dma-buf/fence: Fix lock inversion within dma-fence-array
Ages ago Rob Clark noted, "Currently with fence-array, we have a potential deadlock situation. If we fence_add_callback() on an array-fence, the array-fence's lock is acquired first, and in it's ->enable_signaling() callback, it will install cbs on it's array-member fences, so the array-member's lock is acquired second. But in the signal path, the array-member's lock is acquired first, and the array-fence's lock acquired second." Rob proposed either extensive changes to dma-fence to unnest the fence-array signaling, or to defer the signaling onto a workqueue. This is a more refined version of the later, that should keep the latency of the fence signaling to a minimum by using an irq-work, which is executed asap. Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> References: 1476635975-21981-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114162719.30958-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
70c5f93669
commit
03e4e0a9e0
@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ config DMA_SHARED_BUFFER
|
||||
bool
|
||||
default n
|
||||
select ANON_INODES
|
||||
select IRQ_WORK
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option enables the framework for buffer-sharing between
|
||||
multiple drivers. A buffer is associated with a file using driver
|
||||
|
@ -31,6 +31,14 @@ static const char *dma_fence_array_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
|
||||
return "unbound";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void irq_dma_fence_array_work(struct irq_work *wrk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dma_fence_array *array = container_of(wrk, typeof(*array), work);
|
||||
|
||||
dma_fence_signal(&array->base);
|
||||
dma_fence_put(&array->base);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f,
|
||||
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -39,7 +47,8 @@ static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f,
|
||||
struct dma_fence_array *array = array_cb->array;
|
||||
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&array->num_pending))
|
||||
dma_fence_signal(&array->base);
|
||||
irq_work_queue(&array->work);
|
||||
else
|
||||
dma_fence_put(&array->base);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -136,6 +145,7 @@ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences,
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&array->lock);
|
||||
dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, &array->lock,
|
||||
context, seqno);
|
||||
init_irq_work(&array->work, irq_dma_fence_array_work);
|
||||
|
||||
array->num_fences = num_fences;
|
||||
atomic_set(&array->num_pending, signal_on_any ? 1 : num_fences);
|
||||
|
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
|
||||
#define __LINUX_DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_H
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/dma-fence.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* struct dma_fence_array_cb - callback helper for fence array
|
||||
@ -47,6 +48,8 @@ struct dma_fence_array {
|
||||
unsigned num_fences;
|
||||
atomic_t num_pending;
|
||||
struct dma_fence **fences;
|
||||
|
||||
struct irq_work work;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
extern const struct dma_fence_ops dma_fence_array_ops;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user