linux/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c

2213 lines
62 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/*
* Copyright (C) 2011 Fujitsu. All rights reserved.
* Written by Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
*/
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/iversion.h>
#include "ctree.h"
#include "fs.h"
#include "messages.h"
#include "misc.h"
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
#include "delayed-inode.h"
#include "disk-io.h"
#include "transaction.h"
#include "qgroup.h"
#include "locking.h"
#include "inode-item.h"
#include "space-info.h"
#include "accessors.h"
#include "file-item.h"
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK 512
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND 128
#define BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH 16
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static struct kmem_cache *delayed_node_cache;
int __init btrfs_delayed_inode_init(void)
{
delayed_node_cache = KMEM_CACHE(btrfs_delayed_node, 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_node_cache)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
void __cold btrfs_delayed_inode_exit(void)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
kmem_cache_destroy(delayed_node_cache);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
void btrfs_init_delayed_root(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
atomic_set(&delayed_root->items, 0);
atomic_set(&delayed_root->items_seq, 0);
delayed_root->nodes = 0;
spin_lock_init(&delayed_root->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&delayed_root->wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_root->node_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_root->prepare_list);
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static inline void btrfs_init_delayed_node(
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node,
struct btrfs_root *root, u64 inode_id)
{
delayed_node->root = root;
delayed_node->inode_id = inode_id;
refcount_set(&delayed_node->refs, 0);
delayed_node->ins_root = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
delayed_node->del_root = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
mutex_init(&delayed_node->mutex);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->n_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&delayed_node->p_list);
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_delayed_node(
struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_inode->root;
u64 ino = btrfs_ino(btrfs_inode);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node = READ_ONCE(btrfs_inode->delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (node) {
refcount_inc(&node->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return node;
}
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
node = xa_load(&root->delayed_nodes, ino);
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (node) {
if (btrfs_inode->delayed_node) {
refcount_inc(&node->refs); /* can be accessed */
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
BUG_ON(btrfs_inode->delayed_node != node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
return node;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
/*
* It's possible that we're racing into the middle of removing
* this node from the xarray. In this case, the refcount
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
* was zero and it should never go back to one. Just return
* NULL like it was never in the xarray at all; our release
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
* function is in the process of removing it.
*
* Some implementations of refcount_inc refuse to bump the
* refcount once it has hit zero. If we don't do this dance
* here, refcount_inc() may decide to just WARN_ONCE() instead
* of actually bumping the refcount.
*
* If this node is properly in the xarray, we want to bump the
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
* refcount twice, once for the inode and once for this get
* operation.
*/
if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&node->refs)) {
refcount_inc(&node->refs);
btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node;
} else {
node = NULL;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
return node;
}
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
return NULL;
}
/* Will return either the node or PTR_ERR(-ENOMEM) */
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(
struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode)
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_inode->root;
u64 ino = btrfs_ino(btrfs_inode);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
int ret;
void *ptr;
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
again:
node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(btrfs_inode);
if (node)
return node;
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
node = kmem_cache_zalloc(delayed_node_cache, GFP_NOFS);
if (!node)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
btrfs_init_delayed_node(node, root, ino);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/* Cached in the inode and can be accessed. */
refcount_set(&node->refs, 2);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/* Allocate and reserve the slot, from now it can return a NULL from xa_load(). */
ret = xa_reserve(&root->delayed_nodes, ino, GFP_NOFS);
if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
ptr = xa_load(&root->delayed_nodes, ino);
if (ptr) {
/* Somebody inserted it, go back and read it. */
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
node = NULL;
goto again;
}
ptr = xa_store(&root->delayed_nodes, ino, node, GFP_ATOMIC);
ASSERT(xa_err(ptr) != -EINVAL);
ASSERT(xa_err(ptr) != -ENOMEM);
ASSERT(ptr == NULL);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_inode->delayed_node = node;
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
return node;
}
/*
* Call it when holding delayed_node->mutex
*
* If mod = 1, add this node into the prepared list.
*/
static void btrfs_queue_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *root,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
int mod)
{
spin_lock(&root->lock);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST, &node->flags)) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!list_empty(&node->p_list))
list_move_tail(&node->p_list, &root->prepare_list);
else if (mod)
list_add_tail(&node->p_list, &root->prepare_list);
} else {
list_add_tail(&node->n_list, &root->node_list);
list_add_tail(&node->p_list, &root->prepare_list);
refcount_inc(&node->refs); /* inserted into list */
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
root->nodes++;
set_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST, &node->flags);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
spin_unlock(&root->lock);
}
/* Call it when holding delayed_node->mutex */
static void btrfs_dequeue_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *root,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
spin_lock(&root->lock);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST, &node->flags)) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
root->nodes--;
refcount_dec(&node->refs); /* not in the list */
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_del_init(&node->n_list);
if (!list_empty(&node->p_list))
list_del_init(&node->p_list);
clear_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST, &node->flags);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
spin_unlock(&root->lock);
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_first_delayed_node(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
struct list_head *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node = NULL;
spin_lock(&delayed_root->lock);
if (list_empty(&delayed_root->node_list))
goto out;
p = delayed_root->node_list.next;
node = list_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_node, n_list);
refcount_inc(&node->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
out:
spin_unlock(&delayed_root->lock);
return node;
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_next_delayed_node(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
struct list_head *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *next = NULL;
delayed_root = node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
spin_lock(&delayed_root->lock);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_IN_LIST, &node->flags)) {
/* not in the list */
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (list_empty(&delayed_root->node_list))
goto out;
p = delayed_root->node_list.next;
} else if (list_is_last(&node->n_list, &delayed_root->node_list))
goto out;
else
p = node->n_list.next;
next = list_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_node, n_list);
refcount_inc(&next->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
out:
spin_unlock(&delayed_root->lock);
return next;
}
static void __btrfs_release_delayed_node(
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node,
int mod)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
if (!delayed_node)
return;
delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (delayed_node->count)
btrfs_queue_delayed_node(delayed_root, delayed_node, mod);
else
btrfs_dequeue_delayed_node(delayed_root, delayed_node);
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs)) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_root *root = delayed_node->root;
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
/*
* Once our refcount goes to zero, nobody is allowed to bump it
* back up. We can delete it now.
*/
ASSERT(refcount_read(&delayed_node->refs) == 0);
xa_erase(&root->delayed_nodes, delayed_node->inode_id);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_nodes refcounts have a generic implementation and an asm optimized one. The generic version has extra debugging to make sure that once a refcount goes to zero, refcount_inc won't increase it. The btrfs delayed inode code wasn't expecting this, and we're tripping over the warnings when the generic refcounts are used. We ended up with this race: Process A Process B btrfs_get_delayed_node() spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_lookup() __btrfs_release_delayed_node() refcount_dec_and_test(&delayed_node->refs) our refcount is now zero refcount_add(2) <--- warning here, refcount unchanged spin_lock(root->inode_lock) radix_tree_delete() With the generic refcounts, we actually warn again when process B above tries to release his refcount because refcount_add() turned into a no-op. We saw this in production on older kernels without the asm optimized refcounts. The fix used here is to use refcount_inc_not_zero() to detect when the object is in the middle of being freed and return NULL. This is almost always the right answer anyway, since we usually end up pitching the delayed_node if it didn't have fresh data in it. This also changes __btrfs_release_delayed_node() to remove the extra check for zero refcounts before radix tree deletion. btrfs_get_delayed_node() was the only path that was allowing refcounts to go from zero to one. Fixes: 6de5f18e7b0da ("btrfs: fix refcount_t usage when deleting btrfs_delayed_node") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+ Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-12-15 22:58:27 +03:00
kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
}
static inline void btrfs_release_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
__btrfs_release_delayed_node(node, 0);
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
struct list_head *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node = NULL;
spin_lock(&delayed_root->lock);
if (list_empty(&delayed_root->prepare_list))
goto out;
p = delayed_root->prepare_list.next;
list_del_init(p);
node = list_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_node, p_list);
refcount_inc(&node->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
out:
spin_unlock(&delayed_root->lock);
return node;
}
static inline void btrfs_release_prepared_delayed_node(
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
__btrfs_release_delayed_node(node, 1);
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_item *btrfs_alloc_delayed_item(u16 data_len,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
enum btrfs_delayed_item_type type)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
item = kmalloc(struct_size(item, data, data_len), GFP_NOFS);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (item) {
item->data_len = data_len;
item->type = type;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
item->bytes_reserved = 0;
item->delayed_node = node;
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&item->rb_node);
btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory When logging a directory we start by flushing all its delayed items. That results in adding dir index items to the subvolume btree, for new dentries, and removing dir index items from the subvolume btree for any dentries that were deleted. This makes it straightforward to log a directory simply by iterating over all the modified subvolume btree leaves, especially when we used to log both dir index keys and dir item keys (before commit 339d035424849c ("btrfs: only copy dir index keys when logging a directory") and when we used to copy old dir index entries for leaves modified in the current transaction (before commit 732d591a5d6c12 ("btrfs: stop copying old dir items when logging a directory")). From an efficiency point of view this has a couple of drawbacks: 1) Adds extra latency, due to copying delayed items to the subvolume btree and deleting dir index items from the btree. Further if there are other tasks accessing the btree, which is common (syscalls like creat, mkdir, rename, link, unlink, truncate, reflinks, etc, finishing an ordered extent, etc), lock contention can cause further delays, both to the task logging a directory and to the other tasks accessing the btree; 2) More time spent overall flushing delayed items, if after logging the directory further changes are done to the directory in the same transaction. For example, if we add 10 dentries to a directory, fsync it, add more 10 dentries, fsync it again, then add more 10 dentries and fsync it again, then we end up inserting 3 batches of 10 items to the subvolume btree. With the changes from this patch, we flush all the delayed items to the btree only once - a single batch of 30 items, and outside the logging code (transaction commit or when delayed items are flushed asynchronously). This change simply skips the flushing of delayed items every time we log a directory. Instead we copy the delayed insertion items directly to the log tree and delete delayed deletion items directly from the log tree. Therefore avoiding changing first the subvolume btree and then scanning it for new items to copy from it to the log tree and detecting deletions by observing gaps in consecutive dir index keys in subvolume btree leaves. Running the following tests on a non-debug kernel (Debian's default kernel config), on a box with a NVMe device, a 12 cores Intel CPU and 64G of ram, produced the results below. The results compare a branch without this patch and all the other patches it depends on versus the same branch with the patchset applied. The patchset is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: don't drop dir index range items when logging a directory btrfs: remove the root argument from log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: update stale comment for log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: free list element sooner at log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: avoid memory allocation at log_new_dir_dentries() for common case btrfs: remove root argument from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() btrfs: store index number instead of key in struct btrfs_delayed_item btrfs: remove unused logic when looking up delayed items btrfs: shrink the size of struct btrfs_delayed_item btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode btrfs: move need_log_inode() to above log_conflicting_inodes() btrfs: move log_new_dir_dentries() above btrfs_log_inode() btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode btrfs: skip logging parent dir when conflicting inode is not a dir btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory Custom test script for testing time spent at btrfs_log_inode(): #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 # Total number of files to create in the test directory. NUM_FILES=10000 # Fsync after creating or renaming N files. FSYNC_AFTER=100 umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount -o ssd $DEV $MNT TEST_DIR=$MNT/testdir mkdir $TEST_DIR echo "Creating files..." for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $TEST_DIR/file_$i if (( ($i % $FSYNC_AFTER) == 0 )); then xfs_io -c "fsync" $TEST_DIR fi done sync echo "Renaming files..." for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do mv $TEST_DIR/file_$i $TEST_DIR/file_$i.renamed if (( ($i % $FSYNC_AFTER) == 0 )); then xfs_io -c "fsync" $TEST_DIR fi done umount $MNT And using the following bpftrace script to capture the total time that is spent at btrfs_log_inode(): #!/usr/bin/bpftrace k:btrfs_log_inode { @start_log_inode[tid] = nsecs; } kr:btrfs_log_inode /@start_log_inode[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_log_inode[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_log_inode_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_log_inode[tid]); } END { clear(@start_log_inode); } Result before applying patchset: @btrfs_log_inode_total_time: 622642 Result after applying patchset: @btrfs_log_inode_total_time: 354134 (-43.1% time spent) The following dbench script was also used for testing: #!/bin/bash NUM_JOBS=$(nproc --all) DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-O no-holes -R free-space-tree" echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT dbench -D $MNT --skip-cleanup -t 120 -S $NUM_JOBS umount $MNT Before patchset: Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 3322265 0.034 21.032 Close 2440562 0.002 0.994 Rename 140664 1.150 269.633 Unlink 670796 1.093 269.678 Deltree 96 5.481 15.510 Mkdir 48 0.004 0.052 Qpathinfo 3010924 0.014 8.127 Qfileinfo 528055 0.001 0.518 Qfsinfo 552113 0.003 0.372 Sfileinfo 270575 0.005 0.688 Find 1164176 0.052 13.931 WriteX 1658537 0.019 5.918 ReadX 5207412 0.003 1.034 LockX 10818 0.003 0.079 UnlockX 10818 0.002 0.313 Flush 232811 1.027 269.735 Throughput 869.867 MB/sec (sync dirs) 12 clients 12 procs max_latency=269.741 ms After patchset: Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 4152738 0.029 20.863 Close 3050770 0.002 1.119 Rename 175829 0.871 211.741 Unlink 838447 0.845 211.724 Deltree 120 4.798 14.162 Mkdir 60 0.003 0.005 Qpathinfo 3763807 0.011 4.673 Qfileinfo 660111 0.001 0.400 Qfsinfo 690141 0.003 0.429 Sfileinfo 338260 0.005 0.725 Find 1455273 0.046 6.787 WriteX 2073307 0.017 5.690 ReadX 6509193 0.003 1.171 LockX 13522 0.003 0.077 UnlockX 13522 0.002 0.125 Flush 291044 0.811 211.631 Throughput 1089.27 MB/sec (sync dirs) 12 clients 12 procs max_latency=211.750 ms (+25.2% throughput, -21.5% max latency) Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-22 13:51:44 +03:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&item->log_list);
item->logged = false;
refcount_set(&item->refs, 1);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
return item;
}
/*
* Look up the delayed item by key.
