iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

x25: bit and/or confusion in x25_ioctl()?

Browse Source 
Looking at commit ebc3f64b86 it appears that this was intended
and not the original, equivalent to `if (facilities.reverse & ~0x81)'.

In x25_parse_facilities() that patch changed how facilities->reverse
was set. No other bits were set than 0x80 and/or 0x01.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
roel kluin 2009-10-07 00:59:42 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent f14d42f314
commit 06a96b33ae
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
net/x25/af_x25.c
View File

@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
facilities.throughput > 0xDD)
break;
if (facilities.reverse &&
(facilities.reverse | 0x81)!= 0x81)
(facilities.reverse & 0x81) != 0x81)
break;
x25->facilities = facilities;
rc = 0;