tracing: Comment why cond_snapshot is checked outside of max_lock protection
Before setting tr->cond_snapshot, it must be NULL before it can be updated. It can go to NULL when a trace event hist trigger is created or removed, and can only be modified under the max_lock spin lock. But because it can only be set to something other than NULL under both the max_lock spin lock as well as the trace_types_lock, we can perform the check if it is not NULL only under the trace_types_lock and fail out without having to grab the max_lock spin lock. This is very subtle, and deserves a comment. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3d86a4ad7
commit
1c347a94ca
@ -1116,6 +1116,14 @@ int tracing_snapshot_cond_enable(struct trace_array *tr, void *cond_data,
|
|||||||
goto fail_unlock;
|
goto fail_unlock;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* The cond_snapshot can only change to NULL without the
|
||||||
|
* trace_types_lock. We don't care if we race with it going
|
||||||
|
* to NULL, but we want to make sure that it's not set to
|
||||||
|
* something other than NULL when we get here, which we can
|
||||||
|
* do safely with only holding the trace_types_lock and not
|
||||||
|
* having to take the max_lock.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
if (tr->cond_snapshot) {
|
if (tr->cond_snapshot) {
|
||||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||||
goto fail_unlock;
|
goto fail_unlock;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user