From 195fffbf8291a84580762ac6e3101489954d0216 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:47:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warning in call to intel_read_wm_latency() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit commit 336feb502a715909a8136eb6a62a83d7268a353b upstream. Fix the following -Wstringop-overflow warnings when building with GCC-11: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3106:9: warning: ‘intel_read_wm_latency’ accessing 16 bytes in a region of size 10 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 3106 | intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3106:9: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘u16 *’ {aka ‘short unsigned int *’} drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2861:13: note: in a call to function ‘intel_read_wm_latency’ 2861 | static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ by removing the over-specified array size from the argument declarations. It seems that this code is actually safe because the size of the array depends on the hardware generation, and the function checks for that. Notice that wm can be an array of 5 elements: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3109: intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency); or an array of 8 elements: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3131: intel_read_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.skl_latency); and the compiler legitimately complains about that. This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Wstringop-overflow. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/181 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 57c1dda76b94..1a27e4833adf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, } static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, - u16 wm[8]) + u16 wm[]) { struct intel_uncore *uncore = &dev_priv->uncore;