drm/i915: Mark up the calling context for intel_wakeref_put()

Previously, we assumed we could use mutex_trylock() within an atomic
context, falling back to a worker if contended. However, such trickery
is illegal inside interrupt context, and so we need to always use a
worker under such circumstances. As we normally are in process context,
we can typically use a plain mutex, and only defer to a work when we
know we are being called from an interrupt path.

Fixes: 51fbd8de87 ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref")
References: a0855d24fc ("locking/mutex: Complain upon mutex API misuse in IRQ contexts")
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111626
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120125433.3767149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson
2019-11-20 12:54:33 +00:00
parent 8a126392b7
commit 07779a76ee
11 changed files with 54 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@ -51,11 +51,12 @@ static int live_engine_pm(void *arg)
pr_err("intel_engine_pm_get_if_awake(%s) failed under %s\n",
engine->name, p->name);
else
intel_engine_pm_put(engine);
intel_engine_pm_put(engine);
intel_engine_pm_put_async(engine);
intel_engine_pm_put_async(engine);
p->critical_section_end();
/* engine wakeref is sync (instant) */
intel_engine_pm_flush(engine);
if (intel_engine_pm_is_awake(engine)) {
pr_err("%s is still awake after flushing pm\n",
engine->name);