*
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
* @delayed_node: pointer to the delayed node
* @index: the dir index value to lookup (offset of a dir index key)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
*
* Note: if we don't find the right item, we will return the prev item and
* the next item.
*/
static struct btrfs_delayed_item *__btrfs_lookup_delayed_item(
struct rb_root *root,
u64 index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct rb_node *node = root->rb_node;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *delayed_item = NULL;
while (node) {
delayed_item = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_delayed_item,
rb_node);
if (delayed_item->index < index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node = node->rb_right;
else if (delayed_item->index > index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node = node->rb_left;
else
return delayed_item;
}
return NULL;
}
static int __btrfs_add_delayed_item(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node,
struct btrfs_delayed_item *ins)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct rb_node **p, *node;
struct rb_node *parent_node = NULL;
struct rb_root_cached *root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
bool leftmost = true;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (ins->type == BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
root = &delayed_node->ins_root;
else
root = &delayed_node->del_root;
p = &root->rb_root.rb_node;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node = &ins->rb_node;
while (*p) {
parent_node = *p;
item = rb_entry(parent_node, struct btrfs_delayed_item,
rb_node);
if (item->index < ins->index) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
leftmost = false;
} else if (item->index > ins->index) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
} else {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return -EEXIST;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
rb_link_node(node, parent_node, p);
rb_insert_color_cached(node, root, leftmost);
if (ins->type == BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM &&
ins->index >= delayed_node->index_cnt)
delayed_node->index_cnt = ins->index + 1;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
delayed_node->count++;
atomic_inc(&delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root->items);
return 0;
}
static void finish_one_item(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
int seq = atomic_inc_return(&delayed_root->items_seq);
/* atomic_dec_return implies a barrier */
if ((atomic_dec_return(&delayed_root->items) <
BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND || seq % BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH == 0))
cond_wake_up_nomb(&delayed_root->wait);
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static void __btrfs_remove_delayed_item(struct btrfs_delayed_item *delayed_item)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = delayed_item->delayed_node;
struct rb_root_cached *root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
/* Not inserted, ignore it. */
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&delayed_item->rb_node))
return;
/* If it's in a rbtree, then we need to have delayed node locked. */
lockdep_assert_held(&delayed_node->mutex);
delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (delayed_item->type == BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM)
root = &delayed_node->ins_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
else
root = &delayed_node->del_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
rb_erase_cached(&delayed_item->rb_node, root);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&delayed_item->rb_node);
delayed_node->count--;
finish_one_item(delayed_root);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
static void btrfs_release_delayed_item(struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
if (item) {
__btrfs_remove_delayed_item(item);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&item->refs))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
kfree(item);
}
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_item *__btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
{
struct rb_node *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item = NULL;
p = rb_first_cached(&delayed_node->ins_root);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (p)
item = rb_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_item, rb_node);
return item;
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_item *__btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
{
struct rb_node *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item = NULL;
p = rb_first_cached(&delayed_node->del_root);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (p)
item = rb_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_item, rb_node);
return item;
}
static struct btrfs_delayed_item *__btrfs_next_delayed_item(
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
struct rb_node *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *next = NULL;
p = rb_next(&item->rb_node);
if (p)
next = rb_entry(p, struct btrfs_delayed_item, rb_node);
return next;
}
static int btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
struct btrfs_block_rsv *src_rsv;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *dst_rsv;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
u64 num_bytes;
int ret;
if (!trans->bytes_reserved)
return 0;
src_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
dst_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
num_bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
/*
* Here we migrate space rsv from transaction rsv, since have already
* reserved space when starting a transaction. So no need to reserve
* qgroup space here.
*/
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(src_rsv, dst_rsv, num_bytes, true);
if (!ret) {
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_item",
item->delayed_node->inode_id,
num_bytes, 1);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* For insertions we track reserved metadata space by accounting
* for the number of leaves that will be used, based on the delayed
* node's curr_index_batch_size and index_item_leaves fields.
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
*/
if (item->type == BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM)
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
item->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return ret;
}
static void btrfs_delayed_item_release_metadata(struct btrfs_root *root,
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!item->bytes_reserved)
return;
rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
/*
* Check btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() to see why we don't need
* to release/reserve qgroup space.
*/
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_item",
item->delayed_node->inode_id,
item->bytes_reserved, 0);
btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, rsv, item->bytes_reserved, NULL);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
static void btrfs_delayed_item_release_leaves(struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
unsigned int num_leaves)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = node->root->fs_info;
const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, num_leaves);
/* There are no space reservations during log replay, bail out. */
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags))
return;
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_item", node->inode_id,
bytes, 0);
btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv, bytes, NULL);
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static int btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata(
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_block_rsv *src_rsv;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *dst_rsv;
u64 num_bytes;
int ret;
src_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
dst_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
num_bytes = btrfs_calc_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid. It's not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid. When marking an inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space. This is stupid because we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again and it doesn't matter. Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation. So if trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation. If not return ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction. The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to the thing. Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't matter. But this is stupid because we could write the data after the transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow all the way down to the inode anyway. This used to be masked by the delalloc reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this case. So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass. So if our trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc reserve. Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before. With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last words). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-05 03:56:02 +04:00
/*
* btrfs_dirty_inode will update the inode under btrfs_join_transaction
* which doesn't reserve space for speed. This is a problem since we
* still need to reserve space for this update, so try to reserve the
* space.
*
* Now if src_rsv == delalloc_block_rsv we'll let it just steal since
* we always reserve enough to update the inode item.
Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid. It's not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid. When marking an inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space. This is stupid because we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again and it doesn't matter. Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation. So if trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation. If not return ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction. The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to the thing. Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't matter. But this is stupid because we could write the data after the transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow all the way down to the inode anyway. This used to be masked by the delalloc reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this case. So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass. So if our trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc reserve. Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before. With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last words). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-05 03:56:02 +04:00
*/
if (!src_rsv || (!trans->bytes_reserved &&
src_rsv->type != BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_DELALLOC)) {
btrfs: don't flush from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata Calling btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc from btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata can result in flushing delalloc while holding a transaction and delayed node locks. This is deadlock prone. In the past multiple commits: * ae5e070eaca9 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't try to wait flushing if we're already holding a transaction") * 6f23277a49e6 ("btrfs: qgroup: don't commit transaction when we already hold the handle") Tried to solve various aspects of this but this was always a whack-a-mole game. Unfortunately those 2 fixes don't solve a deadlock scenario involving btrfs_delayed_node::mutex. Namely, one thread can call btrfs_dirty_inode as a result of reading a file and modifying its atime: PID: 6963 TASK: ffff8c7f3f94c000 CPU: 2 COMMAND: "test" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffa52a1bdd #3 wait_for_completion at ffffffffa529eeea <-- sleeps with delayed node mutex held #4 start_delalloc_inodes at ffffffffc0380db5 #5 btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot at ffffffffc0393836 #6 try_flush_qgroup at ffffffffc03f04b2 #7 __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta at ffffffffc03f5bb6 <-- tries to reserve space and starts delalloc inodes. #8 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e31aa <-- acquires delayed node mutex #9 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 #10 btrfs_dirty_inode at ffffffffc038627b <-- TRANSACTIION OPENED #11 touch_atime at ffffffffa4cf0000 #12 generic_file_read_iter at ffffffffa4c1f123 #13 new_sync_read at ffffffffa4ccdc8a #14 vfs_read at ffffffffa4cd0849 #15 ksys_read at ffffffffa4cd0bd1 #16 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa4a052eb #17 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa540008c This will cause an asynchronous work to flush the delalloc inodes to happen which can try to acquire the same delayed_node mutex: PID: 455 TASK: ffff8c8085fa4000 CPU: 5 COMMAND: "kworker/u16:30" #0 __schedule at ffffffffa529e07d #1 schedule at ffffffffa529e4ff #2 schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa529e80a #3 __mutex_lock at ffffffffa529fdcb <-- goes to sleep, never wakes up. #4 btrfs_delayed_update_inode at ffffffffc03e3143 <-- tries to acquire the mutex #5 btrfs_update_inode at ffffffffc0385ba8 <-- this is the same inode that pid 6963 is holding #6 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.78 at ffffffffc0386be7 #7 cow_file_range at ffffffffc03879c1 #8 btrfs_run_delalloc_range at ffffffffc038894c #9 writepage_delalloc at ffffffffc03a3c8f #10 __extent_writepage at ffffffffc03a4c01 #11 extent_write_cache_pages at ffffffffc03a500b #12 extent_writepages at ffffffffc03a6de2 #13 do_writepages at ffffffffa4c277eb #14 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffa4c1e5bb #15 btrfs_run_delalloc_work at ffffffffc0380987 <-- starts running delayed nodes #16 normal_work_helper at ffffffffc03b706c #17 process_one_work at ffffffffa4aba4e4 #18 worker_thread at ffffffffa4aba6fd #19 kthread at ffffffffa4ac0a3d #20 ret_from_fork at ffffffffa54001ff To fully address those cases the complete fix is to never issue any flushing while holding the transaction or the delayed node lock. This patch achieves it by calling qgroup_reserve_meta directly which will either succeed without flushing or will fail and return -EDQUOT. In the latter case that return value is going to be propagated to btrfs_dirty_inode which will fallback to start a new transaction. That's fine as the majority of time we expect the inode will have BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY flag set which will result in directly copying the in-memory state. Fixes: c53e9653605d ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-22 19:40:44 +03:00
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta(root, num_bytes,
BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PREALLOC, true);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_add(fs_info, dst_rsv, num_bytes,
BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH);
/* NO_FLUSH could only fail with -ENOSPC */
ASSERT(ret == 0 || ret == -ENOSPC);
if (ret)
btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(root, num_bytes);
} else {
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_migrate(src_rsv, dst_rsv, num_bytes, true);
Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid. It's not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid. When marking an inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space. This is stupid because we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again and it doesn't matter. Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation. So if trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation. If not return ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction. The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to the thing. Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't matter. But this is stupid because we could write the data after the transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow all the way down to the inode anyway. This used to be masked by the delalloc reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this case. So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass. So if our trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc reserve. Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before. With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last words). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-05 03:56:02 +04:00
}
if (!ret) {
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_inode",
node->inode_id, num_bytes, 1);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node->bytes_reserved = num_bytes;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return ret;
}
static void btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
bool qgroup_free)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv;
if (!node->bytes_reserved)
return;
rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_inode",
node->inode_id, node->bytes_reserved, 0);
btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, rsv, node->bytes_reserved, NULL);
if (qgroup_free)
btrfs_qgroup_free_meta_prealloc(node->root,
node->bytes_reserved);
else
btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(node->root,
node->bytes_reserved);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
node->bytes_reserved = 0;
}
/*
btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for insertion as a single batch (a single btree operation) as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example we have delayed index items for the following index keys: 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21 We end up building three batches: 1) First one for index keys 10, 11 and 12; 2) Second one for index keys 15 and 16; 3) Third one for index keys 20 and 21. However, since the dir index numbers come from a monotonically increasing counter and are never reused, we could group all these items into a single batch. The existence of holes in the sequence happens only when we had delayed dir index items for insertion that got deleted before they were flushed to the subvolume's tree. The delayed items are stored in a rbtree based on their key order, so we can just group items into a batch as long as they all fit in a leaf, and ignore if there's a gap (key offset, index number) between two consecutive items. This is more efficient and reduces the amount of time spent when running delayed items if there are gaps between dir index items. For example running the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=100 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done start=$(date +%s%N) sync end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nsync took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT While having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-delayed-items-inserts.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Must add 'noinline' to btrfs_insert_delayed_items(). */ k:btrfs_insert_delayed_items { @start_insert_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_insert_empty_items /@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/ { @insert_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_insert_delayed_items /@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_insert_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 576 @insert_batches: 51 After this change: @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 174 @insert_batches: 2 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:40 +03:00
* Insert a single delayed item or a batch of delayed items, as many as possible
* that fit in a leaf. The delayed items (dir index keys) are sorted by their key
* in the rbtree, and if there's a gap between two consecutive dir index items,
* then it means at some point we had delayed dir indexes to add but they got
* removed (by btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index()) before we attempted to flush them
* into the subvolume tree. Dir index keys also have their offsets coming from a
* monotonically increasing counter, so we can't get new keys with an offset that
* fits within a gap between delayed dir index items.
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
*/
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
static int btrfs_insert_delayed_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_item *first_item)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node = first_item->delayed_node;
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
LIST_HEAD(item_list);
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *next;
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
const int max_size = BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(fs_info);
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
struct btrfs_item_batch batch;
struct btrfs_key first_key;
const u32 first_data_size = first_item->data_len;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
int total_size;
char *ins_data = NULL;
int ret;
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
bool continuous_keys_only = false;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
lockdep_assert_held(&node->mutex);
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
/*
* During normal operation the delayed index offset is continuously
* increasing, so we can batch insert all items as there will not be any
* overlapping keys in the tree.
*
* The exception to this is log replay, where we may have interleaved
* offsets in the tree, so our batch needs to be continuous keys only in
* order to ensure we do not end up with out of order items in our leaf.
*/
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags))
continuous_keys_only = true;
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* For delayed items to insert, we track reserved metadata bytes based
* on the number of leaves that we will use.
* See btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() and
* btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata()).
*/
ASSERT(first_item->bytes_reserved == 0);
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
list_add_tail(&first_item->tree_list, &item_list);
batch.total_data_size = first_data_size;
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
batch.nr = 1;
total_size = first_data_size + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
curr = first_item;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
while (true) {
int next_size;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
next = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(curr);
btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for insertion as a single batch (a single btree operation) as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example we have delayed index items for the following index keys: 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 20, 21 We end up building three batches: 1) First one for index keys 10, 11 and 12; 2) Second one for index keys 15 and 16; 3) Third one for index keys 20 and 21. However, since the dir index numbers come from a monotonically increasing counter and are never reused, we could group all these items into a single batch. The existence of holes in the sequence happens only when we had delayed dir index items for insertion that got deleted before they were flushed to the subvolume's tree. The delayed items are stored in a rbtree based on their key order, so we can just group items into a batch as long as they all fit in a leaf, and ignore if there's a gap (key offset, index number) between two consecutive items. This is more efficient and reduces the amount of time spent when running delayed items if there are gaps between dir index items. For example running the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=100 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done start=$(date +%s%N) sync end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nsync took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT While having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-delayed-items-inserts.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Must add 'noinline' to btrfs_insert_delayed_items(). */ k:btrfs_insert_delayed_items { @start_insert_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_insert_empty_items /@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/ { @insert_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_insert_delayed_items /@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_insert_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_insert_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 576 @insert_batches: 51 After this change: @btrfs_insert_delayed_items_total_time: 174 @insert_batches: 2 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:40 +03:00
if (!next)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
break;
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
/*
* We cannot allow gaps in the key space if we're doing log
* replay.
*/
if (continuous_keys_only && (next->index != curr->index + 1))
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
break;
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
ASSERT(next->bytes_reserved == 0);
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
next_size = next->data_len + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
if (total_size + next_size > max_size)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
break;
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
list_add_tail(&next->tree_list, &item_list);
batch.nr++;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
total_size += next_size;
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
batch.total_data_size += next->data_len;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
curr = next;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
if (batch.nr == 1) {
first_key.objectid = node->inode_id;
first_key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
first_key.offset = first_item->index;
batch.keys = &first_key;
batch.data_sizes = &first_data_size;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
} else {
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
struct btrfs_key *ins_keys;
u32 *ins_sizes;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
int i = 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
ins_data = kmalloc(batch.nr * sizeof(u32) +
batch.nr * sizeof(struct btrfs_key), GFP_NOFS);
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
if (!ins_data) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
ins_sizes = (u32 *)ins_data;
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
ins_keys = (struct btrfs_key *)(ins_data + batch.nr * sizeof(u32));
batch.keys = ins_keys;
batch.data_sizes = ins_sizes;
list_for_each_entry(curr, &item_list, tree_list) {
ins_keys[i].objectid = node->inode_id;
ins_keys[i].type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
ins_keys[i].offset = curr->index;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
ins_sizes[i] = curr->data_len;
i++;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
ret = btrfs_insert_empty_items(trans, root, path, &batch);
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
if (ret)
goto out;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
list_for_each_entry(curr, &item_list, tree_list) {
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
char *data_ptr;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
data_ptr = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0], char);
write_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], &curr->data,
(unsigned long)data_ptr, curr->data_len);
path->slots[0]++;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
/*
* Now release our path before releasing the delayed items and their
* metadata reservations, so that we don't block other tasks for more
* time than needed.
*/
btrfs_release_path(path);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
ASSERT(node->index_item_leaves > 0);
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
/*
* For normal operations we will batch an entire leaf's worth of delayed
* items, so if there are more items to process we can decrement
* index_item_leaves by 1 as we inserted 1 leaf's worth of items.
*
* However for log replay we may not have inserted an entire leaf's
* worth of items, we may have not had continuous items, so decrementing
* here would mess up the index_item_leaves accounting. For this case
* only clean up the accounting when there are no items left.
*/
if (next && !continuous_keys_only) {
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* We inserted one batch of items into a leaf a there are more
* items to flush in a future batch, now release one unit of
* metadata space from the delayed block reserve, corresponding
* the leaf we just flushed to.
*/
btrfs_delayed_item_release_leaves(node, 1);
node->index_item_leaves--;
btrfs: do not batch insert non-consecutive dir indexes during log replay While running generic/475 in a loop I got the following error BTRFS critical (device dm-11): corrupt leaf: root=5 block=31096832 slot=69, bad key order, prev (263 96 531) current (263 96 524) <snip> item 65 key (263 96 517) itemoff 14132 itemsize 33 item 66 key (263 96 523) itemoff 14099 itemsize 33 item 67 key (263 96 525) itemoff 14066 itemsize 33 item 68 key (263 96 531) itemoff 14033 itemsize 33 item 69 key (263 96 524) itemoff 14000 itemsize 33 As you can see here we have 3 dir index keys with the dir index value of 523, 524, and 525 inserted between 517 and 524. This occurs because our dir index insertion code will bulk insert all dir index items on the node regardless of their actual key value. This makes sense on a normally running system, because if there's a gap in between the items there was a deletion before the item was inserted, so there's not going to be an overlap of the dir index items that need to be inserted and what exists on disk. However during log replay this isn't necessarily true, we could have any number of dir indexes in the tree already. Fix this by seeing if we're replaying the log, and if we are simply skip batching if there's a gap in the key space. This file system was left broken from the fstest, I tested this patch against the broken fs to make sure it replayed the log properly, and then btrfs checked the file system after the log replay to verify everything was ok. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-21 16:47:39 +03:00
} else if (!next) {
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* There are no more items to insert. We can have a number of
* reserved leaves > 1 here - this happens when many dir index
* items are added and then removed before they are flushed (file
* names with a very short life, never span a transaction). So
* release all remaining leaves.
*/
btrfs_delayed_item_release_leaves(node, node->index_item_leaves);
node->index_item_leaves = 0;
}
btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch When inserting a batch of items into a btree, we end up looping over the data sizes array 3 times: 1) Once in the caller of btrfs_insert_empty_items(), when it populates the array with the data sizes for each item; 2) Once at btrfs_insert_empty_items() to sum the elements of the data sizes array and compute the total data size; 3) And then once again at setup_items_for_insert(), where we do exactly the same as what we do at btrfs_insert_empty_items(), to compute the total data size. That is not bad for small arrays, but when the arrays have hundreds of elements, the time spent on looping is not negligible. For example when doing batch inserts of delayed items for dir index items or when logging a directory, it's common to have 200 to 260 dir index items in a single batch when using a leaf size of 16K and using file names between 8 and 12 characters. For a 64K leaf size, multiply that by 4. Taking into account that during directory logging or when flushing delayed dir index items we can have many of those large batches, the time spent on the looping adds up quickly. It's also more important to avoid it at setup_items_for_insert(), since we are holding a write lock on a leaf and, in some cases, on upper nodes of the btree, which causes us to block other tasks that want to access the leaf and nodes for longer than necessary. So change the code so that setup_items_for_insert() and btrfs_insert_empty_items() no longer compute the total data size, and instead rely on the caller to supply it. This makes us loop over the array only once, where we can both populate the data size array and compute the total data size, taking advantage of spatial and temporal locality. To make this more manageable, use a structure to contain all the relevant details for a batch of items (keys array, data sizes array, total data size, number of items), and use it as an argument for btrfs_insert_empty_items() and setup_items_for_insert(). This patch is part of a small patchset that is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: loop only once over data sizes array when inserting an item batch btrfs: unexport setup_items_for_insert() btrfs: use single bulk copy operations when logging directories This is patch 1/3 and performance results, and the specific tests, are included in the changelog of patch 3/3. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-24 14:28:13 +03:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, &item_list, tree_list) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_del(&curr->tree_list);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(curr);
}
out:
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
kfree(ins_data);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return ret;
}
static int btrfs_insert_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
int ret = 0;
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
while (ret == 0) {
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve the batch insertion of delayed items When we insert the delayed items of an inode, which corresponds to the directory index keys for a directory (key type BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY), we do the following: 1) Pick the first delayed item from the rbtree and insert it into the fs/subvolume btree, using btrfs_insert_empty_item() for that; 2) Without releasing the path returned by btrfs_insert_empty_item(), keep collecting as many consecutive delayed items from the rbtree as possible, as long as each one's BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY key is the immediate successor of the previously picked item and as long as they fit in the available space of the leaf the path points to; 3) Then insert all the collected items into the leaf; 4) Release the reserve metadata space for each collected item and release each item (implies deleting from the rbtree); 5) Unlock the path. While this is much better than inserting items one by one, it can be improved in a few aspects: 1) Instead of adding items based on the remaining free space of the leaf, collect as many items that can fit in a leaf and bulk insert them. This results in less and larger batches, reducing the total amount of time to insert the delayed items. For example when adding 100K files to a directory, we ended up creating 1658 batches with very variable sizes ranging from 1 item to 118 items, on a filesystem with a node/leaf size of 16K. After this change, we end up with 839 batches, with the vast majority of them having exactly 120 items; 2) We do the search for more items to batch, by iterating the rbtree, while holding a write lock on the leaf; 3) While still holding the leaf locked, we are releasing the reserved metadata for each item and then deleting each item, keeping a write lock on the leaf for longer than necessary. Releasing the delayed items one by one can take a significant amount of time, because deleting them from the rbtree can often be a bit slow when the deletion results in rebalancing the rbtree. So change this so that we try to create larger batches, with a total item size up to the maximum a leaf can support, and by unlocking the leaf immediately after inserting the items, releasing the reserved metadata space of each item and releasing each item without holding the write lock on the leaf. The following script that runs fs_mark was used to test this change: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-m single -d single" FILES=1000000 THREADS=16 FILE_SIZE=0 echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s $FILE_SIZE -t 16" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT It was run on machine with 12 cores, 64G of ram, using a NVMe device and using a non-debug kernel config (Debian's default config). Results before this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 76182.1 72223046 3 32000000 0 62746.9 80776528 5 48000000 0 77029.0 93022381 6 64000000 0 73691.6 95251075 8 80000000 0 66288.0 85089634 Results after this change: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 1 16000000 0 79049.5 (+3.7%) 69700824 3 32000000 0 65248.9 (+3.9%) 80583693 5 48000000 0 77991.4 (+1.2%) 90040908 6 64000000 0 75096.8 (+1.9%) 89862241 8 80000000 0 66926.8 (+1.0%) 84429169 Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-20 18:05:22 +03:00
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
curr = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(node);
if (!curr) {
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
break;
}
ret = btrfs_insert_delayed_item(trans, root, path, curr);
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
return ret;
}
static int btrfs_batch_delete_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
{
const u64 ino = item->delayed_node->inode_id;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next;
struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
LIST_HEAD(batch_list);
int nitems, slot, last_slot;
int ret;
u64 total_reserved_size = item->bytes_reserved;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
ASSERT(leaf != NULL);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
slot = path->slots[0];
last_slot = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf) - 1;
/*
* Our caller always gives us a path pointing to an existing item, so
* this can not happen.
