x86/sched: Restore the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag in the DIE domain
Commit8f2d6c41e5
("x86/sched: Rewrite topology setup") dropped the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag in the DIE domain added in commit044f0e27de
("x86/sched: Add the SD_ASYM_PACKING flag to the die domain of hybrid processors"). Restore it on hybrid processors. The die-level domain does not depend on any build configuration and now x86_sched_itmt_flags() is always needed. Remove the build dependency on CONFIG_SCHED_[SMT|CLUSTER|MC]. Fixes:8f2d6c41e5
("x86/sched: Rewrite topology setup") Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: Caleb Callaway <caleb.callaway@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230815035747.11529-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
450e749707
commit
108af4b4bd
@ -579,7 +579,6 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC)
|
||||
static inline int x86_sched_itmt_flags(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled ? SD_ASYM_PACKING : 0;
|
||||
@ -603,7 +602,14 @@ static int x86_cluster_flags(void)
|
||||
return cpu_cluster_flags() | x86_sched_itmt_flags();
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int x86_die_flags(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU))
|
||||
return x86_sched_itmt_flags();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set if a package/die has multiple NUMA nodes inside.
|
||||
@ -640,7 +646,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!x86_has_numa_in_package) {
|
||||
x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
|
||||
cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
|
||||
cpu_cpu_mask, x86_die_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE)
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user