s390/kernel: expand exception table logic to allow new handling options
This is a s390 port of commit 548acf1923
("x86/mm: Expand the
exception table logic to allow new handling options"), which is needed
for implementing BPF_PROBE_MEM on s390.
The new handler field is made 64-bit in order to allow pointing from
dynamically allocated entries to handlers in kernel text. Unlike on x86,
NULL is used instead of ex_handler_default. This is because exception
tables are used by boot/text_dma.S, and it would be a pain to preserve
ex_handler_default.
The new infrastructure is ignored in early_pgm_check_handler, since
there is no pt_regs.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
88aa8939c9
commit
05a68e892e
@ -1,12 +1,20 @@
|
||||
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
||||
#ifndef __S390_EXTABLE_H
|
||||
#define __S390_EXTABLE_H
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/compiler.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The exception table consists of pairs of addresses: the first is the
|
||||
* address of an instruction that is allowed to fault, and the second is
|
||||
* the address at which the program should continue. No registers are
|
||||
* modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code to figure out
|
||||
* what to do.
|
||||
* The exception table consists of three addresses:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - Address of an instruction that is allowed to fault.
|
||||
* - Address at which the program should continue.
|
||||
* - Optional address of handler that takes pt_regs * argument and runs in
|
||||
* interrupt context.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* No registers are modified, so it is entirely up to the continuation code
|
||||
* to figure out what to do.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* All the routines below use bits of fixup code that are out of line
|
||||
* with the main instruction path. This means when everything is well,
|
||||
@ -17,6 +25,7 @@
|
||||
struct exception_table_entry
|
||||
{
|
||||
int insn, fixup;
|
||||
long handler;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct exception_table_entry *__start_dma_ex_table;
|
||||
@ -29,6 +38,39 @@ static inline unsigned long extable_fixup(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
|
||||
return (unsigned long)&x->fixup + x->fixup;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
typedef bool (*ex_handler_t)(const struct exception_table_entry *,
|
||||
struct pt_regs *);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline ex_handler_t
|
||||
ex_fixup_handler(const struct exception_table_entry *x)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (likely(!x->handler))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
return (ex_handler_t)((unsigned long)&x->handler + x->handler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool ex_handle(const struct exception_table_entry *x,
|
||||
struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ex_handler_t handler = ex_fixup_handler(x);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(handler))
|
||||
return handler(x, regs);
|
||||
regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(x);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void swap_ex_entry_fixup(struct exception_table_entry *a,
|
||||
struct exception_table_entry *b,
|
||||
struct exception_table_entry tmp,
|
||||
int delta)
|
||||
{
|
||||
a->fixup = b->fixup + delta;
|
||||
b->fixup = tmp.fixup - delta;
|
||||
a->handler = b->handler + delta;
|
||||
b->handler = tmp.handler - delta;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
@ -14,9 +14,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#define __EX_TABLE(_section, _fault, _target) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.section _section,"a";) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.align 4;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.align 8;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.long (_fault) - .;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.long (_target) - .;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.quad 0;) \
|
||||
stringify_in_c(.previous)
|
||||
|
||||
#define EX_TABLE(_fault, _target) \
|
||||
|
@ -523,10 +523,8 @@ static int kprobe_trap_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
|
||||
* zero, try to fix up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
entry = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
|
||||
if (entry) {
|
||||
regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(entry);
|
||||
if (entry && ex_handle(entry, regs))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* fixup_exception() could not handle it,
|
||||
|
@ -50,11 +50,8 @@ void do_report_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, int si_signo, int si_code, char *str)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
|
||||
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
|
||||
if (fixup)
|
||||
regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (!fixup || !ex_handle(fixup, regs))
|
||||
die(regs, str);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -251,7 +248,7 @@ void monitor_event_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE:
|
||||
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
|
||||
if (fixup)
|
||||
regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
|
||||
ex_handle(fixup, regs);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -255,10 +255,8 @@ static noinline void do_no_context(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
|
||||
fixup = s390_search_extables(regs->psw.addr);
|
||||
if (fixup) {
|
||||
regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup);
|
||||
if (fixup && ex_handle(fixup, regs))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
|
||||
|
@ -255,6 +255,45 @@ static void x86_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
|
||||
char *loc = extab_image + i;
|
||||
uint64_t handler;
|
||||
|
||||
w(r((uint32_t *)loc) + i, (uint32_t *)loc);
|
||||
w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) + (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 0 is a special self-relative handler value, which means that
|
||||
* handler should be ignored. It is safe, because it means that
|
||||
* handler field points to itself, which should never happen.
|
||||
* When creating extable-relative values, keep it as 0, since
|
||||
* this should never occur either: it would mean that handler
|
||||
* field points to the first extable entry.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
|
||||
if (handler)
|
||||
handler += i + 8;
|
||||
w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
qsort(extab_image, image_size / 16, 16, compare_relative_table);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
|
||||
char *loc = extab_image + i;
|
||||
uint64_t handler;
|
||||
|
||||
w(r((uint32_t *)loc) - i, (uint32_t *)loc);
|
||||
w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) - (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
|
||||
handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
|
||||
if (handler)
|
||||
handler -= i + 8;
|
||||
w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int rc = -1;
|
||||
@ -297,6 +336,8 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
|
||||
custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case EM_S390:
|
||||
custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case EM_AARCH64:
|
||||
case EM_PARISC:
|
||||
case EM_PPC:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user