*/
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
ASSERT(slot <= last_slot);
if (WARN_ON(slot > last_slot))
return -ENOENT;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
nitems = 1;
curr = item;
list_add_tail(&curr->tree_list, &batch_list);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/*
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
* Keep checking if the next delayed item matches the next item in the
* leaf - if so, we can add it to the batch of items to delete from the
* leaf.
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
*/
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
while (slot < last_slot) {
struct btrfs_key key;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
next = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(curr);
if (!next)
break;
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
slot++;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
if (key.objectid != ino ||
key.type != BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY ||
key.offset != next->index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
break;
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
nitems++;
curr = next;
list_add_tail(&curr->tree_list, &batch_list);
total_reserved_size += curr->bytes_reserved;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
ret = btrfs_del_items(trans, root, path, path->slots[0], nitems);
if (ret)
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
return ret;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/* In case of BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING items won't have reserved space */
if (total_reserved_size > 0) {
/*
* Check btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() to see why we
* don't need to release/reserve qgroup space.
*/
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "delayed_item", ino,
total_reserved_size, 0);
btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv,
total_reserved_size, NULL);
}
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, &batch_list, tree_list) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_del(&curr->tree_list);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(curr);
}
btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items Currently we group delayed dir index items for deletion in a single batch (single btree operation) as long as they all exist in the same leaf and as long as their keys are sequential in the key space. For example if we have a leaf that has dir index items with offsets: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10 And we have delayed dir index items for deleting all these indexes, and no delayed items for any other index keys in between, then we end up deleting in 3 batches: 1) First batch for indexes 2, 3 and 4; 2) Second batch for indexes 6 and 7; 3) Third batch for index 10. This is a waste because we can delete all the index keys in a single batch. What matters is that each consecutive delayed index key matches each consecutive dir index key in a leaf. So update the logic at btrfs_batch_delete_items() to check only for a key match between delayed dir index items and dir index items in a leaf. Also avoid the useless first iteration on comparing the key of the first slot to delete with the key of the first delayed item, as it's silly since they always match, as the delayed item's key was used for the btree search that gave us the path we have. This is more efficient and reduces runtime of running delayed items, as well as lock contention on the subvolume's tree. For example, the following test script: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdj MNT=/mnt/sdj mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT NUM_FILES=1000 mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Now delete every other file, to create gaps in the dir index keys. for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i += 2)); do rm -f $MNT/testdir/file_$i done # Sync to force any delayed items to be flushed to the tree. sync start=$(date +%s%N) rm -fr $MNT/testdir end=$(date +%s%N) dur=$(( (end - start) / 1000000 )) echo -e "\nrm -fr took $dur milliseconds" umount $MNT Running that test script while having the following bpftrace script running in another shell: $ cat bpf-measure.sh #!/usr/bin/bpftrace /* Add 'noinline' to btrfs_delete_delayed_items()'s definition. */ k:btrfs_delete_delayed_items { @start_delete_delayed_items[tid] = nsecs; } k:btrfs_del_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { @delete_batches = count(); } kr:btrfs_delete_delayed_items /@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_delete_delayed_items[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_delete_delayed_items[tid]); } Before this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 9563 @delete_batches: 1001 After this change: @btrfs_delete_delayed_items_total_time: 7328 @delete_batches: 509 Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:38 +03:00
return 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
static int btrfs_delete_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
struct btrfs_key key;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret = 0;
key.objectid = node->inode_id;
key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point The delayed item deletion entry point, btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), is a bit convoluted for a few reasons: 1) It's really a loop disguised with labels and goto statements; 2) There's a 'delete_fail' label which isn't only for error cases, we can jump to that label even if no error happened, if we simply don't have more delayed items to delete; 3) Unnecessarily keeps track of the current and previous items for no good reason, as after getting the next item and releasing the current one, it just jumps to the 'again' label just to look again for the first delayed item; 4) When a delayed item is not in the tree (because it was already deleted before), it releases the item while holding a path locked, which is not necessary and adds more contention to the tree, specially taking into account that the path came from a deletion search, meaning we have write locks for nodes at levels 2, 1 and 0. And releasing the item is not computationally trivial (rb tree deletion, a kfree() and some trivial things). So refactor it to use a while loop and add some comments to make it more obvious why we can have delayed items without a matching item in the tree as well as why not keep the delayed node locked all the time when running all its deletion items. This is also a preparation for some upcoming work involving delayed items. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:37 +03:00
while (ret == 0) {
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
item = __btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(node);
if (!item) {
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
break;
}
key.offset = item->index;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point The delayed item deletion entry point, btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), is a bit convoluted for a few reasons: 1) It's really a loop disguised with labels and goto statements; 2) There's a 'delete_fail' label which isn't only for error cases, we can jump to that label even if no error happened, if we simply don't have more delayed items to delete; 3) Unnecessarily keeps track of the current and previous items for no good reason, as after getting the next item and releasing the current one, it just jumps to the 'again' label just to look again for the first delayed item; 4) When a delayed item is not in the tree (because it was already deleted before), it releases the item while holding a path locked, which is not necessary and adds more contention to the tree, specially taking into account that the path came from a deletion search, meaning we have write locks for nodes at levels 2, 1 and 0. And releasing the item is not computationally trivial (rb tree deletion, a kfree() and some trivial things). So refactor it to use a while loop and add some comments to make it more obvious why we can have delayed items without a matching item in the tree as well as why not keep the delayed node locked all the time when running all its deletion items. This is also a preparation for some upcoming work involving delayed items. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:37 +03:00
if (ret > 0) {
/*
* There's no matching item in the leaf. This means we
* have already deleted this item in a past run of the
* delayed items. We ignore errors when running delayed
* items from an async context, through a work queue job
* running btrfs_async_run_delayed_root(), and don't
* release delayed items that failed to complete. This
* is because we will retry later, and at transaction
* commit time we always run delayed items and will
* then deal with errors if they fail to run again.
*
* So just release delayed items for which we can't find
* an item in the tree, and move to the next item.
*/
btrfs_release_path(path);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
ret = 0;
} else if (ret == 0) {
ret = btrfs_batch_delete_items(trans, root, path, item);
btrfs_release_path(path);
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/*
btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point The delayed item deletion entry point, btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), is a bit convoluted for a few reasons: 1) It's really a loop disguised with labels and goto statements; 2) There's a 'delete_fail' label which isn't only for error cases, we can jump to that label even if no error happened, if we simply don't have more delayed items to delete; 3) Unnecessarily keeps track of the current and previous items for no good reason, as after getting the next item and releasing the current one, it just jumps to the 'again' label just to look again for the first delayed item; 4) When a delayed item is not in the tree (because it was already deleted before), it releases the item while holding a path locked, which is not necessary and adds more contention to the tree, specially taking into account that the path came from a deletion search, meaning we have write locks for nodes at levels 2, 1 and 0. And releasing the item is not computationally trivial (rb tree deletion, a kfree() and some trivial things). So refactor it to use a while loop and add some comments to make it more obvious why we can have delayed items without a matching item in the tree as well as why not keep the delayed node locked all the time when running all its deletion items. This is also a preparation for some upcoming work involving delayed items. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:37 +03:00
* We unlock and relock on each iteration, this is to prevent
* blocking other tasks for too long while we are being run from
* the async context (work queue job). Those tasks are typically
* running system calls like creat/mkdir/rename/unlink/etc which
* need to add delayed items to this delayed node.
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
*/
btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point The delayed item deletion entry point, btrfs_delete_delayed_items(), is a bit convoluted for a few reasons: 1) It's really a loop disguised with labels and goto statements; 2) There's a 'delete_fail' label which isn't only for error cases, we can jump to that label even if no error happened, if we simply don't have more delayed items to delete; 3) Unnecessarily keeps track of the current and previous items for no good reason, as after getting the next item and releasing the current one, it just jumps to the 'again' label just to look again for the first delayed item; 4) When a delayed item is not in the tree (because it was already deleted before), it releases the item while holding a path locked, which is not necessary and adds more contention to the tree, specially taking into account that the path came from a deletion search, meaning we have write locks for nodes at levels 2, 1 and 0. And releasing the item is not computationally trivial (rb tree deletion, a kfree() and some trivial things). So refactor it to use a while loop and add some comments to make it more obvious why we can have delayed items without a matching item in the tree as well as why not keep the delayed node locked all the time when running all its deletion items. This is also a preparation for some upcoming work involving delayed items. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-31 18:06:37 +03:00
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
return ret;
}
static void btrfs_release_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
if (delayed_node &&
test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags)) {
ASSERT(delayed_node->root);
clear_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
delayed_node->count--;
delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
finish_one_item(delayed_root);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
}
static void btrfs_release_delayed_iref(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
{
if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &delayed_node->flags)) {
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
ASSERT(delayed_node->root);
delayed_node->count--;
delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
finish_one_item(delayed_root);
}
}
static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int mod;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret;
key.objectid = node->inode_id;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
key.offset = 0;
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &node->flags))
mod = -1;
else
mod = 1;
ret = btrfs_lookup_inode(trans, root, path, &key, mod);
btrfs: fix error handling in __btrfs_update_delayed_inode If we get an error while looking up the inode item we'll simply bail without cleaning up the delayed node. This results in this style of warning happening on commit: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 76403 at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1365 btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty+0x5b/0x90 CPU: 0 PID: 76403 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.13.0-rc1+ #373 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty+0x5b/0x90 RSP: 0018:ffffb8bb815a7e50 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff95d6d07e1888 RCX: ffff95d6c0fa3000 RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000000000029e91c RDI: ffff95d6c0fc8060 RBP: ffff95d6c0fc8060 R08: 00008d6d701a2c1d R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffff95d6d1760ea0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff95d6c15a4d00 R13: ffff95d6c0fa3000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffb8bb815a7e90 FS: 00007f490e8dbb80(0000) GS:ffff95d73bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f6e75555cb0 CR3: 00000001101ce001 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: btrfs_commit_transaction+0x43c/0xb00 ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 ? vfs_fsync_range+0x90/0x90 iterate_supers+0x8c/0x100 ksys_sync+0x50/0x90 __do_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Because the iref isn't dropped and this leaves an elevated node->count, so any release just re-queues it onto the delayed inodes list. Fix this by going to the out label to handle the proper cleanup of the delayed node. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-05-21 23:44:08 +03:00
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
leaf = path->nodes[0];
inode_item = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_item);
write_extent_buffer(leaf, &node->inode_item, (unsigned long)inode_item,
sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item));
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &node->flags))
goto out;
/*
* Now we're going to delete the INODE_REF/EXTREF, which should be the
* only one ref left. Check if the next item is an INODE_REF/EXTREF.
*
* But if we're the last item already, release and search for the last
* INODE_REF/EXTREF.
