net: fix possible store tearing in neigh_periodic_work()
[ Upstream commit 25563b581ba3a1f263a00e8c9a97f5e7363be6fd ] While looking at a related syzbot report involving neigh_periodic_work(), I found that I forgot to add an annotation when deleting an RCU protected item from a list. Readers use rcu_deference(*np), we need to use either rcu_assign_pointer() or WRITE_ONCE() on writer side to prevent store tearing. I use rcu_assign_pointer() to have lockdep support, this was the choice made in neigh_flush_dev(). Fixes: 767e97e1e0db ("neigh: RCU conversion of struct neighbour") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bdb4fcf18e
commit
147d89ee41
@ -930,7 +930,9 @@ static void neigh_periodic_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
(state == NUD_FAILED ||
|
||||
!time_in_range_open(jiffies, n->used,
|
||||
n->used + NEIGH_VAR(n->parms, GC_STALETIME)))) {
|
||||
*np = n->next;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(*np,
|
||||
rcu_dereference_protected(n->next,
|
||||
lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock)));
|
||||
neigh_mark_dead(n);
|
||||
write_unlock(&n->lock);
|
||||
neigh_cleanup_and_release(n);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user