drm/i915/gem: Move obj->lut_list under its own lock
The obj->lut_list is traversed when the object is closed as the file table is destroyed during process termination. As this occurs before we kill any outstanding context if, due to some bug or another, the closure is blocked, then we fail to shootdown any inflight operations potentially leaving the GPU spinning forever. As we only need to guard the list against concurrent closures and insertions, the hold is short and merits being treated as a simple spinlock. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701084439.17025-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ba7ffea2d
commit
096a42dd19
@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ static void lut_close(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
|
||||
if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&obj->base.refcount))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
i915_gem_object_lock(obj);
|
||||
spin_lock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(lut, &obj->lut_list, obj_link) {
|
||||
if (lut->ctx != ctx)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@ -124,8 +123,7 @@ static void lut_close(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
|
||||
list_del(&lut->obj_link);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
spin_unlock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (&lut->obj_link != &obj->lut_list) {
|
||||
i915_lut_handle_free(lut);
|
||||
|
@ -789,14 +789,14 @@ static int __eb_add_lut(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
|
||||
if (err == 0) { /* And nor has this handle */
|
||||
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
|
||||
|
||||
i915_gem_object_lock(obj);
|
||||
spin_lock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
if (idr_find(&eb->file->object_idr, handle) == obj) {
|
||||
list_add(&lut->obj_link, &obj->lut_list);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
radix_tree_delete(&ctx->handles_vma, handle);
|
||||
err = -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->mm.link);
|
||||
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&obj->lut_list);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&obj->mmo.lock);
|
||||
obj->mmo.offsets = RB_ROOT;
|
||||
@ -104,21 +105,29 @@ void i915_gem_close_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem, struct drm_file *file)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(gem);
|
||||
struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
|
||||
struct i915_lut_handle bookmark = {};
|
||||
struct i915_mmap_offset *mmo, *mn;
|
||||
struct i915_lut_handle *lut, *ln;
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(close);
|
||||
|
||||
i915_gem_object_lock(obj);
|
||||
spin_lock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(lut, ln, &obj->lut_list, obj_link) {
|
||||
struct i915_gem_context *ctx = lut->ctx;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctx->file_priv != fpriv)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (ctx && ctx->file_priv == fpriv) {
|
||||
i915_gem_context_get(ctx);
|
||||
list_move(&lut->obj_link, &close);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
i915_gem_context_get(ctx);
|
||||
list_move(&lut->obj_link, &close);
|
||||
/* Break long locks, and carefully continue on from this spot */
|
||||
if (&ln->obj_link != &obj->lut_list) {
|
||||
list_add_tail(&bookmark.obj_link, &ln->obj_link);
|
||||
if (cond_resched_lock(&obj->lut_lock))
|
||||
list_safe_reset_next(&bookmark, ln, obj_link);
|
||||
__list_del_entry(&bookmark.obj_link);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&obj->lut_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&obj->mmo.lock);
|
||||
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(mmo, mn, &obj->mmo.offsets, offset)
|
||||
|
@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
|
||||
* this translation from object to context->handles_vma.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct list_head lut_list;
|
||||
spinlock_t lut_lock; /* guards lut_list */
|
||||
|
||||
/** Stolen memory for this object, instead of being backed by shmem. */
|
||||
struct drm_mm_node *stolen;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user