*/
if (path->slots[0] + 1 >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
key.objectid = node->inode_id;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY;
key.offset = (u64)-1;
btrfs_release_path(path);
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_out;
ASSERT(ret > 0);
ASSERT(path->slots[0] > 0);
ret = 0;
path->slots[0]--;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
} else {
path->slots[0]++;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
if (key.objectid != node->inode_id)
goto out;
if (key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
goto out;
/*
* Delayed iref deletion is for the inode who has only one link,
* so there is only one iref. The case that several irefs are
* in the same item doesn't exist.
*/
ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path);
out:
btrfs_release_delayed_iref(node);
btrfs_release_path(path);
err_out:
btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(fs_info, node, (ret < 0));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node);
/*
* If we fail to update the delayed inode we need to abort the
* transaction, because we could leave the inode with the improper
* counts behind.
*/
if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
return ret;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
static inline int btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
int ret;
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &node->flags)) {
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
return 0;
}
ret = __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(trans, root, path, node);
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
return ret;
}
static inline int
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node)
{
int ret;
ret = btrfs_insert_delayed_items(trans, path, node->root, node);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = btrfs_delete_delayed_items(trans, path, node->root, node);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = btrfs_record_root_in_trans(trans, node->root);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = btrfs_update_delayed_inode(trans, node->root, path, node);
return ret;
}
/*
* Called when committing the transaction.
* Returns 0 on success.
* Returns < 0 on error and returns with an aborted transaction with any
* outstanding delayed items cleaned up.
*/
static int __btrfs_run_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, int nr)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *curr_node, *prev_node;
struct btrfs_path *path;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret = 0;
bool count = (nr > 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (TRANS_ABORTED(trans))
return -EIO;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
block_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
delayed_root = fs_info->delayed_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
curr_node = btrfs_first_delayed_node(delayed_root);
while (curr_node && (!count || nr--)) {
ret = __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(trans, path,
curr_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
break;
}
prev_node = curr_node;
curr_node = btrfs_next_delayed_node(curr_node);
btrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example, btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 but task is already holding lock: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline] lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781 up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625 btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline] btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239 search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376 btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline] btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153 flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078 process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600 worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751 kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257: #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline] #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287 #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8 </TASK> ------------[ cut here ]------------ Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(). Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-29 13:34:52 +03:00
/*
* See the comment below about releasing path before releasing
* node. If the commit of delayed items was successful the path
* should always be released, but in case of an error, it may
* point to locked extent buffers (a leaf at the very least).
*/
ASSERT(path->nodes[0] == NULL);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_node(prev_node);
}
btrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example, btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 but task is already holding lock: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline] lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781 up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625 btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline] btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239 search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376 btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline] btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153 flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078 process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600 worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751 kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257: #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline] #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287 #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8 </TASK> ------------[ cut here ]------------ Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(). Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-29 13:34:52 +03:00
/*
* Release the path to avoid a potential deadlock and lockdep splat when
* releasing the delayed node, as that requires taking the delayed node's
* mutex. If another task starts running delayed items before we take
* the mutex, it will first lock the mutex and then it may try to lock
* the same btree path (leaf).
*/
btrfs_free_path(path);
if (curr_node)
btrfs_release_delayed_node(curr_node);
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
trans->block_rsv = block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return ret;
}
int btrfs_run_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
return __btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans, -1);
}
int btrfs_run_delayed_items_nr(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, int nr)
{
return __btrfs_run_delayed_items(trans, nr);
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret;
if (!delayed_node)
return 0;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (!delayed_node->count) {
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path) {
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return -ENOMEM;
}
block_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
trans->block_rsv = &delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
ret = __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(trans, path, delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
btrfs_free_path(path);
trans->block_rsv = block_rsv;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return ret;
}
int btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
int ret;
if (!delayed_node)
return 0;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags)) {
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
trans = btrfs_join_transaction(delayed_node->root);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto out;
}
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto trans_out;
}
block_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags))
ret = __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(trans, delayed_node->root,
path, delayed_node);
else
ret = 0;
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_free_path(path);
trans->block_rsv = block_rsv;
trans_out:
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(fs_info);
out:
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_remove_delayed_node(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
delayed_node = READ_ONCE(inode->delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_node)
return;
inode->delayed_node = NULL;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
}
struct btrfs_async_delayed_work {
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
int nr;
struct btrfs_work work;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
};
static void btrfs_async_run_delayed_root(struct btrfs_work *work)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_async_delayed_work *async_work;
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = NULL;
struct btrfs_root *root;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
struct btrfs_block_rsv *block_rsv;
int total_done = 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
async_work = container_of(work, struct btrfs_async_delayed_work, work);
delayed_root = async_work->delayed_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
goto out;
do {
if (atomic_read(&delayed_root->items) <
BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND / 2)
break;
delayed_node = btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node(delayed_root);
if (!delayed_node)
break;
root = delayed_node->root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
btrfs_release_path(path);
btrfs_release_prepared_delayed_node(delayed_node);
total_done++;
continue;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
block_rsv = trans->block_rsv;
trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delayed_block_rsv;
btrfs: fix wrong reservation when doing delayed inode operations We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-15 14:47:30 +04:00
__btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items(trans, path, delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
trans->block_rsv = block_rsv;
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
btrfs_btree_balance_dirty_nodelay(root->fs_info);
btrfs_release_path(path);
btrfs_release_prepared_delayed_node(delayed_node);
total_done++;
} while ((async_work->nr == 0 && total_done < BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK)
|| total_done < async_work->nr);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_free_path(path);
out:
wake_up(&delayed_root->wait);
kfree(async_work);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static int btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int nr)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_async_delayed_work *async_work;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
async_work = kmalloc(sizeof(*async_work), GFP_NOFS);
if (!async_work)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return -ENOMEM;
async_work->delayed_root = delayed_root;
btrfs_init_work(&async_work->work, btrfs_async_run_delayed_root, NULL);
async_work->nr = nr;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_queue_work(fs_info->delayed_workers, &async_work->work);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return 0;
}
void btrfs_assert_delayed_root_empty(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
WARN_ON(btrfs_first_delayed_node(fs_info->delayed_root));
}
static int could_end_wait(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root, int seq)
{
int val = atomic_read(&delayed_root->items_seq);
if (val < seq || val >= seq + BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH)
return 1;
if (atomic_read(&delayed_root->items) < BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND)
return 1;
return 0;
}
void btrfs_balance_delayed_items(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root = fs_info->delayed_root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if ((atomic_read(&delayed_root->items) < BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND) ||
btrfs_workqueue_normal_congested(fs_info->delayed_workers))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return;
if (atomic_read(&delayed_root->items) >= BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK) {
int seq;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret;
seq = atomic_read(&delayed_root->items_seq);
ret = btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (ret)
return;
wait_event_interruptible(delayed_root->wait,
could_end_wait(delayed_root, seq));
return;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(delayed_root, fs_info, BTRFS_DELAYED_BATCH);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
static void btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
const u64 bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags))
return;
/*
* Adding the new dir index item does not require touching another
* leaf, so we can release 1 unit of metadata that was previously
* reserved when starting the transaction. This applies only to
* the case where we had a transaction start and excludes the
* transaction join case (when replaying log trees).
*/
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(fs_info, "transaction",
trans->transid, bytes, 0);
btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL);
ASSERT(trans->bytes_reserved >= bytes);
trans->bytes_reserved -= bytes;
}
/* Will return 0, -ENOMEM or -EEXIST (index number collision, unexpected). */
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
const char *name, int name_len,
struct btrfs_inode *dir,
struct btrfs_disk_key *disk_key, u8 flags,
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
u64 index)
{
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
const unsigned int leaf_data_size = BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(fs_info);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *delayed_item;
struct btrfs_dir_item *dir_item;
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
bool reserve_leaf_space;
u32 data_len;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int ret;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(dir);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (IS_ERR(delayed_node))
return PTR_ERR(delayed_node);
delayed_item = btrfs_alloc_delayed_item(sizeof(*dir_item) + name_len,
delayed_node,
BTRFS_DELAYED_INSERTION_ITEM);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_item) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto release_node;
}
delayed_item->index = index;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
dir_item = (struct btrfs_dir_item *)delayed_item->data;
dir_item->location = *disk_key;
btrfs_set_stack_dir_transid(dir_item, trans->transid);
btrfs_set_stack_dir_data_len(dir_item, 0);
btrfs_set_stack_dir_name_len(dir_item, name_len);
btrfs_set_stack_dir_flags(dir_item, flags);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
memcpy((char *)(dir_item + 1), name, name_len);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
data_len = delayed_item->data_len + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* First attempt to insert the delayed item. This is to make the error
* handling path simpler in case we fail (-EEXIST). There's no risk of
* any other task coming in and running the delayed item before we do
* the metadata space reservation below, because we are holding the
* delayed node's mutex and that mutex must also be locked before the
* node's delayed items can be run.
*/
ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(delayed_node, delayed_item);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
btrfs_err(trans->fs_info,
"error adding delayed dir index item, name: %.*s, index: %llu, root: %llu, dir: %llu, dir->index_cnt: %llu, delayed_node->index_cnt: %llu, error: %d",
name_len, name, index, btrfs_root_id(delayed_node->root),
delayed_node->inode_id, dir->index_cnt,
delayed_node->index_cnt, ret);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item);
btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans);
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
goto release_node;
}
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves == 0 ||
delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size + data_len > leaf_data_size) {
delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size = data_len;
reserve_leaf_space = true;
} else {
delayed_node->curr_index_batch_size += data_len;
reserve_leaf_space = false;
}
if (reserve_leaf_space) {
ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, delayed_item);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* Space was reserved for a dir index item insertion when we
* started the transaction, so getting a failure here should be
* impossible.
*/
if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
btrfs_release_delayed_item(delayed_item);
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
goto release_node;
}
delayed_node->index_item_leaves++;
} else {
btrfs_release_dir_index_item_space(trans);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
release_node:
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return ret;
}
static int btrfs_delete_delayed_insertion_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node,
u64 index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
item = __btrfs_lookup_delayed_item(&node->ins_root.rb_root, index);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!item) {
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
return 1;
}
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/*
* For delayed items to insert, we track reserved metadata bytes based
* on the number of leaves that we will use.
* See btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() and
* btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata()).
*/
ASSERT(item->bytes_reserved == 0);
ASSERT(node->index_item_leaves > 0);
/*
* If there's only one leaf reserved, we can decrement this item from the
* current batch, otherwise we can not because we don't know which leaf
* it belongs to. With the current limit on delayed items, we rarely
* accumulate enough dir index items to fill more than one leaf (even
* when using a leaf size of 4K).
*/
if (node->index_item_leaves == 1) {
const u32 data_len = item->data_len + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
ASSERT(node->curr_index_batch_size >= data_len);
node->curr_index_batch_size -= data_len;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
/* If we now have no more dir index items, we can release all leaves. */
if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->ins_root.rb_root)) {
btrfs_delayed_item_release_leaves(node, node->index_item_leaves);
node->index_item_leaves = 0;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
return 0;
}
int btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *dir, u64 index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
int ret;
node = btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(dir);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (IS_ERR(node))
return PTR_ERR(node);
ret = btrfs_delete_delayed_insertion_item(trans->fs_info, node, index);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!ret)
goto end;
item = btrfs_alloc_delayed_item(0, node, BTRFS_DELAYED_DELETION_ITEM);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!item) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto end;
}
item->index = index;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
ret = btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata(trans, item);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
/*
* we have reserved enough space when we start a new transaction,
* so reserving metadata failure is impossible.
*/
if (ret < 0) {
btrfs_err(trans->fs_info,
"metadata reservation failed for delayed dir item deltiona, should have been reserved");
btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
goto end;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
ret = __btrfs_add_delayed_item(node, item);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (unlikely(ret)) {
btrfs_err(trans->fs_info,
"err add delayed dir index item(index: %llu) into the deletion tree of the delayed node(root id: %llu, inode id: %llu, errno: %d)",
index, btrfs_root_id(node->root),
node->inode_id, ret);
btrfs_delayed_item_release_metadata(dir->root, item);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(item);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
end:
btrfs_release_delayed_node(node);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_inode_delayed_dir_index_count(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_node)
return -ENOENT;
/*
* Since we have held i_mutex of this directory, it is impossible that
* a new directory index is added into the delayed node and index_cnt
* is updated now. So we needn't lock the delayed node.
