kill DCACHE_MAY_FREE
With the new ordering in __dentry_kill() it has become redundant - it's set if and only if both DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED and DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST are set. We set it in __dentry_kill(), after having set DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED with the only condition being that DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST is there; all of that is done without dropping ->d_lock and the only place that checks that flag (shrink_dentry_list()) does so under ->d_lock, after having found the victim on its shrink list. Since DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST is set only when placing dentry into shrink list and removed only by shrink_dentry_list() itself, a check for DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED in there would be equivalent to check for DCACHE_MAY_FREE. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
119dcc73a9
commit
1b327b5ac5
@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ static struct dentry *__dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(&dentry->d_lock, DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
|
||||
dentry_unlist(dentry);
|
||||
if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST) {
|
||||
dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
|
||||
if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST)
|
||||
can_free = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
if (likely(can_free))
|
||||
dentry_free(dentry);
|
||||
@ -1072,7 +1070,7 @@ void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
|
||||
bool can_free;
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
d_shrink_del(dentry);
|
||||
can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_MAY_FREE;
|
||||
can_free = dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
if (can_free)
|
||||
dentry_free(dentry);
|
||||
|
@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ struct dentry_operations {
|
||||
#define DCACHE_SPECIAL_TYPE (5 << 20) /* Other file type */
|
||||
#define DCACHE_SYMLINK_TYPE (6 << 20) /* Symlink */
|
||||
|
||||
#define DCACHE_MAY_FREE BIT(23)
|
||||
#define DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME BIT(25) /* Encrypted name encoded without key */
|
||||
#define DCACHE_OP_REAL BIT(26)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user