drm/i915/gen9: fix the WaWmMemoryReadLatency implementation
Bspec says:
"The mailbox response data may not account for memory read latency.
If the mailbox response data for level 0 is 0us, add 2 microseconds
to the result for each valid level."
This means we should only do the +2 in case wm[0] == 0, not always.
So split the sanitizing implementation from the WA implementation and
fix the WA implementation.
v2: Add Fixes tag (Maarten).
Fixes: 367294be7c
("drm/i915/gen9: Add 2us read latency to WM level")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474578035-424-5-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e3100ec21
commit
0727e40a48
@ -2126,33 +2126,35 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8])
|
|||||||
wm[7] = (val >> GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_3_7_SHIFT) &
|
wm[7] = (val >> GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_3_7_SHIFT) &
|
||||||
GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_MASK;
|
GEN9_MEM_LATENCY_LEVEL_MASK;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* If a level n (n > 1) has a 0us latency, all levels m (m >= n)
|
||||||
|
* need to be disabled. We make sure to sanitize the values out
|
||||||
|
* of the punit to satisfy this requirement.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
|
||||||
|
if (wm[level] == 0) {
|
||||||
|
for (i = level + 1; i <= max_level; i++)
|
||||||
|
wm[i] = 0;
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl
|
* WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
|
* punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
|
||||||
* to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from
|
* to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
|
||||||
* the punit.
|
* punit when level 0 response data us 0us.
|
||||||
* - W0 is a bit special in that it's the only level that
|
|
||||||
* can't be disabled if we want to have display working, so
|
|
||||||
* we always add 2us there.
|
|
||||||
* - For levels >=1, punit returns 0us latency when they are
|
|
||||||
* disabled, so we respect that and don't add 2us then
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Additionally, if a level n (n > 1) has a 0us latency, all
|
|
||||||
* levels m (m >= n) need to be disabled. We make sure to
|
|
||||||
* sanitize the values out of the punit to satisfy this
|
|
||||||
* requirement.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
wm[0] += 2;
|
if (wm[0] == 0) {
|
||||||
for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++)
|
wm[0] += 2;
|
||||||
if (wm[level] != 0)
|
for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
|
||||||
|
if (wm[level] == 0)
|
||||||
|
break;
|
||||||
wm[level] += 2;
|
wm[level] += 2;
|
||||||
else {
|
|
||||||
for (i = level + 1; i <= max_level; i++)
|
|
||||||
wm[i] = 0;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
|
} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
|
||||||
uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
|
uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user