linux/kernel/sched/rt.c

2455 lines
59 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Real-Time Scheduling Class (mapped to the SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR
* policies)
*/
#include "sched.h"
#include <linux/slab.h>
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
int sched_rr_timeslice = RR_TIMESLICE;
int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun);
struct rt_bandwidth def_rt_bandwidth;
static enum hrtimer_restart sched_rt_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b =
container_of(timer, struct rt_bandwidth, rt_period_timer);
int idle = 0;
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
int overrun;
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
for (;;) {
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
overrun = hrtimer_forward_now(timer, rt_b->rt_period);
if (!overrun)
break;
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
idle = do_sched_rt_period_timer(rt_b, overrun);
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
}
sched,perf: Fix periodic timers In the below two commits (see Fixes) we have periodic timers that can stop themselves when they're no longer required, but need to be (re)-started when their idle condition changes. Further complications is that we want the timer handler to always do the forward such that it will always correctly deal with the overruns, and we do not want to race such that the handler has already decided to stop, but the (external) restart sees the timer still active and we end up with a 'lost' timer. The problem with the current code is that the re-start can come before the callback does the forward, at which point the forward from the callback will WARN about forwarding an enqueued timer. Now, conceptually its easy to detect if you're before or after the fwd by comparing the expiration time against the current time. Of course, that's expensive (and racy) because we don't have the current time. Alternatively one could cache this state inside the timer, but then everybody pays the overhead of maintaining this extra state, and that is undesired. The only other option that I could see is the external timer_active variable, which I tried to kill before. I would love a nicer interface for this seemingly simple 'problem' but alas. Fixes: 272325c4821f ("perf: Fix mux_interval hrtimer wreckage") Fixes: 77a4d1a1b9a1 ("sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers") Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: klamm@yandex-team.ru Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150514102311.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
2015-05-14 13:23:11 +03:00
if (idle)
rt_b->rt_period_active = 0;
sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth(). The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove the timer for you if its still enqueued. Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel loop to get stuck in. So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't accidentally lose the timer. It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the timer, it doesn't matter. Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same time. Update the rt bandwidth timer to match. This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab03936 ("sched/fair: Fix tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock"). Reported-by: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2015-04-15 12:41:57 +03:00
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
}
void init_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, u64 period, u64 runtime)
{
rt_b->rt_period = ns_to_ktime(period);
rt_b->rt_runtime = runtime;
raw_spin_lock_init(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
hrtimer_init(&rt_b->rt_period_timer,
CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
rt_b->rt_period_timer.function = sched_rt_period_timer;
}
static void start_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
{
if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled() || rt_b->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
return;
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
sched,perf: Fix periodic timers In the below two commits (see Fixes) we have periodic timers that can stop themselves when they're no longer required, but need to be (re)-started when their idle condition changes. Further complications is that we want the timer handler to always do the forward such that it will always correctly deal with the overruns, and we do not want to race such that the handler has already decided to stop, but the (external) restart sees the timer still active and we end up with a 'lost' timer. The problem with the current code is that the re-start can come before the callback does the forward, at which point the forward from the callback will WARN about forwarding an enqueued timer. Now, conceptually its easy to detect if you're before or after the fwd by comparing the expiration time against the current time. Of course, that's expensive (and racy) because we don't have the current time. Alternatively one could cache this state inside the timer, but then everybody pays the overhead of maintaining this extra state, and that is undesired. The only other option that I could see is the external timer_active variable, which I tried to kill before. I would love a nicer interface for this seemingly simple 'problem' but alas. Fixes: 272325c4821f ("perf: Fix mux_interval hrtimer wreckage") Fixes: 77a4d1a1b9a1 ("sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers") Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: klamm@yandex-team.ru Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150514102311.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
2015-05-14 13:23:11 +03:00
if (!rt_b->rt_period_active) {
rt_b->rt_period_active = 1;
sched/rt: Kick RT bandwidth timer immediately on start up I've been debugging why deadline tasks can cause the RT scheduler to throttle, even when the deadline tasks are only taking up 50% of the CPU and RT tasks are not even using 1% of the CPU. Here's what I found. In order to keep a CPU from being hogged by RT tasks, the deadline scheduler adds its run time (delta_exec) to the rt_time of the RT bandwidth. That way, if the two use more than 95% of the CPU within one second (default settings), the RT tasks are throttled to allow non RT tasks to run. Although the deadline tasks add their run time to the RT bandwidth, it lets the RT tasks do the accounting. This is where the problem lies. If a deadline task runs for a bit, and no RT tasks are running, then it will continually add to the RT rt_time that is used to calculate how much CPU the RT tasks use. But no RT period is in play, and this accumulation of the runtime never gets reset. When an RT task finally gets to run, and the watchdog goes off, it can see that the RT task has used more than it should of, because the deadline task added all this runtime to its rt_time. Then the RT task that just woke up gets throttled for no good reason. I also noticed that when an RT task is queued, it starts the timer to account for overload and such. But that timer goes off one period later, which may be too late and the extra rt_time will trigger a throttle. This is a quick work around to the problem. When a new RT task is queued, the bandwidth timer is set to go off immediately. Then the timer can clear out the extra time added to the rt_time while there was no RT task running. This stops my tests from triggering the throttle, and it will still throttle if an RT task runs too much, even while a deadline task is running. A better solution may be to subtract the bandwidth that the deadline task uses from the rt_runtime, and add it back when its finished. Then there wont be a need for runtime tracking of the time used by deadline tasks. I may play with that solution tomorrow. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160216183746.349ec98b@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-02-17 02:37:46 +03:00
/*
* SCHED_DEADLINE updates the bandwidth, as a run away
* RT task with a DL task could hog a CPU. But DL does
* not reset the period. If a deadline task was running
* without an RT task running, it can cause RT tasks to
* throttle when they start up. Kick the timer right away
* to update the period.
*/
hrtimer_forward_now(&rt_b->rt_period_timer, ns_to_ktime(0));
sched,perf: Fix periodic timers In the below two commits (see Fixes) we have periodic timers that can stop themselves when they're no longer required, but need to be (re)-started when their idle condition changes. Further complications is that we want the timer handler to always do the forward such that it will always correctly deal with the overruns, and we do not want to race such that the handler has already decided to stop, but the (external) restart sees the timer still active and we end up with a 'lost' timer. The problem with the current code is that the re-start can come before the callback does the forward, at which point the forward from the callback will WARN about forwarding an enqueued timer. Now, conceptually its easy to detect if you're before or after the fwd by comparing the expiration time against the current time. Of course, that's expensive (and racy) because we don't have the current time. Alternatively one could cache this state inside the timer, but then everybody pays the overhead of maintaining this extra state, and that is undesired. The only other option that I could see is the external timer_active variable, which I tried to kill before. I would love a nicer interface for this seemingly simple 'problem' but alas. Fixes: 272325c4821f ("perf: Fix mux_interval hrtimer wreckage") Fixes: 77a4d1a1b9a1 ("sched: Cleanup bandwidth timers") Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: klamm@yandex-team.ru Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150514102311.GX21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
2015-05-14 13:23:11 +03:00
hrtimer_start_expires(&rt_b->rt_period_timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
}
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI)
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
static void push_irq_work_func(struct irq_work *work);
#endif
void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array;
int i;
array = &rt_rq->active;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_RT_PRIO; i++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(array->queue + i);
__clear_bit(i, array->bitmap);
}
/* delimiter for bitsearch: */
__set_bit(MAX_RT_PRIO, array->bitmap);
#if defined CONFIG_SMP
rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
rt_rq->highest_prio.next = MAX_RT_PRIO;
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory = 0;
rt_rq->overloaded = 0;
plist_head_init(&rt_rq->pushable_tasks);
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
#ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI
rt_rq->push_flags = 0;
rt_rq->push_cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
raw_spin_lock_init(&rt_rq->push_lock);
init_irq_work(&rt_rq->push_work, push_irq_work_func);
#endif
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/* We start is dequeued state, because no RT tasks are queued */
rt_rq->rt_queued = 0;
rt_rq->rt_time = 0;
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 0;
rt_rq->rt_runtime = 0;
raw_spin_lock_init(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static void destroy_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b)
{
hrtimer_cancel(&rt_b->rt_period_timer);
}
#define rt_entity_is_task(rt_se) (!(rt_se)->my_q)
static inline struct task_struct *rt_task_of(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rt_entity_is_task(rt_se));
#endif
return container_of(rt_se, struct task_struct, rt);
}
static inline struct rq *rq_of_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return rt_rq->rq;
}
static inline struct rt_rq *rt_rq_of_se(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
return rt_se->rt_rq;
}
static inline struct rq *rq_of_rt_se(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_se->rt_rq;
return rt_rq->rq;
}
void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg)
{
int i;
if (tg->rt_se)
destroy_rt_bandwidth(&tg->rt_bandwidth);
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
if (tg->rt_rq)
kfree(tg->rt_rq[i]);
if (tg->rt_se)
kfree(tg->rt_se[i]);
}
kfree(tg->rt_rq);
kfree(tg->rt_se);
}
void init_tg_rt_entry(struct task_group *tg, struct rt_rq *rt_rq,
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int cpu,
struct sched_rt_entity *parent)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted = 0;
rt_rq->rq = rq;
rt_rq->tg = tg;
tg->rt_rq[cpu] = rt_rq;
tg->rt_se[cpu] = rt_se;
if (!rt_se)
return;
if (!parent)
rt_se->rt_rq = &rq->rt;
else
rt_se->rt_rq = parent->my_q;
rt_se->my_q = rt_rq;
rt_se->parent = parent;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rt_se->run_list);
}
int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
int i;
tg->rt_rq = kzalloc(sizeof(rt_rq) * nr_cpu_ids, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tg->rt_rq)
goto err;
tg->rt_se = kzalloc(sizeof(rt_se) * nr_cpu_ids, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tg->rt_se)
goto err;
init_rt_bandwidth(&tg->rt_bandwidth,
ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period), 0);
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
rt_rq = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct rt_rq),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
if (!rt_rq)
goto err;
rt_se = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_rt_entity),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
if (!rt_se)
goto err_free_rq;
init_rt_rq(rt_rq);
rt_rq->rt_runtime = tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
init_tg_rt_entry(tg, rt_rq, rt_se, i, parent->rt_se[i]);
}
return 1;
err_free_rq:
kfree(rt_rq);
err:
return 0;
}
#else /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#define rt_entity_is_task(rt_se) (1)
static inline struct task_struct *rt_task_of(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
return container_of(rt_se, struct task_struct, rt);
}
static inline struct rq *rq_of_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return container_of(rt_rq, struct rq, rt);
}
static inline struct rq *rq_of_rt_se(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct task_struct *p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
return task_rq(p);
}
static inline struct rt_rq *rt_rq_of_se(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
return &rq->rt;
}
void free_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
{
return 1;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
/* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
return rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio;
}
static inline int rt_overloaded(struct rq *rq)
{
return atomic_read(&rq->rd->rto_count);
}
static inline void rt_set_overload(struct rq *rq)
{
if (!rq->online)
return;
cpumask_set_cpu(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
/*
* Make sure the mask is visible before we set
* the overload count. That is checked to determine
* if we should look at the mask. It would be a shame
* if we looked at the mask, but the mask was not
* updated yet.
*
* Matched by the barrier in pull_rt_task().
*/
smp_wmb();
atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rto_count);
}
static inline void rt_clear_overload(struct rq *rq)
{
if (!rq->online)
return;
/* the order here really doesn't matter */
atomic_dec(&rq->rd->rto_count);
cpumask_clear_cpu(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
}
sched: add RT-balance cpu-weight Some RT tasks (particularly kthreads) are bound to one specific CPU. It is fairly common for two or more bound tasks to get queued up at the same time. Consider, for instance, softirq_timer and softirq_sched. A timer goes off in an ISR which schedules softirq_thread to run at RT50. Then the timer handler determines that it's time to smp-rebalance the system so it schedules softirq_sched to run. So we are in a situation where we have two RT50 tasks queued, and the system will go into rt-overload condition to request other CPUs for help. This causes two problems in the current code: 1) If a high-priority bound task and a low-priority unbounded task queue up behind the running task, we will fail to ever relocate the unbounded task because we terminate the search on the first unmovable task. 2) We spend precious futile cycles in the fast-path trying to pull overloaded tasks over. It is therefore optimial to strive to avoid the overhead all together if we can cheaply detect the condition before overload even occurs. This patch tries to achieve this optimization by utilizing the hamming weight of the task->cpus_allowed mask. A weight of 1 indicates that the task cannot be migrated. We will then utilize this information to skip non-migratable tasks and to eliminate uncessary rebalance attempts. We introduce a per-rq variable to count the number of migratable tasks that are currently running. We only go into overload if we have more than one rt task, AND at least one of them is migratable. In addition, we introduce a per-task variable to cache the cpus_allowed weight, since the hamming calculation is probably relatively expensive. We only update the cached value when the mask is updated which should be relatively infrequent, especially compared to scheduling frequency in the fast path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25 23:08:07 +03:00
static void update_rt_migration(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
sched: add RT-balance cpu-weight Some RT tasks (particularly kthreads) are bound to one specific CPU. It is fairly common for two or more bound tasks to get queued up at the same time. Consider, for instance, softirq_timer and softirq_sched. A timer goes off in an ISR which schedules softirq_thread to run at RT50. Then the timer handler determines that it's time to smp-rebalance the system so it schedules softirq_sched to run. So we are in a situation where we have two RT50 tasks queued, and the system will go into rt-overload condition to request other CPUs for help. This causes two problems in the current code: 1) If a high-priority bound task and a low-priority unbounded task queue up behind the running task, we will fail to ever relocate the unbounded task because we terminate the search on the first unmovable task. 2) We spend precious futile cycles in the fast-path trying to pull overloaded tasks over. It is therefore optimial to strive to avoid the overhead all together if we can cheaply detect the condition before overload even occurs. This patch tries to achieve this optimization by utilizing the hamming weight of the task->cpus_allowed mask. A weight of 1 indicates that the task cannot be migrated. We will then utilize this information to skip non-migratable tasks and to eliminate uncessary rebalance attempts. We introduce a per-rq variable to count the number of migratable tasks that are currently running. We only go into overload if we have more than one rt task, AND at least one of them is migratable. In addition, we introduce a per-task variable to cache the cpus_allowed weight, since the hamming calculation is probably relatively expensive. We only update the cached value when the mask is updated which should be relatively infrequent, especially compared to scheduling frequency in the fast path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25 23:08:07 +03:00
{
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory && rt_rq->rt_nr_total > 1) {
if (!rt_rq->overloaded) {
rt_set_overload(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq));
rt_rq->overloaded = 1;
}
} else if (rt_rq->overloaded) {
rt_clear_overload(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq));
rt_rq->overloaded = 0;
}
sched: add RT-balance cpu-weight Some RT tasks (particularly kthreads) are bound to one specific CPU. It is fairly common for two or more bound tasks to get queued up at the same time. Consider, for instance, softirq_timer and softirq_sched. A timer goes off in an ISR which schedules softirq_thread to run at RT50. Then the timer handler determines that it's time to smp-rebalance the system so it schedules softirq_sched to run. So we are in a situation where we have two RT50 tasks queued, and the system will go into rt-overload condition to request other CPUs for help. This causes two problems in the current code: 1) If a high-priority bound task and a low-priority unbounded task queue up behind the running task, we will fail to ever relocate the unbounded task because we terminate the search on the first unmovable task. 2) We spend precious futile cycles in the fast-path trying to pull overloaded tasks over. It is therefore optimial to strive to avoid the overhead all together if we can cheaply detect the condition before overload even occurs. This patch tries to achieve this optimization by utilizing the hamming weight of the task->cpus_allowed mask. A weight of 1 indicates that the task cannot be migrated. We will then utilize this information to skip non-migratable tasks and to eliminate uncessary rebalance attempts. We introduce a per-rq variable to count the number of migratable tasks that are currently running. We only go into overload if we have more than one rt task, AND at least one of them is migratable. In addition, we introduce a per-task variable to cache the cpus_allowed weight, since the hamming calculation is probably relatively expensive. We only update the cached value when the mask is updated which should be relatively infrequent, especially compared to scheduling frequency in the fast path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25 23:08:07 +03:00
}
static void inc_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct task_struct *p;
if (!rt_entity_is_task(rt_se))
return;
p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
rt_rq = &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->rt;
rt_rq->rt_nr_total++;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory++;
update_rt_migration(rt_rq);
}
static void dec_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct task_struct *p;
if (!rt_entity_is_task(rt_se))
return;
p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
rt_rq = &rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->rt;
rt_rq->rt_nr_total--;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory--;
update_rt_migration(rt_rq);
}
sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Hillf Danton proposed a patch (see link) that cleaned up the sched_rt code that calculates the priority of the next highest priority task to be used in finding run queues to pull from. His patch removed the calculating of the next prio to just use the current prio when deteriming if we should examine a run queue to pull from. The problem with his patch was that it caused more false checks. Because we check a run queue for pushable tasks if the current priority of that run queue is higher in priority than the task about to run on our run queue. But after grabbing the locks and doing the real check, we find that there may not be a task that has a higher prio task to pull. Thus the locks were taken with nothing to do. I added some trace_printks() to record when and how many times the run queue locks were taken to check for pullable tasks, compared to how many times we pulled a task. With the current method, it was: 3806 locks taken vs 2812 pulled tasks With Hillf's patch: 6728 locks taken vs 2804 pulled tasks The number of times locks were taken to pull a task went up almost double with no more success rate. But his patch did get me thinking. When we look at the priority of the highest task to consider taking the locks to do a pull, a failure to pull can be one of the following: (in order of most likely) o RT task was pushed off already between the check and taking the lock o Waiting RT task can not be migrated o RT task's CPU affinity does not include the target run queue's CPU o RT task's priority changed between the check and taking the lock And with Hillf's patch, the thing that caused most of the failures, is the RT task to pull was not at the right priority to pull (not greater than the current RT task priority on the target run queue). Most of the above cases we can't help. But the current method does not check if the next highest prio RT task can be migrated or not, and if it can not, we still grab the locks to do the test (we don't find out about this fact until after we have the locks). I thought about this case, and realized that the pushable task plist that is maintained only holds RT tasks that can migrate. If we move the calculating of the next highest prio task from the inc/dec_rt_task() functions into the queuing of the pushable tasks, then we only measure the priorities of those tasks that we push, and we get this basically for free. Not only does this patch make the code a little more efficient, it cleans it up and makes it a little simpler. Thanks to Hillf Danton for inspiring me on this patch. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimQ67180HxCx5vgMqumqw1EkFh3qg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-17 05:55:23 +04:00
static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_push_head);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, rt_pull_head);
static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *);
static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *);
static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
return;
queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_push_head, rq->cpu), push_rt_tasks);
}
static inline void queue_pull_task(struct rq *rq)
{
queue_balance_callback(rq, &per_cpu(rt_pull_head, rq->cpu), pull_rt_task);
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
static void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
plist_node_init(&p->pushable_tasks, p->prio);
plist_add(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Hillf Danton proposed a patch (see link) that cleaned up the sched_rt code that calculates the priority of the next highest priority task to be used in finding run queues to pull from. His patch removed the calculating of the next prio to just use the current prio when deteriming if we should examine a run queue to pull from. The problem with his patch was that it caused more false checks. Because we check a run queue for pushable tasks if the current priority of that run queue is higher in priority than the task about to run on our run queue. But after grabbing the locks and doing the real check, we find that there may not be a task that has a higher prio task to pull. Thus the locks were taken with nothing to do. I added some trace_printks() to record when and how many times the run queue locks were taken to check for pullable tasks, compared to how many times we pulled a task. With the current method, it was: 3806 locks taken vs 2812 pulled tasks With Hillf's patch: 6728 locks taken vs 2804 pulled tasks The number of times locks were taken to pull a task went up almost double with no more success rate. But his patch did get me thinking. When we look at the priority of the highest task to consider taking the locks to do a pull, a failure to pull can be one of the following: (in order of most likely) o RT task was pushed off already between the check and taking the lock o Waiting RT task can not be migrated o RT task's CPU affinity does not include the target run queue's CPU o RT task's priority changed between the check and taking the lock And with Hillf's patch, the thing that caused most of the failures, is the RT task to pull was not at the right priority to pull (not greater than the current RT task priority on the target run queue). Most of the above cases we can't help. But the current method does not check if the next highest prio RT task can be migrated or not, and if it can not, we still grab the locks to do the test (we don't find out about this fact until after we have the locks). I thought about this case, and realized that the pushable task plist that is maintained only holds RT tasks that can migrate. If we move the calculating of the next highest prio task from the inc/dec_rt_task() functions into the queuing of the pushable tasks, then we only measure the priorities of those tasks that we push, and we get this basically for free. Not only does this patch make the code a little more efficient, it cleans it up and makes it a little simpler. Thanks to Hillf Danton for inspiring me on this patch. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimQ67180HxCx5vgMqumqw1EkFh3qg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-17 05:55:23 +04:00
/* Update the highest prio pushable task */
if (p->prio < rq->rt.highest_prio.next)
rq->rt.highest_prio.next = p->prio;
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
}
static void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Hillf Danton proposed a patch (see link) that cleaned up the sched_rt code that calculates the priority of the next highest priority task to be used in finding run queues to pull from. His patch removed the calculating of the next prio to just use the current prio when deteriming if we should examine a run queue to pull from. The problem with his patch was that it caused more false checks. Because we check a run queue for pushable tasks if the current priority of that run queue is higher in priority than the task about to run on our run queue. But after grabbing the locks and doing the real check, we find that there may not be a task that has a higher prio task to pull. Thus the locks were taken with nothing to do. I added some trace_printks() to record when and how many times the run queue locks were taken to check for pullable tasks, compared to how many times we pulled a task. With the current method, it was: 3806 locks taken vs 2812 pulled tasks With Hillf's patch: 6728 locks taken vs 2804 pulled tasks The number of times locks were taken to pull a task went up almost double with no more success rate. But his patch did get me thinking. When we look at the priority of the highest task to consider taking the locks to do a pull, a failure to pull can be one of the following: (in order of most likely) o RT task was pushed off already between the check and taking the lock o Waiting RT task can not be migrated o RT task's CPU affinity does not include the target run queue's CPU o RT task's priority changed between the check and taking the lock And with Hillf's patch, the thing that caused most of the failures, is the RT task to pull was not at the right priority to pull (not greater than the current RT task priority on the target run queue). Most of the above cases we can't help. But the current method does not check if the next highest prio RT task can be migrated or not, and if it can not, we still grab the locks to do the test (we don't find out about this fact until after we have the locks). I thought about this case, and realized that the pushable task plist that is maintained only holds RT tasks that can migrate. If we move the calculating of the next highest prio task from the inc/dec_rt_task() functions into the queuing of the pushable tasks, then we only measure the priorities of those tasks that we push, and we get this basically for free. Not only does this patch make the code a little more efficient, it cleans it up and makes it a little simpler. Thanks to Hillf Danton for inspiring me on this patch. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimQ67180HxCx5vgMqumqw1EkFh3qg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-17 05:55:23 +04:00
/* Update the new highest prio pushable task */
if (has_pushable_tasks(rq)) {
p = plist_first_entry(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks,
struct task_struct, pushable_tasks);
rq->rt.highest_prio.next = p->prio;
} else
rq->rt.highest_prio.next = MAX_RT_PRIO;
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
#else
static inline void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
}
static inline void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
}
static inline
void inc_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
}
static inline
void dec_rt_migration(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
return false;
}
static inline void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
{
}
static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void enqueue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
static void dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
static inline int on_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
return rt_se->on_rq;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static inline u64 sched_rt_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
if (!rt_rq->tg)
return RUNTIME_INF;
return rt_rq->rt_runtime;
}
static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
typedef struct task_group *rt_rq_iter_t;
static inline struct task_group *next_task_group(struct task_group *tg)
{
do {
tg = list_entry_rcu(tg->list.next,
typeof(struct task_group), list);
} while (&tg->list != &task_groups && task_group_is_autogroup(tg));
if (&tg->list == &task_groups)
tg = NULL;
return tg;
}
#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
for (iter = container_of(&task_groups, typeof(*iter), list); \
(iter = next_task_group(iter)) && \
(rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]);)
#define for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) \
for (; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->parent)
static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
return rt_se->my_q;
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags);
static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags);
static void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
sched_rt.c: resch needed in rt_rq_enqueue() for the root rt_rq While working on the new version of the code for SCHED_SPORADIC I noticed something strange in the present throttling mechanism. More specifically in the throttling timer handler in sched_rt.c (do_sched_rt_period_timer()) and in rt_rq_enqueue(). The problem is that, when unthrottling a runqueue, rt_rq_enqueue() only asks for rescheduling if the runqueue has a sched_entity associated to it (i.e., rt_rq->rt_se != NULL). Now, if the runqueue is the root rq (which has a rt_se = NULL) rescheduling does not take place, and it is delayed to some undefined instant in the future. This imply some random bandwidth usage by the RT tasks under throttling. For instance, setting rt_runtime_us/rt_period_us = 950ms/1000ms an RT task will get less than 95%. In our tests we got something varying between 70% to 95%. Using smaller time values, e.g., 95ms/100ms, things are even worse, and I can see values also going down to 20-25%!! The tests we performed are simply running 'yes' as a SCHED_FIFO task, and checking the CPU usage with top, but we can investigate thoroughly if you think it is needed. Things go much better, for us, with the attached patch... Don't know if it is the best approach, but it solved the issue for us. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-03 19:40:46 +04:00
struct task_struct *curr = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->curr;
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
rt_se = rt_rq->tg->rt_se[cpu];
sched_rt.c: resch needed in rt_rq_enqueue() for the root rt_rq While working on the new version of the code for SCHED_SPORADIC I noticed something strange in the present throttling mechanism. More specifically in the throttling timer handler in sched_rt.c (do_sched_rt_period_timer()) and in rt_rq_enqueue(). The problem is that, when unthrottling a runqueue, rt_rq_enqueue() only asks for rescheduling if the runqueue has a sched_entity associated to it (i.e., rt_rq->rt_se != NULL). Now, if the runqueue is the root rq (which has a rt_se = NULL) rescheduling does not take place, and it is delayed to some undefined instant in the future. This imply some random bandwidth usage by the RT tasks under throttling. For instance, setting rt_runtime_us/rt_period_us = 950ms/1000ms an RT task will get less than 95%. In our tests we got something varying between 70% to 95%. Using smaller time values, e.g., 95ms/100ms, things are even worse, and I can see values also going down to 20-25%!! The tests we performed are simply running 'yes' as a SCHED_FIFO task, and checking the CPU usage with top, but we can investigate thoroughly if you think it is needed. Things go much better, for us, with the attached patch... Don't know if it is the best approach, but it solved the issue for us. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <trimarchimichael@yahoo.it> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-10-03 19:40:46 +04:00
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
if (!rt_se)
enqueue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
else if (!on_rt_rq(rt_se))
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
if (rt_rq->highest_prio.curr < curr->prio)
resched_curr(rq);
}
}
static void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
int cpu = cpu_of(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq));
rt_se = rt_rq->tg->rt_se[cpu];
if (!rt_se)
dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
else if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, 0);
}
static inline int rt_rq_throttled(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return rt_rq->rt_throttled && !rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted;
}
static int rt_se_boosted(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
struct task_struct *p;
if (rt_rq)
return !!rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted;
p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
return p->prio != p->normal_prio;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static inline const struct cpumask *sched_rt_period_mask(void)
{
return this_rq()->rd->span;
}
#else
static inline const struct cpumask *sched_rt_period_mask(void)
{
return cpu_online_mask;
}
#endif
static inline
struct rt_rq *sched_rt_period_rt_rq(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int cpu)
{
return container_of(rt_b, struct task_group, rt_bandwidth)->rt_rq[cpu];
}
static inline struct rt_bandwidth *sched_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return &rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
static inline u64 sched_rt_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return rt_rq->rt_runtime;
}
static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
typedef struct rt_rq *rt_rq_iter_t;
#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
#define for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) \
for (; rt_se; rt_se = NULL)
static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
return;
enqueue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
resched_curr(rq);
}
static inline void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq);
}
static inline int rt_rq_throttled(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return rt_rq->rt_throttled;
}
static inline const struct cpumask *sched_rt_period_mask(void)
{
return cpu_online_mask;
}
static inline
struct rt_rq *sched_rt_period_rt_rq(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int cpu)
{
return &cpu_rq(cpu)->rt;
}
static inline struct rt_bandwidth *sched_rt_bandwidth(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
return &def_rt_bandwidth;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
sched/deadline: Prevent rt_time growth to infinity Kirill Tkhai noted: Since deadline tasks share rt bandwidth, we must care about bandwidth timer set. Otherwise rt_time may grow up to infinity in update_curr_dl(), if there are no other available RT tasks on top level bandwidth. RT task were in fact throttled right after they got enqueued, and never executed again (rt_time never again went below rt_runtime). Peter then proposed to accrue DL execution on rt_time only when rt timer is active, and proposed a patch (this patch is a slight modification of that) to implement that behavior. While this solves Kirill problem, it has a drawback. Indeed, Kirill noted again: It looks we may get into a situation, when all CPU time is shared between RT and DL tasks: rt_runtime = n rt_period = 2n | RT working, DL sleeping | DL working, RT sleeping | ----------------------------------------------------------- | (1) duration = n | (2) duration = n | (repeat) |--------------------------|------------------------------| | (rt_bw timer is running) | (rt_bw timer is not running) | No time for fair tasks at all. While this can happen during the first period, if rq is always backlogged, RT tasks won't have the opportunity to execute anymore: rt_time reached rt_runtime during (1), suppose after (2) RT is enqueued back, it gets throttled since rt timer didn't fire, replenishment is from now on eaten up by DL tasks that accrue their execution on rt_time (while rt timer is active - we have an RT task waiting for replenishment). FAIR tasks are not touched after this first period. Ok, this is not ideal, and the situation is even worse! What above (the nice case), practically never happens in reality, where your rt timer is not aligned to tasks periods, tasks are in general not periodic, etc.. Long story short, you always risk to overload your system. This patch is based on Peter's idea, but exploits an additional fact: if you don't have RT tasks enqueued, it makes little sense to continue incrementing rt_time once you reached the upper limit (DL tasks have their own mechanism for throttling). This cures both problems: - no matter how many DL instances in the past, you'll have an rt_time slightly above rt_runtime when an RT task is enqueued, and from that point on (after the first replenishment), the task will normally execute; - you can still eat up all bandwidth during the first period, but not anymore after that, remember that DL execution will increment rt_time till the upper limit is reached. The situation is still not perfect! But, we have a simple solution for now, that limits how much you can jeopardize your system, as we keep working towards the right answer: RT groups scheduled using deadline servers. Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140225151515.617714e2f2cd6c558531ba61@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-02-21 14:37:15 +04:00
bool sched_rt_bandwidth_account(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
return (hrtimer_active(&rt_b->rt_period_timer) ||
rt_rq->rt_time < rt_b->rt_runtime);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* We ran out of runtime, see if we can borrow some from our neighbours.
