bpf, libbpf: fixing leak when kernel does not support btf
We could end up in situation when we have object file w/ all btf
info, but kernel does not support btf yet. In this situation
currently libbpf just set obj->btf to NULL w/o freeing it first.
This patch is fixing it by making sure to run btf__free first.
Fixes: d29d87f7e6
("btf: separate btf creation and loading")
Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@tehnerd.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
20182390c4
commit
243b4cdab9
@ -838,6 +838,8 @@ static int bpf_object__elf_collect(struct bpf_object *obj, int flags)
|
|||||||
if (IS_ERR(obj->btf) || btf__load(obj->btf)) {
|
if (IS_ERR(obj->btf) || btf__load(obj->btf)) {
|
||||||
pr_warning("Error loading ELF section %s: %ld. Ignored and continue.\n",
|
pr_warning("Error loading ELF section %s: %ld. Ignored and continue.\n",
|
||||||
BTF_ELF_SEC, PTR_ERR(obj->btf));
|
BTF_ELF_SEC, PTR_ERR(obj->btf));
|
||||||
|
if (!IS_ERR(obj->btf))
|
||||||
|
btf__free(obj->btf);
|
||||||
obj->btf = NULL;
|
obj->btf = NULL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
} else if (strcmp(name, BTF_EXT_ELF_SEC) == 0) {
|
} else if (strcmp(name, BTF_EXT_ELF_SEC) == 0) {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user