iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

eventpoll: prefer kfree_rcu() in __ep_remove()

Browse Source 
In '__ep_remove()', prefer 'kfree_rcu()' over 'call_rcu()' with
dummy 'epi_rcu_free()' callback. This follows commit d0089603fa
("fs: prefer kfree_rcu() in fasync_remove_entry()") and should not
be backported to stable as well.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221112205.48389-2-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Antipov 2024-02-21 14:22:05 +03:00 committed by Christian Brauner
parent 4af6ccb469
commit 0611a640e6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fs/eventpoll.c
View File

@ -678,12 +678,6 @@ static void ep_done_scan(struct eventpoll *ep,
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
}
static void epi_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct epitem *epi = container_of(head, struct epitem, rcu);
kmem_cache_free(epi_cache, epi);
}
static void ep_get(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
refcount_inc(&ep->refcount);
@ -767,7 +761,7 @@ static bool __ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, bool force)
* ep->mtx. The rcu read side, reverse_path_check_proc(), does not make
* use of the rbn field.
*/
call_rcu(&epi->rcu, epi_rcu_free);
kfree_rcu(epi, rcu);
percpu_counter_dec(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
return ep_refcount_dec_and_test(ep);