iommu/amd: Fix alloc_irq_index() increment
On an is_allocated() interrupt index, we ALIGN() the current index and
then increment it via the for loop, guaranteeing that it is no longer
aligned for alignments >1. We instead need to align the next index,
to guarantee forward progress, moving the increment-only to the case
where the index was found to be unallocated.
Fixes: 37946d95fc
('iommu/amd: Add align parameter to alloc_irq_index()')
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a593472591
commit
07d1c91b6c
@ -3682,13 +3682,12 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Scan table for free entries */
|
||||
for (index = ALIGN(table->min_index, alignment), c = 0;
|
||||
index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;
|
||||
index++) {
|
||||
index < MAX_IRQS_PER_TABLE;) {
|
||||
if (!iommu->irte_ops->is_allocated(table, index)) {
|
||||
c += 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
c = 0;
|
||||
index = ALIGN(index, alignment);
|
||||
index = ALIGN(index + 1, alignment);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3699,6 +3698,8 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
|
||||
index -= count - 1;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
index++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
index = -ENOSPC;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user