*/
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
if (!delayed_node->index_cnt) {
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
return -EINVAL;
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
inode->index_cnt = delayed_node->index_cnt;
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
bool btrfs_readdir_get_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
btrfs: fix infinite directory reads The readdir implementation currently processes always up to the last index it finds. This however can result in an infinite loop if the directory has a large number of entries such that they won't all fit in the given buffer passed to the readdir callback, that is, dir_emit() returns a non-zero value. Because in that case readdir() will be called again and if in the meanwhile new directory entries were added and we still can't put all the remaining entries in the buffer, we keep repeating this over and over. The following C program and test script reproduce the problem: $ cat /mnt/readdir_prog.c #include <sys/types.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { DIR *dir = opendir("."); struct dirent *dd; while ((dd = readdir(dir))) { printf("%s\n", dd->d_name); rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE"); rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name); } closedir(dir); } $ gcc -o /mnt/readdir_prog /mnt/readdir_prog.c $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= 2000; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done cd $MNT/testdir /mnt/readdir_prog cd /mnt umount $MNT This behaviour is surprising to applications and it's unlike ext4, xfs, tmpfs, vfat and other filesystems, which always finish. In this case where new entries were added due to renames, some file names may be reported more than once, but this varies according to each filesystem - for example ext4 never reported the same file more than once while xfs reports the first 13 file names twice. So change our readdir implementation to track the last index number when opendir() is called and then make readdir() never process beyond that index number. This gives the same behaviour as ext4. Reported-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-13 14:34:08 +03:00
u64 last_index,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(BTRFS_I(inode));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_node)
return false;
/*
* We can only do one readdir with delayed items at a time because of
* item->readdir_list.
*/
btrfs_inode_unlock(BTRFS_I(inode), BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
btrfs_inode_lock(BTRFS_I(inode), 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
item = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(delayed_node);
btrfs: fix infinite directory reads The readdir implementation currently processes always up to the last index it finds. This however can result in an infinite loop if the directory has a large number of entries such that they won't all fit in the given buffer passed to the readdir callback, that is, dir_emit() returns a non-zero value. Because in that case readdir() will be called again and if in the meanwhile new directory entries were added and we still can't put all the remaining entries in the buffer, we keep repeating this over and over. The following C program and test script reproduce the problem: $ cat /mnt/readdir_prog.c #include <sys/types.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { DIR *dir = opendir("."); struct dirent *dd; while ((dd = readdir(dir))) { printf("%s\n", dd->d_name); rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE"); rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name); } closedir(dir); } $ gcc -o /mnt/readdir_prog /mnt/readdir_prog.c $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= 2000; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done cd $MNT/testdir /mnt/readdir_prog cd /mnt umount $MNT This behaviour is surprising to applications and it's unlike ext4, xfs, tmpfs, vfat and other filesystems, which always finish. In this case where new entries were added due to renames, some file names may be reported more than once, but this varies according to each filesystem - for example ext4 never reported the same file more than once while xfs reports the first 13 file names twice. So change our readdir implementation to track the last index number when opendir() is called and then make readdir() never process beyond that index number. This gives the same behaviour as ext4. Reported-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-13 14:34:08 +03:00
while (item && item->index <= last_index) {
refcount_inc(&item->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_add_tail(&item->readdir_list, ins_list);
item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
}
item = __btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(delayed_node);
btrfs: fix infinite directory reads The readdir implementation currently processes always up to the last index it finds. This however can result in an infinite loop if the directory has a large number of entries such that they won't all fit in the given buffer passed to the readdir callback, that is, dir_emit() returns a non-zero value. Because in that case readdir() will be called again and if in the meanwhile new directory entries were added and we still can't put all the remaining entries in the buffer, we keep repeating this over and over. The following C program and test script reproduce the problem: $ cat /mnt/readdir_prog.c #include <sys/types.h> #include <dirent.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { DIR *dir = opendir("."); struct dirent *dd; while ((dd = readdir(dir))) { printf("%s\n", dd->d_name); rename(dd->d_name, "TEMPFILE"); rename("TEMPFILE", dd->d_name); } closedir(dir); } $ gcc -o /mnt/readdir_prog /mnt/readdir_prog.c $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV &> /dev/null #mkfs.ext4 -F $DEV &> /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/testdir for ((i = 1; i <= 2000; i++)); do echo -n > $MNT/testdir/file_$i done cd $MNT/testdir /mnt/readdir_prog cd /mnt umount $MNT This behaviour is surprising to applications and it's unlike ext4, xfs, tmpfs, vfat and other filesystems, which always finish. In this case where new entries were added due to renames, some file names may be reported more than once, but this varies according to each filesystem - for example ext4 never reported the same file more than once while xfs reports the first 13 file names twice. So change our readdir implementation to track the last index number when opendir() is called and then make readdir() never process beyond that index number. This gives the same behaviour as ext4. Reported-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@landley.net/ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217681 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-08-13 14:34:08 +03:00
while (item && item->index <= last_index) {
refcount_inc(&item->refs);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_add_tail(&item->readdir_list, del_list);
item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
}
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
/*
* This delayed node is still cached in the btrfs inode, so refs
* must be > 1 now, and we needn't check it is going to be freed
* or not.
*
* Besides that, this function is used to read dir, we do not
* insert/delete delayed items in this period. So we also needn't
* requeue or dequeue this delayed node.
*/
refcount_dec(&delayed_node->refs);
return true;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
void btrfs_readdir_put_delayed_items(struct inode *inode,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next;
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, ins_list, readdir_list) {
list_del(&curr->readdir_list);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&curr->refs))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
kfree(curr);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, del_list, readdir_list) {
list_del(&curr->readdir_list);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&curr->refs))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
kfree(curr);
}
/*
* The VFS is going to do up_read(), so we need to downgrade back to a
* read lock.
*/
downgrade_write(&inode->i_rwsem);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
int btrfs_should_delete_dir_index(struct list_head *del_list,
u64 index)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr;
int ret = 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
list_for_each_entry(curr, del_list, readdir_list) {
if (curr->index > index)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
break;
if (curr->index == index) {
ret = 1;
break;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
return ret;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
/*
* Read dir info stored in the delayed tree.
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
*/
int btrfs_readdir_delayed_dir_index(struct dir_context *ctx,
struct list_head *ins_list)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr, *next;
struct btrfs_key location;
char *name;
int name_len;
int over = 0;
unsigned char d_type;
/*
* Changing the data of the delayed item is impossible. So
* we needn't lock them. And we have held i_mutex of the
* directory, nobody can delete any directory indexes now.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(curr, next, ins_list, readdir_list) {
list_del(&curr->readdir_list);
if (curr->index < ctx->pos) {
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&curr->refs))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
kfree(curr);
continue;
}
ctx->pos = curr->index;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
di = (struct btrfs_dir_item *)curr->data;
name = (char *)(di + 1);
name_len = btrfs_stack_dir_name_len(di);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
d_type = fs_ftype_to_dtype(btrfs_dir_flags_to_ftype(di->type));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(&location, &di->location);
over = !dir_emit(ctx, name, name_len,
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
location.objectid, d_type);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&curr->refs))
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
kfree(curr);
if (over)
return 1;
ctx->pos++;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
return 0;
}
static void fill_stack_inode_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item,
struct inode *inode)
{
btrfs: add ro compat flags to inodes Currently, inode flags are fully backwards incompatible in btrfs. If we introduce a new inode flag, then tree-checker will detect it and fail. This can even cause us to fail to mount entirely. To make it possible to introduce new flags which can be read-only compatible, like VERITY, we add new ro flags to btrfs without treating them quite so harshly in tree-checker. A read-only file system can survive an unexpected flag, and can be mounted. As for the implementation, it unfortunately gets a little complicated. The on-disk representation of the inode, btrfs_inode_item, has an __le64 for flags but the in-memory representation, btrfs_inode, uses a u32. David Sterba had the nice idea that we could reclaim those wasted 32 bits on disk and use them for the new ro_compat flags. It turns out that the tree-checker code which checks for unknown flags is broken, and ignores the upper 32 bits we are hoping to use. The issue is that the flags use the literal 1 rather than 1ULL, so the flags are signed ints, and one of them is specifically (1 << 31). As a result, the mask which ORs the flags is a negative integer on machines where int is 32 bit twos complement. When tree-checker evaluates the expression: btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, iitem) & ~BTRFS_INODE_FLAG_MASK) The mask is something like 0x80000abc, which gets promoted to u64 with sign extension to 0xffffffff80000abc. Negating that 64 bit mask leaves all the upper bits zeroed, and we can't detect unexpected flags. This suggests that we can't use those bits after all. Luckily, we have good reason to believe that they are zero anyway. Inode flags are metadata, which is always checksummed, so any bit flips that would introduce 1s would cause a checksum failure anyway (excluding the improbable case of the checksum getting corrupted exactly badly). Further, unless the 1 << 31 flag is used, the cast to u64 of the 32 bit inode flag should preserve its value and not add leading zeroes (at least for twos complement). The only place that flag (BTRFS_INODE_ROOT_ITEM_INIT) is used is in a special inode embedded in the root item, and indeed for that inode we see 0xffffffff80000000 as the flags on disk. However, that inode is never seen by tree checker, nor is it used in a context where verity might be meaningful. Theoretically, a future ro flag might cause trouble on that inode, so we should proactively clean up that mess before it does. With the introduction of the new ro flags, keep two separate unsigned masks and check them against the appropriate u32. Since we no longer run afoul of sign extension, this also stops writing out 0xffffffff80000000 in root_item inodes going forward. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-30 23:01:48 +03:00
u64 flags;
btrfs_set_stack_inode_uid(inode_item, i_uid_read(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_inode_gid(inode_item, i_gid_read(inode));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_set_stack_inode_size(inode_item, BTRFS_I(inode)->disk_i_size);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_mode(inode_item, inode->i_mode);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_nlink(inode_item, inode->i_nlink);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_nbytes(inode_item, inode_get_bytes(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_inode_generation(inode_item,
BTRFS_I(inode)->generation);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_sequence(inode_item,
inode_peek_iversion(inode));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_set_stack_inode_transid(inode_item, trans->transid);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_rdev(inode_item, inode->i_rdev);