*/
static void do_balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
struct root_domain *rd = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->rd;
int i, weight;
u64 rt_period;
weight = cpumask_weight(rd->span);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
rt_period = ktime_to_ns(rt_b->rt_period);
for_each_cpu(i, rd->span) {
struct rt_rq *iter = sched_rt_period_rt_rq(rt_b, i);
s64 diff;
if (iter == rt_rq)
continue;
raw_spin_lock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
/*
* Either all rqs have inf runtime and there's nothing to steal
* or __disable_runtime() below sets a specific rq to inf to
* indicate its been disabled and disalow stealing.
*/
if (iter->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
goto next;
/*
* From runqueues with spare time, take 1/n part of their
* spare time, but no more than our period.
*/
diff = iter->rt_runtime - iter->rt_time;
if (diff > 0) {
diff = div_u64((u64)diff, weight);
if (rt_rq->rt_runtime + diff > rt_period)
diff = rt_period - rt_rq->rt_runtime;
iter->rt_runtime -= diff;
rt_rq->rt_runtime += diff;
if (rt_rq->rt_runtime == rt_period) {
raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
break;
}
}
next:
raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
}
/*
* Ensure this RQ takes back all the runtime it lend to its neighbours.
*/
static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
return;
for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
s64 want;
int i;
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
/*
* Either we're all inf and nobody needs to borrow, or we're
* already disabled and thus have nothing to do, or we have
* exactly the right amount of runtime to take out.
*/
if (rt_rq->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF ||
rt_rq->rt_runtime == rt_b->rt_runtime)
goto balanced;
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
/*
* Calculate the difference between what we started out with
* and what we current have, that's the amount of runtime
* we lend and now have to reclaim.
*/
want = rt_b->rt_runtime - rt_rq->rt_runtime;
/*
* Greedy reclaim, take back as much as we can.
*/
for_each_cpu(i, rd->span) {
struct rt_rq *iter = sched_rt_period_rt_rq(rt_b, i);
s64 diff;
/*
* Can't reclaim from ourselves or disabled runqueues.
*/
if (iter == rt_rq || iter->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
continue;
raw_spin_lock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
if (want > 0) {
diff = min_t(s64, iter->rt_runtime, want);
iter->rt_runtime -= diff;
want -= diff;
} else {
iter->rt_runtime -= want;
want -= want;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&iter->rt_runtime_lock);
if (!want)
break;
}
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
/*
* We cannot be left wanting - that would mean some runtime
* leaked out of the system.
*/
BUG_ON(want);
balanced:
/*
* Disable all the borrow logic by pretending we have inf
* runtime - in which case borrowing doesn't make sense.
*/
rt_rq->rt_runtime = RUNTIME_INF;
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 0;
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
/* Make rt_rq available for pick_next_task() */
sched_rt_rq_enqueue(rt_rq);
}
}
static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
return;
/*
* Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
*/
for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
rt_rq->rt_runtime = rt_b->rt_runtime;
rt_rq->rt_time = 0;
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 0;
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
}
}
static void balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
if (!sched_feat(RT_RUNTIME_SHARE))
return;
if (rt_rq->rt_time > rt_rq->rt_runtime) {
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
do_balance_runtime(rt_rq);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
}
}
#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
static inline void balance_runtime(struct rt_rq *rt_rq) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun)
{
int i, idle = 1, throttled = 0;
const struct cpumask *span;
span = sched_rt_period_mask();
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
/*
* FIXME: isolated CPUs should really leave the root task group,
* whether they are isolcpus or were isolated via cpusets, lest
* the timer run on a CPU which does not service all runqueues,
* potentially leaving other CPUs indefinitely throttled. If
* isolation is really required, the user will turn the throttle
* off to kill the perturbations it causes anyway. Meanwhile,
* this maintains functionality for boot and/or troubleshooting.
*/
if (rt_b == &root_task_group.rt_bandwidth)
span = cpu_online_mask;
#endif
for_each_cpu(i, span) {
int enqueue = 0;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = sched_rt_period_rt_rq(rt_b, i);
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
if (rt_rq->rt_time) {
u64 runtime;
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
if (rt_rq->rt_throttled)
balance_runtime(rt_rq);
runtime = rt_rq->rt_runtime;
rt_rq->rt_time -= min(rt_rq->rt_time, overrun*runtime);
if (rt_rq->rt_throttled && rt_rq->rt_time < runtime) {
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 0;
enqueue = 1;
/*
* When we're idle and a woken (rt) task is
* throttled check_preempt_curr() will set
* skip_update and the time between the wakeup
* and this unthrottle will get accounted as
* 'runtime'.
*/
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running && rq->curr == rq->idle)
rq_clock_skip_update(rq, false);
}
if (rt_rq->rt_time || rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
idle = 0;
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
} else if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
idle = 0;
if (!rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq))
enqueue = 1;
}
if (rt_rq->rt_throttled)
throttled = 1;
if (enqueue)
sched_rt_rq_enqueue(rt_rq);
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
}
if (!throttled && (!rt_bandwidth_enabled() || rt_b->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF))
return 1;
return idle;
}
static inline int rt_se_prio(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
if (rt_rq)
return rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
#endif
return rt_task_of(rt_se)->prio;
}
static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
u64 runtime = sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq);
if (rt_rq->rt_throttled)
return rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq);
if (runtime >= sched_rt_period(rt_rq))
return 0;
balance_runtime(rt_rq);
runtime = sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq);
if (runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
return 0;
if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
/*
* Don't actually throttle groups that have no runtime assigned
* but accrue some time due to boosting.
*/
if (likely(rt_b->rt_runtime)) {
rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated\n");
} else {
/*
* In case we did anyway, make it go away,
* replenishment is a joke, since it will replenish us
* with exactly 0 ns.
*/
rt_rq->rt_time = 0;
}
if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq)) {
sched_rt_rq_dequeue(rt_rq);
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Update the current task's runtime statistics. Skip current tasks that
* are not in our scheduling class.
*/
static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &curr->rt;
u64 delta_exec;
if (curr->sched_class != &rt_sched_class)
return;
delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - curr->se.exec_start;
if (unlikely((s64)delta_exec <= 0))
return;
/* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
cpufreq_update_this_cpu(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
curr->se.sum_exec_runtime += delta_exec;
timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Overview This patch reworks the handling of POSIX CPU timers, including the ITIMER_PROF, ITIMER_VIRT timers and rlimit handling. It was put together with the help of Roland McGrath, the owner and original writer of this code. The problem we ran into, and the reason for this rework, has to do with using a profiling timer in a process with a large number of threads. It appears that the performance of the old implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() was at least O(n*3) (where "n" is the number of threads in a process) or worse. Everything is fine with an increasing number of threads until the time taken for that routine to run becomes the same as or greater than the tick time, at which point things degrade rather quickly. This patch fixes bug 9906, "Weird hang with NPTL and SIGPROF." Code Changes This rework corrects the implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() to make it run in constant time for a particular machine. (Performance may vary between one machine and another depending upon whether the kernel is built as single- or multiprocessor and, in the latter case, depending upon the number of running processors.) To do this, at each tick we now update fields in signal_struct as well as task_struct. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function uses those fields to make its decisions. We define a new structure, "task_cputime," to contain user, system and scheduler times and use these in appropriate places: struct task_cputime { cputime_t utime; cputime_t stime; unsigned long long sum_exec_runtime; }; This is included in the structure "thread_group_cputime," which is a new substructure of signal_struct and which varies for uniprocessor versus multiprocessor kernels. For uniprocessor kernels, it uses "task_cputime" as a simple substructure, while for multiprocessor kernels it is a pointer: struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime totals; }; struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime *totals; }; We also add a new task_cputime substructure directly to signal_struct, to cache the earliest expiration of process-wide timers, and task_cputime also replaces the it_*_expires fields of task_struct (used for earliest expiration of thread timers). The "thread_group_cputime" structure contains process-wide timers that are updated via account_user_time() and friends. In the non-SMP case the structure is a simple aggregator; unfortunately in the SMP case that simplicity was not achievable due to cache-line contention between CPUs (in one measured case performance was actually _worse_ on a 16-cpu system than the same test on a 4-cpu system, due to this contention). For SMP, the thread_group_cputime counters are maintained as a per-cpu structure allocated using alloc_percpu(). The timer functions update only the timer field in the structure corresponding to the running CPU, obtained using per_cpu_ptr(). We define a set of inline functions in sched.h that we use to maintain the thread_group_cputime structure and hide the differences between UP and SMP implementations from the rest of the kernel. The thread_group_cputime_init() function initializes the thread_group_cputime structure for the given task. The thread_group_cputime_alloc() is a no-op for UP; for SMP it calls the out-of-line function thread_group_cputime_alloc_smp() to allocate and fill in the per-cpu structures and fields. The thread_group_cputime_free() function, also a no-op for UP, in SMP frees the per-cpu structures. The thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() function (also a UP no-op) for SMP calls thread_group_cputime_alloc() if the per-cpu structures haven't yet been allocated. The thread_group_cputime() function fills the task_cputime structure it is passed with the contents of the thread_group_cputime fields; in UP it's that simple but in SMP it must also safely check that tsk->signal is non-NULL (if it is it just uses the appropriate fields of task_struct) and, if so, sums the per-cpu values for each online CPU. Finally, the three functions account_group_user_time(), account_group_system_time() and account_group_exec_runtime() are used by timer functions to update the respective fields of the thread_group_cputime structure. Non-SMP operation is trivial and will not be mentioned further. The per-cpu structure is always allocated when a task creates its first new thread, via a call to thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() from copy_signal(). It is freed at process exit via a call to thread_group_cputime_free() from cleanup_signal(). All functions that formerly summed utime/stime/sum_sched_runtime values from from all threads in the thread group now use thread_group_cputime() to snapshot the values in the thread_group_cputime structure or the values in the task structure itself if the per-cpu structure hasn't been allocated. Finally, the code in kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c has changed quite a bit. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function has been split into a fast path and a slow path; the former safely checks whether there are any expired thread timers and, if not, just returns, while the slow path does the heavy lifting. With the dedicated thread group fields, timers are no longer "rebalanced" and the process_timer_rebalance() function and related code has gone away. All summing loops are gone and all code that used them now uses the thread_group_cputime() inline. When process-wide timers are set, the new task_cputime structure in signal_struct is used to cache the earliest expiration; this is checked in the fast path. Performance The fix appears not to add significant overhead to existing operations. It generally performs the same as the current code except in two cases, one in which it performs slightly worse (Case 5 below) and one in which it performs very significantly better (Case 2 below). Overall it's a wash except in those two cases. I've since done somewhat more involved testing on a dual-core Opteron system. Case 1: With no itimer running, for a test with 100,000 threads, the fixed kernel took 1428.5 seconds, 513 seconds more than the unfixed system, all of which was spent in the system. There were twice as many voluntary context switches with the fix as without it. Case 2: With an itimer running at .01 second ticks and 4000 threads (the most an unmodified kernel can handle), the fixed kernel ran the test in eight percent of the time (5.8 seconds as opposed to 70 seconds) and had better tick accuracy (.012 seconds per tick as opposed to .023 seconds per tick). Case 3: A 4000-thread test with an initial timer tick of .01 second and an interval of 10,000 seconds (i.e. a timer that ticks only once) had very nearly the same performance in both cases: 6.3 seconds elapsed for the fixed kernel versus 5.5 seconds for the unfixed kernel. With fewer threads (eight in these tests), the Case 1 test ran in essentially the same time on both the modified and unmodified kernels (5.2 seconds versus 5.8 seconds). The Case 2 test ran in about the same time as well, 5.9 seconds versus 5.4 seconds but again with much better tick accuracy, .013 seconds per tick versus .025 seconds per tick for the unmodified kernel. Since the fix affected the rlimit code, I also tested soft and hard CPU limits. Case 4: With a hard CPU limit of 20 seconds and eight threads (and an itimer running), the modified kernel was very slightly favored in that while it killed the process in 19.997 seconds of CPU time (5.002 seconds of wall time), only .003 seconds of that was system time, the rest was user time. The unmodified kernel killed the process in 20.001 seconds of CPU (5.014 seconds of wall time) of which .016 seconds was system time. Really, though, the results were too close to call. The results were essentially the same with no itimer running. Case 5: With a soft limit of 20 seconds and a hard limit of 2000 seconds (where the hard limit would never be reached) and an itimer running, the modified kernel exhibited worse tick accuracy than the unmodified kernel: .050 seconds/tick versus .028 seconds/tick. Otherwise, performance was almost indistinguishable. With no itimer running this test exhibited virtually identical behavior and times in both cases. In times past I did some limited performance testing. those results are below. On a four-cpu Opteron system without this fix, a sixteen-thread test executed in 3569.991 seconds, of which user was 3568.435s and system was 1.556s. On the same system with the fix, user and elapsed time were about the same, but system time dropped to 0.007 seconds. Performance with eight, four and one thread were comparable. Interestingly, the timer ticks with the fix seemed more accurate: The sixteen-thread test with the fix received 149543 ticks for 0.024 seconds per tick, while the same test without the fix received 58720 for 0.061 seconds per tick. Both cases were configured for an interval of 0.01 seconds. Again, the other tests were comparable. Each thread in this test computed the primes up to 25,000,000. I also did a test with a large number of threads, 100,000 threads, which is impossible without the fix. In this case each thread computed the primes only up to 10,000 (to make the runtime manageable). System time dominated, at 1546.968 seconds out of a total 2176.906 seconds (giving a user time of 629.938s). It received 147651 ticks for 0.015 seconds per tick, still quite accurate. There is obviously no comparable test without the fix. Signed-off-by: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-12 20:54:39 +04:00
account_group_exec_runtime(curr, delta_exec);
curr->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
sched: cpu accounting controller (V2) Commit cfb5285660aad4931b2ebbfa902ea48a37dfffa1 removed a useful feature for us, which provided a cpu accounting resource controller. This feature would be useful if someone wants to group tasks only for accounting purpose and doesnt really want to exercise any control over their cpu consumption. The patch below reintroduces the feature. It is based on Paul Menage's original patch (Commit 62d0df64065e7c135d0002f069444fbdfc64768f), with these differences: - Removed load average information. I felt it needs more thought (esp to deal with SMP and virtualized platforms) and can be added for 2.6.25 after more discussions. - Convert group cpu usage to be nanosecond accurate (as rest of the cfs stats are) and invoke cpuacct_charge() from the respective scheduler classes - Make accounting scalable on SMP systems by splitting the usage counter to be per-cpu - Move the code from kernel/cpu_acct.c to kernel/sched.c (since the code is not big enough to warrant a new file and also this rightly needs to live inside the scheduler. Also things like accessing rq->lock while reading cpu usage becomes easier if the code lived in kernel/sched.c) The patch also modifies the cpu controller not to provide the same accounting information. Tested-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested the patches on top of 2.6.24-rc3. The patches work fine. Ran some simple tests like cpuspin (spin on the cpu), ran several tasks in the same group and timed them. Compared their time stamps with cpuacct.usage. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-12-02 22:04:49 +03:00
cpuacct_charge(curr, delta_exec);
sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_exec);
if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled())
return;
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
if (sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq) != RUNTIME_INF) {
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
rt_rq->rt_time += delta_exec;
if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq))
resched_curr(rq);
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
}
}
}
static void
dequeue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
BUG_ON(&rq->rt != rt_rq);
if (!rt_rq->rt_queued)
return;
BUG_ON(!rq->nr_running);
sub_nr_running(rq, rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
rt_rq->rt_queued = 0;
}
static void
enqueue_top_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
BUG_ON(&rq->rt != rt_rq);
if (rt_rq->rt_queued)
return;
if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq) || !rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
return;
add_nr_running(rq, rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
rt_rq->rt_queued = 1;
}
#if defined CONFIG_SMP
static void
inc_rt_prio_smp(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio, int prev_prio)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
/*
* Change rq's cpupri only if rt_rq is the top queue.
