mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred_list
The current comment is confusing because if global or memcg deferred list in the second tail page is occupied by compound_head, why we still use page[2].deferred_list here? I think it wants to say that Global or memcg deferred list in the first tail page is occupied by compound_mapcount and compound_pincount so we use the second tail page's deferred_list instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220704132201.14611-14-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a17206dac7
commit
121c1781ae
@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
|
||||
static inline struct list_head *page_deferred_list(struct page *page)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Global or memcg deferred list in the second tail pages is
|
||||
* occupied by compound_head.
|
||||
* See organization of tail pages of compound page in
|
||||
* "struct page" definition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return &page[2].deferred_list;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user