drm/i915/dsb: Use non-posted register writes for legacy LUT
The DSB has problems writing the legacy LUT. The two workarounds I've discoverted are: - write each entry twice back to back - use non-posted writes Let's use non-posted writes as that seems a bit more standard. TODO: measure which is faster Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ae0da3fc7
commit
25ea3411bd
@ -1329,9 +1329,20 @@ static void ilk_load_lut_8(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
|
||||
|
||||
lut = blob->data;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* DSB fails to correctly load the legacy LUT
|
||||
* unless we either write each entry twice,
|
||||
* or use non-posted writes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (crtc_state->dsb)
|
||||
intel_dsb_nonpost_start(crtc_state->dsb);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++)
|
||||
ilk_lut_write(crtc_state, LGC_PALETTE(pipe, i),
|
||||
i9xx_lut_8(&lut[i]));
|
||||
|
||||
if (crtc_state->dsb)
|
||||
intel_dsb_nonpost_end(crtc_state->dsb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void ilk_load_lut_10(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user