btrfs: add ro compat flags to inodes Currently, inode flags are fully backwards incompatible in btrfs. If we introduce a new inode flag, then tree-checker will detect it and fail. This can even cause us to fail to mount entirely. To make it possible to introduce new flags which can be read-only compatible, like VERITY, we add new ro flags to btrfs without treating them quite so harshly in tree-checker. A read-only file system can survive an unexpected flag, and can be mounted. As for the implementation, it unfortunately gets a little complicated. The on-disk representation of the inode, btrfs_inode_item, has an __le64 for flags but the in-memory representation, btrfs_inode, uses a u32. David Sterba had the nice idea that we could reclaim those wasted 32 bits on disk and use them for the new ro_compat flags. It turns out that the tree-checker code which checks for unknown flags is broken, and ignores the upper 32 bits we are hoping to use. The issue is that the flags use the literal 1 rather than 1ULL, so the flags are signed ints, and one of them is specifically (1 << 31). As a result, the mask which ORs the flags is a negative integer on machines where int is 32 bit twos complement. When tree-checker evaluates the expression: btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, iitem) & ~BTRFS_INODE_FLAG_MASK) The mask is something like 0x80000abc, which gets promoted to u64 with sign extension to 0xffffffff80000abc. Negating that 64 bit mask leaves all the upper bits zeroed, and we can't detect unexpected flags. This suggests that we can't use those bits after all. Luckily, we have good reason to believe that they are zero anyway. Inode flags are metadata, which is always checksummed, so any bit flips that would introduce 1s would cause a checksum failure anyway (excluding the improbable case of the checksum getting corrupted exactly badly). Further, unless the 1 << 31 flag is used, the cast to u64 of the 32 bit inode flag should preserve its value and not add leading zeroes (at least for twos complement). The only place that flag (BTRFS_INODE_ROOT_ITEM_INIT) is used is in a special inode embedded in the root item, and indeed for that inode we see 0xffffffff80000000 as the flags on disk. However, that inode is never seen by tree checker, nor is it used in a context where verity might be meaningful. Theoretically, a future ro flag might cause trouble on that inode, so we should proactively clean up that mess before it does. With the introduction of the new ro flags, keep two separate unsigned masks and check them against the appropriate u32. Since we no longer run afoul of sign extension, this also stops writing out 0xffffffff80000000 in root_item inodes going forward. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-30 23:01:48 +03:00
flags = btrfs_inode_combine_flags(BTRFS_I(inode)->flags,
BTRFS_I(inode)->ro_flags);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_flags(inode_item, flags);
btrfs_set_stack_inode_block_group(inode_item, 0);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->atime,
inode_get_atime_sec(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->atime,
inode_get_atime_nsec(inode));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->mtime,
inode_get_mtime_sec(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->mtime,
inode_get_mtime_nsec(inode));
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->ctime,
inode_get_ctime_sec(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->ctime,
inode_get_ctime_nsec(inode));
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_sec);
btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->otime, BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_nsec);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
int btrfs_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, u32 *rdev)
{
btrfs: use the file extent tree infrastructure We want to use this everywhere we modify the file extent items permanently. These include: 1) Inserting new file extents for writes and prealloc extents. 2) Truncating inode items. 3) btrfs_cont_expand(). 4) Insert inline extents. 5) Insert new extents from log replay. 6) Insert a new extent for clone, as it could be past i_size. 7) Hole punching For hole punching in particular it might seem it's not necessary because anybody extending would use btrfs_cont_expand, however there is a corner that still can give us trouble. Start with an empty file and fallocate KEEP_SIZE 1M-2M We now have a 0 length file, and a hole file extent from 0-1M, and a prealloc extent from 1M-2M. Now punch 1M-1.5M Because this is past i_size we have [HOLE EXTENT][ NOTHING ][PREALLOC] [0 1M][1M 1.5M][1.5M 2M] with an i_size of 0. Now if we pwrite 0-1.5M we'll increas our i_size to 1.5M, but our disk_i_size is still 0 until the ordered extent completes. However if we now immediately truncate 2M on the file we'll just call btrfs_cont_expand(inode, 1.5M, 2M), since our old i_size is 1.5M. If we commit the transaction here and crash we'll expose the gap. To fix this we need to clear the file extent mapping for the range that we punched but didn't insert a corresponding file extent for. This will mean the truncate will only get an disk_i_size set to 1M if we crash before the finish ordered io happens. I've written an xfstest to reproduce the problem and validate this fix. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-17 17:02:22 +03:00
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = BTRFS_I(inode)->root->fs_info;
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(BTRFS_I(inode));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
if (!delayed_node)
return -ENOENT;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags)) {
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return -ENOENT;
}
inode_item = &delayed_node->inode_item;
i_uid_write(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_uid(inode_item));
i_gid_write(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_gid(inode_item));
btrfs_i_size_write(BTRFS_I(inode), btrfs_stack_inode_size(inode_item));
btrfs: use the file extent tree infrastructure We want to use this everywhere we modify the file extent items permanently. These include: 1) Inserting new file extents for writes and prealloc extents. 2) Truncating inode items. 3) btrfs_cont_expand(). 4) Insert inline extents. 5) Insert new extents from log replay. 6) Insert a new extent for clone, as it could be past i_size. 7) Hole punching For hole punching in particular it might seem it's not necessary because anybody extending would use btrfs_cont_expand, however there is a corner that still can give us trouble. Start with an empty file and fallocate KEEP_SIZE 1M-2M We now have a 0 length file, and a hole file extent from 0-1M, and a prealloc extent from 1M-2M. Now punch 1M-1.5M Because this is past i_size we have [HOLE EXTENT][ NOTHING ][PREALLOC] [0 1M][1M 1.5M][1.5M 2M] with an i_size of 0. Now if we pwrite 0-1.5M we'll increas our i_size to 1.5M, but our disk_i_size is still 0 until the ordered extent completes. However if we now immediately truncate 2M on the file we'll just call btrfs_cont_expand(inode, 1.5M, 2M), since our old i_size is 1.5M. If we commit the transaction here and crash we'll expose the gap. To fix this we need to clear the file extent mapping for the range that we punched but didn't insert a corresponding file extent for. This will mean the truncate will only get an disk_i_size set to 1M if we crash before the finish ordered io happens. I've written an xfstest to reproduce the problem and validate this fix. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-01-17 17:02:22 +03:00
btrfs_inode_set_file_extent_range(BTRFS_I(inode), 0,
round_up(i_size_read(inode), fs_info->sectorsize));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode->i_mode = btrfs_stack_inode_mode(inode_item);
set_nlink(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_nlink(inode_item));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode_set_bytes(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_nbytes(inode_item));
BTRFS_I(inode)->generation = btrfs_stack_inode_generation(inode_item);
BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = btrfs_stack_inode_transid(inode_item);
inode_set_iversion_queried(inode,
btrfs_stack_inode_sequence(inode_item));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode->i_rdev = 0;
*rdev = btrfs_stack_inode_rdev(inode_item);
btrfs: add ro compat flags to inodes Currently, inode flags are fully backwards incompatible in btrfs. If we introduce a new inode flag, then tree-checker will detect it and fail. This can even cause us to fail to mount entirely. To make it possible to introduce new flags which can be read-only compatible, like VERITY, we add new ro flags to btrfs without treating them quite so harshly in tree-checker. A read-only file system can survive an unexpected flag, and can be mounted. As for the implementation, it unfortunately gets a little complicated. The on-disk representation of the inode, btrfs_inode_item, has an __le64 for flags but the in-memory representation, btrfs_inode, uses a u32. David Sterba had the nice idea that we could reclaim those wasted 32 bits on disk and use them for the new ro_compat flags. It turns out that the tree-checker code which checks for unknown flags is broken, and ignores the upper 32 bits we are hoping to use. The issue is that the flags use the literal 1 rather than 1ULL, so the flags are signed ints, and one of them is specifically (1 << 31). As a result, the mask which ORs the flags is a negative integer on machines where int is 32 bit twos complement. When tree-checker evaluates the expression: btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, iitem) & ~BTRFS_INODE_FLAG_MASK) The mask is something like 0x80000abc, which gets promoted to u64 with sign extension to 0xffffffff80000abc. Negating that 64 bit mask leaves all the upper bits zeroed, and we can't detect unexpected flags. This suggests that we can't use those bits after all. Luckily, we have good reason to believe that they are zero anyway. Inode flags are metadata, which is always checksummed, so any bit flips that would introduce 1s would cause a checksum failure anyway (excluding the improbable case of the checksum getting corrupted exactly badly). Further, unless the 1 << 31 flag is used, the cast to u64 of the 32 bit inode flag should preserve its value and not add leading zeroes (at least for twos complement). The only place that flag (BTRFS_INODE_ROOT_ITEM_INIT) is used is in a special inode embedded in the root item, and indeed for that inode we see 0xffffffff80000000 as the flags on disk. However, that inode is never seen by tree checker, nor is it used in a context where verity might be meaningful. Theoretically, a future ro flag might cause trouble on that inode, so we should proactively clean up that mess before it does. With the introduction of the new ro flags, keep two separate unsigned masks and check them against the appropriate u32. Since we no longer run afoul of sign extension, this also stops writing out 0xffffffff80000000 in root_item inodes going forward. Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-30 23:01:48 +03:00
btrfs_inode_split_flags(btrfs_stack_inode_flags(inode_item),
&BTRFS_I(inode)->flags, &BTRFS_I(inode)->ro_flags);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode_set_atime(inode, btrfs_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->atime),
btrfs_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->atime));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode_set_mtime(inode, btrfs_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->mtime),
btrfs_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->mtime));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode_set_ctime(inode, btrfs_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->ctime),
btrfs_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->ctime));
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_sec = btrfs_stack_timespec_sec(&inode_item->otime);
BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime_nsec = btrfs_stack_timespec_nsec(&inode_item->otime);
btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-06-23 11:27:13 +04:00
inode->i_generation = BTRFS_I(inode)->generation;
BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = (u64)-1;
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return 0;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
int btrfs_delayed_update_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
int ret = 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
delayed_node = btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (IS_ERR(delayed_node))
return PTR_ERR(delayed_node);
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags)) {
fill_stack_inode_item(trans, &delayed_node->inode_item,
&inode->vfs_inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
goto release_node;
}
ret = btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata(trans, root, delayed_node);
Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid. It's not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid. When marking an inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space. This is stupid because we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again and it doesn't matter. Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation. So if trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation. If not return ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction. The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to the thing. Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't matter. But this is stupid because we could write the data after the transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow all the way down to the inode anyway. This used to be masked by the delalloc reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this case. So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass. So if our trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc reserve. Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before. With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last words). Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-05 03:56:02 +04:00
if (ret)
goto release_node;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
fill_stack_inode_item(trans, &delayed_node->inode_item, &inode->vfs_inode);
set_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
delayed_node->count++;
atomic_inc(&root->fs_info->delayed_root->items);
release_node:
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_delayed_delete_inode_ref(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
/*
* we don't do delayed inode updates during log recovery because it
* leads to enospc problems. This means we also can't do
* delayed inode refs
*/
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &fs_info->flags))
return -EAGAIN;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_or_create_delayed_node(inode);
if (IS_ERR(delayed_node))
return PTR_ERR(delayed_node);
/*
* We don't reserve space for inode ref deletion is because:
* - We ONLY do async inode ref deletion for the inode who has only
* one link(i_nlink == 1), it means there is only one inode ref.
* And in most case, the inode ref and the inode item are in the
* same leaf, and we will deal with them at the same time.
* Since we are sure we will reserve the space for the inode item,
* it is unnecessary to reserve space for inode ref deletion.
* - If the inode ref and the inode item are not in the same leaf,
* We also needn't worry about enospc problem, because we reserve
* much more space for the inode update than it needs.
* - At the worst, we can steal some space from the global reservation.
* It is very rare.
*/
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &delayed_node->flags))
goto release_node;
set_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &delayed_node->flags);
delayed_node->count++;
atomic_inc(&fs_info->delayed_root->items);
release_node:
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
return 0;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
static void __btrfs_kill_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = delayed_node->root;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_item *curr_item, *prev_item;
mutex_lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
curr_item = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(delayed_node);
while (curr_item) {
prev_item = curr_item;
curr_item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(prev_item);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(prev_item);
}
btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Whenever we want to create a new dir index item (when creating an inode, create a hard link, rename a file) we reserve 1 unit of metadata space for it in a transaction (that's 256K for a node/leaf size of 16K), and then create a delayed insertion item for it to be added later to the subvolume's tree. That unit of metadata is kept until the delayed item is inserted into the subvolume tree, which may take a while to happen (in the worst case, it's done only when the transaction commits). If we have multiple dir index items to insert for the same directory, say N index items, and they all fit in a single leaf of metadata, then we are holding N units of reserved metadata space when all we need is 1 unit. This change addresses that, whenever a new delayed dir index item is added, we release the unit of metadata the caller has reserved when it started the transaction if adding that new dir index item does not result in touching one more metadata leaf, otherwise the reservation is kept by transferring it from the transaction block reserve to the delayed items block reserve, just like before. Given that with a leaf size of 16K we can have a few hundred dir index items in a single leaf (the exact value depends on file name lengths), this reduces pressure on metadata reservation by releasing unnecessary space much sooner. The following fs_mark test showed some improvement when creating many files in parallel on machine running a non debug kernel (debian's default kernel config) with 12 cores: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" FILES=100000 THREADS=$(nproc --all) echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT OPTS="-S 0 -L 10 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k" for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i" done fs_mark $OPTS umount $MNT Before: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 225991.3 5465891 4 2400000 0 345728.1 5512106 4 3600000 0 346959.5 5557653 8 4800000 0 329643.0 5587548 8 6000000 0 312657.4 5606717 8 7200000 0 281707.5 5727985 12 8400000 0 88309.8 5020422 12 9600000 0 85835.9 5207496 16 10800000 0 81039.2 5404964 16 12000000 0 58548.6 5842468 After: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 2 1200000 0 230604.5 5778375 4 2400000 0 348908.3 5508072 4 3600000 0 357028.7 5484337 6 4800000 0 342898.3 5565703 6 6000000 0 314670.8 5751555 8 7200000 0 282548.2 5778177 12 8400000 0 90844.9 5306819 12 9600000 0 86963.1 5304689 16 10800000 0 89113.2 5455248 16 12000000 0 86693.5 5518933 The "after" results are after applying this patch and all the other patches in the same patchset, which is comprised of the following changes: btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after a rename btrfs: free the path earlier when creating a new inode btrfs: balance btree dirty pages and delayed items after clone and dedupe btrfs: add assertions when deleting batches of delayed items btrfs: deal with deletion errors when deleting delayed items btrfs: refactor the delayed item deletion entry point btrfs: improve batch deletion of delayed dir index items btrfs: assert that delayed item is a dir index item when adding it btrfs: improve batch insertion of delayed dir index items btrfs: do not BUG_ON() on failure to reserve metadata for delayed item btrfs: set delayed item type when initializing it btrfs: reduce amount of reserved metadata for delayed item insertion Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-22 12:37:45 +03:00
if (delayed_node->index_item_leaves > 0) {
btrfs_delayed_item_release_leaves(delayed_node,
delayed_node->index_item_leaves);
delayed_node->index_item_leaves = 0;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
curr_item = __btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(delayed_node);
while (curr_item) {
btrfs_delayed_item_release_metadata(root, curr_item);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
prev_item = curr_item;
curr_item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(prev_item);
btrfs_release_delayed_item(prev_item);
}
btrfs_release_delayed_iref(delayed_node);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_INODE_DIRTY, &delayed_node->flags)) {
btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(fs_info, delayed_node, false);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
btrfs_release_delayed_inode(delayed_node);
}
mutex_unlock(&delayed_node->mutex);
}
void btrfs_kill_delayed_inode_items(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
delayed_node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
if (!delayed_node)
return;
__btrfs_kill_delayed_node(delayed_node);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_node);
}
void btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(struct btrfs_root *root)
{
unsigned long index = 0;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_nodes[8];
while (1) {
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
int count;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
if (xa_empty(&root->delayed_nodes)) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
return;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
}
count = 0;
xa_for_each_start(&root->delayed_nodes, index, node, index) {
/*
* Don't increase refs in case the node is dead and
* about to be removed from the tree in the loop below
*/
if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&node->refs)) {
delayed_nodes[count] = node;
count++;
}
if (count >= ARRAY_SIZE(delayed_nodes))
break;
}
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
index++;
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation Changelog V5 -> V6: - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go. Changelog V4 -> V5: - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by Chris Mason. - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch. - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama. Changelog V3 -> V4: - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache inode in time. Changelog V2 -> V3: - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh. - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment. - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason Changelog V1 -> V2: - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes, which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes. Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. Implementation: - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory. One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with by the work thread. - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree. - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion and deletion and the delayed inode update. When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then go back. When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some threshold value. - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the information into the delayed inserting rb-tree. And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The balance policy is above.) - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not, add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree. Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items balance. (The same to inserting manipulation) - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion. - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more inode updates. - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node. - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode. - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items and the delayed inode update. I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%. Before applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.096108 Average time: 0.000022 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.510403 Average time: 0.000030 After applying this patch: Create files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 0.932899 Average time: 0.000019 Delete files: Total files: 50000 Total time: 1.215732 Average time: 0.000024 [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3 Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help! Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-04-22 14:12:22 +04:00
__btrfs_kill_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(delayed_nodes[i]);
}
}
}
void btrfs_destroy_delayed_inodes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *curr_node, *prev_node;
curr_node = btrfs_first_delayed_node(fs_info->delayed_root);
while (curr_node) {
__btrfs_kill_delayed_node(curr_node);
prev_node = curr_node;
curr_node = btrfs_next_delayed_node(curr_node);
btrfs_release_delayed_node(prev_node);
}
}
btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory When logging a directory we start by flushing all its delayed items. That results in adding dir index items to the subvolume btree, for new dentries, and removing dir index items from the subvolume btree for any dentries that were deleted. This makes it straightforward to log a directory simply by iterating over all the modified subvolume btree leaves, especially when we used to log both dir index keys and dir item keys (before commit 339d035424849c ("btrfs: only copy dir index keys when logging a directory") and when we used to copy old dir index entries for leaves modified in the current transaction (before commit 732d591a5d6c12 ("btrfs: stop copying old dir items when logging a directory")). From an efficiency point of view this has a couple of drawbacks: 1) Adds extra latency, due to copying delayed items to the subvolume btree and deleting dir index items from the btree. Further if there are other tasks accessing the btree, which is common (syscalls like creat, mkdir, rename, link, unlink, truncate, reflinks, etc, finishing an ordered extent, etc), lock contention can cause further delays, both to the task logging a directory and to the other tasks accessing the btree; 2) More time spent overall flushing delayed items, if after logging the directory further changes are done to the directory in the same transaction. For example, if we add 10 dentries to a directory, fsync it, add more 10 dentries, fsync it again, then add more 10 dentries and fsync it again, then we end up inserting 3 batches of 10 items to the subvolume btree. With the changes from this patch, we flush all the delayed items to the btree only once - a single batch of 30 items, and outside the logging code (transaction commit or when delayed items are flushed asynchronously). This change simply skips the flushing of delayed items every time we log a directory. Instead we copy the delayed insertion items directly to the log tree and delete delayed deletion items directly from the log tree. Therefore avoiding changing first the subvolume btree and then scanning it for new items to copy from it to the log tree and detecting deletions by observing gaps in consecutive dir index keys in subvolume btree leaves. Running the following tests on a non-debug kernel (Debian's default kernel config), on a box with a NVMe device, a 12 cores Intel CPU and 64G of ram, produced the results below. The results compare a branch without this patch and all the other patches it depends on versus the same branch with the patchset applied. The patchset is comprised of the following patches: btrfs: don't drop dir index range items when logging a directory btrfs: remove the root argument from log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: update stale comment for log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: free list element sooner at log_new_dir_dentries() btrfs: avoid memory allocation at log_new_dir_dentries() for common case btrfs: remove root argument from btrfs_delayed_item_reserve_metadata() btrfs: store index number instead of key in struct btrfs_delayed_item btrfs: remove unused logic when looking up delayed items btrfs: shrink the size of struct btrfs_delayed_item btrfs: search for last logged dir index if it's not cached in the inode btrfs: move need_log_inode() to above log_conflicting_inodes() btrfs: move log_new_dir_dentries() above btrfs_log_inode() btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode btrfs: skip logging parent dir when conflicting inode is not a dir btrfs: use delayed items when logging a directory Custom test script for testing time spent at btrfs_log_inode(): #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 # Total number of files to create in the test directory. NUM_FILES=10000 # Fsync after creating or renaming N files. FSYNC_AFTER=100 umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount -o ssd $DEV $MNT TEST_DIR=$MNT/testdir mkdir $TEST_DIR echo "Creating files..." for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do echo -n > $TEST_DIR/file_$i if (( ($i % $FSYNC_AFTER) == 0 )); then xfs_io -c "fsync" $TEST_DIR fi done sync echo "Renaming files..." for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_FILES; i++)); do mv $TEST_DIR/file_$i $TEST_DIR/file_$i.renamed if (( ($i % $FSYNC_AFTER) == 0 )); then xfs_io -c "fsync" $TEST_DIR fi done umount $MNT And using the following bpftrace script to capture the total time that is spent at btrfs_log_inode(): #!/usr/bin/bpftrace k:btrfs_log_inode { @start_log_inode[tid] = nsecs; } kr:btrfs_log_inode /@start_log_inode[tid]/ { $dur = (nsecs - @start_log_inode[tid]) / 1000; @btrfs_log_inode_total_time = sum($dur); delete(@start_log_inode[tid]); } END { clear(@start_log_inode); } Result before applying patchset: @btrfs_log_inode_total_time: 622642 Result after applying patchset: @btrfs_log_inode_total_time: 354134 (-43.1% time spent) The following dbench script was also used for testing: #!/bin/bash NUM_JOBS=$(nproc --all) DEV=/dev/nvme0n1 MNT=/mnt/nvme0n1 MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-O no-holes -R free-space-tree" echo "performance" | \ tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor umount $DEV &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT dbench -D $MNT --skip-cleanup -t 120 -S $NUM_JOBS umount $MNT Before patchset: Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 3322265 0.034 21.032 Close 2440562 0.002 0.994 Rename 140664 1.150 269.633 Unlink 670796 1.093 269.678 Deltree 96 5.481 15.510 Mkdir 48 0.004 0.052 Qpathinfo 3010924 0.014 8.127 Qfileinfo 528055 0.001 0.518 Qfsinfo 552113 0.003 0.372 Sfileinfo 270575 0.005 0.688 Find 1164176 0.052 13.931 WriteX 1658537 0.019 5.918 ReadX 5207412 0.003 1.034 LockX 10818 0.003 0.079 UnlockX 10818 0.002 0.313 Flush 232811 1.027 269.735 Throughput 869.867 MB/sec (sync dirs) 12 clients 12 procs max_latency=269.741 ms After patchset: Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 4152738 0.029 20.863 Close 3050770 0.002 1.119 Rename 175829 0.871 211.741 Unlink 838447 0.845 211.724 Deltree 120 4.798 14.162 Mkdir 60 0.003 0.005 Qpathinfo 3763807 0.011 4.673 Qfileinfo 660111 0.001 0.400 Qfsinfo 690141 0.003 0.429 Sfileinfo 338260 0.005 0.725 Find 1455273 0.046 6.787 WriteX 2073307 0.017 5.690 ReadX 6509193 0.003 1.171 LockX 13522 0.003 0.077 UnlockX 13522 0.002 0.125 Flush 291044 0.811 211.631 Throughput 1089.27 MB/sec (sync dirs) 12 clients 12 procs max_latency=211.750 ms (+25.2% throughput, -21.5% max latency) Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-22 13:51:44 +03:00
void btrfs_log_get_delayed_items(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
if (!node)
return;
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
item = __btrfs_first_delayed_insertion_item(node);
while (item) {
/*
* It's possible that the item is already in a log list. This
* can happen in case two tasks are trying to log the same
* directory. For example if we have tasks A and task B:
*
* Task A collected the delayed items into a log list while
* under the inode's log_mutex (at btrfs_log_inode()), but it
* only releases the items after logging the inodes they point
* to (if they are new inodes), which happens after unlocking
* the log mutex;
*
* Task B enters btrfs_log_inode() and acquires the log_mutex
* of the same directory inode, before task B releases the
* delayed items. This can happen for example when logging some
* inode we need to trigger logging of its parent directory, so
* logging two files that have the same parent directory can
* lead to this.
*
* If this happens, just ignore delayed items already in a log
* list. All the tasks logging the directory are under a log
* transaction and whichever finishes first can not sync the log
* before the other completes and leaves the log transaction.
*/
if (!item->logged && list_empty(&item->log_list)) {
refcount_inc(&item->refs);
list_add_tail(&item->log_list, ins_list);
}
item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
}
item = __btrfs_first_delayed_deletion_item(node);
while (item) {
/* It may be non-empty, for the same reason mentioned above. */
if (!item->logged && list_empty(&item->log_list)) {
refcount_inc(&item->refs);
list_add_tail(&item->log_list, del_list);
}
item = __btrfs_next_delayed_item(item);
}
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
/*
* We are called during inode logging, which means the inode is in use
* and can not be evicted before we finish logging the inode. So we never
* have the last reference on the delayed inode.
* Also, we don't use btrfs_release_delayed_node() because that would
* requeue the delayed inode (change its order in the list of prepared
* nodes) and we don't want to do such change because we don't create or
* delete delayed items.
*/
ASSERT(refcount_read(&node->refs) > 1);
refcount_dec(&node->refs);
}
void btrfs_log_put_delayed_items(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
struct list_head *ins_list,
struct list_head *del_list)
{
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *item;
struct btrfs_delayed_item *next;
node = btrfs_get_delayed_node(inode);
if (!node)
return;
mutex_lock(&node->mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(item, next, ins_list, log_list) {
item->logged = true;
list_del_init(&item->log_list);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&item->refs))
kfree(item);
}
list_for_each_entry_safe(item, next, del_list, log_list) {
item->logged = true;
list_del_init(&item->log_list);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&item->refs))
kfree(item);
}
mutex_unlock(&node->mutex);
/*
* We are called during inode logging, which means the inode is in use
* and can not be evicted before we finish logging the inode. So we never
* have the last reference on the delayed inode.
* Also, we don't use btrfs_release_delayed_node() because that would
* requeue the delayed inode (change its order in the list of prepared
* nodes) and we don't want to do such change because we don't create or
* delete delayed items.
*/
ASSERT(refcount_read(&node->refs) > 1);
refcount_dec(&node->refs);
}