*/
if (&rq->rt != rt_rq)
return;
#endif
sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Hillf Danton proposed a patch (see link) that cleaned up the sched_rt code that calculates the priority of the next highest priority task to be used in finding run queues to pull from. His patch removed the calculating of the next prio to just use the current prio when deteriming if we should examine a run queue to pull from. The problem with his patch was that it caused more false checks. Because we check a run queue for pushable tasks if the current priority of that run queue is higher in priority than the task about to run on our run queue. But after grabbing the locks and doing the real check, we find that there may not be a task that has a higher prio task to pull. Thus the locks were taken with nothing to do. I added some trace_printks() to record when and how many times the run queue locks were taken to check for pullable tasks, compared to how many times we pulled a task. With the current method, it was: 3806 locks taken vs 2812 pulled tasks With Hillf's patch: 6728 locks taken vs 2804 pulled tasks The number of times locks were taken to pull a task went up almost double with no more success rate. But his patch did get me thinking. When we look at the priority of the highest task to consider taking the locks to do a pull, a failure to pull can be one of the following: (in order of most likely) o RT task was pushed off already between the check and taking the lock o Waiting RT task can not be migrated o RT task's CPU affinity does not include the target run queue's CPU o RT task's priority changed between the check and taking the lock And with Hillf's patch, the thing that caused most of the failures, is the RT task to pull was not at the right priority to pull (not greater than the current RT task priority on the target run queue). Most of the above cases we can't help. But the current method does not check if the next highest prio RT task can be migrated or not, and if it can not, we still grab the locks to do the test (we don't find out about this fact until after we have the locks). I thought about this case, and realized that the pushable task plist that is maintained only holds RT tasks that can migrate. If we move the calculating of the next highest prio task from the inc/dec_rt_task() functions into the queuing of the pushable tasks, then we only measure the priorities of those tasks that we push, and we get this basically for free. Not only does this patch make the code a little more efficient, it cleans it up and makes it a little simpler. Thanks to Hillf Danton for inspiring me on this patch. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimQ67180HxCx5vgMqumqw1EkFh3qg@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-06-17 05:55:23 +04:00
if (rq->online && prio < prev_prio)
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, prio);
}
sched: add RT-balance cpu-weight Some RT tasks (particularly kthreads) are bound to one specific CPU. It is fairly common for two or more bound tasks to get queued up at the same time. Consider, for instance, softirq_timer and softirq_sched. A timer goes off in an ISR which schedules softirq_thread to run at RT50. Then the timer handler determines that it's time to smp-rebalance the system so it schedules softirq_sched to run. So we are in a situation where we have two RT50 tasks queued, and the system will go into rt-overload condition to request other CPUs for help. This causes two problems in the current code: 1) If a high-priority bound task and a low-priority unbounded task queue up behind the running task, we will fail to ever relocate the unbounded task because we terminate the search on the first unmovable task. 2) We spend precious futile cycles in the fast-path trying to pull overloaded tasks over. It is therefore optimial to strive to avoid the overhead all together if we can cheaply detect the condition before overload even occurs. This patch tries to achieve this optimization by utilizing the hamming weight of the task->cpus_allowed mask. A weight of 1 indicates that the task cannot be migrated. We will then utilize this information to skip non-migratable tasks and to eliminate uncessary rebalance attempts. We introduce a per-rq variable to count the number of migratable tasks that are currently running. We only go into overload if we have more than one rt task, AND at least one of them is migratable. In addition, we introduce a per-task variable to cache the cpus_allowed weight, since the hamming calculation is probably relatively expensive. We only update the cached value when the mask is updated which should be relatively infrequent, especially compared to scheduling frequency in the fast path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25 23:08:07 +03:00
static void
dec_rt_prio_smp(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio, int prev_prio)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
/*
* Change rq's cpupri only if rt_rq is the top queue.
*/
if (&rq->rt != rt_rq)
return;
#endif
if (rq->online && rt_rq->highest_prio.curr != prev_prio)
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rt_rq->highest_prio.curr);
}
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
static inline
void inc_rt_prio_smp(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio, int prev_prio) {}
static inline
void dec_rt_prio_smp(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio, int prev_prio) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static void
inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
{
int prev_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
if (prio < prev_prio)
rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = prio;
inc_rt_prio_smp(rt_rq, prio, prev_prio);
}
static void
dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio)
{
int prev_prio = rt_rq->highest_prio.curr;
if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running) {
WARN_ON(prio < prev_prio);
/*
* This may have been our highest task, and therefore
* we may have some recomputation to do
*/
if (prio == prev_prio) {
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
rt_rq->highest_prio.curr =
sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
}
} else
rt_rq->highest_prio.curr = MAX_RT_PRIO;
sched: add RT-balance cpu-weight Some RT tasks (particularly kthreads) are bound to one specific CPU. It is fairly common for two or more bound tasks to get queued up at the same time. Consider, for instance, softirq_timer and softirq_sched. A timer goes off in an ISR which schedules softirq_thread to run at RT50. Then the timer handler determines that it's time to smp-rebalance the system so it schedules softirq_sched to run. So we are in a situation where we have two RT50 tasks queued, and the system will go into rt-overload condition to request other CPUs for help. This causes two problems in the current code: 1) If a high-priority bound task and a low-priority unbounded task queue up behind the running task, we will fail to ever relocate the unbounded task because we terminate the search on the first unmovable task. 2) We spend precious futile cycles in the fast-path trying to pull overloaded tasks over. It is therefore optimial to strive to avoid the overhead all together if we can cheaply detect the condition before overload even occurs. This patch tries to achieve this optimization by utilizing the hamming weight of the task->cpus_allowed mask. A weight of 1 indicates that the task cannot be migrated. We will then utilize this information to skip non-migratable tasks and to eliminate uncessary rebalance attempts. We introduce a per-rq variable to count the number of migratable tasks that are currently running. We only go into overload if we have more than one rt task, AND at least one of them is migratable. In addition, we introduce a per-task variable to cache the cpus_allowed weight, since the hamming calculation is probably relatively expensive. We only update the cached value when the mask is updated which should be relatively infrequent, especially compared to scheduling frequency in the fast path. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-01-25 23:08:07 +03:00
dec_rt_prio_smp(rt_rq, prio, prev_prio);
}
#else
static inline void inc_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio) {}
static inline void dec_rt_prio(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, int prio) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP || CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
static void
inc_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
if (rt_se_boosted(rt_se))
rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted++;
if (rt_rq->tg)
start_rt_bandwidth(&rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth);
}
static void
dec_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
if (rt_se_boosted(rt_se))
rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted--;
WARN_ON(!rt_rq->rt_nr_running && rt_rq->rt_nr_boosted);
}
#else /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
static void
inc_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
start_rt_bandwidth(&def_rt_bandwidth);
}
static inline
void dec_rt_group(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
static inline
unsigned int rt_se_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
if (group_rq)
return group_rq->rt_nr_running;
else
return 1;
}
static inline
unsigned int rt_se_rr_nr_running(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
{
struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
struct task_struct *tsk;
if (group_rq)
return group_rq->rr_nr_running;
tsk = rt_task_of(rt_se);
return (tsk->policy == SCHED_RR) ? 1 : 0;
}
static inline
void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
int prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);
WARN_ON(!rt_prio(prio));
rt_rq->rt_nr_running += rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
rt_rq->rr_nr_running += rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
inc_rt_prio(rt_rq, prio);
inc_rt_migration(rt_se, rt_rq);
inc_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq);
}
static inline
void dec_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
WARN_ON(!rt_rq->rt_nr_running);
rt_rq->rt_nr_running -= rt_se_nr_running(rt_se);
rt_rq->rr_nr_running -= rt_se_rr_nr_running(rt_se);
dec_rt_prio(rt_rq, rt_se_prio(rt_se));
dec_rt_migration(rt_se, rt_rq);
dec_rt_group(rt_se, rt_rq);
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
/*
* Change rt_se->run_list location unless SAVE && !MOVE
*
* assumes ENQUEUE/DEQUEUE flags match
*/
static inline bool move_entity(unsigned int flags)
{
if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) == DEQUEUE_SAVE)
return false;
return true;
}
static void __delist_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_prio_array *array)
{
list_del_init(&rt_se->run_list);
if (list_empty(array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se)))
__clear_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
rt_se->on_list = 0;
}
static void __enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
struct rt_rq *group_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
sched: rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" regarding this commit: 45c01e824991b2dd0a332e19efc4901acb31209f I think we can do it simpler. Please take a look at the patch below. Instead of having 2 separate arrays (which is + ~800 bytes on x86_32 and twice so on x86_64), let's add "exclusive" (the ones that are bound to this CPU) tasks to the head of the queue and "shared" ones -- to the end. In case of a few newly woken up "exclusive" tasks, they are 'stacked' (not queued as now), meaning that a task {i+1} is being placed in front of the previously woken up task {i}. But I don't think that this behavior may cause any realistic problems. There are a couple of changes on top of this one. (1) in check_preempt_curr_rt() I don't think there is a need for the "pick_next_rt_entity(rq, &rq->rt) != &rq->curr->rt" check. enqueue_task_rt(p) and check_preempt_curr_rt() are always called one after another with rq->lock being held so the following check "p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1 && rq->curr->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1" should be enough (well, just its left part) to guarantee that 'p' has been queued in front of the 'curr'. (2) in set_cpus_allowed_rt() I don't thinks there is a need for requeue_task_rt() here. Perhaps, the only case when 'requeue' (+ reschedule) might be useful is as follows: i) weight == 1 && cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), *new_mask) i.e. a task is being bound to this CPU); ii) 'p' != rq->curr but here, 'p' has already been on this CPU for a while and was not migrated. i.e. it's possible that 'rq->curr' would not have high chances to be migrated right at this particular moment (although, has chance in a bit longer term), should we allow it to be preempted. Anyway, I think we should not perhaps make it more complex trying to address some rare corner cases. For instance, that's why a single queue approach would be preferable. Unless I'm missing something obvious, this approach gives us similar functionality at lower cost. Verified only compilation-wise. (Almost)-Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-06-11 02:58:30 +04:00
struct list_head *queue = array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se);
/*
* Don't enqueue the group if its throttled, or when empty.
* The latter is a consequence of the former when a child group
* get throttled and the current group doesn't have any other
* active members.
*/
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
if (group_rq && (rt_rq_throttled(group_rq) || !group_rq->rt_nr_running)) {
if (rt_se->on_list)
__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
return;
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
if (move_entity(flags)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(rt_se->on_list);
if (flags & ENQUEUE_HEAD)
list_add(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
else
list_add_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
__set_bit(rt_se_prio(rt_se), array->bitmap);
rt_se->on_list = 1;
}
rt_se->on_rq = 1;
inc_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
static void __dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
if (move_entity(flags)) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rt_se->on_list);
__delist_rt_entity(rt_se, array);
}
rt_se->on_rq = 0;
dec_rt_tasks(rt_se, rt_rq);
}
/*
* Because the prio of an upper entry depends on the lower
* entries, we must remove entries top - down.
*/
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
static void dequeue_rt_stack(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *back = NULL;
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
rt_se->back = back;
back = rt_se;
}
dequeue_top_rt_rq(rt_rq_of_se(back));
for (rt_se = back; rt_se; rt_se = rt_se->back) {
if (on_rt_rq(rt_se))
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
__dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
}
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
static void enqueue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
}
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
static void dequeue_rt_entity(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, unsigned int flags)
{
struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
dequeue_rt_stack(rt_se, flags);
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
if (rt_rq && rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
__enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
}
enqueue_top_rt_rq(&rq->rt);
}
/*
* Adding/removing a task to/from a priority array:
*/
static void
enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
rt_se->timeout = 0;
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
update_curr_rt(rq);
sched/rt: Fix PI handling vs. sched_setscheduler() Andrea Parri reported: > I found that the following scenario (with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y) is not > handled correctly: > > T1 (prio = 20) > lock(rtmutex); > > T2 (prio = 20) > blocks on rtmutex (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > T1 (prio = 20) > sys_set_scheduler(prio = 0) > [new_effective_prio == oldprio] > T1 prio = 20 (rt_nr_boosted = 0 on T1's rq) > > The last step is incorrect as T1 is now boosted (c.f., rt_se_boosted()); > in particular, if we continue with > > T1 (prio = 20) > unlock(rtmutex) > wakeup(T2) > adjust_prio(T1) > [prio != rt_mutex_getprio(T1)] > dequeue(T1) > rt_nr_boosted = (unsigned long)(-1) > ... > T1 prio = 0 > > then we end up leaving rt_nr_boosted in an "inconsistent" state. > > The simple program attached could reproduce the previous scenario; note > that, as a consequence of the presence of this state, the "assertion" > > WARN_ON(!rt_nr_running && rt_nr_boosted) > > from dec_rt_group() may trigger. So normally we dequeue/enqueue tasks in sched_setscheduler(), which would ensure the accounting stays correct. However in the early PI path we fail to do so. So this was introduced at around v3.14, by: c365c292d059 ("sched: Consider pi boosting in setscheduler()") which fixed another problem exactly because that dequeue/enqueue, joy. Fix this by teaching rt about DEQUEUE_SAVE/ENQUEUE_RESTORE and have it preserve runqueue location with that option. This requires decoupling the on_rt_rq() state from being on the list. In order to allow for explicit movement during the SAVE/RESTORE, introduce {DE,EN}QUEUE_MOVE. We still must use SAVE/RESTORE in these cases to preserve other invariants. Respecting the SAVE/RESTORE flags also has the (nice) side-effect that things like sys_nice()/sys_sched_setaffinity() also do not reorder FIFO tasks (whereas they used to before this patch). Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-01-18 17:27:07 +03:00
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se, flags);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
/*
* Put task to the head or the end of the run list without the overhead of
* dequeue followed by enqueue.
*/
static void
requeue_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, int head)
{
if (on_rt_rq(rt_se)) {
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
struct list_head *queue = array->queue + rt_se_prio(rt_se);
if (head)
list_move(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
else
list_move_tail(&rt_se->run_list, queue);
}
}
static void requeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int head)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
requeue_rt_entity(rt_rq, rt_se, head);
}
}
static void yield_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
requeue_task_rt(rq, rq->curr, 0);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task);
static int
select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
struct task_struct *curr;
struct rq *rq;
/* For anything but wake ups, just return the task_cpu */
if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE && sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_FORK)
goto out;
rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
rcu_read_lock();
curr = READ_ONCE(rq->curr); /* unlocked access */
/*
* If the current task on @p's runqueue is an RT task, then
* try to see if we can wake this RT task up on another
* runqueue. Otherwise simply start this RT task
* on its current runqueue.
*
sched: Try not to migrate higher priority RT tasks When first working on the RT scheduler design, we concentrated on keeping all CPUs running RT tasks instead of having multiple RT tasks on a single CPU waiting for the migration thread to move them. Instead we take a more proactive stance and push or pull RT tasks from one CPU to another on wakeup or scheduling. When an RT task wakes up on a CPU that is running another RT task, instead of preempting it and killing the cache of the running RT task, we look to see if we can migrate the RT task that is waking up, even if the RT task waking up is of higher priority. This may sound a bit odd, but RT tasks should be limited in migration by the user anyway. But in practice, people do not do this, which causes high prio RT tasks to bounce around the CPUs. This becomes even worse when we have priority inheritance, because a high prio task can block on a lower prio task and boost its priority. When the lower prio task wakes up the high prio task, if it happens to be on the same CPU it will migrate off of it. But in reality, the above does not happen much either, because the wake up of the lower prio task, which has already been boosted, if it was on the same CPU as the higher prio task, it would then migrate off of it. But anyway, we do not want to migrate them either. To examine the scheduling, I created a test program and examined it under kernelshark. The test program created CPU * 2 threads, where each thread had a different priority. The program takes different options. The options used in this change log was to have priority inheritance mutexes or not. All threads did the following loop: static void grab_lock(long id, int iter, int l) { ftrace_write("thread %ld iter %d, taking lock %d\n", id, iter, l); pthread_mutex_lock(&locks[l]); ftrace_write("thread %ld iter %d, took lock %d\n", id, iter, l); busy_loop(nr_tasks - id); ftrace_write("thread %ld iter %d, unlock lock %d\n", id, iter, l); pthread_mutex_unlock(&locks[l]); } void *start_task(void *id) { [...] while (!done) { for (l = 0; l < nr_locks; l++) { grab_lock(id, i, l); ftrace_write("thread %ld iter %d sleeping\n", id, i); ms_sleep(id); } i++; } [...] } The busy_loop(ms) keeps the CPU spinning for ms milliseconds. The ms_sleep(ms) sleeps for ms milliseconds. The ftrace_write() writes to the ftrace buffer to help analyze via ftrace. The higher the id, the higher the prio, the shorter it does the busy loop, but the longer it spins. This is usually the case with RT tasks, the lower priority tasks usually run longer than higher priority tasks. At the end of the test, it records the number of loops each thread took, as well as the number of voluntary preemptions, non-voluntary preemptions, and number of migrations each thread took, taking the information from /proc/$$/sched and /proc/$$/status. Running this on a 4 CPU processor, the results without changes to the kernel looked like this: Task vol nonvol migrated iterations ---- --- ------ -------- ---------- 0: 53 3220 1470 98 1: 562 773 724 98 2: 752 933 1375 98 3: 749 39 697 98 4: 758 5 515 98 5: 764 2 679 99 6: 761 2 535 99 7: 757 3 346 99 total: 5156 4977 6341 787 Each thread regardless of priority migrated a few hundred times. The higher priority tasks, were a little better but still took quite an impact. By letting higher priority tasks bump the lower prio task from the CPU, things changed a bit: Task vol nonvol migrated iterations ---- --- ------ -------- ---------- 0: 37 2835 1937 98 1: 666 1821 1865 98 2: 654 1003 1385 98 3: 664 635 973 99 4: 698 197 352 99 5: 703 101 159 99 6: 708 1 75 99 7: 713 1 2 99 total: 4843 6594 6748 789 The total # of migrations did not change (several runs showed the difference all within the noise). But we now see a dramatic improvement to the higher priority tasks. (kernelshark showed that the watchdog timer bumped the highest priority task to give it the 2 count. This was actually consistent with every run). Notice that the # of iterations did not change either. The above was with priority inheritance mutexes. That is, when the higher prority task blocked on a lower priority task, the lower priority task would inherit the higher priority task (which shows why task 6 was bumped so many times). When not using priority inheritance mutexes, the current kernel shows this: Task vol nonvol migrated iterations ---- --- ------ -------- ---------- 0: 56 3101 1892 95 1: 594 713 937 95 2: 625 188 618 95 3: 628 4 491 96 4: 640 7 468 96 5: 631 2 501 96 6: 641 1 466 96 7: 643 2 497 96 total: 4458 4018 5870 765 Not much changed with or without priority inheritance mutexes. But if we let the high priority task bump lower priority tasks on wakeup we see: Task vol nonvol migrated iterations ---- --- ------ -------- ---------- 0: 115 3439 2782 98 1: 633 1354 1583 99 2: 652 919 1218 99 3: 645 713 934 99 4: 690 3 3 99 5: 694 1 4 99 6: 720 3 4 99 7: 747 0 1 100 Which shows a even bigger change. The big difference between task 3 and task 4 is because we have only 4 CPUs on the machine, causing the 4 highest prio tasks to always have preference. Although I did not measure cache misses, and I'm sure there would be little to measure since the test was not data intensive, I could imagine large improvements for higher priority tasks when dealing with lower priority tasks. Thus, I'm satisfied with making the change and agreeing with what Gregory Haskins argued a few years ago when we first had this discussion. One final note. All tasks in the above tests were RT tasks. Any RT task will always preempt a non RT task that is running on the CPU the RT task wants to run on. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> LKML-Reference: <20100921024138.605460343@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2010-09-21 06:40:03 +04:00
* We want to avoid overloading runqueues. If the woken
* task is a higher priority, then it will stay on this CPU
* and the lower prio task should be moved to another CPU.
* Even though this will probably make the lower prio task
* lose its cache, we do not want to bounce a higher task
* around just because it gave up its CPU, perhaps for a
* lock?
*
* For equal prio tasks, we just let the scheduler sort it out.
*
* Otherwise, just let it ride on the affined RQ and the
* post-schedule router will push the preempted task away
*
* This test is optimistic, if we get it wrong the load-balancer
* will have to sort it out.
*/
if (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) &&
(curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
curr->prio <= p->prio)) {
int target = find_lowest_rq(p);
/*
* Don't bother moving it if the destination CPU is
* not running a lower priority task.
*/
if (target != -1 &&
p->prio < cpu_rq(target)->rt.highest_prio.curr)
cpu = target;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
out:
return cpu;
}
static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
/*
* Current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule,
* let's hope p can move out.
*/
if (rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 ||
!cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->curr, NULL))
return;
/*
* p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
* see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
*/
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1
&& cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, p, NULL))
return;
/*
* There appears to be other cpus that can accept
* current and none to run 'p', so lets reschedule
* to try and push current away:
*/
requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 1);
resched_curr(rq);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/*
* Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed:
*/
static void check_preempt_curr_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones Dmitry Adamushko pointed out a known flaw in the rt-balancing algorithm that could allow suboptimal balancing if a non-migratable task gets queued behind a running migratable one. It is discussed in this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 This issue has been further exacerbated by a recent checkin to sched-devel (git-id 5eee63a5ebc19a870ac40055c0be49457f3a89a3). >From a pure priority standpoint, the run-queue is doing the "right" thing. Using Dmitry's nomenclature, if T0 is on cpu1 first, and T1 wakes up at equal or lower priority (affined only to cpu1) later, it *should* wait for T0 to finish. However, in reality that is likely suboptimal from a system perspective if there are other cores that could allow T0 and T1 to run concurrently. Since T1 can not migrate, the only choice for higher concurrency is to try to move T0. This is not something we addessed in the recent rt-balancing re-work. This patch tries to enhance the balancing algorithm by accomodating this scenario. It accomplishes this by incorporating the migratability of a task into its priority calculation. Within a numerical tsk->prio, a non-migratable task is logically higher than a migratable one. We maintain this by introducing a new per-priority queue (xqueue, or exclusive-queue) for holding non-migratable tasks. The scheduler will draw from the xqueue over the standard shared-queue (squeue) when available. There are several details for utilizing this properly. 1) During task-wake-up, we not only need to check if the priority preempts the current task, but we also need to check for this non-migratable condition. Therefore, if a non-migratable task wakes up and sees an equal priority migratable task already running, it will attempt to preempt it *if* there is a likelyhood that the current task will find an immediate home. 2) Tasks only get this non-migratable "priority boost" on wake-up. Any requeuing will result in the non-migratable task being queued to the end of the shared queue. This is an attempt to prevent the system from being completely unfair to migratable tasks during things like SCHED_RR timeslicing. I am sure this patch introduces potentially "odd" behavior if you concoct a scenario where a bunch of non-migratable threads could starve migratable ones given the right pattern. I am not yet convinced that this is a problem since we are talking about tasks of equal RT priority anyway, and there never is much in the way of guarantees against starvation under that scenario anyway. (e.g. you could come up with a similar scenario with a specific timing environment verses an affinity environment). I can be convinced otherwise, but for now I think this is "ok". Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-12 23:20:41 +04:00
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio) {
resched_curr(rq);
sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones Dmitry Adamushko pointed out a known flaw in the rt-balancing algorithm that could allow suboptimal balancing if a non-migratable task gets queued behind a running migratable one. It is discussed in this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 This issue has been further exacerbated by a recent checkin to sched-devel (git-id 5eee63a5ebc19a870ac40055c0be49457f3a89a3). >From a pure priority standpoint, the run-queue is doing the "right" thing. Using Dmitry's nomenclature, if T0 is on cpu1 first, and T1 wakes up at equal or lower priority (affined only to cpu1) later, it *should* wait for T0 to finish. However, in reality that is likely suboptimal from a system perspective if there are other cores that could allow T0 and T1 to run concurrently. Since T1 can not migrate, the only choice for higher concurrency is to try to move T0. This is not something we addessed in the recent rt-balancing re-work. This patch tries to enhance the balancing algorithm by accomodating this scenario. It accomplishes this by incorporating the migratability of a task into its priority calculation. Within a numerical tsk->prio, a non-migratable task is logically higher than a migratable one. We maintain this by introducing a new per-priority queue (xqueue, or exclusive-queue) for holding non-migratable tasks. The scheduler will draw from the xqueue over the standard shared-queue (squeue) when available. There are several details for utilizing this properly. 1) During task-wake-up, we not only need to check if the priority preempts the current task, but we also need to check for this non-migratable condition. Therefore, if a non-migratable task wakes up and sees an equal priority migratable task already running, it will attempt to preempt it *if* there is a likelyhood that the current task will find an immediate home. 2) Tasks only get this non-migratable "priority boost" on wake-up. Any requeuing will result in the non-migratable task being queued to the end of the shared queue. This is an attempt to prevent the system from being completely unfair to migratable tasks during things like SCHED_RR timeslicing. I am sure this patch introduces potentially "odd" behavior if you concoct a scenario where a bunch of non-migratable threads could starve migratable ones given the right pattern. I am not yet convinced that this is a problem since we are talking about tasks of equal RT priority anyway, and there never is much in the way of guarantees against starvation under that scenario anyway. (e.g. you could come up with a similar scenario with a specific timing environment verses an affinity environment). I can be convinced otherwise, but for now I think this is "ok". Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-12 23:20:41 +04:00
return;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If:
*
* - the newly woken task is of equal priority to the current task
* - the newly woken task is non-migratable while current is migratable
* - current will be preempted on the next reschedule
*
* we should check to see if current can readily move to a different
* cpu. If so, we will reschedule to allow the push logic to try
* to move current somewhere else, making room for our non-migratable
* task.
*/
if (p->prio == rq->curr->prio && !test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
check_preempt_equal_prio(rq, p);
sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones Dmitry Adamushko pointed out a known flaw in the rt-balancing algorithm that could allow suboptimal balancing if a non-migratable task gets queued behind a running migratable one. It is discussed in this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/22/296 This issue has been further exacerbated by a recent checkin to sched-devel (git-id 5eee63a5ebc19a870ac40055c0be49457f3a89a3). >From a pure priority standpoint, the run-queue is doing the "right" thing. Using Dmitry's nomenclature, if T0 is on cpu1 first, and T1 wakes up at equal or lower priority (affined only to cpu1) later, it *should* wait for T0 to finish. However, in reality that is likely suboptimal from a system perspective if there are other cores that could allow T0 and T1 to run concurrently. Since T1 can not migrate, the only choice for higher concurrency is to try to move T0. This is not something we addessed in the recent rt-balancing re-work. This patch tries to enhance the balancing algorithm by accomodating this scenario. It accomplishes this by incorporating the migratability of a task into its priority calculation. Within a numerical tsk->prio, a non-migratable task is logically higher than a migratable one. We maintain this by introducing a new per-priority queue (xqueue, or exclusive-queue) for holding non-migratable tasks. The scheduler will draw from the xqueue over the standard shared-queue (squeue) when available. There are several details for utilizing this properly. 1) During task-wake-up, we not only need to check if the priority preempts the current task, but we also need to check for this non-migratable condition. Therefore, if a non-migratable task wakes up and sees an equal priority migratable task already running, it will attempt to preempt it *if* there is a likelyhood that the current task will find an immediate home. 2) Tasks only get this non-migratable "priority boost" on wake-up. Any requeuing will result in the non-migratable task being queued to the end of the shared queue. This is an attempt to prevent the system from being completely unfair to migratable tasks during things like SCHED_RR timeslicing. I am sure this patch introduces potentially "odd" behavior if you concoct a scenario where a bunch of non-migratable threads could starve migratable ones given the right pattern. I am not yet convinced that this is a problem since we are talking about tasks of equal RT priority anyway, and there never is much in the way of guarantees against starvation under that scenario anyway. (e.g. you could come up with a similar scenario with a specific timing environment verses an affinity environment). I can be convinced otherwise, but for now I think this is "ok". Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> CC: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-05-12 23:20:41 +04:00
#endif
}
static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rq *rq,
struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
struct rt_prio_array *array = &rt_rq->active;
struct sched_rt_entity *next = NULL;
struct list_head *queue;
int idx;
idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
queue = array->queue + idx;
next = list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
return next;
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se;
struct task_struct *p;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
do {
rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rq, rt_rq);
BUG_ON(!rt_se);
rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
} while (rt_rq);
p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
return p;
}
static struct task_struct *
pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
{
struct task_struct *p;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = &rq->rt;
if (need_pull_rt_task(rq, prev)) {
/*
* This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
* picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
* disabled avoiding further scheduler activity on it and we're
* being very careful to re-start the picking loop.
*/
rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
pull_rt_task(rq);
rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
/*
* pull_rt_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this
* means a dl or stop task can slip in, in which case we need
* to re-start task selection.
*/
if (unlikely((rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)) ||
rq->dl.dl_nr_running))
return RETRY_TASK;
}
/*
* We may dequeue prev's rt_rq in put_prev_task().
* So, we update time before rt_nr_running check.
*/
if (prev->sched_class == &rt_sched_class)
update_curr_rt(rq);
if (!rt_rq->rt_queued)
return NULL;
sched: Fix hotplug task migration Dan Carpenter reported: > kernel/sched/rt.c:1347 pick_next_task_rt() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'prev' (see line 1338) > kernel/sched/deadline.c:1011 pick_next_task_dl() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'prev' (see line 1005) Kirill also spotted that migrate_tasks() will have an instant NULL deref because pick_next_task() will immediately deref prev. Instead of fixing all the corner cases because migrate_tasks() can pass in a NULL prev task in the unlikely case of hot-un-plug, provide a fake task such that we can remove all the NULL checks from the far more common paths. A further problem; not previously spotted; is that because we pushed pre_schedule() and idle_balance() into pick_next_task() we now need to avoid those getting called and pulling more tasks on our dying CPU. We avoid pull_{dl,rt}_task() by setting fake_task.prio to MAX_PRIO+1. We also note that since we call pick_next_task() exactly the amount of times we have runnable tasks present, we should never land in idle_balance(). Fixes: 38033c37faab ("sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance()") Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140212094930.GB3545@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-02-12 13:49:30 +04:00
put_prev_task(rq, prev);
p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
queue_push_tasks(rq);
return p;
}
static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
update_curr_rt(rq);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
/*
* The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
* if it is still active
*/
if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* Only try algorithms three times */
#define RT_MAX_TRIES 3
static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
{
if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed))
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
* Return the highest pushable rq's task, which is suitable to be executed
* on the cpu, NULL otherwise
*/
static struct task_struct *pick_highest_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
{
struct plist_head *head = &rq->rt.pushable_tasks;
struct task_struct *p;
if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
return NULL;
plist_for_each_entry(p, head, pushable_tasks) {
if (pick_rt_task(rq, p, cpu))
return p;
}
return NULL;
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask);
static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
struct cpumask *lowest_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask);
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
int cpu = task_cpu(task);
/* Make sure the mask is initialized first */
if (unlikely(!lowest_mask))
return -1;
if (task->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return -1; /* No other targets possible */
if (!cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask))
return -1; /* No targets found */
/*
* At this point we have built a mask of cpus representing the
* lowest priority tasks in the system. Now we want to elect
* the best one based on our affinity and topology.
*
* We prioritize the last cpu that the task executed on since
* it is most likely cache-hot in that location.
*/
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, lowest_mask))
return cpu;
/*
* Otherwise, we consult the sched_domains span maps to figure
* out which cpu is logically closest to our hot cache data.
*/
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, lowest_mask))
this_cpu = -1; /* Skip this_cpu opt if not among lowest */
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
int best_cpu;
/*
* "this_cpu" is cheaper to preempt than a
* remote processor.
*/
if (this_cpu != -1 &&
cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return this_cpu;
}
best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
sched_domain_span(sd));
if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return best_cpu;
}
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* And finally, if there were no matches within the domains
* just give the caller *something* to work with from the compatible
* locations.
*/
if (this_cpu != -1)
return this_cpu;
cpu = cpumask_any(lowest_mask);
if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return cpu;
return -1;
}
/* Will lock the rq it finds */
static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
{
struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
int tries;
int cpu;
for (tries = 0; tries < RT_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
cpu = find_lowest_rq(task);
if ((cpu == -1) || (cpu == rq->cpu))
break;
lowest_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr <= task->prio) {
/*
* Target rq has tasks of equal or higher priority,
* retrying does not release any lock and is unlikely
* to yield a different result.
*/
lowest_rq = NULL;
break;
}
/* if the prio of this runqueue changed, try again */
if (double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq)) {
/*
* We had to unlock the run queue. In
* the mean time, task could have
* migrated already or had its affinity changed.
* Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq.
*/
if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq ||
!cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu, &task->cpus_allowed) ||
task_running(rq, task) ||
!rt_task(task) ||
!task_on_rq_queued(task))) {
double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
lowest_rq = NULL;
break;
}
}
/* If this rq is still suitable use it. */
if (lowest_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > task->prio)
break;
/* try again */
double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
lowest_rq = NULL;
}
return lowest_rq;
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_task(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *p;
if (!has_pushable_tasks(rq))
return NULL;
p = plist_first_entry(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks,
struct task_struct, pushable_tasks);
BUG_ON(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p));
BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p));
BUG_ON(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
BUG_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
BUG_ON(!rt_task(p));
return p;
}
/*
* If the current CPU has more than one RT task, see if the non
* running task can migrate over to a CPU that is running a task
* of lesser priority.
*/
static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *next_task;
struct rq *lowest_rq;
int ret = 0;
if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
return 0;
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
next_task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
if (!next_task)
return 0;
retry:
if (unlikely(next_task == rq->curr)) {
WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
/*
* It's possible that the next_task slipped in of
* higher priority than current. If that's the case
* just reschedule current.
*/
if (unlikely(next_task->prio < rq->curr->prio)) {
resched_curr(rq);
return 0;
}
/* We might release rq lock */
get_task_struct(next_task);
/* find_lock_lowest_rq locks the rq if found */
lowest_rq = find_lock_lowest_rq(next_task, rq);
if (!lowest_rq) {
struct task_struct *task;
/*
* find_lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
* so it is possible that next_task has migrated.
*
* We need to make sure that the task is still on the same
* run-queue and is also still the next task eligible for
* pushing.
*/
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
/*
* The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
* eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
* to push it to. Do not retry in this case, since
* other cpus will pull from us when ready.
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
*/
goto out;
}
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
if (!task)
/* No more tasks, just exit */
goto out;
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
/*
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
* Something has shifted, try again.
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
*/
RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly A panic was discovered by Chirag Jog where a BUG_ON sanity check in the new "pushable_task" logic would trigger a panic under certain circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/25/189 Gilles Carry discovered that the root cause was attributed to the pushable_tasks list getting corrupted in the push_rt_task logic. This was the result of a dropped rq lock in double_lock_balance allowing a task in the process of being pushed to potentially migrate away, and thus corrupt the pushable_tasks() list. I traced back the problem as introduced by the pushable_tasks patch that went in recently. There is a "retry" path in push_rt_task() that actually had a compound conditional to decide whether to retry or exit. I missed the meaning behind the rationale for the virtual "if(!task) goto out;" portion of the compound statement and thus did not handle it properly. The new pushable_tasks logic actually creates three distinct conditions: 1) an untouched and unpushable task should be dequeued 2) a migrated task where more pushable tasks remain should be retried 3) a migrated task where no more pushable tasks exist should exit The original logic mushed (1) and (3) together, resulting in the system dequeuing a migrated task (against an unlocked foreign run-queue nonetheless). To fix this, we get rid of the notion of "paranoid" and we support the three unique conditions properly. The paranoid feature is no longer relevant with the new pushable logic (since pushable naturally limits the loop) anyway, so lets just remove it. Reported-By: Chirag Jog <chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Found-by: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
put_task_struct(next_task);
next_task = task;
goto retry;
}
deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
ret = 1;
resched_curr(lowest_rq);
double_unlock_balance(rq, lowest_rq);
out:
put_task_struct(next_task);
return ret;
}
static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
/* push_rt_task will return true if it moved an RT */
while (push_rt_task(rq))
;
}
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
#ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI
/*
* The search for the next cpu always starts at rq->cpu and ends
* when we reach rq->cpu again. It will never return rq->cpu.
* This returns the next cpu to check, or nr_cpu_ids if the loop
* is complete.
*
* rq->rt.push_cpu holds the last cpu returned by this function,
* or if this is the first instance, it must hold rq->cpu.
*/
static int rto_next_cpu(struct rq *rq)
{
int prev_cpu = rq->rt.push_cpu;
int cpu;
cpu = cpumask_next(prev_cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
/*
* If the previous cpu is less than the rq's CPU, then it already
* passed the end of the mask, and has started from the beginning.
* We end if the next CPU is greater or equal to rq's CPU.
*/
if (prev_cpu < rq->cpu) {
if (cpu >= rq->cpu)
return nr_cpu_ids;
} else if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
/*
* We passed the end of the mask, start at the beginning.
* If the result is greater or equal to the rq's CPU, then
* the loop is finished.
*/
cpu = cpumask_first(rq->rd->rto_mask);
if (cpu >= rq->cpu)
return nr_cpu_ids;
}
rq->rt.push_cpu = cpu;
/* Return cpu to let the caller know if the loop is finished or not */
return cpu;
}
static int find_next_push_cpu(struct rq *rq)
{
struct rq *next_rq;
int cpu;
while (1) {
cpu = rto_next_cpu(rq);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
break;
next_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
/* Make sure the next rq can push to this rq */
if (next_rq->rt.highest_prio.next < rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
break;
}
return cpu;
}
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING 1
#define RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART 2
/*
* When a high priority task schedules out from a CPU and a lower priority
* task is scheduled in, a check is made to see if there's any RT tasks
* on other CPUs that are waiting to run because a higher priority RT task
* is currently running on its CPU. In this case, the CPU with multiple RT
* tasks queued on it (overloaded) needs to be notified that a CPU has opened
* up that may be able to run one of its non-running queued RT tasks.
*
* On large CPU boxes, there's the case that several CPUs could schedule
* a lower priority task at the same time, in which case it will look for
* any overloaded CPUs that it could pull a task from. To do this, the runqueue
* lock must be taken from that overloaded CPU. Having 10s of CPUs all fighting
* for a single overloaded CPU's runqueue lock can produce a large latency.
* (This has actually been observed on large boxes running cyclictest).
* Instead of taking the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, each of the
* CPUs that scheduled a lower priority task simply sends an IPI to the
* overloaded CPU. An IPI is much cheaper than taking an runqueue lock with
* lots of contention. The overloaded CPU will look to push its non-running
* RT task off, and if it does, it can then ignore the other IPIs coming
* in, and just pass those IPIs off to any other overloaded CPU.
*
* When a CPU schedules a lower priority task, it only sends an IPI to
* the "next" CPU that has overloaded RT tasks. This prevents IPI storms,
* as having 10 CPUs scheduling lower priority tasks and 10 CPUs with
* RT overloaded tasks, would cause 100 IPIs to go out at once.
*
* The overloaded RT CPU, when receiving an IPI, will try to push off its
* overloaded RT tasks and then send an IPI to the next CPU that has
* overloaded RT tasks. This stops when all CPUs with overloaded RT tasks
* have completed. Just because a CPU may have pushed off its own overloaded
* RT task does not mean it should stop sending the IPI around to other
* overloaded CPUs. There may be another RT task waiting to run on one of
* those CPUs that are of higher priority than the one that was just
* pushed.
*
* An optimization that could possibly be made is to make a CPU array similar
* to the cpupri array mask of all running RT tasks, but for the overloaded
* case, then the IPI could be sent to only the CPU with the highest priority
* RT task waiting, and that CPU could send off further IPIs to the CPU with
* the next highest waiting task. Since the overloaded case is much less likely
* to happen, the complexity of this implementation may not be worth it.
* Instead, just send an IPI around to all overloaded CPUs.
*
* The rq->rt.push_flags holds the status of the IPI that is going around.
* A run queue can only send out a single IPI at a time. The possible flags
* for rq->rt.push_flags are:
*
* (None or zero): No IPI is going around for the current rq
* RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING: An IPI for the rq is being passed around
* RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART: The priority of the running task for the rq
* has changed, and the IPI should restart
* circulating the overloaded CPUs again.
*
* rq->rt.push_cpu contains the CPU that is being sent the IPI. It is updated
* before sending to the next CPU.
*
* Instead of having all CPUs that schedule a lower priority task send
* an IPI to the same "first" CPU in the RT overload mask, they send it
* to the next overloaded CPU after their own CPU. This helps distribute
* the work when there's more than one overloaded CPU and multiple CPUs
* scheduling in lower priority tasks.
*
* When a rq schedules a lower priority task than what was currently
* running, the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks is examined first.
* That is, if CPU 1 and 5 are overloaded, and CPU 3 schedules a lower
* priority task, it will send an IPI first to CPU 5, then CPU 5 will
* send to CPU 1 if it is still overloaded. CPU 1 will clear the
* rq->rt.push_flags if RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART is not set.
*
* The first CPU to notice IPI_RESTART is set, will clear that flag and then
* send an IPI to the next overloaded CPU after the rq->cpu and not the next
* CPU after push_cpu. That is, if CPU 1, 4 and 5 are overloaded when CPU 3
* schedules a lower priority task, and the IPI_RESTART gets set while the
* handling is being done on CPU 5, it will clear the flag and send it back to
* CPU 4 instead of CPU 1.
*
* Note, the above logic can be disabled by turning off the sched_feature
* RT_PUSH_IPI. Then the rq lock of the overloaded CPU will simply be
* taken by the CPU requesting a pull and the waiting RT task will be pulled
* by that CPU. This may be fine for machines with few CPUs.
*/
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
static void tell_cpu_to_push(struct rq *rq)
{
int cpu;
if (rq->rt.push_flags & RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING) {
raw_spin_lock(&rq->rt.push_lock);
/* Make sure it's still executing */
if (rq->rt.push_flags & RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING) {
/*
* Tell the IPI to restart the loop as things have
* changed since it started.
*/
rq->rt.push_flags |= RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART;
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->rt.push_lock);
return;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->rt.push_lock);
}
/* When here, there's no IPI going around */
rq->rt.push_cpu = rq->cpu;
cpu = find_next_push_cpu(rq);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return;
rq->rt.push_flags = RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING;
irq_work_queue_on(&rq->rt.push_work, cpu);
}
/* Called from hardirq context */
static void try_to_push_tasks(void *arg)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = arg;
struct rq *rq, *src_rq;
int this_cpu;
int cpu;
this_cpu = rt_rq->push_cpu;
/* Paranoid check */
BUG_ON(this_cpu != smp_processor_id());
rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu);
src_rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
again:
if (has_pushable_tasks(rq)) {
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
push_rt_task(rq);
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
}
/* Pass the IPI to the next rt overloaded queue */
raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->push_lock);
/*
* If the source queue changed since the IPI went out,
* we need to restart the search from that CPU again.
*/
if (rt_rq->push_flags & RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART) {
rt_rq->push_flags &= ~RT_PUSH_IPI_RESTART;
rt_rq->push_cpu = src_rq->cpu;
}
cpu = find_next_push_cpu(src_rq);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
rt_rq->push_flags &= ~RT_PUSH_IPI_EXECUTING;
raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->push_lock);
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return;
/*
* It is possible that a restart caused this CPU to be
* chosen again. Don't bother with an IPI, just see if we
* have more to push.
*/
if (unlikely(cpu == rq->cpu))
goto again;
/* Try the next RT overloaded CPU */
irq_work_queue_on(&rt_rq->push_work, cpu);
}
static void push_irq_work_func(struct irq_work *work)
{
struct rt_rq *rt_rq = container_of(work, struct rt_rq, push_work);
try_to_push_tasks(rt_rq);
}
#endif /* HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI */
static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
{
int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu, cpu;
bool resched = false;
struct task_struct *p;
struct rq *src_rq;
if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
return;
/*
* Match the barrier from rt_set_overloaded; this guarantees that if we
* see overloaded we must also see the rto_mask bit.
*/
smp_rmb();
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
#ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI
if (sched_feat(RT_PUSH_IPI)) {
tell_cpu_to_push(this_rq);
return;
sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling When debugging the latencies on a 40 core box, where we hit 300 to 500 microsecond latencies, I found there was a huge contention on the runqueue locks. Investigating it further, running ftrace, I found that it was due to the pulling of RT tasks. The test that was run was the following: cyclictest --numa -p95 -m -d0 -i100 This created a thread on each CPU, that would set its wakeup in iterations of 100 microseconds. The -d0 means that all the threads had the same interval (100us). Each thread sleeps for 100us and wakes up and measures its latencies. cyclictest is maintained at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git What happened was another RT task would be scheduled on one of the CPUs that was running our test, when the other CPU tests went to sleep and scheduled idle. This caused the "pull" operation to execute on all these CPUs. Each one of these saw the RT task that was overloaded on the CPU of the test that was still running, and each one tried to grab that task in a thundering herd way. To grab the task, each thread would do a double rq lock grab, grabbing its own lock as well as the rq of the overloaded CPU. As the sched domains on this box was rather flat for its size, I saw up to 12 CPUs block on this lock at once. This caused a ripple affect with the rq locks especially since the taking was done via a double rq lock, which means that several of the CPUs had their own rq locks held while trying to take this rq lock. As these locks were blocked, any wakeups or load balanceing on these CPUs would also block on these locks, and the wait time escalated. I've tried various methods to lessen the load, but things like an atomic counter to only let one CPU grab the task wont work, because the task may have a limited affinity, and we may pick the wrong CPU to take that lock and do the pull, to only find out that the CPU we picked isn't in the task's affinity. Instead of doing the PULL, I now have the CPUs that want the pull to send over an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and let that CPU pick what CPU to push the task to. No more need to grab the rq lock, and the push/pull algorithm still works fine. With this patch, the latency dropped to just 150us over a 20 hour run. Without the patch, the huge latencies would trigger in seconds. I've created a new sched feature called RT_PUSH_IPI, which is enabled by default. When RT_PUSH_IPI is not enabled, the old method of grabbing the rq locks and having the pulling CPU do the work is implemented. When RT_PUSH_IPI is enabled, the IPI is sent to the overloaded CPU to do a push. To enabled or disable this at run time: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features or # echo NO_RT_PUSH_IPI > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features Update: This original patch would send an IPI to all CPUs in the RT overload list. But that could theoretically cause the reverse issue. That is, there could be lots of overloaded RT queues and one CPU lowers its priority. It would then send an IPI to all the overloaded RT queues and they could then all try to grab the rq lock of the CPU lowering its priority, and then we have the same problem. The latest design sends out only one IPI to the first overloaded CPU. It tries to push any tasks that it can, and then looks for the next overloaded CPU that can push to the source CPU. The IPIs stop when all overloaded CPUs that have pushable tasks that have priorities greater than the source CPU are covered. In case the source CPU lowers its priority again, a flag is set to tell the IPI traversal to restart with the first RT overloaded CPU after the source CPU. Parts-suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Joern Engel <joern@purestorage.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150318144946.2f3cc982@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-03-18 21:49:46 +03:00
}
#endif
for_each_cpu(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
if (this_cpu == cpu)
continue;
src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
/*
* Don't bother taking the src_rq->lock if the next highest
* task is known to be lower-priority than our current task.
* This may look racy, but if this value is about to go
* logically higher, the src_rq will push this task away.
* And if its going logically lower, we do not care
*/
if (src_rq->rt.highest_prio.next >=
this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
continue;
/*
* We can potentially drop this_rq's lock in
* double_lock_balance, and another CPU could
* alter this_rq
*/
double_lock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
/*
* We can pull only a task, which is pushable
* on its rq, and no others.
*/
p = pick_highest_pushable_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
/*
* Do we have an RT task that preempts
* the to-be-scheduled task?
*/
if (p && (p->prio < this_rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)) {
WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr);
WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
/*
* There's a chance that p is higher in priority
* than what's currently running on its cpu.
* This is just that p is wakeing up and hasn't
* had a chance to schedule. We only pull
* p if it is lower in priority than the
* current task on the run queue
*/
if (p->prio < src_rq->curr->prio)
goto skip;
resched = true;
deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
/*
* We continue with the search, just in
* case there's an even higher prio task
* in another runqueue. (low likelihood
* but possible)
*/
}
skip:
double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
}
if (resched)
resched_curr(this_rq);
}
/*
* If we are not running and we are not going to reschedule soon, we should
* try to push tasks away now
*/
static void task_woken_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
!test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr) &&
p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
sched/deadline: Add SCHED_DEADLINE SMP-related data structures & logic Introduces data structures relevant for implementing dynamic migration of -deadline tasks and the logic for checking if runqueues are overloaded with -deadline tasks and for choosing where a task should migrate, when it is the case. Adds also dynamic migrations to SCHED_DEADLINE, so that tasks can be moved among CPUs when necessary. It is also possible to bind a task to a (set of) CPU(s), thus restricting its capability of migrating, or forbidding migrations at all. The very same approach used in sched_rt is utilised: - -deadline tasks are kept into CPU-specific runqueues, - -deadline tasks are migrated among runqueues to achieve the following: * on an M-CPU system the M earliest deadline ready tasks are always running; * affinity/cpusets settings of all the -deadline tasks is always respected. Therefore, this very special form of "load balancing" is done with an active method, i.e., the scheduler pushes or pulls tasks between runqueues when they are woken up and/or (de)scheduled. IOW, every time a preemption occurs, the descheduled task might be sent to some other CPU (depending on its deadline) to continue executing (push). On the other hand, every time a CPU becomes idle, it might pull the second earliest deadline ready task from some other CPU. To enforce this, a pull operation is always attempted before taking any scheduling decision (pre_schedule()), as well as a push one after each scheduling decision (post_schedule()). In addition, when a task arrives or wakes up, the best CPU where to resume it is selected taking into account its affinity mask, the system topology, but also its deadline. E.g., from the scheduling point of view, the best CPU where to wake up (and also where to push) a task is the one which is running the task with the latest deadline among the M executing ones. In order to facilitate these decisions, per-runqueue "caching" of the deadlines of the currently running and of the first ready task is used. Queued but not running tasks are also parked in another rb-tree to speed-up pushes. Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-07 17:43:38 +04:00
(dl_task(rq->curr) || rt_task(rq->curr)) &&
(rq->curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 ||
rq->curr->prio <= p->prio))
push_rt_tasks(rq);
}
/* Assumes rq->lock is held */
static void rq_online_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_set_overload(rq);
__enable_runtime(rq);
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio.curr);
}
/* Assumes rq->lock is held */
static void rq_offline_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
if (rq->rt.overloaded)
rt_clear_overload(rq);
__disable_runtime(rq);
cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_INVALID);
}
/*
* When switch from the rt queue, we bring ourselves to a position
* that we might want to pull RT tasks from other runqueues.
*/
static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
/*
* If there are other RT tasks then we will reschedule
* and the scheduling of the other RT tasks will handle
* the balancing. But if we are the last RT task
* we may need to handle the pulling of RT tasks
* now.
*/
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
return;
queue_pull_task(rq);
}
void __init init_sched_rt_class(void)
{
unsigned int i;
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(local_cpu_mask, i),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
}
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
/*
* When switching a task to RT, we may overload the runqueue
* with RT tasks. In this case we try to push them off to
* other runqueues.
*/
static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
/*
* If we are already running, then there's nothing
* that needs to be done. But if we are not running
* we may need to preempt the current running task.
* If that current running task is also an RT task
* then see if we can move to another run queue.
*/
if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && rq->curr != p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && rq->rt.overloaded)
queue_push_tasks(rq);
sched/rt: Add a missing rescheduling point Since the change in commit: fd7a4bed1835 ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks") ... we don't reschedule a task under certain circumstances: Lets say task-A, SCHED_OTHER, is running on CPU0 (and it may run only on CPU0) and holds a PI lock. This task is removed from the CPU because it used up its time slice and another SCHED_OTHER task is running. Task-B on CPU1 runs at RT priority and asks for the lock owned by task-A. This results in a priority boost for task-A. Task-B goes to sleep until the lock has been made available. Task-A is already runnable (but not active), so it receives no wake up. The reality now is that task-A gets on the CPU once the scheduler decides to remove the current task despite the fact that a high priority task is enqueued and waiting. This may take a long time. The desired behaviour is that CPU0 immediately reschedules after the priority boost which made task-A the task with the lowest priority. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: fd7a4bed1835 ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170124144006.29821-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-01-24 17:40:06 +03:00
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_curr(rq);
}
}
/*
* Priority of the task has changed. This may cause
* us to initiate a push or pull.
*/
static void
prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
{
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
return;
if (rq->curr == p) {
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* If our priority decreases while running, we
* may need to pull tasks to this runqueue.
*/
if (oldprio < p->prio)
queue_pull_task(rq);
/*
* If there's a higher priority task waiting to run
* then reschedule.
*/
if (p->prio > rq->rt.highest_prio.curr)
resched_curr(rq);
#else
/* For UP simply resched on drop of prio */
if (oldprio < p->prio)
resched_curr(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
} else {
/*
* This task is not running, but if it is
* greater than the current running task
* then reschedule.
