loop: reduce the loop_ctl_mutex scope
syzbot is reporting circular locking problem at __loop_clr_fd() [1], for commita160c6159d
("block: add an optional probe callback to major_names") is calling the module's probe function with major_names_lock held. Fortunately, since commit990e78116d
("block: loop: fix deadlock between open and remove") stopped holding loop_ctl_mutex in lo_open(), current role of loop_ctl_mutex is to serialize access to loop_index_idr and loop_add()/loop_remove(); in other words, management of id for IDR. To avoid holding loop_ctl_mutex during whole add/remove operation, use a bool flag to indicate whether the loop device is ready for use. loop_unregister_transfer() which is called from cleanup_cryptoloop() currently has possibility of use-after-free problem due to lack of serialization between kfree() from loop_remove() from loop_control_remove() and mutex_lock() from unregister_transfer_cb(). But since lo->lo_encryption should be already NULL when this function is called due to module unload, and commit222013f9ac
("cryptoloop: add a deprecation warning") indicates that we will remove this function shortly, this patch updates this function to emit warning instead of checking lo->lo_encryption. Holding loop_ctl_mutex in loop_exit() is pointless, for all users must close /dev/loop-control and /dev/loop$num (in order to drop module's refcount to 0) before loop_exit() starts, and nobody can open /dev/loop-control or /dev/loop$num afterwards. Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7bb10e8b62f83e4d445cdf4c13d69e407e629558 [1] Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+f61766d5763f9e7a118f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/adb1e792-fc0e-ee81-7ea0-0906fc36419d@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ef47db1cb
commit
1c500ad706
@ -2111,18 +2111,6 @@ int loop_register_transfer(struct loop_func_table *funcs)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct loop_device *lo = ptr;
|
||||
struct loop_func_table *xfer = data;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer)
|
||||
loop_release_xfer(lo);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int loop_unregister_transfer(int number)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int n = number;
|
||||
@ -2130,9 +2118,20 @@ int loop_unregister_transfer(int number)
|
||||
|
||||
if (n == 0 || n >= MAX_LO_CRYPT || (xfer = xfer_funcs[n]) == NULL)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This function is called from only cleanup_cryptoloop().
|
||||
* Given that each loop device that has a transfer enabled holds a
|
||||
* reference to the module implementing it we should never get here
|
||||
* with a transfer that is set (unless forced module unloading is
|
||||
* requested). Thus, check module's refcount and warn if this is
|
||||
* not a clean unloading.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD
|
||||
if (xfer->owner && module_refcount(xfer->owner) != -1)
|
||||
pr_err("Danger! Unregistering an in use transfer function.\n");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
xfer_funcs[n] = NULL;
|
||||
idr_for_each(&loop_index_idr, &unregister_transfer_cb, xfer);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2323,8 +2322,9 @@ static int loop_add(int i)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
err = idr_alloc(&loop_index_idr, lo, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
goto out_free_dev;
|
||||
i = err;
|
||||
|
||||
err = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
@ -2393,15 +2393,19 @@ static int loop_add(int i)
|
||||
disk->events = DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE;
|
||||
disk->event_flags = DISK_EVENT_FLAG_UEVENT;
|
||||
sprintf(disk->disk_name, "loop%d", i);
|
||||
/* Make this loop device reachable from pathname. */
|
||||
add_disk(disk);
|
||||
/* Show this loop device. */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
lo->idr_visible = true;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
return i;
|
||||
|
||||
out_cleanup_tags:
|
||||
blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
|
||||
out_free_idr:
|
||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, i);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
out_free_dev:
|
||||
kfree(lo);
|
||||
@ -2411,9 +2415,14 @@ out:
|
||||
|
||||
static void loop_remove(struct loop_device *lo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Make this loop device unreachable from pathname. */
|
||||
del_gendisk(lo->lo_disk);
|
||||
blk_cleanup_disk(lo->lo_disk);
|
||||
blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
/* There is no route which can find this loop device. */
|
||||
mutex_destroy(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
kfree(lo);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2437,31 +2446,40 @@ static int loop_control_remove(int idx)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hide this loop device for serialization. */
|
||||
ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
lo = idr_find(&loop_index_idr, idx);
|
||||
if (!lo) {
|
||||
if (!lo || !lo->idr_visible)
|
||||
ret = -ENODEV;
|
||||
goto out_unlock_ctrl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
lo->idr_visible = false;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check whether this loop device can be removed. */
|
||||
ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto out_unlock_ctrl;
|
||||
goto mark_visible;
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound ||
|
||||
atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
goto out_unlock_ctrl;
|
||||
goto mark_visible;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Mark this loop device no longer open()-able. */
|
||||
lo->lo_state = Lo_deleting;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number);
|
||||
loop_remove(lo);
|
||||
out_unlock_ctrl:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mark_visible:
|
||||
/* Show this loop device again. */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
lo->idr_visible = true;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2475,7 +2493,8 @@ static int loop_control_get_free(int idx)
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
idr_for_each_entry(&loop_index_idr, lo, id) {
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state == Lo_unbound)
|
||||
/* Hitting a race results in creating a new loop device which is harmless. */
|
||||
if (lo->idr_visible && data_race(lo->lo_state) == Lo_unbound)
|
||||
goto found;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
@ -2591,10 +2610,14 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void)
|
||||
unregister_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop");
|
||||
misc_deregister(&loop_misc);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There is no need to use loop_ctl_mutex here, for nobody else can
|
||||
* access loop_index_idr when this module is unloading (unless forced
|
||||
* module unloading is requested). If this is not a clean unloading,
|
||||
* we have no means to avoid kernel crash.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
idr_for_each_entry(&loop_index_idr, lo, id)
|
||||
loop_remove(lo);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
idr_destroy(&loop_index_idr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct loop_device {
|
||||
struct blk_mq_tag_set tag_set;
|
||||
struct gendisk *lo_disk;
|
||||
struct mutex lo_mutex;
|
||||
bool idr_visible;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct loop_cmd {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user