reiserfs: don't acquire lock recursively in reiserfs_acl_chmod
reiserfs_acl_chmod() can be called by reiserfs_set_attr() and then take the reiserfs lock a second time. Thereafter it may call journal_begin() that definitely requires the lock not to be nested in order to release it before taking the journal mutex because the reiserfs lock depends on the journal mutex already. So, aviod nesting the lock in reiserfs_acl_chmod(). Reported-by: Pawel Zawora <pzawora@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Tested-by: Pawel Zawora <pzawora@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.32.x+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bae35e14b
commit
238af8751f
@ -472,7 +472,9 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
struct reiserfs_transaction_handle th;
|
||||
size_t size = reiserfs_xattr_nblocks(inode,
|
||||
reiserfs_acl_size(clone->a_count));
|
||||
reiserfs_write_lock(inode->i_sb);
|
||||
int depth;
|
||||
|
||||
depth = reiserfs_write_lock_once(inode->i_sb);
|
||||
error = journal_begin(&th, inode->i_sb, size * 2);
|
||||
if (!error) {
|
||||
int error2;
|
||||
@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ int reiserfs_acl_chmod(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
if (error2)
|
||||
error = error2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb);
|
||||
reiserfs_write_unlock_once(inode->i_sb, depth);
|
||||
}
|
||||
posix_acl_release(clone);
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user