*/
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_curr(rq);
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
static void watchdog(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned long soft, hard;
/* max may change after cur was read, this will be fixed next tick */
soft = task_rlimit(p, RLIMIT_RTTIME);
hard = task_rlimit_max(p, RLIMIT_RTTIME);
if (soft != RLIM_INFINITY) {
unsigned long next;
sched/rt: Avoid updating RT entry timeout twice within one tick period The issue below was found in 2.6.34-rt rather than mainline rt kernel, but the issue still exists upstream as well. So please let me describe how it was noticed on 2.6.34-rt: On this version, each softirq has its own thread, it means there is at least one RT FIFO task per cpu. The priority of these tasks is set to 49 by default. If user launches an RT FIFO task with priority lower than 49 of softirq RT tasks, it's possible there are two RT FIFO tasks enqueued one cpu runqueue at one moment. By current strategy of balancing RT tasks, when it comes to RT tasks, we really need to put them off to a CPU that they can run on as soon as possible. Even if it means a bit of cache line flushing, we want RT tasks to be run with the least latency. When the user RT FIFO task which just launched before is running, the sched timer tick of the current cpu happens. In this tick period, the timeout value of the user RT task will be updated once. Subsequently, we try to wake up one softirq RT task on its local cpu. As the priority of current user RT task is lower than the softirq RT task, the current task will be preempted by the higher priority softirq RT task. Before preemption, we check to see if current can readily move to a different cpu. If so, we will reschedule to allow the RT push logic to try to move current somewhere else. Whenever the woken softirq RT task runs, it first tries to migrate the user FIFO RT task over to a cpu that is running a task of lesser priority. If migration is done, it will send a reschedule request to the found cpu by IPI interrupt. Once the target cpu responds the IPI interrupt, it will pick the migrated user RT task to preempt its current task. When the user RT task is running on the new cpu, the sched timer tick of the cpu fires. So it will tick the user RT task again. This also means the RT task timeout value will be updated again. As the migration may be done in one tick period, it means the user RT task timeout value will be updated twice within one tick. If we set a limit on the amount of cpu time for the user RT task by setrlimit(RLIMIT_RTTIME), the SIGXCPU signal should be posted upon reaching the soft limit. But exactly when the SIGXCPU signal should be sent depends on the RT task timeout value. In fact the timeout mechanism of sending the SIGXCPU signal assumes the RT task timeout is increased once every tick. However, currently the timeout value may be added twice per tick. So it results in the SIGXCPU signal being sent earlier than expected. To solve this issue, we prevent the timeout value from increasing twice within one tick time by remembering the jiffies value of last updating the timeout. As long as the RT task's jiffies is different with the global jiffies value, we allow its timeout to be updated. Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342508623-2887-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-07-17 11:03:43 +04:00
if (p->rt.watchdog_stamp != jiffies) {
p->rt.timeout++;
p->rt.watchdog_stamp = jiffies;
}
next = DIV_ROUND_UP(min(soft, hard), USEC_PER_SEC/HZ);
if (p->rt.timeout > next)
timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Overview This patch reworks the handling of POSIX CPU timers, including the ITIMER_PROF, ITIMER_VIRT timers and rlimit handling. It was put together with the help of Roland McGrath, the owner and original writer of this code. The problem we ran into, and the reason for this rework, has to do with using a profiling timer in a process with a large number of threads. It appears that the performance of the old implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() was at least O(n*3) (where "n" is the number of threads in a process) or worse. Everything is fine with an increasing number of threads until the time taken for that routine to run becomes the same as or greater than the tick time, at which point things degrade rather quickly. This patch fixes bug 9906, "Weird hang with NPTL and SIGPROF." Code Changes This rework corrects the implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() to make it run in constant time for a particular machine. (Performance may vary between one machine and another depending upon whether the kernel is built as single- or multiprocessor and, in the latter case, depending upon the number of running processors.) To do this, at each tick we now update fields in signal_struct as well as task_struct. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function uses those fields to make its decisions. We define a new structure, "task_cputime," to contain user, system and scheduler times and use these in appropriate places: struct task_cputime { cputime_t utime; cputime_t stime; unsigned long long sum_exec_runtime; }; This is included in the structure "thread_group_cputime," which is a new substructure of signal_struct and which varies for uniprocessor versus multiprocessor kernels. For uniprocessor kernels, it uses "task_cputime" as a simple substructure, while for multiprocessor kernels it is a pointer: struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime totals; }; struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime *totals; }; We also add a new task_cputime substructure directly to signal_struct, to cache the earliest expiration of process-wide timers, and task_cputime also replaces the it_*_expires fields of task_struct (used for earliest expiration of thread timers). The "thread_group_cputime" structure contains process-wide timers that are updated via account_user_time() and friends. In the non-SMP case the structure is a simple aggregator; unfortunately in the SMP case that simplicity was not achievable due to cache-line contention between CPUs (in one measured case performance was actually _worse_ on a 16-cpu system than the same test on a 4-cpu system, due to this contention). For SMP, the thread_group_cputime counters are maintained as a per-cpu structure allocated using alloc_percpu(). The timer functions update only the timer field in the structure corresponding to the running CPU, obtained using per_cpu_ptr(). We define a set of inline functions in sched.h that we use to maintain the thread_group_cputime structure and hide the differences between UP and SMP implementations from the rest of the kernel. The thread_group_cputime_init() function initializes the thread_group_cputime structure for the given task. The thread_group_cputime_alloc() is a no-op for UP; for SMP it calls the out-of-line function thread_group_cputime_alloc_smp() to allocate and fill in the per-cpu structures and fields. The thread_group_cputime_free() function, also a no-op for UP, in SMP frees the per-cpu structures. The thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() function (also a UP no-op) for SMP calls thread_group_cputime_alloc() if the per-cpu structures haven't yet been allocated. The thread_group_cputime() function fills the task_cputime structure it is passed with the contents of the thread_group_cputime fields; in UP it's that simple but in SMP it must also safely check that tsk->signal is non-NULL (if it is it just uses the appropriate fields of task_struct) and, if so, sums the per-cpu values for each online CPU. Finally, the three functions account_group_user_time(), account_group_system_time() and account_group_exec_runtime() are used by timer functions to update the respective fields of the thread_group_cputime structure. Non-SMP operation is trivial and will not be mentioned further. The per-cpu structure is always allocated when a task creates its first new thread, via a call to thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() from copy_signal(). It is freed at process exit via a call to thread_group_cputime_free() from cleanup_signal(). All functions that formerly summed utime/stime/sum_sched_runtime values from from all threads in the thread group now use thread_group_cputime() to snapshot the values in the thread_group_cputime structure or the values in the task structure itself if the per-cpu structure hasn't been allocated. Finally, the code in kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c has changed quite a bit. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function has been split into a fast path and a slow path; the former safely checks whether there are any expired thread timers and, if not, just returns, while the slow path does the heavy lifting. With the dedicated thread group fields, timers are no longer "rebalanced" and the process_timer_rebalance() function and related code has gone away. All summing loops are gone and all code that used them now uses the thread_group_cputime() inline. When process-wide timers are set, the new task_cputime structure in signal_struct is used to cache the earliest expiration; this is checked in the fast path. Performance The fix appears not to add significant overhead to existing operations. It generally performs the same as the current code except in two cases, one in which it performs slightly worse (Case 5 below) and one in which it performs very significantly better (Case 2 below). Overall it's a wash except in those two cases. I've since done somewhat more involved testing on a dual-core Opteron system. Case 1: With no itimer running, for a test with 100,000 threads, the fixed kernel took 1428.5 seconds, 513 seconds more than the unfixed system, all of which was spent in the system. There were twice as many voluntary context switches with the fix as without it. Case 2: With an itimer running at .01 second ticks and 4000 threads (the most an unmodified kernel can handle), the fixed kernel ran the test in eight percent of the time (5.8 seconds as opposed to 70 seconds) and had better tick accuracy (.012 seconds per tick as opposed to .023 seconds per tick). Case 3: A 4000-thread test with an initial timer tick of .01 second and an interval of 10,000 seconds (i.e. a timer that ticks only once) had very nearly the same performance in both cases: 6.3 seconds elapsed for the fixed kernel versus 5.5 seconds for the unfixed kernel. With fewer threads (eight in these tests), the Case 1 test ran in essentially the same time on both the modified and unmodified kernels (5.2 seconds versus 5.8 seconds). The Case 2 test ran in about the same time as well, 5.9 seconds versus 5.4 seconds but again with much better tick accuracy, .013 seconds per tick versus .025 seconds per tick for the unmodified kernel. Since the fix affected the rlimit code, I also tested soft and hard CPU limits. Case 4: With a hard CPU limit of 20 seconds and eight threads (and an itimer running), the modified kernel was very slightly favored in that while it killed the process in 19.997 seconds of CPU time (5.002 seconds of wall time), only .003 seconds of that was system time, the rest was user time. The unmodified kernel killed the process in 20.001 seconds of CPU (5.014 seconds of wall time) of which .016 seconds was system time. Really, though, the results were too close to call. The results were essentially the same with no itimer running. Case 5: With a soft limit of 20 seconds and a hard limit of 2000 seconds (where the hard limit would never be reached) and an itimer running, the modified kernel exhibited worse tick accuracy than the unmodified kernel: .050 seconds/tick versus .028 seconds/tick. Otherwise, performance was almost indistinguishable. With no itimer running this test exhibited virtually identical behavior and times in both cases. In times past I did some limited performance testing. those results are below. On a four-cpu Opteron system without this fix, a sixteen-thread test executed in 3569.991 seconds, of which user was 3568.435s and system was 1.556s. On the same system with the fix, user and elapsed time were about the same, but system time dropped to 0.007 seconds. Performance with eight, four and one thread were comparable. Interestingly, the timer ticks with the fix seemed more accurate: The sixteen-thread test with the fix received 149543 ticks for 0.024 seconds per tick, while the same test without the fix received 58720 for 0.061 seconds per tick. Both cases were configured for an interval of 0.01 seconds. Again, the other tests were comparable. Each thread in this test computed the primes up to 25,000,000. I also did a test with a large number of threads, 100,000 threads, which is impossible without the fix. In this case each thread computed the primes only up to 10,000 (to make the runtime manageable). System time dominated, at 1546.968 seconds out of a total 2176.906 seconds (giving a user time of 629.938s). It received 147651 ticks for 0.015 seconds per tick, still quite accurate. There is obviously no comparable test without the fix. Signed-off-by: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-12 20:54:39 +04:00
p->cputime_expires.sched_exp = p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
}
}
#else
static inline void watchdog(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
#endif
static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued)
{
struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se = &p->rt;
update_curr_rt(rq);
watchdog(rq, p);
/*
* RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management.
* FIFO tasks have no timeslices.
*/
if (p->policy != SCHED_RR)
return;
if (--p->rt.time_slice)
return;
p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice;
/*
* Requeue to the end of queue if we (and all of our ancestors) are not
* the only element on the queue
*/
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
if (rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next) {
requeue_task_rt(rq, p, 0);
resched_curr(rq);
return;
}
}
}
static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *p = rq->curr;
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt The RT scheduler employs a "push/pull" design to actively balance tasks within the system (on a per disjoint cpuset basis). When a task is awoken, it is immediately determined if there are any lower priority cpus which should be preempted. This is opposed to the way normal SCHED_OTHER tasks behave, which will wait for a periodic rebalancing operation to occur before spreading out load. When a particular RQ has more than 1 active RT task, it is said to be in an "overloaded" state. Once this occurs, the system enters the active balancing mode, where it will try to push the task away, or persuade a different cpu to pull it over. The system will stay in this state until the system falls back below the <= 1 queued RT task per RQ. However, the current implementation suffers from a limitation in the push logic. Once overloaded, all tasks (other than current) on the RQ are analyzed on every push operation, even if it was previously unpushable (due to affinity, etc). Whats more, the operation stops at the first task that is unpushable and will not look at items lower in the queue. This causes two problems: 1) We can have the same tasks analyzed over and over again during each push, which extends out the fast path in the scheduler for no gain. Consider a RQ that has dozens of tasks that are bound to a core. Each one of those tasks will be encountered and skipped for each push operation while they are queued. 2) There may be lower-priority tasks under the unpushable task that could have been successfully pushed, but will never be considered until either the unpushable task is cleared, or a pull operation succeeds. The net result is a potential latency source for mid priority tasks. This patch aims to rectify these two conditions by introducing a new priority sorted list: "pushable_tasks". A task is added to the list each time a task is activated or preempted. It is removed from the list any time it is deactivated, made current, or fails to push. This works because a task only needs to be attempted to push once. After an initial failure to push, the other cpus will eventually try to pull the task when the conditions are proper. This also solves the problem that we don't completely analyze all tasks due to encountering an unpushable tasks. Now every task will have a push attempted (when appropriate). This reduces latency both by shorting the critical section of the rq->lock for certain workloads, and by making sure the algorithm considers all eligible tasks in the system. [ rostedt: added a couple more BUG_ONs ] Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
2008-12-29 17:39:53 +03:00
/* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
}
static unsigned int get_rr_interval_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
{
/*
* Time slice is 0 for SCHED_FIFO tasks
*/
if (task->policy == SCHED_RR)
return sched_rr_timeslice;
else
return 0;
}
const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.next = &fair_sched_class,
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
.yield_task = yield_task_rt,
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
.pick_next_task = pick_next_task_rt,
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_common,
.rq_online = rq_online_rt,
.rq_offline = rq_offline_rt,
.task_woken = task_woken_rt,
.switched_from = switched_from_rt,
#endif
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_rt,
.task_tick = task_tick_rt,
.get_rr_interval = get_rr_interval_rt,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_rt,
.switched_to = switched_to_rt,
sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency Commit d670ec13178d0 "posix-cpu-timers: Cure SMP wobbles" fixes one glibc test case in cost of breaking another one. After that commit, calling clock_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, X) and then clock_gettime(&Y) can result of Y time being smaller than X time. Reproducer/tester can be found further below, it can be compiled and ran by: gcc -o tst-cpuclock2 tst-cpuclock2.c -pthread while ./tst-cpuclock2 ; do : ; done This reproducer, when running on a buggy kernel, will complain about "clock_gettime difference too small". Issue happens because on start in thread_group_cputimer() we initialize sum_exec_runtime of cputimer with threads runtime not yet accounted and then add the threads runtime to running cputimer again on scheduler tick, making it's sum_exec_runtime bigger than actual threads runtime. KOSAKI Motohiro posted a fix for this problem, but that patch was never applied: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/26/191 . This patch takes different approach to cure the problem. It calls update_curr() when cputimer starts, that assure we will have updated stats of running threads and on the next schedule tick we will account only the runtime that elapsed from cputimer start. That also assure we have consistent state between cpu times of individual threads and cpu time of the process consisted by those threads. Full reproducer (tst-cpuclock2.c): #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <inttypes.h> /* Parameters for the Linux kernel ABI for CPU clocks. */ #define CPUCLOCK_SCHED 2 #define MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(pid, clock) \ ((~(clockid_t) (pid) << 3) | (clockid_t) (clock)) static pthread_barrier_t barrier; /* Help advance the clock. */ static void *chew_cpu(void *arg) { pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); while (1) ; return NULL; } /* Don't use the glibc wrapper. */ static int do_nanosleep(int flags, const struct timespec *req) { clockid_t clock_id = MAKE_PROCESS_CPUCLOCK(0, CPUCLOCK_SCHED); return syscall(SYS_clock_nanosleep, clock_id, flags, req, NULL); } static int64_t tsdiff(const struct timespec *before, const struct timespec *after) { int64_t before_i = before->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + before->tv_nsec; int64_t after_i = after->tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + after->tv_nsec; return after_i - before_i; } int main(void) { int result = 0; pthread_t th; pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2); if (pthread_create(&th, NULL, chew_cpu, NULL) != 0) { perror("pthread_create"); return 1; } pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); /* The test. */ struct timespec before, after, sleeptimeabs; int64_t sleepdiff, diffabs; const struct timespec sleeptime = {.tv_sec = 0,.tv_nsec = 100000000 }; /* The relative nanosleep. Not sure why this is needed, but its presence seems to make it easier to reproduce the problem. */ if (do_nanosleep(0, &sleeptime) != 0) { perror("clock_nanosleep"); return 1; } /* Get the current time. */ if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &before) < 0) { perror("clock_gettime[2]"); return 1; } /* Compute the absolute sleep time based on the current time. */ uint64_t nsec = before.tv_nsec + sleeptime.tv_nsec; sleeptimeabs.tv_sec = before.tv_sec + nsec / 1000000000; sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec = nsec % 1000000000; /* Sleep for the computed time. */ if (do_nanosleep(TIMER_ABSTIME, &sleeptimeabs) != 0) { perror("absolute clock_nanosleep"); return 1; } /* Get the time after the sleep. */ if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &after) < 0) { perror("clock_gettime[3]"); return 1; } /* The time after sleep should always be equal to or after the absolute sleep time passed to clock_nanosleep. */ sleepdiff = tsdiff(&sleeptimeabs, &after); if (sleepdiff < 0) { printf("absolute clock_nanosleep woke too early: %" PRId64 "\n", sleepdiff); result = 1; printf("Before %llu.%09llu\n", before.tv_sec, before.tv_nsec); printf("After %llu.%09llu\n", after.tv_sec, after.tv_nsec); printf("Sleep %llu.%09llu\n", sleeptimeabs.tv_sec, sleeptimeabs.tv_nsec); } /* The difference between the timestamps taken before and after the clock_nanosleep call should be equal to or more than the duration of the sleep. */ diffabs = tsdiff(&before, &after); if (diffabs < sleeptime.tv_nsec) { printf("clock_gettime difference too small: %" PRId64 "\n", diffabs); result = 1; } pthread_cancel(th); return result; } Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141112155843.GA24803@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2014-11-12 18:58:44 +03:00
.update_curr = update_curr_rt,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, cpu_rq(cpu))
print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */