From 1d9a6159bd04b676cb7d9b13245888fa450cec10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:47:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning
Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: joe@perches.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) {
- pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
- __func__, wq->name);
+ pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n",
+ __func__, wq->name);
show_pwq(pwq);
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);