mm: do not grow the stack vma just because of an overrun on preceding vma
The stack vma is designed to grow automatically (marked with VM_GROWSUP or VM_GROWSDOWN depending on architecture) when an access is made beyond the existing boundary. However, particularly if you have not limited your stack at all ("ulimit -s unlimited"), this can cause the stack to grow even if the access was really just one past *another* segment. And that's wrong, especially since we first grow the segment, but then immediately later enforce the stack guard page on the last page of the segment. So _despite_ first growing the stack segment as a result of the access, the kernel will then make the access cause a SIGSEGV anyway! So do the same logic as the guard page check does, and consider an access to within one page of the next segment to be a bad access, rather than growing the stack to abut the next segment. Reported-and-tested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d895cb1af1
commit
0988496433
27
mm/mmap.c
27
mm/mmap.c
@ -2185,9 +2185,28 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note how expand_stack() refuses to expand the stack all the way to
|
||||
* abut the next virtual mapping, *unless* that mapping itself is also
|
||||
* a stack mapping. We want to leave room for a guard page, after all
|
||||
* (the guard page itself is not added here, that is done by the
|
||||
* actual page faulting logic)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This matches the behavior of the guard page logic (see mm/memory.c:
|
||||
* check_stack_guard_page()), which only allows the guard page to be
|
||||
* removed under these circumstances.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
|
||||
int expand_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *next;
|
||||
|
||||
address &= PAGE_MASK;
|
||||
next = vma->vm_next;
|
||||
if (next && next->vm_start == address + PAGE_SIZE) {
|
||||
if (!(next->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP))
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return expand_upwards(vma, address);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2209,6 +2228,14 @@ find_extend_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
int expand_stack(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *prev;
|
||||
|
||||
address &= PAGE_MASK;
|
||||
prev = vma->vm_prev;
|
||||
if (prev && prev->vm_end == address) {
|
||||
if (!(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return expand_downwards(vma, address);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user