tools/testing/nvdimm: Fix the array size for dimm devices.
[ Upstream commit af31b04b67f4fd7f639fd465a507c154c46fc9fb ] KASAN reports following global out of bounds access while nfit_test is being loaded. The out of bound access happens the following reference to dimm_fail_cmd_flags[dimm]. 'dimm' is over than the index value, NUM_DCR (==5). static int override_return_code(int dimm, unsigned int func, int rc) { if ((1 << func) & dimm_fail_cmd_flags[dimm]) { dimm_fail_cmd_flags[] definition: static unsigned long dimm_fail_cmd_flags[NUM_DCR]; 'dimm' is the return value of get_dimm(), and get_dimm() returns the index of handle[] array. The handle[] has 7 index. Let's use ARRAY_SIZE(handle) as the array size. KASAN report: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in nfit_test_ctl+0x47bb/0x55b0 [nfit_test] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffffc10cbbe8 by task kworker/u41:0/8 ... Call Trace: dump_stack+0xea/0x1b0 ? dump_stack_print_info.cold.0+0x1b/0x1b ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xd9/0xd9 print_address_description+0x65/0x22e ? nfit_test_ctl+0x47bb/0x55b0 [nfit_test] kasan_report.cold.6+0x92/0x1a6 nfit_test_ctl+0x47bb/0x55b0 [nfit_test] ... The buggy address belongs to the variable: dimm_fail_cmd_flags+0x28/0xffffffffffffa440 [nfit_test] ================================================================== Fixes: 39611e83a28c ("tools/testing/nvdimm: Make DSM failure code injection...") Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c4b25ef590
commit
08609aace6
@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ static u32 handle[] = {
|
||||
[6] = NFIT_DIMM_HANDLE(1, 0, 0, 0, 1),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long dimm_fail_cmd_flags[NUM_DCR];
|
||||
static int dimm_fail_cmd_code[NUM_DCR];
|
||||
static unsigned long dimm_fail_cmd_flags[ARRAY_SIZE(handle)];
|
||||
static int dimm_fail_cmd_code[ARRAY_SIZE(handle)];
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct nd_intel_smart smart_def = {
|
||||
.flags = ND_INTEL_SMART_HEALTH_VALID
|
||||
@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct nfit_test {
|
||||
unsigned long deadline;
|
||||
spinlock_t lock;
|
||||
} ars_state;
|
||||
struct device *dimm_dev[NUM_DCR];
|
||||
struct device *dimm_dev[ARRAY_SIZE(handle)];
|
||||
struct nd_intel_smart *smart;
|
||||
struct nd_intel_smart_threshold *smart_threshold;
|
||||
struct badrange badrange;
|
||||
@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ static int nfit_test_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
u32 nfit_handle = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DCR; i++)
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(handle); i++)
|
||||
if (nfit_handle == handle[i])
|
||||
dev_set_drvdata(nfit_test->dimm_dev[i],
|
||||
nfit_mem);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user