(cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit);