iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c

195 lines
5.7 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
{
"precise: test 1",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8), /* map_value_ptr -= map_value_ptr */
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvements In particular these include: 1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state 2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages 3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value) 4) Remove output of id=0 5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0 Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com
2022-03-01 14:27:45 -08:00
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=scalar(umin=1, umax=8) */
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
bpf, selftests: Use bpf_probe_read_kernel Since commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work") 44 verifier tests fail on s390 due to not having bpf_probe_read anymore. Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200602174448.2501214-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2020-06-02 19:44:48 +02:00
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
.errstr =
bpf, selftests: Use bpf_probe_read_kernel Since commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work") 44 verifier tests fail on s390 due to not having bpf_probe_read anymore. Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200602174448.2501214-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2020-06-02 19:44:48 +02:00
"26: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel#113\
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
last_idx 26 first_idx 20\
regs=4 stack=0 before 25\
regs=4 stack=0 before 24\
regs=4 stack=0 before 23\
regs=4 stack=0 before 22\
regs=4 stack=0 before 20\
parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 19 first_idx 10\
regs=4 stack=0 before 19\
regs=200 stack=0 before 18\
regs=300 stack=0 before 17\
regs=201 stack=0 before 15\
regs=201 stack=0 before 14\
regs=200 stack=0 before 13\
regs=200 stack=0 before 12\
regs=200 stack=0 before 11\
regs=200 stack=0 before 10\
parent already had regs=0 stack=0 marks",
},
{
"precise: test 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_6, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8), /* map_value_ptr -= map_value_ptr */
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvements In particular these include: 1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state 2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages 3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value) 4) Remove output of id=0 5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0 Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com
2022-03-01 14:27:45 -08:00
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=scalar(umin=1, umax=8) */
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
bpf, selftests: Use bpf_probe_read_kernel Since commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work") 44 verifier tests fail on s390 due to not having bpf_probe_read anymore. Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200602174448.2501214-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2020-06-02 19:44:48 +02:00
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel),
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
.fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 },
.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
.errstr =
bpf, selftests: Use bpf_probe_read_kernel Since commit 0ebeea8ca8a4 ("bpf: Restrict bpf_probe_read{, str}() only to archs where they work") 44 verifier tests fail on s390 due to not having bpf_probe_read anymore. Fix by using bpf_probe_read_kernel. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200602174448.2501214-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
2020-06-02 19:44:48 +02:00
"26: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel#113\
selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Use BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to check that precision tracking works as expected by comparing every step it takes. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:14 -07:00
last_idx 26 first_idx 22\
regs=4 stack=0 before 25\
regs=4 stack=0 before 24\
regs=4 stack=0 before 23\
regs=4 stack=0 before 22\
parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 20 first_idx 20\
regs=4 stack=0 before 20\
parent didn't have regs=4 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 19 first_idx 17\
regs=4 stack=0 before 19\
regs=200 stack=0 before 18\
regs=300 stack=0 before 17\
parent already had regs=0 stack=0 marks",
},
selftests/bpf: add precision tracking test Copy-paste of existing test "calls: cross frame pruning - liveness propagation" but ran with different parentage chain heuristic which stresses different path in precision tracking logic. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-08-22 22:52:15 -07:00
{
"precise: cross frame pruning",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_8, 1),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_9, 1),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_8, 1, 1),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
.errstr = "!read_ok",
.result = REJECT,
},
selftests/bpf: precision tracking tests Add two tests to check that stack slot marking during backtracking doesn't trigger 'spi > allocated_stack' warning. One test is using BPF_ST insn. Another is using BPF_STX. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-09-03 15:51:33 -07:00
{
"precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, -8, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
.errstr = "5: (2d) if r4 > r0 goto pc+0\
last_idx 5 first_idx 5\
parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 4 first_idx 2\
regs=10 stack=0 before 4\
regs=10 stack=0 before 3\
regs=0 stack=1 before 2\
last_idx 5 first_idx 5\
parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks",
.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
.retval = -1,
},
{
"precise: STX insn causing spi > allocated_stack",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, -8),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
.flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
.errstr = "last_idx 6 first_idx 6\
parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 5 first_idx 3\
regs=10 stack=0 before 5\
regs=10 stack=0 before 4\
regs=0 stack=1 before 3\
last_idx 6 first_idx 6\
parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks\
last_idx 5 first_idx 3\
regs=1 stack=0 before 5",
.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
.retval = -1,
},
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink