From 0099a29bc5a0d1eb6c9bb71b2f5eb1f05d8cb637 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vernon Lovejoy <vlovejoy@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:42:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/show_trace_log_lvl: Ensure stack pointer is aligned,
again
commit 2e4be0d011f21593c6b316806779ba1eba2cd7e0 upstream.
The commit e335bb51cc15 ("x86/unwind: Ensure stack pointer is aligned")
tried to align the stack pointer in show_trace_log_lvl(), otherwise the
"stack < stack_info.end" check can't guarantee that the last read does
not go past the end of the stack.
However, we have the same problem with the initial value of the stack
pointer, it can also be unaligned. So without this patch this trivial
kernel module
#include <linux/module.h>
static int init(void)
{
asm volatile("sub $0x4,%rsp");
dump_stack();
asm volatile("add $0x4,%rsp");
return -EAGAIN;
}
module_init(init);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
crashes the kernel.
Fixes: e335bb51cc15 ("x86/unwind: Ensure stack pointer is aligned")
Signed-off-by: Vernon Lovejoy <vlovejoy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512104232.GA10227@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index e72042dc9487..9b2bbb66d0c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
printk("%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
unwind_start(&state, task, regs, stack);
- stack = stack ? : get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state, &partial);
/*
@@ -190,9 +189,13 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
* - hardirq stack
* - entry stack
*/
- for ( ; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
+ for (stack = stack ?: get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
+ stack;
+ stack = stack_info.next_sp) {
const char *stack_name;
+ stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack, sizeof(long));
+
if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask)) {
/*
* We weren't on a valid stack. It's possible that