2019-05-19 15:08:20 +03:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
# include <kunit/test.h>
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
# include <linux/kernel.h>
# include <linux/list_sort.h>
# include <linux/list.h>
# include <linux/module.h>
# include <linux/printk.h>
# include <linux/slab.h>
# include <linux/random.h>
/*
* The pattern of set bits in the list length determines which cases
* are hit in list_sort ( ) .
*/
# define TEST_LIST_LEN (512+128+2) /* not including head */
# define TEST_POISON1 0xDEADBEEF
# define TEST_POISON2 0xA324354C
struct debug_el {
unsigned int poison1 ;
struct list_head list ;
unsigned int poison2 ;
int value ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
unsigned int serial ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
} ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
static void check ( struct kunit * test , struct debug_el * ela , struct debug_el * elb )
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
{
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
struct debug_el * * elts = test - > priv ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG ( test , ela - > serial , ( unsigned int ) TEST_LIST_LEN , " incorrect serial " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG ( test , elb - > serial , ( unsigned int ) TEST_LIST_LEN , " incorrect serial " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG ( test , elts [ ela - > serial ] , ela , " phantom element " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG ( test , elts [ elb - > serial ] , elb , " phantom element " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG ( test , ela - > poison1 , TEST_POISON1 , " bad poison " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG ( test , ela - > poison2 , TEST_POISON2 , " bad poison " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG ( test , elb - > poison1 , TEST_POISON1 , " bad poison " ) ;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG ( test , elb - > poison2 , TEST_POISON2 , " bad poison " ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
/* `priv` is the test pointer so check() can fail the test if the list is invalid. */
static int cmp ( void * priv , const struct list_head * a , const struct list_head * b )
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
{
struct debug_el * ela , * elb ;
ela = container_of ( a , struct debug_el , list ) ;
elb = container_of ( b , struct debug_el , list ) ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
check ( priv , ela , elb ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
return ela - > value - elb - > value ;
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
static void list_sort_test ( struct kunit * test )
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
{
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
int i , count = 1 ;
struct debug_el * el , * * elts ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
struct list_head * cur ;
LIST_HEAD ( head ) ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
elts = kunit_kcalloc ( test , TEST_LIST_LEN , sizeof ( * elts ) , GFP_KERNEL ) ;
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL ( test , elts ) ;
test - > priv = elts ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
for ( i = 0 ; i < TEST_LIST_LEN ; i + + ) {
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
el = kunit_kmalloc ( test , sizeof ( * el ) , GFP_KERNEL ) ;
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL ( test , el ) ;
2017-11-18 02:28:00 +03:00
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
/* force some equivalencies */
2022-10-05 17:43:38 +03:00
el - > value = prandom_u32_max ( TEST_LIST_LEN / 3 ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
el - > serial = i ;
el - > poison1 = TEST_POISON1 ;
el - > poison2 = TEST_POISON2 ;
elts [ i ] = el ;
list_add_tail ( & el - > list , & head ) ;
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
list_sort ( test , & head , cmp ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
for ( cur = head . next ; cur - > next ! = & head ; cur = cur - > next ) {
struct debug_el * el1 ;
int cmp_result ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ_MSG ( test , cur - > next - > prev , cur ,
" list is corrupted " ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
cmp_result = cmp ( test , cur , cur - > next ) ;
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG ( test , cmp_result , 0 , " list is not sorted " ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
el = container_of ( cur , struct debug_el , list ) ;
el1 = container_of ( cur - > next , struct debug_el , list ) ;
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
if ( cmp_result = = 0 ) {
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG ( test , el - > serial , el1 - > serial ,
" order of equivalent elements not preserved " ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
check ( test , el , el1 ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
count + + ;
}
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG ( test , head . prev , cur , " list is corrupted " ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG ( test , count , TEST_LIST_LEN ,
" list length changed after sorting! " ) ;
}
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 23:58:35 +03:00
static struct kunit_case list_sort_cases [ ] = {
KUNIT_CASE ( list_sort_test ) ,
{ }
} ;
static struct kunit_suite list_sort_suite = {
. name = " list_sort " ,
. test_cases = list_sort_cases ,
} ;
kunit_test_suites ( & list_sort_suite ) ;
2017-05-09 01:55:26 +03:00
MODULE_LICENSE ( " GPL " ) ;