irqchip/gic-v2, v3: Implement irq_chip->irq_retrigger()
While digging around IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED and irq/resend.c, it has come to my attention that the IRQ resend situation seems a bit precarious for the GIC(s). When marking an IRQ with IRQS_PENDING, handle_fasteoi_irq() will bail out and issue an irq_eoi(). Should the IRQ in question be re-enabled, check_irq_resend() will trigger a SW resend, which will go through the flow handler again and issue *another* irq_eoi() on the *same* IRQ activation. This is something the GIC spec clearly describes as a bad idea: any EOI must match a previous ACK. Implement irq_chip.irq_retrigger() for the GIC chips by setting the GIC pending bit of the relevant IRQ. After being called by check_irq_resend(), this will eventually trigger a *new* interrupt which we will handle as usual. Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730170321.31228-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd1752d34e
commit
17f644e949
@ -1207,6 +1207,11 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
|
||||
#define gic_smp_init() do { } while(0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(data, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
|
||||
static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
|
||||
unsigned long cmd, void *v)
|
||||
@ -1242,6 +1247,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
|
||||
.irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq,
|
||||
.irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
|
||||
.irq_set_affinity = gic_set_affinity,
|
||||
.irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger,
|
||||
.irq_get_irqchip_state = gic_irq_get_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.irq_set_irqchip_state = gic_irq_set_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.irq_nmi_setup = gic_irq_nmi_setup,
|
||||
@ -1258,6 +1264,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
|
||||
.irq_eoi = gic_eoimode1_eoi_irq,
|
||||
.irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
|
||||
.irq_set_affinity = gic_set_affinity,
|
||||
.irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger,
|
||||
.irq_get_irqchip_state = gic_irq_get_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.irq_set_irqchip_state = gic_irq_set_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity,
|
||||
|
@ -347,6 +347,11 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int gic_retrigger(struct irq_data *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(data, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 irqstat, irqnr;
|
||||
@ -417,6 +422,7 @@ static const struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
|
||||
.irq_unmask = gic_unmask_irq,
|
||||
.irq_eoi = gic_eoi_irq,
|
||||
.irq_set_type = gic_set_type,
|
||||
.irq_retrigger = gic_retrigger,
|
||||
.irq_get_irqchip_state = gic_irq_get_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.irq_set_irqchip_state = gic_irq_set_irqchip_state,
|
||||
.flags = IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED |
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user