drm/dp: Fix bogus DPCD version check in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
Ville pointed this out to me when fixing some issues in drm_dp_read_downstream_info() - the DPCD version check here is bogus as there's no DisplayPort versions prior to 1.0. The original code from i915 that this was extracted from actually did: dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == DP_DPCD_REV_10 Which is correct, and somehow got missed when extracting this function. So let's fix this. Note that as far as I'm aware, I don't think this fixes any actual issues users are hitting. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210507214209.554866-1-lyude@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
04dfe19a5e
commit
208d8b9d26
@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
|
||||
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
|
||||
|
||||
/* No downstream info to read */
|
||||
if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
|
||||
if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == DP_DPCD_REV_10)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user