From ded8b9c761c50d147b20d7de18766fcdb8f5b621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:08:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sfc: Use filter index rather than ID for rps_flow_id table efx->type->filter_insert() returns an ID rather than the index that efx->type->filter_async_insert() used to, which causes it to exceed efx->type->max_rx_ip_filters on some EF10 configurations, leading to out- of-bounds array writes. So, in efx_filter_rfs_work(), convert this back into an index (which is what the remove call in the expiry path expects, anyway). Fixes: 3af0f34290f6 ("sfc: replace asynchronous filter operations") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c index 64a94f242027..d2e254f2f72b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c @@ -839,6 +839,8 @@ static void efx_filter_rfs_work(struct work_struct *data) int rc; rc = efx->type->filter_insert(efx, &req->spec, true); + if (rc >= 0) + rc %= efx->type->max_rx_ip_filters; if (efx->rps_hash_table) { spin_lock_bh(&efx->rps_hash_lock); rule = efx_rps_hash_find(efx, &req->spec); From 987c658a61f432804c4662b736dbd5fc5939af1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward Cree Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:08:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sfc: fix ARFS expiry check on EF10 Owing to a missing conditional, the result of rps_may_expire_flow() was being ignored and filters were being removed even if we'd decided not to expire them. Fixes: f8d6203780b7 ("sfc: ARFS filter IDs") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c index 63036d9bf3e6..d90a7b1f4088 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c @@ -4784,8 +4784,9 @@ expire: * will set rule->filter_id to EFX_ARFS_FILTER_ID_PENDING, meaning that * the rule is not removed by efx_rps_hash_del() below. */ - ret = efx_ef10_filter_remove_internal(efx, 1U << spec->priority, - filter_idx, true) == 0; + if (ret) + ret = efx_ef10_filter_remove_internal(efx, 1U << spec->priority, + filter_idx, true) == 0; /* While we can't safely dereference rule (we dropped the lock), we can * still test it for NULL. */