ACPI: processor_idle: Fix invalid comparison with insertion sort for latency
The acpi_cst_latency_cmp() comparison function currently used for
sorting C-state latencies does not satisfy transitivity, causing
incorrect sorting results.
Specifically, if there are two valid acpi_processor_cx elements A and B
and one invalid element C, it may occur that A < B, A = C, and B = C.
Sorting algorithms assume that if A < B and A = C, then C < B, leading
to incorrect ordering.
Given the small size of the array (<=8), we replace the library sort
function with a simple insertion sort that properly ignores invalid
elements and sorts valid ones based on latency. This change ensures
correct ordering of the C-state latencies.
Fixes: 65ea8f2c6e
("ACPI: processor idle: Fix up C-state latency if not ordered")
Reported-by: Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/70674dc7-5586-4183-8953-8095567e73df@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Julian Sikorski <belegdol@gmail.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240701205639.117194-1-visitorckw@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22a40d14b5
commit
233323f9b9
@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/acpi.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/dmi.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/sched.h> /* need_resched() */
|
||||
#include <linux/sort.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/tick.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/cpu.h>
|
||||
@ -386,25 +385,24 @@ static void acpi_processor_power_verify_c3(struct acpi_processor *pr,
|
||||
acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_BUS_MASTER_RLD, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_cst_latency_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
|
||||
static void acpi_cst_latency_sort(struct acpi_processor_cx *states, size_t length)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct acpi_processor_cx *x = a, *y = b;
|
||||
int i, j, k;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(x->valid && y->valid))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (x->latency > y->latency)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if (x->latency < y->latency)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
static void acpi_cst_latency_swap(void *a, void *b, int n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct acpi_processor_cx *x = a, *y = b;
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < length; i++) {
|
||||
if (!states[i].valid)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(x->valid && y->valid))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
swap(x->latency, y->latency);
|
||||
for (j = i - 1, k = i; j >= 0; j--) {
|
||||
if (!states[j].valid)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (states[j].latency > states[k].latency)
|
||||
swap(states[j].latency, states[k].latency);
|
||||
|
||||
k = j;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
|
||||
@ -449,10 +447,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(struct acpi_processor *pr)
|
||||
|
||||
if (buggy_latency) {
|
||||
pr_notice("FW issue: working around C-state latencies out of order\n");
|
||||
sort(&pr->power.states[1], max_cstate,
|
||||
sizeof(struct acpi_processor_cx),
|
||||
acpi_cst_latency_cmp,
|
||||
acpi_cst_latency_swap);
|
||||
acpi_cst_latency_sort(&pr->power.states[1], max_cstate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(pr);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user