vxlan: test dev->flags & IFF_UP before calling gro_cells_receive()
[ Upstream commit 59cbf56fcd98ba2a715b6e97c4e43f773f956393 ] Same reasons than the ones explained in commit 4179cb5a4c92 ("vxlan: test dev->flags & IFF_UP before calling netif_rx()") netif_rx() or gro_cells_receive() must be called under a strict contract. At device dismantle phase, core networking clears IFF_UP and flush_all_backlogs() is called after rcu grace period to make sure no incoming packet might be in a cpu backlog and still referencing the device. A similar protocol is used for gro_cells infrastructure, as gro_cells_destroy() will be called only after a full rcu grace period is observed after IFF_UP has been cleared. Most drivers call netif_rx() from their interrupt handler, and since the interrupts are disabled at device dismantle, netif_rx() does not have to check dev->flags & IFF_UP Virtual drivers do not have this guarantee, and must therefore make the check themselves. Otherwise we risk use-after-free and/or crashes. Fixes: d342894c5d2f ("vxlan: virtual extensible lan") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb604342bc
commit
195e9aa9fe
@ -1229,6 +1229,14 @@ static void vxlan_rcv(struct vxlan_sock *vs, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!(vxlan->dev->flags & IFF_UP))) {
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
atomic_long_inc(&vxlan->dev->rx_dropped);
|
||||
goto drop;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
stats = this_cpu_ptr(vxlan->dev->tstats);
|
||||
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
|
||||
stats->rx_packets++;
|
||||
@ -1237,6 +1245,8 @@ static void vxlan_rcv(struct vxlan_sock *vs, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
|
||||
gro_cells_receive(&vxlan->gro_cells, skb);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
drop:
|
||||
if (tun_dst)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user