RISC-V: Fix hartid mask handling for hartid 31 and up

Jessica reports that using "1 << hartid" causes undefined behavior for
hartid 31 and up.

Fix this by using the BIT() helper instead of an explicit shift.

Reported-by: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Fixes: 26fb751ca37846c9 ("RISC-V: Do not use cpumask data structure for hartid bitmap")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
Geert Uytterhoeven 2022-01-31 14:26:20 +01:00 committed by Palmer Dabbelt
parent 6df2a016c0
commit 12f4a665cc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 2E1319F35FBB1889

View File

@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2020 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates.
*/
#include <linux/bits.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ static unsigned long __sbi_v01_cpumask_to_hartmask(const struct cpumask *cpu_mas
pr_warn("Unable to send any request to hartid > BITS_PER_LONG for SBI v0.1\n");
break;
}
hmask |= 1 << hartid;
hmask |= BIT(hartid);
}
return hmask;
@ -268,7 +269,7 @@ static int __sbi_send_ipi_v02(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask)
}
if (!hmask)
hbase = hartid;
hmask |= 1UL << (hartid - hbase);
hmask |= BIT(hartid - hbase);
}
if (hmask) {
@ -362,7 +363,7 @@ static int __sbi_rfence_v02(int fid, const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
}
if (!hmask)
hbase = hartid;
hmask |= 1UL << (hartid - hbase);
hmask |= BIT(hartid - hbase);
}
if (hmask) {