s390/uv: Don't call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference
[ Upstream commit 3f29f6537f54d74e64bac0a390fb2e26da25800d ] folio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that a folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the folio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference. Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests") Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508182955.358628-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd5df00391
commit
1a1eb2f3fc
@ -299,6 +299,13 @@ again:
|
||||
rc = make_folio_secure(folio, uvcb);
|
||||
folio_unlock(folio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Once we drop the PTL, the folio may get unmapped and
|
||||
* freed immediately. We need a temporary reference.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rc == -EAGAIN)
|
||||
folio_get(folio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptelock);
|
||||
@ -311,6 +318,7 @@ out:
|
||||
* completion, this is just a useless check, but it is safe.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
|
||||
folio_put(folio);
|
||||
} else if (rc == -EBUSY) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we have tried a local drain and the folio refcount
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user